Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Higginson

Publications and source records attributed to J Higginson.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

The role of the pathologist in environmental medicine and public health.

The present paper summarizes the role of the morbid anatomist and clinical pathologist in environmental carcinogenesis. It points out that in the past he has contributed considerably to the identification of rare tumors and their etiology. He has an important role to play in the future in providing more accurate data on which epidemiology studies can be developed. The view is also expressed that it is highly important that modern pathologists have an understanding of toxicologic and pharmacologic techniques and their potential application to biologic material in order that they may be in a position to correlate and develop multidisciplinary approaches to the identification of environmental hazards. Some of these approaches are illustrated and their potential developments outlined.

Animals↗

Epidemiological review of lung cancer in man.

Lung cancer is primarily a 20th century phenomenon; its epidemiology is reviewed and the usefulness of epidemiological studies in providing clues to etiology is evaluated. Internationally, lung cancer accounts for up to 13% of all deaths in age groups above 45 years. It is a disease characterized by large international variations in incidence; in addition, urban-rural differences occur in many countries. Male:female ratios are high, 4 to 5; but after a rise during the first half of the century, these ratios are now declining in a number of countries. Neither racial distribution nor migrant studies indicate that genetic factors play any important role in the etiology of lung cancer. The only possible indication of their playing such a role is the high incidence of lung cancer among Chinese, primarily Cantonese, women. A genetic determination of individual susceptibility has been suggested, but racial differences remain to be demonstrated. The increase in lung cancer that started during the first decades of the 20th century in Europe and North America is consistent with the introduction of a carcinogen into the environment at the turn of the century. Both spatial and temporal trends of lung cancer support the hypothesis that cigarette smoking is the major etiological factor. This is further supported by numerous specific investigations of the problem. A decrease in lung cancer incidence in certain age groups in a number of countries may reflect changing smoking habits and the diminishing tar content of modern cigarettes, thus indicating ways of prevention. Current knowledge of general air pollution seems to ascribe it a secondary role as an etiological factor. The risk of lung cancer is greater in certain occupations, often because of an interaction between industrial air pollution and smoking. It may be concluded that lung cancer is largely a problem of modern society and that the epidemiological results are consistent with an etiological role of preventable environmental factors.

Adult↗

[Determination of the importance of environmental factors in human cancer: the role of epidemiology].

The evidence in support of the assertion that 80% of human cancers are of environmental origin is reviewed. The environment is used in its broadest sense and is taken to include the widespread general exposures of air and water pollution, the work environment, exposures resulting from personal choice such as smoking and drinking, and the diet. Several examples are chosen to show that a wide range of environmental agents can cause cancer. Consideration of descriptive epidemiological data relating to migrants, geographical variation in incidence, changes in risk over time, correlation studies, clusters and case reports, supports an environmental etiology for many cancers the cause of which is at present unkown. The same data can be used to show that a large proportion of cancer is likely to be due to environmental factors. If the lowest rate observed in a series of populations be regarded as representing a residuum of cancers due to non-environmental causes then it is possible to imagine a hypothetical population with a very low rate indeed. However, it is unlikely that such a level could be achieved even if all causal mechanisms were understood as it is possible that factors leading to one cancer may protect against another. Until evidence to the contrary is aduced it is held that the vast majority of human cancers are due to the environment: the reasons why there has been reluctance to accept this conclusion are discussed.

Animals↗

Importance of environmental factors in cancer.

The present paper reviews the nature of epidemiological studies and their importance as a background for determining the hazard of cancer. An attempt is made to explain how risks in the cancer area may be compared by the use of cumulative data over a lifespan as compared to use of age-specific rates. In addition, the classification of the aetiological factors so far identified is summarized and it is pointed out that to date, the most important environmental risks relate to those of cultural habits. Of the 85% of cancers for which the causes have not yet been established, there is circumstantial evidence that the greater part of these are dependent directly or indirectly on environmental factors.

Africa↗