Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J G Meechan

Publications and source records attributed to J G Meechan.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: restorative dentistry.

This paper considers the role of restorative dentistry in the management of hypodontia. The paper describes the general restorative considerations common to patients with hypodontia and illustrates the variety of restorative techniques available in the restorative management of hypodontia and oligodontia.

Anodontia↗
PubMed2003

The interdisciplinary management of hypodontia: background and role of paediatric dentistry.

This paper is the first of a series on the comprehensive management of young people with hypodontia. The paper looks at the background to the condition, the possible aetiological factors, the prevalence of hypodontia and other related conditions. Lastly there is consideration of the role of the paediatric dentist in interdisciplinary management of the affected child and adolescent patient.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

The role of magnets in the management of unerupted teeth in children and adolescents.

This case report describes the use of magnets in the management of teeth that fail to erupt. Eight children aged between 10 and 15 years were treated. Magnetic traction was applied to two premolars and six molars. Seven teeth (one premolar and six molars) erupted successfully (mean treatment time with magnetic traction: 7.5 months). One premolar failed to erupt; serial radiographic assessment over a 9-month period revealed no evidence of movement and so the magnetic fixture was removed. Histological evaluation of tissue samples taken from around the fixture revealed no evidence of abnormal pathology.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Effects of dental local anaesthetics in cardiac transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the cardiovascular responses of cardiac transplant recipients to dental local anaesthetic solutions with and without epinephrine (adrenaline). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A clinical study employing 30 patients (20 cardiac transplant recipients and ten healthy) awaiting gingival or minor oral surgery under local anaesthesia receiving either 4.4 ml lidocaine (lignocaine) with 1:80,000 epinephrine or 4.4 ml 3% prilocaine with 0.031 U/ml felypressin. RESULTS: Cardiac transplant patients experienced a significant tachycardia 10 minutes after injection of the epinephrine-containing solution. No significant change in heart rate was detected after the injection of an epinephrine-free solution. Blood pressure was not affected. Periodontal surgery did not affect the responses to the local anaesthetics in the transplant recipients. CONCLUSIONS: The cardiovascular response to dental local anaesthesia in cardiac transplant recipients is governed by the solution injected.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Pulpal anaesthesia for mandibular central incisor teeth: a comparison of infiltration and intraligamentary injections.

AIM: This study compared the anaesthetic efficacy of infiltration and intraligamentary injections in the permanent mandibular central incisor. METHODOLOGY: Twelve healthy volunteers received each of the following methods of anaesthesia for one of their mandibular central incisors over four visits. 1 Labial infiltration of 1.0 mL. 2 Lingual infiltration of 1.0 mL. 3 Labial infiltration of 0.5 mL plus lingual infiltration of 0.5 mL. 4 Intraligamentary injection of (118 mL. Two percent lidocaine with 1: 80 000 adrenaline and 30 gauge needles were used throughout. Electrical pulp testing was performed before injection and every 2 min up to 30 min after the injection. Injection discomfort was recorded on a 100-mm visual analogue scale. Data were compared with ANOVA, Student's t-test and chi2 tests. RESULTS: Anaesthesia varied between techniques(F = 9.3, P < 0.001). The incidence of anaesthesia at any time was as follows: 50% success for labial infiltration; 50% success for lingual infiltration: 92% success for combined labial and lingual infiltration; 0% success for intraligamentary injections (chi2 = 20; P < 0.001). The mean (+/-SD) VAS score for intraligamentary injection discomfort was 28 +/- 12 mm, for buccal infiltrations 17 +/- 8 mm and for lingual infiltrations 16 +16 mm. Intraligamentary injections were more uncomfortable than buccal (t = 3.7: P < 0.01) and lingual infiltrations (t = 2.67: P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The most reliable method of the techniques investigated for obtaining pulpal anaesthesia in mandibular permanent central incisors was a combination of labial and lingual infiltration. Intraligamentary injections were unreliable and were more uncomfortable than infiltrations in the mandibular central incisor region.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Supplementary routes to local anaesthesia.

The satisfactory provision of many dental treatments, particularly endodontics, relies on achieving excellent pain control. Unfortunately, the administration of a local anaesthetic solution does not always produce satisfactory anaesthesia of the dental pulp. This may be distressing for both patient and operator. Fortunately, failure of local anaesthetic injections can be overcome. This is often achieved by using alternative routes of approach for subsequent injections. Nerves such as the inferior alveolar nerve can be anaesthetized by a variety of block methods. However, techniques of anaesthesia other than the standard infiltration and regional block injections may be employed successfully when these former methods have failed to produce adequate pain control. This paper describes some supplementary local anaesthetic techniques that may be used to achieve pulpal anaesthesia for endodontic procedures when conventional approaches have failed. Although some of these techniques can be used as the primary form of anaesthesia, these are normally employed as 'back-up'. The methods described are intraligamentary (periodontal ligament) injections, intraosseous anaesthesia and the intrapulpal approach. The factors that influence the success of these methods and the advantages and disadvantages of each technique are discussed. The advent of new instrumentation, which permits the slow delivery of local anaesthetic solution has led to the development of novel methods of anaesthesia in dentistry. These new approaches are discussed.

Anesthesia, Dental↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of ropivacaine and lidocaine with epinephrine for intraligamentary anesthesia.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of 2 different concentrations of ropivacaine with lidocaine containing epinephrine for intraligamentary anesthesia. STUDY DESIGN: Ethical approval was obtained and a randomized, double-blind, cross-over volunteer investigation was conducted. Twenty-four volunteers had intraligamentary injections of 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine, 0.75% ropivacaine, or 1% ropivacaine at the upper lateral incisor and lower first bicuspid teeth. The response of the test teeth to electrical pulp testing and the reaction of the gingiva to sharp probing were assessed up to 29 minutes after injection. Injection discomfort and side effects were also recorded. Data were analyzed by using the chi-square test and analysis of variance. RESULTS: Lidocaine with epinephrine was more successful than the ropivacaine solutions in obtaining pulpal anesthesia (chi-square = 12; P <.002) and produced longer-lasting pulpal (F = 21; P <.001) and soft tissue (F = 16; P <.001) anesthesia. Injection discomfort and incidence of side effects were similar between solutions, and none produced serious adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Lidocaine with epinephrine is more effective than ropivacaine as an intraligamentary anesthetic.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Polypharmacy and dentistry: I. Introduction and interactions with local anaesthetics and sedative drugs.

This series of two papers considers the effects of drug interactions in dentistry. In this first paper, the principles of drug interactions will be described. In addition, interactions with drugs used in local anaesthesia and sedation will be discussed. The second paper will concentrate on interactions with analgesics and antimicrobials prescribed in dental practice.

Anesthesia, Dental↗
PubMed2002

A comparison of intraoral injection discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine local anesthetic solutions: a randomized, double-blind, split-mouth, volunteer investigation.

The authors report a clinical trial designed to compare the discomfort produced by plain and epinephrine-containing lidocaine solutions during local anesthesia in the maxilla. Twenty-four healthy volunteers were recruited; each received buccal and palatal infiltrations on each side of the maxilla in the premolar region. The solutions were 2% lidocaine and 2% lidocaine with 1:80,000 epinephrine. Allocation to side was randomized and operator and volunteer were blinded to the identity of the solutions. Volunteers recorded injection discomfort on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS). Volunteers were included in the trial if a score of at least 30 mm was recorded for at least 1 of the matched pair of injections. Differences between treatments were measured using Student's paired t test. Twelve volunteers recorded a VAS score of at least 30 mm for 1 or both buccal injections, and 17 volunteers reached this score for palatal injections. Buccal injection pain was less when the plain solution was used (P = .04) and was not influenced by the order of the injection. Palatal injection discomfort did not differ between the solutions; however, the second palatal injection was more uncomfortable than the first palatal injection (P = .046). These results suggest that plain lidocaine produces less discomfort than lidocaine with epinephrine when administered into the maxillary premolar buccal sulcus in individuals who report moderate pain during this injection. Palatal injection discomfort does not differ between these solutions.

Administration, Buccal↗
PubMed2001

Ridge augmentation using mandibular tori.

A 19-year-old female was referred by her dental practitioner for the restoration of missing maxillary lateral incisors and canines. Ridge augmentation was required. This was undertaken using mandibular tori as the sites for harvesting bone. The grafting was successful and the spaces were subsequently restored using resin-bonded bridgework. The case reports that mandibular tori provide a local and convenient source of bone for ridge augmentation procedures.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The influence of two different dental local anaesthetic solutions on the haemodynamic responses of children undergoing restorative dentistry: a randomised, single-blind, split-mouth study.

OBJECTIVES: This investigation was designed to study the haemodynamic effects of two different local anaesthetic solutions during restorative dental treatment in children. DESIGN: A randomised, single-blind, split-mouth cross-over design was employed using children undergoing bilaterally similar restorative treatments over two visits. SETTING: The study was performed in a dental hospital paediatric dentistry department. METHODS: Ten children participated. At one visit the local anaesthetic was 2% lidocaine (lignocaine) with 1:80,000 epinephrine (adrenaline); at the other the anaesthetic was 3% prilocaine with 0.03IU/ml felypressin. Local anaesthetic was administered at a dose of 0.5 ml/10 kg body weight. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured before and during treatment with an automatic blood pressure recorder. Data were analysed by ANOVA and Student's paired t test. RESULTS: Significant differences between treatments in diastolic blood pressure (F = 2.37; P = 0.05) and heart rate (F = 2.98; P< 0.02) were noted. The heart rate increased ten minutes following the injection of the epinephrine-containing solution. The diastolic blood pressure fell 20 minutes after injection of lidocaine with epinephrine. CONCLUSION: The choice of local anaesthetic solution influences the haemodynamic response during restorative treatment in children.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

The effect of moisture and blood contamination on bond strength of a new orthodontic bonding material.

The practice of orthodontics often requires the bonding of brackets under difficult conditions of moisture and/or blood contamination. Transbond MIP (3M Unitek, Monrovia, Calif) is a hydrophilic primer designed to bond in moist conditions. This study evaluated the bond strength of Transbond MIP under dry, moist, and blood-contaminated conditions. Ninety human premolars were bonded in 3 equal groups with Transbond MIP after acid etching; the enamel surfaces were either dry, moist, or contaminated with human blood. The shear bond strength was recorded. Dry bonding resulted in a significantly higher bond strength (15.69 MPa) than moist (12.89 MPa) or blood-contaminated (11.16 MPa) bonds. However, all bond strengths were in excess of previous reports of required clinical bond strength, and it was concluded that Transbond MIP is a suitable adhesive for bonding in conditions of poor moisture control or blood contamination.

Acid Etching, Dental↗