Subcutaneous compared with intravenous heparin for deep vein thrombosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J Hirsh.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Successful coronary thrombolysis depends on rapidly restoring blood flow and maintaining patency of the infarct-related artery. Although widely used as an adjunct to lytic therapy, heparin is limited in its ability to produce these effects. Since the limitations of heparin may reflect its inability to inactivate clot-bound thrombin, we developed a rat model of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) induced thrombolysis to compare doses of heparin, hirudin, hirulog (a synthetic hirudin-derived peptide), and D-Phe-Pro-ArgCH2Cl (PPACK) that produced a 4-fold prolongation of the baseline activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) with saline in terms of their ability to accelerate thrombolysis and to prevent reocclusion. A thrombus rich in red cells and fibrin was formed in the distal aorta by applying an external constrictor after denuding the endothelium with a balloon catheter. Thrombolysis was induced with t-PA (1 mg/kg bolus, followed by 1 mg kg-1 h-1 over 30 min) and the rats were then randomized to receive a concomitant 80 min infusion of a thrombin inhibitor or saline. By continuously monitoring blood flow and pre- and post-stenotic blood pressures, the time to clot lysis, and the number of reocclusions were determined. Compared to saline, heparin had no significant effect on these variables.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Heparin dosage requirements vary widely among patients with venous thromboembolism. In this study, we measured the proportion of anticoagulantly-active heparin which was reversibly bound and neutralized by plasma proteins (defined as reversible heparin neutralization) in the pre-treatment plasma (in vitro) and in the 6 h post-treatment plasma (ex vivo) of patients with venous thromboembolism treated with a fixed dose of heparin. Reversible heparin neutralization was assessed by comparing the heparin levels measured as anti-factor Xa activity before and after the addition of low affinity heparin which is essentially devoid of anti-factor Xa activity, in order to displace heparin bound to plasma proteins. The results indicate that reversible heparin neutralization due to binding to plasma proteins is a major determinant of the anticoagulant response to a fixed dose of standard heparin 6 h post-treatment and of the eventual heparin dose required to achieve a therapeutic anticoagulant effect on days 3-5 of heparin treatment.
Hirudin and hirulog-1 [D-Phe-Pro-Arg-Pro-[Gly]4-desulphohirudin-(54-65)] abrogate the enzyme activities of alpha-thrombin by binding the enzyme simultaneously at its catalytic centre and fibrin(ogen)-recognition exosite. In contrast, hirugen [hirudin-(54-65)] binds alpha-thrombin solely at the fibrin(ogen)-recognition exosite, and competitively inhibits fibrinopeptide A release. To investigate the extent to which the fibrin(ogen)-recognition exosite is involved when alpha-thrombin catalyses the amplification reactions of coagulation, we compared the abilities of hirudin, hirulog-1 and hirugen to inhibit simultaneously Factor X, Factor V and prothrombin activation. Whereas 0.1 microM-hirudin and 0.1 microM-hirulog-1 (i.e. less than 10% of the concentration of prothrombin in plasma) inhibited Factor X, Factor V and prothrombin activation, 10 microM was the minimum concentration of hirugen to achieve a similar anticoagulant action. Concentrations of hirudin and hirulog-1 equimolar to and 5 times greater than those of alpha-thrombin respectively abrogated Factor V activation by exogenous alpha-thrombin. In contrast, a 500-fold molar excess of hirugen could not. The inability of hirugen to inhibit the activation of the three clotting factors effectively suggests that the fibrin(ogen)-recognition exosite does not play a mandatory role when thrombin activates Factor V.
PURPOSE: To estimate the prevalence of objectively proven thrombotic complications in antithrombin-III-deficient persons. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study and a critical review of the literature. DATA SOURCES AND EXTRACTION: The prevalence of thrombosis in antithrombin III-deficient and -nondeficient family members of a large kindred was estimated by history, review of diagnostic tests, and examination for venous reflux by Doppler ultrasonography, as an indicator of previous venous thrombosis. A MEDLINE search and literature review of the published English- and French-language literature from 1966 to 1990 that described antithrombin-III-deficient families was done, and the following information was obtained: the prevalence of thrombosis in deficient and nondeficient family members, the presence or absence of risk factors for thrombosis (surgery, pregnancy, the postpartum state, use of oral contraceptives, immobilization, metastatic cancer, major trauma) at the time of the thrombotic event, and age of onset of the first episode of thrombosis. The validity of the studies was assessed according to predetermined criteria. RESULTS: Sixty-seven research subjects were evaluated. Six of 31 (19.4%) antithrombin-III-deficient subjects compared with none of 36 (0%) nondeficient subjects had had one or more thrombotic events. The initial episode in five of six subjects had occurred in association with risk factors for thrombosis. The literature search indicated that the pooled prevalence of symptomatic venous thrombosis among the deficient subjects was 51%, but objective testing was done in only 17% of these subjects at the time of presentation. CONCLUSION: Based on the data from this antithrombin-III-deficient kindred, lifelong anticoagulant prophylaxis does not appear to be warranted in asymptomatic carriers, and prophylaxis could be limited to periods of high risk for thrombosis.
This review discusses the problem of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) after operation and identifies three levels of risk of DVT: low (less than 10 per cent), moderate (10-40 per cent) and high (40-80 per cent). Special emphasis is placed on the most recent prophylactic treatment, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs), particularly enoxaparin. Several LMWHs are now available, but they differ slightly and each must be evaluated on its own merits. In general, however, LMWHs are both effective and safe in those patients at moderate or high risk of DVT. Thromboprophylaxis is cost effective when analysed using health-economic methodology.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
After 50 years of clinical use anticoagulants are still the mainstay of treatment for venous thromboembolism. Several studies have demonstrated that failure to attain or to maintain an adequate anticoagulant effect with heparin after venous thromboembolism is associated with an increased risk of recurrence. The safety and effectiveness of heparin administered by continuous intravenous infusion has been compared with administration by intermittent intravenous injection; three studies reported less bleeding with the former. The relative efficacy and safety of continuous intravenous and intermittent subcutaneous heparin appear to be comparable. The readily available and relatively inexpensive activated partial thromboplastin time test is used most commonly to monitor heparin therapy. Recent audits indicate that current practices in the administration of heparin are often suboptimal because of an inadequate starting dose, a delay in obtaining or responding to activated partial thromboplastin time test results, or inappropriate adjustments of heparin doses. Attempts have recently been made to improve practices in the administration of heparin by developing a standardization protocol. Recommendations for patient management are discussed.
We have studied a 40-bp upstream regulatory region of the DOPA decarboxylase gene (Ddc) which is important for cell-specific expression in the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS). This region contains two redundant elements which when simultaneously mutated result in lowered DDC expression in serotonin neurons. We uncovered a protein binding site within one of these elements and have cloned a factor which binds to the site. This factor is the product of the zfh-2 gene, a complex homeodomain/zinc finger protein previously identified by binding to an opsin regulatory element. The in vivo profile of ZFH-2 in the larval CNS shows intriguing overlap with DDC in specific serotonin and dopamine neurons. We show that ZFH-2 is related to a human transcription factor ATBF1. The multiple homeodomain and zinc finger motifs in these two proteins show a similar linear arrangement which implies coordinate action among the motifs. In addition, the homology defines a new homeodomain subtype.
Cyclosporine has been shown to reduce renal perfusion and to decrease glomerular filtration rate. Experimental studies suggest that nifedipine might reverse this renal vasoconstrictive effect of cyclosporine. We studied renal hemodynamics of 5 cyclosporine-treated renal transplant recipients before and after 2 weeks of therapy with high-dose nifedipine (up to 120 mg/day). Pretreatment GFR and renal plasma flow (RPF) were decreased. Following administration of nifedipine, RPF increased by 18% (P less than 0.01), while GFR did not change. Filtration fraction decreased by 10.5% (P less than 0.01). Mean arterial pressure declined from 111 +/- 5 to 96 +/- 3 mmHg (P less than 0.01). Renal vascular resistance dropped by 25% (P less than 0.01). Calculated postglomerular plasma flow increased by 20.5% (P less than 0.01). Urinary albumin excretion rate was unaffected. Cyclosporine whole blood levels were unchanged. The increase in RPF and in postglomerular plasma flow suggests that high-dose nifedipine might lessen cyclosporine-induced glomerular and interstitial ischemia in renal allograft recipients.
The inhibition of thrombin is the key to the prevention and treatment of thrombotic disorders. Although heparin is an extremely effective anticoagulant, it has certain limitations that are not shared by newer thrombin inhibitors. As a result, these novel inhibitors may have advantages over heparin in certain clinical settings.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.