Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Hirschfeld

Publications and source records attributed to J Hirschfeld.

60 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Towards a unified theory for immunogenetic systems. I. Probing the serologic field--a meta-serologic approach.

A serologic field (SEF) is produced by the in vitro studies of antibody-antigen interactions and usually includes serologic information processing (SIF). SIF can be regarded as the process whereby essentially "meaningless" raw data or experimental observables emanating from an input reality are structuralized and hence falsified into a "meaningful" pattern, Gestalt or output image. According to this "black box model", different "fact categories" (FC) can be identified in SEF. Traditional serology generally confounds its FC whereby fact category mistakes (FCM) are produced. Some FCM are structurally similar to the description of "mice" as four-letter animals or as a four-legged word--i.e. facts about "thing-properties" (animals, legs) are confounded with facts about "language-properties" (letters, words). In SEF, antibody and antigen molecules (thing-properties) are similarly endowed with "empty symbols" (language-properties). Due to such FCM, radically new meanings are assigned to experimental observables if the serologic language and/or theory is changed. The present meta-serologic approach consists of the design of a meta-serologic symbol language (SL-2) which includes the contemporary (simple-complex) conceptual framework (language and theory) as a limiting case. Consequently, some truly radical and revolutionary Gestalt switches will be generated when a specified SEF is mapped onto SL-2.

Antigen-Antibody Reactions↗

Towards a unified theory for immunogenetic systems. Some selected properties of ABC- and AB-D reaction patterns generated by S3 and T3 universes.

The principles of a radically new unified theory and a unified but fundamentally theory-invariant classification system are described and exemplified for immunogenetic systems. The classification system permits a differentiation of immunogenetic systems into 15 qualitatively distinct classes with quantitative subsets when tested against two reagents. It can easily be expanded into a n-reagent taxonomy. The theory logically explains a set of selected and previously more or less "unexplainable" properties and their (even more unexplainable and probably previously unnoticed) associations in two main classes of immunogenetic systems, the ABC- and AB-D systems. The associated properties discussed are the presence (+) or absence (-) of: 1. antithetical alleles; 2. dosage effects; 3. inherited "strong" and "weak" antigens; 4. "silent" or "amorphous" genes. In ABC- systems, properties 1 and 2 are present while 3 and 4 are absent or extremely rare (i.e. 1+2+3-4-). In AB-D systems, properties 1 and 2 are absent while 3 and 4 are present (i.e. 1-2-3+4+). Through the design of hypothetical immunogenetic universes (HIU), these property associations are shown to be produced by the contemporary (simple-complex) framework-dependent transformations of experimental observables/matrix facts and not by any corresponding associated properties present in the input HIU in themselves.

ABO Blood-Group System↗

Conceptual framework shifts in immunogenetics. II. Some notes on the Ag system.

Two Caucasian population materials totalling 530 individuals and 3,180 typing results are analyzed with regard to various combinations of the Ag(x, y, a1, d, c, g) factors. Superficially, both materials appear well aligned to each other and the contemporary (simple-complex) framework. However, when the same set of data are structuralized within a new (complex-simple) framework, the typing results for 12 of 362 or 3.3% of the Swiss and no less than 19 of 168 or 11.3% of the English samples are not compatible with the new framework specifying that the various anti-Ag reagents can be arranged in two 'inclusion groups'--the anti-Ag (y greater than d greater than c) and the anti-Ag (g greater than a1 greater than x) series.

England↗