Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Guydish

Publications and source records attributed to J Guydish.

26 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1984

Helping behavior of females: effects of stress and commonality of fate.

In a design replication of Dovidio and Morris' study, the effects of stress and commonality of fate on helping behavior were examined. Ss were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: high stress/common fate (n = 15), high stress/dissimilar fate (n = 15), or low stress/common fate (n = 15), or low stress/dissimilar fate (n = 15). While the initial study involved male Ss, the present study involved females in order to assess the generality of the original findings. Other aspects of the original experiment were repeated as closely as possible. Consistent with the original study, a significant interaction was found, indicating that Ss were more helpful under conditions of high stress and common fate. Results also revealed a greater overall amount of helping behavior than that found by Dovidio and Morris.

Adult↗
PubMed1982

Behavior modification: doing battle in the ethical arena.

Behavior modification, designed to change behavior, is a social intervention. While the ethical considerations of all types of social intervention would appear similar, behavior modification is often used as the forum for discussing them. Such frequent use creates the impression that the field is riddled with numerous, unique ethical problems, which in turn contribute to an already questionable image. A variety of factors which have led to the use of behavior modification in this manner and the consequences of this approach are discussed.

Aversive Therapy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A day treatment program in a therapeutic community setting: six-month outcomes. The Walden House Day Treatment Program.

Although not well represented in the literature, day treatment programs targeting substance abuse problems have increased in both number and acceptability in recent years. This article reports on a day treatment program based on the Therapeutic Community (TC), and on outcomes for a sample of substance abuse clients (n = 66) entering the program. Participants were interviewed early in treatment and 6 months after admission using the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) and other measures. Clients entering day treatment were demographically diverse, with serious substance-abuse problems and psychiatric morbidity. Median retention in day treatment was about 5 weeks, but many clients received a contiguous episode of residential treatment, so that the median for total time in treatment was 18 weeks. Clients located and interviewed at 6-month follow-up (n = 38) showed significant improvement in alcohol and drug use, legal and social problems, and psychiatric symptoms. Findings suggest that day treatment can be used effectively as a precursor to residential treatment and that some clients applying for residential treatment can be treated effectively in day treatment alone.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Drug abuse treatment on demand in San Francisco: preliminary findings.

This article reports on a process and capacity evaluation of San Francisco's Treatment on Demand Initiative, which was launched in 1997 to increase availability of publicly-funded substance abuse treatment. For the process evaluation, data from public documents, interviews with community key informants, and newspaper articles were analyzed. For the capacity evaluation, budget documents and admissions data for publicly-funded substance abuse treatment in San Francisco for fiscal years 1995-1998 were analyzed. Results from the process evaluation document the development of the community-oriented Treatment on Demand Planning Council, and its efforts to not only expand treatment, but to create a continuum of services to address the needs of San Francisco's richly diverse communities, to provide service enhancements, and to prioritize service needs. Process evaluation results also highlight the complexities of implementing treatment on demand, including the difficulty of opening new programs. Results from the capacity evaluation indicate that the San Francisco budget supporting publicly-funded treatment increased from $32 million to $45.2 million over four years. During the same period, the number of persons entering the system in a single year increased by 18%, and the number of admissions in a single year increased by 15%. Implications of these findings are discussed.

Female↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Drug court effectiveness: a review of California evaluation reports, 1995-1999.

Over the past two decades, drug courts have emerged as a viable alternative for addressing drug cases within the criminal justice system. In California, the Drug Court Partnership Program (DCPP) was created in 1998 and has supported and funded the development of drug courts throughout the State. This article reports on a review of California drug court evaluations through January 2000 conducted as part of an evaluation of the California DCPP. A total of 23 evaluations were collected. Seventeen were reviewed in detail, and six were excluded because they were internal reports rather than evaluations. A standardized review process was initiated which led to a scored rating of the evaluation reports. Results of this review support previous findings that drug court participants may experience reduced rearrest rates by 11% to 14% compared to nonparticipants. The largest reduction in rearrest rates appears among graduates. The graduation rates were between 19% and 54%. Costs and savings associated with drug courts were discussed but no conclusions were possible based on the findings from these evaluations. The evaluation of the effectiveness of drug courts presents unique challenges. This review concludes with a discussion of evaluation methods (e.g. standardizing rate calculations, term definitions) that would strengthen drug court research.

California↗