Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J J Sramek

Publications and source records attributed to J J Sramek.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Placebo-controlled evaluation of three doses of a controlled-onset, extended-release formulation of verapamil in the treatment of stable angina pectoris.

This double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a new controlled-onset, extended-release formulation of verapamil hydrochloride called physiologic pattern release (PPR) verapamil. The study was conducted at 24 sites (13 United States, 5 Canada, 6 overseas; see Appendix). Following a 1- to 3-week single-blind placebo lead-in period, 278 patients with chronic stable angina pectoris (247 males, 31 females, mean age 60.8 years, range 32 to 78) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 once-daily, fixed-dose treatment groups: verapamil 180, 360, or 540 mg, or placebo. PPR verapamil at all doses significantly increased (p < 0.05) time to moderate angina and symptom-limited exercise duration, and verapamil 360 mg significantly increased (p < 0.05) time to > or = 1 mm ST-segment depression, after 4 weeks of treatment when assessed 24 hour after the previous dose. Larger doses of verapamil were associated with proportionately greater improvements in exercise tolerance. Frequency of anginal attacks was also reduced by verapamil. The most frequently observed adverse events were dizziness, headache, constipation, and nausea. The incidence of constipation was high (20.9%) within the 540 mg treatment group. This verapamil formulation can be clinically titrated within a 180 to 540 mg dosing range, permitting effective once-daily administration for the treatment of chronic stable angina.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Acetylcholinesterase inhibition by zifrosilone: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of the acetylcholinesterase inhibitor zifrosilone in healthy male volunteers. METHODS: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerance of zifrosilone were studied in a double-blind, sequential, single-escalating-dose, randomized panel design. Each panel consisted of six subjects, with four subjects receiving zifrosilone (10, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, 200, 250, and 300 mg orally) and two subjects receiving matching placebo. Serial blood samples were obtained for zifrosilone plasma concentrations and red blood cell acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase activities. Participating subjects (n = 54) were men between the ages of 18 and 45 years. Each subject had a normal physical examination, electrocardiogram, serum chemistries, hematology, urinalysis, and test for human immunodeficiency virus at screening. RESULTS: A greater than proportionate increase in mean plasma concentration values for area under the curve from time zero to infinity was observed over the 200 to 300 mg dose range groups. Red blood cell acetylcholinesterase showed a dose-inhibition relationship, with a mean maximum inhibition of 20.9% at 10 mg that increased to 62.1% at 300 mg. Butyrylcholinesterase activity was relatively unaffected by zifrosilone (< 20% inhibition at 300 mg). For doses > or = 200 mg, an Emax pharmacodynamic model was used to describe the relationship between zifrosilone plasma concentration and red blood cell acetylcholinesterase inhibition (Emax = 83.8%; EC50 = 0.65 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Zifrosilone showed dose-dependent pharmacokinetics after oral administration and was effective in causing selective inhibition of red blood cell acetylcholinesterase.

Acetophenones↗
PubMed1995

A multiple-dose safety trial of eptastigmine in Alzheimer's disease, with pharmacodynamic observations of red blood cell cholinesterase.

A placebo-controlled multiple dose study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and pharmacodynamics of multiple dose levels of eptastigmine in 25 patients with probable Alzheimer's disease (AD). Twenty patients (12 M, 8 F; mean age 74, range 57-84) were randomized to receive 12mg (N = 3), 20mg (N = 6), 28mg (N = 6) or placebo (N = 5) tid on a double-blind basis for 14 days, followed by seven days of single blind placebo, in successively rising dose groups. All patients completed the study without intolerable or severe adverse events. All doses significantly (p < 0.001) reduced peak and trough RBC cholinesterase (AChE) activity as compared to baseline. Percent inhibition for Day 14 peak and trough RBC AChE peak and trough values, respectively, appeared proportional to dose: 18% and 21% (12mg); 36% and 35% (20mg); 40% and 44% (28mg). In order to determine the maximum tolerated dose of eptastigmine, an additional single-blind study was performed in five patients (2 M, 3 F; mean age 78, range 72-80) utilizing a rising dose schedule of eptastigmine (N = 4) or placebo (N = 1), starting with the previously tolerated 28mg tid dose and increasing by 4mg tid up to a potential maximum of 56mg tid. Dose-limiting adverse events occurred requiring discontinuation of medication in one patient at 48mg tid and two patients at 52mg tid; RBC AChE inhibition was proportional to dose, with peak values up to 70% inhibition at 48mg tid. The maximum tolerated dose of 48mg tid was identified as a basis for potential Phase II multicenter efficacy trials.

Acetylcholinesterase↗
PubMed1995

Safety and tolerability of CI-979 in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

CI-979 ((E)-1,2,5,6-tetrahydro-1-methyl-3-pyridinecarboxaldehyde, O-methyloxime monohydrochloride), a novel muscarinic agonist, is being investigated as a potential treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD). The objective of the present study was to determine the safety and tolerance of multiple, rising, oral doses of CI-979 in patients with AD. Ten male patients aged 59 to 74 years (mean 65 years) who met NINCDS criteria for AD were randomized to receive either CI-979 (eight patients) or placebo (two patients) according to a double-blind, parallel-group, rising-dose design. Doses were 0.5-mg q6h, 1-mg q12h, 1-mg q6h, 2-mg q12h, 2-mg q6h, 2.5-mg q6h, and 3-mg q6h. All doses were to be administered sequentially for 3 days each with the exception of the 2.5-mg q6h dose, which was to be administered for 1.5 days. Five patients receiving CI-979 discontinued study medication because of adverse events; two after receiving 2-mg q6h (10 doses), two after 2.5-mg q6h (5 doses), and one after 3-mg q6h (4 doses). The study was terminated following administration of the fourth 3-mg dose due to the nature and intensity of adverse events. Cholinergic symptoms including diaphoresis, hypersalivation, nausea, diarrhea, hypotension, chills, headache, flatulence, and urinary frequency and signs suggestive of parkinsonism (cogwheeling, tremor, pillrolling, posturing, and shuffling gait) were dose-limiting. The frequency and intensity of adverse events increased with increasing CI-979 dose. No other clinically significant CI-979-related changes occurred in physical examinations, clinical laboratory measurements, electrocardiograms, or ophthalmologic examinations. Steady-state trough plasma CI-979 concentrations increased in proportion to dose. In summary, CI-979 doses of 1-mg q6h were well tolerated by all patients; 2-mg q6h was tolerated by most patients, and 2.5-mg and 3-mg doses were poorly tolerated, Dose titration to a maximum of 2-mg q6h will therefore be used in initial efficacy trials of CI-979 in patients with AD.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

A "bridging" (safety/tolerance) study of besipirdine hydrochloride in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

Besipirdine hydrochloride is a novel compound with cholinergic and adrenergic activity being investigated as a treatment for Alzheimer's disease (AD). The pharmacodynamics of some anti-dementia drugs are known to differ in patients with AD as compared with elderly normals. The present study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of multiple oral doses of besipirdine in AD patients. Twelve AD patients (NINCDS/ADRDA criteria; 7M, 5F, ages 58-75, mean age 65) were randomized to besipirdine (n = 9) or placebo (n = 3) in a double-blind, parallel-group, rising-dose design. Doses were 10, 20, 30, and 40 mg bid for 2 days each, followed by 50 and 60 mg bid for 5 days each. The most common adverse events were asymptomatic postural hypotension and asymptomatic bradycardia. Two patients on active drug developed severe adverse events: 1 after 3 days at 50 mg bid (nausea and vomiting); 1 after 3 days at 60 mg bid (angina). Due to the anginal episode, the study was terminated on Day 17. Plasma concentrations increased linearly with dose for besipirdine and its major metabolite. The two patients who developed severe adverse events had the highest plasma concentrations measured. Besipirdine 50 mg bid was considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD).

Aged↗
PubMed1995

The utility of salivary amylase as an evaluation of M3 muscarinic agonist activity in Alzheimer's disease.

1. In this double-blind, placebo-controlled phase I study of the safety/tolerance of two doses of xanomeline tartrate (100 mg and 115 mg tid) given to 12 AD patients, the authors measured serum amylase, fractionated into pancreatic and salivary isoenzymes, as a potential marker for M3 activity associated with maximally tolerated dose (MTD). 2. MTD of xanomeline was determined to be 100 mg tid based on intolerable adverse events at 115 mg tid. One patient at the 115 mg tid level presented with moderate hypersalivation and salivary amylase levels 400% of baseline. 3. Overall amylase results were not significant, however a trend in the results for salivary amylase in the 115 mg panel suggests that salivary amylase may be a useful marker for M3 activity.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Efficacy trial of the 5-HT2 antagonist MDL 11,939 in patients with generalized anxiety disorder.

The purpose of this study was to assess the anxiolytic effect of MDL 11,939, a selective 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, in patients with generalized anxiety disorder. After a 1-week placebo lead-in period, 72 healthy male outpatients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for generalized anxiety disorder were randomized to MDL 11,939, 32 mg thrice daily (N = 37), or placebo (N = 35) for 6 weeks. At the end of treatment, MDL 11,939 showed a 7.2-point (30%) decrease in Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety scores compared with a 5.7-point (23%) decrease with placebo, but the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). The incidence of adverse events between treatments was similar. MDL 11,939 was well tolerated but did not demonstrate significant anxiolytic effects in this pilot study.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Effects of the cholinomimetic SDZ ENS-163 on scopolamine-induced cognitive impairment in humans.

Scopolamine-induced cognitive impairment was used in healthy men to evaluate the central nervous system activity of the new cholinomimetic SDZ ENS-163. Eighteen subjects were treated in a crossover design with oral placebo/intravenous saline, 50 mg of oral SDZ ENS-163/intravenous saline, oral placebo/0.4 mg of intravenous scopolamine, and 50 mg of oral SDZ ENS-163/0.4 mg of intravenous scopolamine. The administration of placebo with scopolamine caused significant cognitive impairment, as assessed by the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB), and also decreased salivation and heart rate. In contrast, SDZ ENS-163 with saline had no effect on CNTB scores, increased salivation, and increased heart rate. Despite the observed cholinomimetic effects of SDZ ENS-163 when administered with saline, the changes in CNTB scores, heart rate, and salivation were indistinguishable between placebo/scopolamine and SDZ ENS-163/scopolamine. Thus, 50 mg of oral SDZ ENS-163 has cholinomimetic activity in normal men, but this dose is insufficient to reverse the muscarinic effects of 0.4 mg of intravenous scopolamine.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

A phase II multicenter dose-finding, efficacy and safety trial of ipsapirone in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder.

Benzodiazepines have been prescribed for the treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) for nearly three decades due to their proven anxiolytic efficacy, despite a considerable side effect and abuse liability profile. A new class of compounds, the azapirones, have been developed as an alternative to benzodiazepine treatment. Ipsapirone is a novel anxiolytic azapirone which has high specificity for the 5-HT1A receptor and which has the potential for offering certain advantages over buspirone. The present 5-week study investigated three doses of ipsapirone (2.5mg, 5.0mg and 7.5mg tid) versus placebo in 267 GAD outpatients. Efficacy was evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), Zung Anxiety Scale (Zung-A), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI). The study design consisted of a 1-week placebo run-in, a 4-week double-blind treatment period, and a 1-week placebo washout. The 5.0mg group demonstrated consistently superior improvement in all efficacy variables during the treatment period, with significant differences (p < 0.05) from placebo and, at times, the 2.5mg and 7.5mg groups. Incidence of adverse events, primarily dizziness, nausea, sedation, and asthenia, was found to be dose proportional, with significant increase in the 7.5mg group, which may account for the diminished effectiveness seen with this dose. Our results suggest that ipsapirone may represent a viable treatment for GAD.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

An evaluation of the anxiolytic SC 48,274 in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD)

1. The present study evaluated the safety and efficacy of two dosages of SC 48,274 (1mg and 25mg) as compared to placebo in subjects with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). 2. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study which was part of one of three large multicenter trials which evaluated a total of 5 doses of SC 48,274 (.25, 1, 5, 25, and 100mg bid). Following a 7-day placebo baseline period, patients entered 4 weeks of double-blind treatment and a 7-day placebo follow-up period. 3. Efficacy was assessed weekly throughout the study with the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A), and Clinical Global Impression (CGI), and at treatment endpoint with the Covi Anxiety Scale, Raskin Depression Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D). A diagnosis of GAD according to DSM-III-R criteria (with the exception that a GAD minimum duration of 3 months was allowed), a HAM-A score > or = 20 (anxious mood and tension items > or = 2), HAM-D less than HAM-A, Covi Anxiety Score > or = 8, Raskin Depression Scale less than the Covi Anxiety, and age of 18 to 65 years were necessary for inclusion in the study. 4. Patients received one of two dosages of SC 48,274, either 1mg (n = 28), 25mg (n = 9), or placebo (n = 28) bid, during the 4-week randomized portion of the trial. 5. Mean changes from baseline in HAM-A scores for the 1mg, 25mg, and placebo groups after 4 weeks treatment were -5.1, -4.2, and -1.9, respectively. Changes were significant for the 1mg group vs. placebo (F = 8.93, p = 0.004), but not for the 25mg group (F = 2.26, p = 0.138). 6. CGI severity of illness scores were also significant for the 1mg group versus placebo at the end of treatment (X2 = 3.8, p = 0.05), but not for the 25mg group (X2 = 0.90, p = 0.343). Neither group showed significant CGI improvement scores by end of treatment. 7. The most frequent adverse events associated with the study drug (n = 37) were headache (n = 7), nausea (n = 3), palpitations (n = 4) and chest pains (n = 2). There was, however, no apparent pattern of adverse events distinguishing SC 48,274 from placebo.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Pharmacokinetics of co-administered didanosine and stavudine in HIV-seropositive male patients.

The pharmacokinetics of single and co-administered didanosine and stavudine were evaluated in 10 HIV-seropositive subjects in an open, within subject design in which each subject received each of three treatments. Single doses of didanosine 100 mg were alternated randomly with single doses of stavudine 40 mg on days 1 and 2. Beginning on day 3, subjects received the same doses of both drugs simultaneously every 12 h for nine doses. Serial blood and urine samples were obtained on single dose days 1 and 2, first simultaneous dose day 3, and last simultaneous dose day 7. The average maximum plasma concentrations of didanosine and stavudine before and after simultaneous administration were 422 +/- 184 (s.d.) ng ml-1 and 603 +/- 160 (s.d.) ng ml-1, and 419 +/- 153 (s.d.) ng ml-1 and 726 +/- 188 (s.d.) ng ml-1, respectively. Didanosine and stavudine AUC values before and after simultaneous administration were 615 +/- 170 (s.d.) ng ml-1 h and 1246 +/- 230 (s.d.) ng ml-1 h, 637 +/- 155 (s.d.) ng ml-1 h and 1326 +/- 267 (s.d.) ng ml-1 h, respectively. No significant changes in maximum plasma concentration, AUC elimination half-life, or renal clearance of didanosine and stavudine were observed when the drugs were administered simultaneously. Co-administration of didanosine 100 mg and stavudine 40 mg is well tolerated and the drugs do not interact pharmacokinetically.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Safety and tolerance of intravenous nimodipine.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and tolerance of intravenous nimodipine administered via a peripheral vein in healthy male volunteers. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo- and vehicle-controlled trial with three fixed-dose panels. SETTING: Inpatient infusion and observation periods. SUBJECTS: 61 healthy male volunteers, aged 18-40 years. METHODS: Subjects in panel 1 received nimodipine 0.4 mg/h, vehicle 2 mL/h, or placebo 2 mL/h; subjects in panel 2 received nimodipine 1 mg/h, vehicle 5 mL/h, or placebo 5 mL/h; subjects in panel 3 received nimodipine 2 mg/h, vehicle 10 mL/h, or placebo 10 mL/h. All infusions were administered intravenously for 48 hours and volunteers were observed for 48 hours after cessation of the infusion. In addition to standard safety assessments (physical examination, electrocardiogram, laboratory studies, and adverse event reporting), supine and standing blood pressures and pulse rates were measured frequently. Plasma samples were also analyzed for nimodipine and its two demethylated metabolites. RESULTS: Of 61 subjects, 55 completed the 48-hour infusion and 6 discontinued the study because of adverse events. Intravenous nimodipine was well tolerated at 0.4 and 1 mg/h. However, all six subjects who received nimodipine 2 mg/h experienced moderate-to-severe adverse events, and one subject was discontinued because of dizziness, diaphoresis, and postural hypotension. The matched vehicle (10 mL/h) also was not well tolerated, with three subjects who discontinued because of phlebitis. Two subjects who received placebo were also discontinued during the study. Small (2 mm Hg) decreases in mean supine diastolic blood pressure were observed in the 0.4- and 1-mg/h nimodipine groups, but the 2-mg/h group showed a slight (5 mm Hg) increase in blood pressure. These changes were not clinically significant. Clearance and half-life of nimodipine and its metabolites were similar at all three dosages. CONCLUSIONS: Using peripheral vein administration, nimodipine 2 mg/h and matched vehicle at 10 mL/h were not well tolerated in this healthy normal population. The maximum tolerated dose of nimodipine was found to be 1 mg/h.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

The use of the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) in an efficacy and safety trial of BMY 21,502 in Alzheimer's disease.

BMY 21,502 is a nootropic which protects memory and enhances long-term potentiation according to preclinical findings. Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients who were diagnosed by DSM-III-R and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria were enrolled in a 12-week double-blind investigation of BMY 21,502 vs. placebo at 300 mg tid. The study design included a 1-week placebo lead-in and a 4-week placebo washout in addition to the 12-week double-blind treatment period. Efficacy was assessed with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS) and the Computerized Neuropsychological Test Battery (CNTB) at weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16. Clinical Global Impression (CGI) assessments were also performed biweekly. Sixty-nine patients (28M, 41F; mean age 72 years, range 54 to 92 years) were enrolled in the study. Baseline Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) scores ranged from 16 to 26 (mean 23.5) in patients on active drug (n = 34), and from 15 to 26 (mean 22.5) in placebo patients (n = 35). Baseline efficacy scores were comparable for drug and placebo patients (p > 0.05). Twelve (35%) patients who received BMY 21,502 withdrew from the study, 8 (24%) due to adverse events. Three (9%) patients who received placebo withdrew from the study, all due to adverse events. Patients on active drug who were valid for analysis of efficacy (n = 22) showed a mean decrease in ADAS of -1.5 at week 12, vs. a mean change of -0.5 in patients who received placebo (n = 32), although there was no significant difference between the two (p > 0.05). Correlations between the CNTB summary scores and ADAS cognitive subscores were, nevertheless, highly significant at baseline (r = -0.83, p = 0.0001) and week 12 (r = -0.83, p = 0.0001). Correlations between the word list learning, spatial, and naming subtests of the ADAS and CNTB were also highly significant (p = 0.0001). Although modest, the findings for active drug vs. placebo response in this study suggest that BMY 21,502 should be further investigated, with a larger study population, in order to fully determine the compound's potential efficacy.

Aged↗
PubMed1993

The safety and efficacy of ipsapirone vs. lorazepam in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD): single site findings from a multicenter trial.

We report the findings of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) outpatient study. The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ipsapirone, an azapirone and 5-HT1A agonist, given at a total daily dose of 10 mg to 30 mg, with a total daily dose of 2 mg to 6 mg of lorazepam or placebo in 90 outpatients with GAD of moderate or greater severity. At baseline, all patients had a Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) score of > or = 18 and Covi anxiety score of > or = 8. After a 1-week single-blind washout, patients entered a 4-week double-blind period with an optional extension for another 4 weeks, followed by a 2-week single-blind placebo washout. Ipsapirone and lorazepam ratings on the HAM-A and Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) were significantly (p < .05) superior to placebo at the end of the acute and maintenance periods of the trial, with a 50 percent HAM-A reduction on active drugs vs. 20 percent on placebo. The anxiety of patients receiving lorazepam, but not ipsapirone, rebounded during the final placebo washout.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study comparing the efficacy and safety of ipsapirone versus lorazepam in patients with generalized anxiety disorder: a prospective multicenter trial.

This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study compared the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ipsapirone (an azapirone anxiolytic) at daily dose levels of 10.0 to 30.0 mg with a daily dose of 2.0 to 6.0 mg of lorazepam (a benzodiazepine) or placebo when given to outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) of moderate or greater severity. A total of 317 outpatients with a primary diagnosis of GAD according to DSM-III criteria (at least 1 month's duration) were randomized. Study entry criteria at the time of screening and at baseline included a Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) score of 18 or more, a Covi Anxiety Scale score of 8 or more, and a Raskin Depression Scale score of 7 or less. The study design consisted of a 1-week, single-blind placebo evaluation, a 4-week, double-blind acute treatment period, and a 4-week extension period, followed by a 2-week, single-blind placebo withdrawal period. Efficacy was measured by changes in the HAM-A and Clinical Global Impression Scale and by evaluations of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and Zung-Anxiety Self-Rating scale. The Raskin and Covi scales were performed at screening and baseline only. Withdrawal reactions were assessed during the withdrawal period by the Physician Withdrawal Checklist and by a patient self-rating checklist. Two-hundred sixty-three patients were valid for the analysis of efficacy in the ipsapirone (N = 87), lorazepam (N = 89), and placebo (N = 87) groups.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗