Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J H Kreeft

Publications and source records attributed to J H Kreeft.

20 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Once-daily dosing of acebutolol in hypertension.

Twenty-six patients with essential hypertension were admitted to a protocol comparing the efficacy of the once-a-day administration of acebutolol with twice-a-day administration. A placebo was substituted initially for their beta-blocker therapy. Other therapy was continued in 14 (11, diuretics alone; two, diuretics plus hydralazine or alpha-methyldopa; one, alpha-methyldopa alone). After 4 weeks, lying blood pressures were 160 +/- 16 (SD) mm Hg systolic, and 101 +/- 7 mm Hg diastolic. Incremental twice-a-day doses of acebutolol resulted in normotension (lying systolic, 131 +/- 12 mm Hg; diastolic, 84 +/- 5 mm Hg) in all 26 patients (eight on 400 mg, four on 600 mg, seven on 800 mg, one on 1,000 mg, and six on 1,200 mg/day). The same twice-a-day acebutolol dose was continued for two visits, 4 weeks apart, recording pressures at 8 a.m., 12 noon, 4 p.m., and 8 p.m.; followed by two visits, 4 weeks apart, while taking the total daily dose after the 8 a.m. recording. Blood pressures during once-a-day dosing were not different from those during twice-a-day dosing at any time. Highest pressures were at 8 a.m. and lowest were at 12 noon or 4 p.m. Variations during the day in both systolic and diastolic pressures were greater during once-a-day dosing. Plasma acebutolol and metabolite concentrations were proportional to the administered dose. Eighteen patients continued acebutolol for 1 year without adverse effects other than an asymptomatic positive antinuclear antibody test in six. Once-a-day dosing was as effective as twice-a-day dosing in this group of hypertensive patients.

Acebutolol↗

Comparative trial of indapamide and hydrochlorothiazide in essential hypertension, with forearm plethysmography.

Seventeen patients (11 males) 34-66 years in age with uncomplicated essential hypertension completed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over study comparing indapamide (IND) 2.5 mg q am with hydrochlorothiazide (HCT) 50 mg q am. The lead-in placebo period of 2 months was followed by two active drug phases of 3 months' duration separated by a 2-month placebo-washout period. The mean standing systolic/diastolic pressures (+/- SD) during placebo were 150 +/- 18/98 +/- 6 mm Hg. The pressures were 137 +/- 16/90 +/- 7 IND and 137 +/- 17/91 +/- 7 mm Hg on HCT. Thus the drugs produced similar systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures. Orthostatic changes in mean pressure and heart rate were similar with the two drugs. Both drugs decreased serum potassium (-14.3% with IND and -13.7% with HCT), and increased serum uric acid (+26.7% with IND and +25.7% with HCT), and cholesterol (+11.7% with IND and +11.1% with HCT) equally. Forearm blood flow (FBF) and venous compliance (FVC) were measured by a plethysmographic technique in six of the patients. FBF during placebo of 3.53 +/- 0.58 ml/min/100 ml forearm volume was increased to 4.01 +/- 0.74 ml/min during IND and decreased to 3.40 +/- 1.16 ml/min on HCT, but our sample size did not permit detection of significant differences. FVC was not altered from baseline by the drugs. No side effects attributable to either of the two drugs were elicited. We conclude that IND did not differ from HCT in its effect on blood pressure, heart rate, venous compliance, or biochemistry. A possible peripheral arteriolar vasodilator effect on IND should be investigated further.

Adult↗