Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J G Kuhn

Publications and source records attributed to J G Kuhn.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

A Phase II study of paclitaxel in patients with recurrent malignant glioma using different doses depending upon the concomitant use of anticonvulsants: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium report.

BACKGROUND: The primary objective of the current study was to determine the response rate of paclitaxel in patients with recurrent malignant glioma by using different doses dependent on the concomitant use of anticonvulsants. Secondary objectives were to determine the time period to treatment failure, to evaluate toxicities, and to obtain pharmacokinetic data. METHODS: Adult patients who had recurrent malignant glioma were treated with paclitaxel. Patients were treated at different doses depending on the concomitant use of anticonvulsants known to induce the p450 hepatic enzyme system. Patients on such agents were treated at a dose of 330 mg/m2, whereas those not on these anticonvulsants were treated at a dose of 210 mg/m2. Tumor response was assessed at 6-week intervals. Treatment was continued until documented tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred, or a total of 12 paclitaxel infusions was completed. RESULTS: From January 1997 to June 1997, 23 patients were treated with paclitaxel. Four patients were ineligible for the current study. Of the 19 eligible patients, there were no responses seen. Four (21%) had stabilization of disease. Median time to treatment failure was 1 month (95% confidence interval [CI], 1-2 mos) and median survival was 7 months (95% CI, 6-10 mos). Three patients were removed from the current study because they had toxicity. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated that drug levels and clearance values were consistent with previously reported findings. CONCLUSION: Even though higher doses were administered to patients who had recurrent malignant glioma and who were on concomitant anticonvulsants, there were no objective responses to paclitaxel. Time to tumor progression was 1 month. Further testing of paclitaxel at this dose schedule does not appear to be warranted in this patient population.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic trial of irinotecan (CPT-11) administered every two weeks.

OBJECTIVES: This trial was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and pharmacokinetic profile of irinotecan (CPT-11) when administered on a once-every-2-week schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPT-11 was administered to successive cohorts of patients at progressively increasing starting doses ranging from 125 to 350 mg/m2. The MTD and DLTs were determined both for CPT-11 alone and for CPT-11 followed by filgrastim (G-CSF). Plasma samples were obtained during the first 24 hours after initial dosing to determine the total concentrations (lactone + carboxylate forms) of CPT-11; of the active metabolite SN-38; and of SN-38 glucuronide (SN-38G). RESULTS: Neutropenic fever was the DLT for CPT-11 at the 300 mg/m2 dose level. When G-CSF was added, dose escalation beyond 350 mg/m2 could not be achieved due to grade 2-3 toxicities that prevented on-time retreatment with CPT-11. Severe, late diarrhea was uncommon on this schedule. Peak plasma concentrations of SN-38 and SN-38G were approximately 2.5% and 4.2% of the corresponding peak plasma concentration for CPT-II, respectively The harmonic mean terminal half-lives for CPT-11, SN-38, and SN-38G were 7.1 hours, 13.4 hours, and 12.7 hours, respectively. No predictive correlation was observed between CPT-11 or SN-38 peak concentration or AUC and first-cycle diarrhea, neutropenia, nausea, or vomiting. Across the range of doses studied, mean CPT-11 clearance was 14.0 +/- 4.0 l/h/m2 and volume of distribution was 146 +/- 45.9 l/m2. CONCLUSIONS: When administered every two weeks, the recommended phase II starting dose of CPT-11 is 250 mg/m2 when given alone and 300 mg/m2 when supported by G-CSF. This every-two-week regimen offers a tolerable and active alternative to weekly or every-three-week single-agent CPT-11 therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Fluorouracil and the new oral fluorinated pyrimidines.

OBJECTIVE: To briefly review the biotransformation and bioavailability of fluorouracil (5-FU); discuss the effects of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DpD) on the efficacy and toxicity profiles of 5-FU; and review a new class of drugs known collectively as the oral fluorinated pyrimidines, which inhibit or circumvent DpD activity and, when administered with 5-FU, alter its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. DATA SOURCES: A MEDLINE literature search was conducted (1966-March 1999) using the search terms fluoropyrimidines, fluorouracil, 5-FU, fluorinated pyrimidines, capecitabine, eniluracil, uracil-tegafur, uracil-ftorafur, UFT, S1, BMS-247616, and BOF-A2. Reference lists, bibliographies of pertinent articles, and abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium annual meetings were also identified and reviewed. Both preclinical and clinical literature were reviewed and analyzed. DATA SYNTHESIS: The new oral fluorinated pyrimidines appear to produce antitumor activity equivalent or superior to that of intravenously administered 5-FU by achieving higher intratumoral 5-FU concentrations or sustained 5-FU exposure. These agents are generally associated with manageable and non-life-threatening toxicities. The oral route of administration facilitates ease of administration and may reduce total healthcare costs associated with 5-FU-sensitive tumors. More studies are needed to assess the therapeutic and economic benefits of the oral fluorinated pyrimidines. CONCLUSIONS: The bioavailability, efficacy, and toxicity of 5-FU depend on its catabolic rate-limiting enzyme, The new oral fluorinated pyrimidines inhibit or circumvent DpD activity and, when combined with 5-FU, increase 5-FU's bioavailability and cytotoxic effects and decrease its toxicities. Results of Phase I and II studies in patients with a variety of malignancies suggest positive outcomes, including greater efficacy, less drug-related toxicity, lower costs related to drug administration, and greater patient convenience.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Effects of hydroxyurea on extrachromosomal DNA in patients with advanced ovarian carcinomas.

PURPOSE: In vitro low concentrations of hydroxyurea eliminate double-minute chromosomes (dmins) containing amplified drug-resistance genes and oncogenes from cancer cells. This clinical trial investigated whether a noncytotoxic dose of oral hydroxyurea could reduce the number of dmins in cancer cells in patients with advanced ovarian carcinomas. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The high frequency of ascites associated with ovarian cancer facilitated the monitoring of cytogenetic variations with minimal discomfort in patients who required frequent abdominal paracentesis. Sixteen patients with advanced ovarian carcinomas resistant to conventional cisplatin-based and/or paclitaxel chemotherapy and with ascites requiring frequent abdominal paracentesis were entered in this study. A course of treatment consisted of a single oral dose of 80 mg/kg hydroxyurea every 3 days for 6 weeks. Blood and i.p. levels of hydroxyurea were determined. We monitored the variations of dmins in tumor cells taken from serial abdominal paracenteses. RESULTS: The median number of courses administered to the patients was 1 (range, 1--9). In ascites, hydroxyurea concentrations were 610.3 +/- 76.3, 219.8 +/- 85.6, and 86.1 micromol/liter at 4, 24, and 30 h after oral administration, respectively. Eleven (78.6%) of 14 patient specimens contained dmins before therapy. The number of spreads with tumor cells containing dmins were reduced by more than 50% in 5 (45%) of 11 and 3 (60%) of 5 patients at the completion of the first and second course of chemotherapy, respectively. Using tumor cells taken directly from the patients and grown in soft agar, we documented that concentrations of hydroxyurea in ascites were too low to have any cytotoxic effects. No grade 3--4 hydroxyurea-related toxicities nor any objective responses were observed. However, despite the utilization of a low noncytotoxic dose of hydroxyurea, two patients had prolonged stabilization of their disease for 6 and 10 months, respectively, with concomitant decreases in the number of dmins that remained until progression. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that, in some circumstances, a noncytotoxic dose of hydroxyurea given to patients with ovarian cancer can decrease the number of metaphase spreads containing dmins in cancer cells.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of irofulven, a novel mushroom-derived cytotoxin, administered for five consecutive days every four weeks in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the toxicity and pharmacologic behavior of the novel mushroom-derived cytotoxin irofulven administered as a 5-minute intravenous (IV) infusion daily for 5 days every 4 weeks to patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this phase I trial, 46 patients were treated with irofulven doses ranging from 1.0 to 17.69 mg/m(2) as a 5-minute IV infusion (two patients received a 1-hour infusion) daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. The modified continual reassessment method was used for dose escalation. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed on days 1 and 5 to characterize the plasma disposition of irofulven. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were treated with 92 courses of irofulven. The dose-limiting toxicities on this schedule were myelosuppression and renal dysfunction. At the 14.15-mg/m(2) dose level, renal dysfunction resembling renal tubular acidosis occurred in four of 10 patients and was ameliorated by prophylactic IV hydration. The 17.69-mg/m(2) dose level was not tolerated because of grade 4 neutropenia and renal toxicity, whereas the 14.15-mg/m(2) dose level was not tolerable with repetitive dosing because of persistent thrombocytopenia. Other common toxicities included mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, facial erythema, and fatigue. One partial response occurred in a patient with advanced, refractory metastatic pancreatic cancer lasting 7 months. Pharmacokinetic studies of irofulven revealed dose-proportional increases in both maximum plasma concentrations and area under the concentration-time curve, while the agent exhibited a rapid elimination half-life of 2 to 10 minutes. CONCLUSION: Given the results of this study, the recommended dose of irofulven is 10.64 mg/m(2) as a 5-minute IV infusion daily for 5 days every 4 weeks. The preliminary antitumor activity documented in a patient with advanced pancreatic cancer and the striking preclinical antitumor effects of irofulven observed on intermittent dosing schedules support further disease-directed evaluations of this agent on the schedule evaluated in this study.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

A phase I trial of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea plus temozolomide: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium study.

The North American Brain Tumor Consortium conducted a phase I trial of the combination 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) and temozolomide. Eligibility included a patient with a cancer type that was considered refractory to standard therapy. Prior nitrosourea treatments were not permitted. There were parallel dose escalations in two treatment schedules. Forty-five patients were enrolled during an 18-month period. The maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) when temozolomide followed BCNU (Arm A) were temozolomide at 550 mg/m2/p.o. and BCNU at 150 mg/m2/i.v.), whereas the MTD when temozolomide preceded BCNU (Arm B) was temozolomide at 400 mg/m2/p.o. and BCNU at 100 mg/m2/i.v. Toxicity was predominantly hematologic, although there were three instances of pulmonary toxicity, which in one case could have represented potentiation of nitrosourea-induced pulmonary fibrosis. The half-life of temozolomide was 1.86 (+/-0.31) h. There was a moderate relationship between dose and peak concentration and a strong relationship between dose and plasma concentration time curve. Pharmacokinetic parameters of temozolomide were unaffected by the treatment schedule, so the difference in MTD between the schedules is likely due to a biologic rather than a pharmacokinetic sequence interaction. There were 9 partial responses among 43 patients evaluable for response, including 5 of 25 with a histologic diagnosis of glioblastoma. The recommended dose and schedule for phase II trials of this regimen are BCNU 150 mg/m2/i.v. followed in 2 h by temozolomide 550 mg/m2/p.o. repeated every 6 weeks. We are also recommending screening and periodic pulmonary function testing during treatment to assess the possible potentiation of nitrosourea-induced pulmonary fibrosis.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗
PubMed2000

9-cis-Retinoic acid suppresses mammary tumorigenesis in C3(1)-simian virus 40 T antigen-transgenic mice.

Retinoids have been investigated as potential agents for the prevention and treatment of human cancers. These compounds play an important role in regulating cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. 9-cis-Retinoic acid (9cRA) is a naturally occurring ligand with a high affinity for both the retinoic acid receptors and the retinoid X receptors. We hypothesized that treatment with 9cRA would prevent mammary tumorigenesis in transgenic mice that spontaneously develop mammary tumors. To test this hypothesis, C3(1)-SV40 T antigen (Tag) mice, which develop mammary tumors by the age of 6 months, were treated daily p.o. with vehicle or two different dose levels of 9cRA (10 or 50 mg/kg) from 5 weeks to 6 months of age. Tumor size and number were measured twice each week, and histological samples of normal and malignant tissue were obtained from each mouse at time of sacrifice. Our results demonstrate that 9cRA suppresses mammary tumorigenesis in C3(1)-SV40 Tag-transgenic mice. Time to tumor development was significantly delayed in treated mice; median time to tumor formation for vehicle-treated mice was 140 days versus 167 days for mice treated with 50 mg/kg 9cRA (P = 0.05). In addition, the number of tumors per mouse was reduced by >50% in mice treated with 9cRA (3.43 for vehicle, 2.33 for 10 mg/kg 9cRA, and 1.13 for 50 mg/kg 9cRA, P < or = 0.002). Histological analysis of the mammary glands from vehicle and treated mice demonstrated that 9cRA treatment also did not affect normal mammary gland development. Immunohistochemical staining of normal and malignant breast tissue and Western blot analysis demonstrated that SV40 Tag expression was not affected by treatment with retinoids. Single doses of 10 and 50 mg/kg resulted in peak plasma concentrations of 3.4 and 6.71 microM, respectively. Daily doses of 9cRA for 28 days resulted in plasma concentrations of 0.86 and 1.68 microM, respectively, concentrations consistent with that seen in humans treated with 9cRA in clinical trials. These results demonstrate that 9cRA suppresses mammary carcinogenesis in transgenic mice without any major toxicity and suggest that retinoids are promising agents for the prevention of human breast cancer.

Alitretinoin↗
PubMed1999

A phase I evaluation of multitargeted antifolate (MTA, LY231514), administered every 21 days, utilizing the modified continual reassessment method for dose escalation.

PURPOSE: To determine toxicities, maximally tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetic profile, and potential antitumor activity of MTA, a novel antifolate compound which inhibits the enzymes thymidylate synthase (TS), glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase (GARFT), and dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR). METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors were given MTA intravenously over 10 min every 21 days. Dose escalation was based on the modified continual reassessment method (MCRM), with one patient treated at each minimally toxic dose level. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed in all patients. RESULTS: A total of 37 patients (27 males, 10 females, median age 59 years, median performance status 90%) were treated with 132 courses at nine dose levels, ranging from 50 to 700 mg/m(2). The MTD of MTA was 600 mg/m(2), with neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and cumulative fatigue as the dose-limiting toxicities. Hematologic toxicity correlated with renal function and mild reversible renal dysfunction was observed in multiple patients. Other nonhematologic toxicities observed included mild to moderate fatigue, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, mucositis, rash, and reversible hepatic transaminase elevations. Three patients expired due to drug-related complications. Pharmacokinetic analysis during the first course of treatment at the 600 mg/m(2) dose level demonstrated a mean harmonic half-life, maximum plasma concentration (Cpmax), clearance (CL), area under the curve (AUC), and apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss) of 3.08 h, 137 microg/ml, 40.0 ml/min per m(2), 266 microg. h/ml, and 7.0 l/m(2), respectively. An average of 78% of the compound was excreted unchanged in the urine. Partial responses were achieved in two patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and in two patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Minor responses were obtained in six patients with advanced colorectal cancer. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD and dose for phase II clinical trials of MTA when administered intravenously over 10 min every 21 days was 600 mg/m(2). MTA is a promising new anticancer agent.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of oral irinotecan administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I dose-escalation trial of orally administered irinotecan (CPT-11) to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: CPT-11 solution for intravenous (IV) use was mixed with CranGrape juice (Ocean Spray, Lakeville-Middleboro, MA) and administered orally once per day for 5 days every 3 weeks to 28 patients. Starting dosages ranged from 20 to 100 mg/m2/d. RESULTS: Grade 4 delayed diarrhea was the DLT at the 80 mg/m2/d dosage in patients younger than 65 years of age and at the 66 mg/m2/d dosage in patients 65 or older. The other most clinically significant toxicity of oral CPT-11 was neutropenia. A linear relationship was found between dose, peak plasma concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for both CPT-11 and SN-38 lactone, implying no saturation in the conversion of irinotecan to SN-38. The mean metabolic ratio ([AUC(SN-38 total) + AUC(SN-38G total)]/AUC(CPT-11 total)) was 0.7 to 0.8, which suggests that oral dosing results in presystemic conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38. An average of 72% of SN-38 was maintained in the lactone form during the first 24 hours after drug administration. One patient with previously treated colorectal cancer and liver metastases who received oral CPT-11 at the 80 mg/m2/d dosage achieved a confirmed partial response. CONCLUSION: The MTD and recommended phase II dosage for oral CPT-11 is 66 mg/m2/d in patients younger than 65 years of age and 50 mg/m2/d in patients 65 or older, administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. The DLT of diarrhea is similar to that observed with IV administration of CPT-11. The biologic activity and favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics make oral administration of CPT-11 an attractive option for further clinical development.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Phase II study of phenylacetate in patients with recurrent malignant glioma: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium report.

PURPOSE: To determine the response rate, time to treatment failure, and toxicity of phenylacetate in patients with recurrent malignant glioma and to identify plasma concentrations achieved during repeated continuous infusion of this agent. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Adult patients with recurrent malignant glioma were treated with phenylacetate. The schedule consisted of a 2-week continuous, intravenous infusion followed by a 2-week rest period (14 days on, 14 days off). A starting dose of 400 mg/kg total body weight per day of phenylacetate was initially used and subsequently changed to 400 mg/kg/d based on ideal body weight. Intrapatient dose escalations were allowed to a maximum of 450 mg/kg ideal body weight/d. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks. The National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria were used to assess toxicity. Plasma concentrations achieved during the patients' first two 14-day infusions were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled between December 1994 and December 1996. Of these, 40 patients were assessable for toxicity and response to therapy. Reversible symptoms of fatigue and somnolence were the primary toxicities, with only mild hematologic toxicity. Thirty (75%) of the 40 patients failed treatment within 2 months, seven (17.5%) had stable disease, and three (7.5%) had a response defined as more than 50% reduction in the tumor. Median time to treatment failure was 2 months. Thirty-five patients have died, with a median survival of 8 months. Pharmacokinetic data for this dose schedule showed no difference in the mean plasma concentrations of phenylacetate between weeks 1 and 2 or between weeks 5 and 6. CONCLUSION: Phenylacetate has little activity at this dose schedule in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. Further studies with this drug would necessitate an evaluation of a different dose schedule.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Phase I and pharmacologic study of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU101 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical feasibility and pharmacologic behavior of the platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) tyrosine kinase inhibitor SU101, administered on a prolonged, intermittent dosing schedule to patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients were treated with SU101 doses ranging from 15 to 443 mg/m(2) as a 24-hour continuous intravenous (IV) infusion weekly for 4 weeks, repeated every 6 weeks. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed to characterize the disposition of SU101 and its major active metabolite, SU0020. Immunohistochemical staining of PDGF-alpha and -beta receptors was performed on malignant tumor specimens obtained at diagnosis. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients were treated with 52 courses (187 infusions) of SU101. The most common toxicities were mild to moderate nausea, vomiting, and fever. Two patients experienced one episode each of grade 3 neutropenia at the 333 and 443 mg/m(2) dose levels. Dose escalation of SU101 above 443 mg/m(2)/wk was precluded by the total volume of infusate required, 2.5 to 3.0 L. Individual plasma SU101 and SU0020 concentrations were described by a one-compartment model that incorporates both first-order formation and elimination of SU0020. SU101 was rapidly converted to SU0020, which exhibited a long elimination half-life averaging 19 +/- 12 days. At the 443 mg/m(2)/wk dose level, trough plasma SU0020 concentrations during weeks 2 and 4 ranged from 54 to 522 micromol/L. Immunohistochemical studies revealed PDGF-alpha and -beta receptor staining in the majority (15 of 19) of malignant neoplasms. CONCLUSION: SU101 was well tolerated as a 24-hour continuous IV infusion at doses of up to 443 mg/m(2)/wk for 4 consecutive weeks every 6 weeks. Although further dose escalation was precluded by infusate volume constraints, this SU101 dose schedule resulted in the achievement and maintenance of substantial plasma concentrations of the major metabolite, SU0020, for the entire treatment period.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A bioavailability and pharmacokinetic study of oral and intravenous hydroxyurea.

Despite the widespread usage of hydroxyurea in the treatment of both malignant and nonmalignant diseases and a recent expansion in the recognition of its potential therapeutic applications, there have been few detailed studies of hydroxyurea's pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior and oral bioavailability. Parenteral administration schedules have been evaluated because of concerns about the possibility for significant interindividual variability in the PK behavior and bioavailability of hydroxyurea after oral administration. In this PK and bioavailability study, 29 patients with advanced solid malignancies were randomized to treatment with 2, 000 mg hydroxyurea administered either orally or as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion accompanied by extensive plasma and urine sampling for PK studies. After 3 weeks of treatment with hydroxyurea (80 mg/kg orally every 3 days followed by a 1-week washout period), patients were crossed over to the alternate route of administration, at which time extensive PK studies were repeated. Three days later, patients continued treatment with 80 mg/kg hydroxyurea orally every 3 days for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period. Thereafter, 80 mg/kg hydroxyurea was administered orally every 3 days. Twenty-two of 29 patients had extensive plasma and urine sampling performed after treatment with both oral and IV hydroxyurea. Oral bioavailability (F) averaged 108%. Moreover, interindividual variability in F was low, as indicated by 19 of 22 individual F values within a narrow range of 85% to 127% and a modest coefficient of variation of 17%. The time in which maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) were achieved averaged 1.22 hours with an average lag time of 0.22 hours after oral administration. Except for Cmax, which was 19. 5% higher after IV drug administration, the PK profiles of oral and IV hydroxyurea were very similar. The plasma disposition of hydroxyurea was well described by a linear two-compartment model. The initial harmonic mean half-lives for oral and IV hydroxyurea were 1.78 and 0.63 hours, respectively, and the harmonic mean terminal half-lives were 3.32 and 3.39 hours, respectively. For IV hydroxyurea, systemic clearance averaged 76.16 mL/min/m2 and the mean volume of distribution at steady-state was 19.71 L/m2, whereas Cloral/F and Voral/F averaged 73.16 mL/min/m2 and 19.65 L/m2, respectively, after oral administration. The percentage of the administered dose of hydroxyurea that was excreted unchanged into the urine was nearly identical after oral and IV administration-36. 84% and 35.82%, respectively. Additionally, the acute toxic effects of hydroxyurea after treatment on both routes were similar. Relationships between pertinent PK parameters and the principal toxicity, neutropenia, were sought, but no pharmacodynamic relationships were evident. From PK, bioavailability, and toxicologic standpoints, these results indicate that there are no clear advantages for administering hydroxyurea by the IV route except in situations when oral administration is not possible and/or in the case of severe gastrointestinal impairment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1998

Evaluation of the linearity of docetaxel pharmacokinetics.

The taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, have favorable response rates in patients with breast, gynecologic, and lung cancers and have demonstrated activity against a variety of malignancies. In human trials, paclitaxel pharmacokinetics are nonlinear and are best fit by a three-compartment model with nonlinear distribution into the second compartment as well as nonlinear elimination. This finding is important for patients receiving paclitaxel at high doses or as a short infusion, as it results in disproportionately high peak concentrations and delayed elimination. The presence of nonlinear processes in docetaxel pharmacokinetics has not previously been examined. Therefore, plasma concentration data obtained from 53 patients receiving docetaxel at 55-115 mg/m2 over 1-24 h as part of phase I studies were modeled using the nonlinear three-compartment model found most suitable for paclitaxel and the results were compared with those obtained using the linear version. Docetaxel disposition was best described by the three-compartment nonlinear model in 28 of 53 data sets (53%). However, the difference in curve fit observed between the two models was modest (did not improve Akaike criteria) and unlikely to be of relevance. This study suggests that nonlinear processes in docetaxel pharmacokinetics may exist, but, unlike the case of paclitaxel, they are not likely to have a significant impact at the dose and administration schedule used in routine clinical practice (60-100 mg/m2 given over 1 h by infusion). The presence of nonlinear docetaxel pharmacokinetics at doses above 115 mg/m2 will have to be determined in case of further dose escalation.

Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic↗
PubMed1998

A phase I and pharmacokinetic trial of terephthalamidine (NSC 57155) as a 120-hour continuous infusion.

In this phase I study, terephthalamidine was administered as a 120-hour continuous infusion repeated every 21 days. Thirteen patients received 27 courses of terephthalamidine at four dose levels ( 14, 28, 46, and 70 mg/m2/day). Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of profound and intractable anorexia, weight loss and prostration in all patients. Toxicity was delayed and accompanied by hyponatremia and hypokalemia. No hematologic or other toxicity was documented. One patient with adenocarcinoma of the lung had a 40% decrease in mediastinal lymph nodes and resolution of a pleural effusion lasting 2 months. Pharmacokinetic analysis by HPLC was performed in all patients during their first course. The harmonic mean terminal half-life for terephthalamidine was 23 hours with a plasma clearance of 1.7 1/hr/m2. Both plasma concentrations achieved during infusion (r2 = 0.9) and area under the curve (AUC) (r2 = 0.8) were proportional to increase in dose (p < 0.002). Renal excretion accounted for 64% of the total cumulative dose, with an average renal clearance of 1.16 1/hr/m2. Due to the unacceptable toxicity seen at all doses with this schedule, no further studies are recommended unless the mechanism of toxicity is better understood and can be prevented.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Pharmacokinetic and phase I studies of brequinar (DUP 785; NSC 368390) in combination with cisplatin in patients with advanced malignancies.

Brequinar (DUP 785; NSC 368390) is a quinoline carboxylic acid derivative that inhibits pyrimidine synthesis at the level of dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase and revealed synergy with cisplatin in preclinical models. In this study investigating the pharmacokinetic and toxicity of brequinar in combination with cisplatin, patients were initially treated with weekly brequinar, in combination with an every-three-week administration of cisplatin. Due to toxicity, the schedule was modified to a 28-day cycle with brequinar given on days 1, 8, 15, and cisplatin on day 1. A total of 24 patients (16 male, 8 female; median age 57; median performance status 1) received 69 courses of therapy. Six dose levels were explored, with cisplatin/ brequinar doses, respectively, of 50/500, 50/650, 50/860, 60/860, 75/650, and 75/860 mg/m2. The serum concentration versus time curves for brequinar were biphasic. A comparison of the pharmacokinetic results after the first and third doses of brequinar indicate that the presence of 50, 60, and 75 mg/m2cisplatin did not change the protein binding and the pharmacokinetics of brequinar in any of the three brequinar-dose groups. Total cisplatin plasma pharmacokinetic followed a triphasic-shape curve and unbound cisplatin decayed at a very rapid rate. Since pharmacokinetic parameters for total cisplatin in this study were similar to those reported in the literature, the presence of brequinar is unlikely to alter the pharmacokinetics of cisplatin. Main dose-limiting toxicities included myelosuppression (including neutropenia and thrombocytopenia) and mucositis. Cisplatin/brequinar doses of 50/500, 50/650, 50/860, 60/860, 75/650, and 75/860 mg/m2, were associated with dose limiting toxicity in 0/3, 1/3, 1/3, 1/3, 2/4, 2/5, and 4/6 patients, respectively. This study shows that co-administration of brequinar and cisplatin does not affect the pharmacokinetic properties of either drug and that the MTDs of cisplatin/brequinar combinations are 60/860 mg/m2 or 75/650 mg/m2. From this study, we conclude that full dose of 75 mg/m2 cisplatin (day 1) can be administered with 650 mg/m2 brequinar (days 1, 8 and 15) without significant modifications of individual drug pharmacokinetic parameters.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Phase I study of paclitaxel in patients with recurrent malignant glioma: a North American Brain Tumor Consortium report.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were stratified by starting dose of paclitaxel and concurrent anticonvulsant (AC) use and were treated in cohorts of three patients. The starting dose was 240 mg/m2 administered intravenously with escalations of 30 mg/m2 until the MTD was established. Pharmacokinetic data were obtained for each patient for the first infusion. Tumor response was assessed at 6-week intervals and treatment was continued until documented tumor progression, unacceptable toxicity, or a total of 12 paclitaxel infusions. RESULTS: From April 1995 to December 1996, 34 patients were treated; 27 patients in the AC group and seven patients in the non-AC group. The MTD for patients who received ACs was established at 360 mg/m2 and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was central neurotoxicity, characterized as transient encephalopathy and seizures. In contrast, the MTD for patients who did not receive ACs was 240 mg/m2, and myelosuppression, gastrointestinal toxicity, and fatigue were the DLTs. Pharmacokinetic data confirmed that the plasma drug levels and clearance rates were similar for patients in both groups at the respective dose levels that produced DLTs. CONCLUSION: The pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel are altered by ACs, and significantly larger doses of the drug can be administered to patients with brain tumors on AC therapy. The toxicity profile is different for patients on AC therapy treated at these higher doses. A phase II study has been initiated that uses a dose of 330 mg/m2 for patients on AC therapy and 210 mg/m2 for patients not on AC therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of GI147211, a water-soluble camptothecin analogue, administered for five consecutive days every three weeks.

GI1147211 is a 7-substituted 10,11-ethylenedioxy-20(S)-camptothecin analogue that inhibits the nuclear enzyme topoisomerase I. In this Phase I and pharmacological study, 24 patients with advanced solid malignancies received a total of 72 courses of GI147211 as a 30-min infusion daily for 5 consecutive days, at doses ranging from 0.3 to 1.75 mg/m2/day. Severe neutropenia precluded dose escalation above 1.5 mg/m2/day in minimally pretreated patients, and both severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were dose limiting in heavily pretreated patients at doses above 1.0 mg/m2/day. These doses are, therefore, recommended for subsequent Phase II evaluations of GI147211 in patients with comparable prior therapy. Nonhematological toxicities, including nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and anorexia, were mild to moderate. The disposition of GI147211 in blood was described by a linear three-compartment model, with renal elimination accounting for only 11% of drug distribution. No relationship was observed between the pharmacological exposure to GI147211 and effects on neutrophils; however, patients who developed dose-limiting myelosuppression did experience greater exposure to both the lactone and total forms of the drug. The hydrolysis kinetics of GI147211 revealed not only a shift of the drug to the inactive carboxylate form in human serum albumin but also stabilization of the lactone in erythrocytes, perhaps accounting for the observed lactone:total area under the concentration-time curve ratio of 0.27. These results indicate that GI147211 exhibits predictable toxicities and that further studies are warranted to determine the distinct role of this compound among currently available camptothecin analogues.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A phase I and translational study of sequential administration of the topoisomerase I and II inhibitors topotecan and etoposide.

Because topoisomerase (topo) I- and topo II-targeting agents exert their principal effects on the two major classes of enzymes involved in regulating DNA topology in the cell, there has been considerable interest in evaluating combinations of these classes of agents. In preclinical studies of inhibitors of topo I and topo II in combination, drug scheduling and sequencing have been critical determinants of antitumor activity, with a greater magnitude of cytotoxicity generally occurring when treatment with the topo I inhibitor precedes treatment with the topo II-targeting agent. The underlying mechanism that has been proposed to explain this schedule dependency is compensatory up-regulation of topo II and, therefore, enhanced cytotoxicity of topo II inhibitors in cells treated initially with topo I inhibitors. The feasibility of sequentially administering the topo I inhibitor topotecan (TPT) followed by the topo II inhibitor etoposide to patients with advanced solid malignancies was evaluated in this Phase I and translational laboratory study. Fifty patients with solid neoplasms were treated with TPT doses ranging from 0.17 to 1.05 mg/m2/day as a 72-h continuous (i.v.) infusion on days 1-3 followed by etoposide, 75 or 100 mg/m2/day as a 2-h i.v. infusion daily on days 8-10. The combined rate of severe neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was unacceptably high above the TPT (mg/m2/day)/etoposide (mg/m2/day) dose levels of 0.68/100 and 0.68/75 in minimally and heavily pretreated patients, respectively, and these dose levels are recommended for further disease-directed evaluations of TPT/etoposide on this administration schedule. Successive biopsies of accessible tumors were obtained for quantitation of topo I and II levels prior to and immediately after treatment with TPT and prior to and immediately after treatment with etoposide in seven patients. The results of these limited studies in tumors did not fully support the proposed mechanistic rationale favoring the development of this particular sequential TPT/etoposide regimen, because only two of the six patients' tumors in whom topo I was successively measured had either modest or substantial decrements in topo I levels following treatment with TPT, and the principal effect of interest, up-regulation of topo II following treatment with TPT, was clearly documented in the tumors of only one of six subjects in whom successive measurements of topo I were performed. Even in view of the notable objective antitumor activity in three subjects, including a complete response in a patient with colorectal carcinoma and partial responses in one patient each with non-small cell lung and gastric carcinomas, the toxicity and ancillary laboratory results do not provide substantial evidence that sequential treatment with TPT and etoposide might be more advantageous than either TPT or etoposide administered as a single agent.

Adult↗