The induction of precipitating antibodies to the mammary tumor virus in several inbred mouse strains.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
Biomedical subjects
J Hilgers
Publications and source records attributed to J Hilgers.
Characterization of a new MUC1 monoclonal antibody (VU-2-G7) directed to the glycosylated PDTR sequence of MUC1.
A monoclonal antibody (MAb), VU-2-G7, was generated against a synthetic 60-mer MUC1 triple tandem repeat peptide with N-acetyl-galactosamine (GalNAc) O-linked to the threonine in the PDTR region of each repeat (3M GalNAc). VU-2-G7 and 8 MUC1 MAbs (VU-3-C6, VU-4-H5, 139H2, A76-A/C7, VU-12-E1, BCP9, MF11 and BW835) were tested against various glycosylated and nonglycosylated MUC1 tandem repeat peptides. VU-2-G7 showed strong reactivity with its immunogen, 3M GalNAc, and much lower reactivity with the nonglycosylated 60-mer MUC1 triple tandem repeat peptide. VU-2-G7 showed no reactivity with a 60-mer MUC1 triple tandem repeat peptide modified at the PDTR region or with a 60-mer MUC1 triple tandem repeat peptide with 3 GalNAc per repeat outside the PDTR region (9M GalNAc). In ELISA and flow cytometry, VU-2-G7 ubiquitously reacted with 4 MUC1-expressing breast cancer and 2 ovarian cancer cell lines and with a MUC1-gene-transfected Chinese hamster ovary cell line. The reactivity of VU-2-G7 was always higher than that of VU-4-H5, raised against a nonglycosylated 60-mer MUC1 triple tandem repeat peptide. Immunohistochemical staining of paraffin sections of breast and ovarian tumor tissues showed strong binding of VU-2-G7 predominantly at the cell membrane. The dominant epitope of VU-2-G7 is in the glycosylated PDTR motif of the MUC1 tandem repeat, and this epitope is abundantly present on the surface of tumor cell lines and breast and ovarian tumor tissues. Given the ubiquitously aberrant glycosylation of MUC1 in malignant cells, the production of MAbs against highly purified glycosylated MUC1 tandem repeat peptides may yield MAbs better suited for the immunotherapy of carcinomas than those available at the moment.
Acetylgalactosamine↗
Immunohistochemical profiles of 30 monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratins 8, 18 and 19. Second report of the TD5 workshop.
In the first report of the TD5 workshop (TD5-1), the epitope specificities of 30 different monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratins 8, 18 and 19 were determined. This second report presents the immunohistochemical profiles of these antibodies using human appendix and normal skin for evaluation. Each antibody was tested by one or two different laboratories recruited from the Dutch Working Group on Immunohistochemistry and Cytochemistry. Eight different laboratories participated. The histological specimens were pretreated by the participants in three different ways for immunohistochemistry: microwave antigen retrieval in citrate buffer, enzymatic digestion to restore epitope exposure, no specific treatment (untreated paraffin-embedded samples), and tested blindly without knowledge of cytokeratin or epitope specificity of the antibodies at three different concentrations of 50, 10 and 1 microg/ml. Most of the tested antibodies (29/30) were useful in at least one pretreatment method, with microwave antigen retrieval being the most sensitive approach. For some antibodies, very high backgrounds were observed. Furthermore, it can be concluded that 11 MAbs performed well using all three staining protocols, including untreated paraffin-embedded sections. Interestingly, all the antibodies with documented selected specificity towards cytokeratin 8 (i.e. 178, 191, 199, 202 and 206) are reactive with an immunodominant region corresponding to amino acids 340-365 on cytokeratin 8, which evidently is well-suited as target for immunohistochemical interactions. Similarly, three antibodies with the same capacity to react with untreated samples had specificity against cytokeratin 19 (i.e. 179, 197 and 204) in the corresponding region in this filament, i.e. amino acids 311-335, or the KS 19.1 epitope. None of the six antibodies against the other major cytokeratin 19 epitope (BM 19.21) were found useful for immunohistochemistry on untreated samples. The overall conclusions from the present investigation are that all cytokeratin-8-specific antibodies with defined epitope specificities were very useful. Only one of the major two epitopes on cytokeratin 19 seems to be available for efficient immunohistochemistry. Cytokeratin 18 exposes some epitopes outside the immunodominant region reactive with the antibodies 190, 203 and 205 which can be used for untreated samples. The implications of these findings are of significance both for diagnostic histopathology and for the biology of tumor marker epitope expression in tissues.
Animals↗
Overexpression of the p53 gene product in canine mammary tumors.
p53, a tumor suppressor gene, is a target of genetic alternations in many human and animal cancers. Compared to normal tissues, cancer tissues overexpress mutant p53 protein thus allowing their detection by a number of immunochemical procedures. To what extent the expression of mutant p53 correlates with dog mammary tumorigenesis has not been fully studied. In the present study, 20 spontaneously arising canine mammary tumors were examined for overexpression of mutant p53. Two different monoclonal antibodies, BP53-12 and PAb122, which recognize different epitopes of the p53 product, were used. The canine tumors in the present study exhibited five different histological types: i) osteosarcoma (n=7); ii) carcinosarcoma (n=4); iii) solid carcinoma (n=5); iv) complex carcinoma (n=3); and v) tubulopapillar carcinoma (n=1). The positive ratios against BP53-12 and PAb122 antibodies were 50% (10/20) and 60% (12/20) respectively. Among these positive samples, 35% (7/20) reacted to both antibodies. Finally, 15 out of 20 tumors showed positivity against one of the monoclonal antibodies. Mostly, as in human mammary tumor cells, BP53-12 staining was observed in the nuclei of tumor cells. PAb122 staining, however, was confined to cytoplasm of osteosarcoma or carcinosarcoma cells. To confirm the location of the staining, immunoelectron microscopy was done. The results showed that the cytoplasm of cartilage cells in the sarcomas had positive staining. These results indicate that anti-p53 antibodies BP53-12 and PAb122, generated against human p53 are cross reacting with the same molecule in canine cells and that the role of p53 in tumorigenesis is not only confined to tumors in human. Our finding suggests that a combination of p53 monoclonal antibodies should be used to screen, not only canine mammary tumors but also human mammary tumors, to obtain a better tumor prognosis.
Adenocarcinoma↗
CEA-specificity of CEA-reactive monoclonal antibodies. Immunochemical and immunocytochemical studies.
Four carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) reactive monoclonal antibodies Parlam 1, 4, 5 and 6 were studied in respect to reactivity with CEA and its cross-reacting antigens (NCA-1, NCA-2, BGP). In immunochemical studies (ELISA and SDS-PAGE followed by immunoblotting) Parlam 4 did not react with these crossreacting antigens, whereas Parlam 1, 5, and 6 demonstrated variable reactivity with these antigens. As expected, by immunocytochemistry Parlam 1, 5, and 6 stained bile canaliculi in the liver (due to crossreactivity with BGP), pneumocytes and splenic tissue (NCA-1) to an extent comparable with the results in biochemical tests. In contrast with the immunochemical observations, however, Parlam 4 showed slight but distinct reactivity with splenic granulocytes (NCA-1) and hepatic bile canaliculi (BGP). Relative epitope specificity of the monoclonal antibodies was tested in blocking experiments. These showed that Parlam 1 and 5 detect the same epitope on CEA as they block each others binding completely. In other combinations monoclonal antibodies block each others binding only partially, indicating that they detect different or partially overlapping epitopes. These results suggest that CEA specific epitopes may partly overlap with epitopes on crossreacting antigens. In this context, we propose that on crossreacting antigens epitopes exist that are structurally similar to epitopes on CEA or that some epitopes on CEA may consist of a spatial configuration which involves CEA specific as well as non-CEA specific structures. The antibody will show the highest affinity towards CEA, as this molecule contains the uniquely matching or complete epitope and lower affinity towards the crossreacting antigen with an imperfectly matching or only partially available epitope.
Animals↗