Is administration time of oral non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs important? A clinical study in patients undergoing arthroscopic subacromial decompression.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J G Jakobsson.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Lateralization of cerebral blood flow and EEG activity is known to vary during cognition, sleep and waking. In spite of this, electrode placement for the cerebral state index (CSI) monitor is not specified to a particular side of the brain. This study is designed to determine if pairwise registrations differ for CSI measured simultaneously from the left or right sides of the brain. METHODS: In total, 25 ASA I-II patients undergoing elective day surgery under general anaesthesia were recruited. Pairwise recordings were made every minute from two CSI monitors (Cerebral State Monitor, Danmeter A/S; Odense, Denmark) connected to the left and the right side of the head. Sedation was graded according to the observer's assessment of alertness/sedation rating scale and correlated with CSI. RESULTS: A large overlap of indices, of similar magnitude, for each side of the brain was seen between different levels of sedation. The agreement between pairwise registrations was high, correlation between the 584 CSI pairs of recordings left/right was r(2)=0.92. CONCLUSIONS: Despite known lateralization of the EEC, this study found a very high correlation in CSI derived simultaneously from the left and right sides of the brain by two independent monitors.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The cerebral state index (CSI) derived from a new small handheld electroencephalogram monitor was studied during routine day surgical anaesthesia titrated according to the bispectral index (BIS). The objective was to determine the degree of agreement between the two monitors. METHODS: Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl (0.1 mg) in 38 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for routine day-surgery. Maintenance anaesthesia (sevoflurane (20/38), desflurane (10/38) or propofol (8/38)) titrated by BIS XP (Aspect Medical, Natwick, MA, USA) and BIS and CSI (cerebral State Monitor, Danmeter; Odense, Denmark) index values were recorded every minute. No patient received muscle relaxation. Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation rating scale was used to assess level of sedation. RESULTS: Pair-wise recordings (914) of CSI and BIS were collected. The indices showed similar pattern and decreased with increasing level of sedation, however with large ranges for each level of sedation. Median indices were similar during surgery (BIS: 50 (14-89); CSI: 51 (7-88)) and both indices increased (P 20% from BIS-index in 24% of readings, and on rare occasions CSI indices deviated >100% from the BIS reading. When BIS < 40, CSI decreased slower than BIS and with wider spreading. CONCLUSIONS: When used for day-surgery anaesthesia without muscle relaxation, CSI and BIS show similar patterns and numerical values but with the incidence of occasionally large discrepancies between pair-wise readings. Which monitor is the more dependable remains to be established and cannot be implied from this initial explorative study.
BACKGROUND: Sevoflurane has become widely used in day surgery; however, desflurane may be a valuable alternative even in this setting. This study compares emergence from anaesthesia for day surgery with spontaneous breathing using either desflurane or sevoflurane. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, single-blinded study examined 70 ASA III patients undergoing elective ambulatory varicose vein surgery. Primary endpoint was emergence time (cessation of anaesthetic gas to communicating). Secondary endpoints included post-operative pain, nausea, time to discharge, and patient satisfaction. Patients were anaesthetized according to a standardized protocol including multimodal analgesia and antiemetic therapy and were randomized to receive sevoflurane or desflurane as the main anaesthetic while breathing spontaneously through a laryngeal mask airway. Fresh gas flow was oxygen in air 1 : 2 l/min. RESULTS: Intra-operative anaesthesia was uneventful apart from airway irritation observed in 5/35 desflurane and 1/35 sevoflurane patients. Emergence was 25-40% faster in patients anaesthetized with desflurane. Pain and post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were equally infrequent in both groups. Overall, patient satisfaction was high with no difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Desflurane is associated with a faster emergence with no differences during the post-operative course except a somewhat higher incidence of airway irritation.
BACKGROUND: Inadequate anaesthesia, with somatic/autonomic response or awareness, is often revealed at intubation and surgical incision. Anaesthetic depth monitors should be able to prevent this risk. This explorative study examined the ability of the cerebral state monitor to predict autonomic/somatic responses to incision. METHODS: Forty-two ASA I-II day-surgical patients [19 men and 23 females; mean age 52 (29-79) years, mean weight 77 (50-118) kg] were induced clinically with fentanyl/propofol with sevoflurane after placement of the laryngeal mask airway. The cerebral state index (CSI) was blindly recorded 4 min prior to and 4 min after incision. RESULTS: During the 4 min prior to incision, the mean CSI was 45 (16-62) and increased by 9 (-13-40) when the mean value for the first 4 min after incision was subtracted from the value prior to incision, corresponding to a relative change of 21% (-21-118). The change in CSI did not show any consistent relation to the value before incision. Five patients showed minor movements after incision and six patients had > 25% increase in blood pressure. Neither CSI nor the change in index differed between patients who did or did not respond somatically or autonomically to incision. The last CSI value just prior to incision was 44 for non-responders and 40 and 42 for somatic and autonomic responders, respectively. CONCLUSION: The CSI in the majority of patients was within acceptable ranges during clinically adjusted anaesthesia prior to incision but seems not to be able to reliably predict an autonomic or somatic response to incision.
The lack of a gold standard complicates the evaluation and comparison of anaesthetic depth monitors. This randomised study compares three different depth-of-anaesthesia monitors during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) at 34 degrees C with fentanyl/propofol anaesthesia adjusted clinically and blinded to the monitors. Coronary artery bypass grafting patients (n = 21) were randomly assigned to all three possible paired combinations of three monitors: Bispectral Index (Aspect Medical), AAI auditory evoked potential (Danmeter), Entropy (Datex-Ohmeda). Indices were manually recorded every 5 min during CPB. Agreement between paired indices was classified as good, non-, or disagreement. Anaesthesia was classed as adequate, inadequate, or excessive according to recommended index values. Of the 255 paired indices recorded, 62% showed good agreement, 33% showed non-agreement, and 5% showed disagreement. Using good agreement between two monitors as a gold standard, a quarter of the measurements indicate inappropriate anaesthetic depth monitoring during CPB with clinically titrated anaesthetic depth.
BACKGROUND: Confidently predicting the depth of anaesthesia for the individual patient and independently of drug(s) type using EEG-based monitors has proven difficult. This open, randomized, explorative study of day surgical patients evaluates the ability of the Cerebral State Monitor (Danmeter AB, Odense, Denmark) of anaesthetic depth to identify loss of response (LOR) using either propofol or N(2)0 for induction. METHODS: In this open, randomized study, day surgical patients (n=10 in each group) were studied using the Cerebral State Index Monitor. After baseline measurements, induction to LOR was achieved with either repeated 30-mg boluses of propofol every second minute or with N(2)0 (after premedication 5 min before with 30 mg propofol) increased every other minute in 15% increments (max. 75%). Sedation level was evaluated every other minute using the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale. RESULTS: Baseline values were 91 (82-98) and 94 (82-100) for N(2)0 and propofol patients, respectively. During induction CSI decreased with increasing sedation in patients given propofol (P<0.001) but not in patients given nitrous oxide. Median value at LOR was 56 (40-76) and 95 (87-100) for the propofol and nitrous oxide group of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The Cerebral State Index(trade mark) behaves as other depth of anaesthesia monitors with a progressive decrease during propofol induction but loss of consciousness with N(2)0 results in no change in CSI.
BACKGROUND: The search continues for an anaesthetic monitor that can define the level of anaesthesia in an individual patient irrespective of anaesthetic agent(s) used. Studies of available monitors based on bispectral analysis or evoked auditory potentials show the complexity of the problem. We assessed a new monitor, based on the entropy of the EEG, during induction of anaesthesia with either propofol or nitrous oxide. METHODS: In an open, randomized study (two groups; n=10) of day surgical patients, we induced loss of response with incremental boluses of propofol. The other group was given propofol 30 mg and then increasing concentrations of nitrous oxide until loss of response. We measured entropy with the M-Entropy Module S/5 (Datex-Ohmeda) using forehead electrodes and recorded response entropy (RE; including frontal electromyogram) and state entropy (SE; only the cortical EEG). Values are median (range). RESULTS: Baseline values were RE 98 (96-100), SE 89 (87-91) and RE 98 (96-99), SE 89 (87-91) for the propofol and nitrous oxide patients, respectively. During propofol induction, both entropy indices decreased with increasing sedation, with RE 40 (23-76) and SE 34 (17-70) at loss of response. Neither RE nor SE decreased during nitrous oxide inhalation, and at loss of response using nitrous oxide, RE and SE were unchanged at 98 (96-100) and 88 (85-91) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The entropy monitor of anaesthetic depth shows a successive decrease with propofol but loss of consciousness with nitrous oxide is not associated with change in entropy indices.
BACKGROUND: Being awake during anaesthesia is a serious complication. An anaesthetic depth monitor must discriminate in real time between wakefulness and unconsciousness. The present study created a period of wakefulness during propofol-induced hypnosis. Bispectral index (BIS), explicit and implicit memories of the awake period were investigated. METHODS: Ten volunteers were studied. The calculated brain concentration of a target controlled infusion of propofol was increased until loss of response (LOR) to verbal command and then propofol was stopped. When fully awake, volunteers were presented with a picture, sound and smell. Propofol infusion was restarted until LOR and then ceased. BIS and the calculated brain concentration of propofol were recorded every minute. A structured interview was conducted for explicit memories after awakening and for explicit as well as implicit memories the day after. RESULTS: Median BIS-index for the transition between awake and asleep and vice versa differed significantly. It was not possible, however, to establish any threshold value or zone for discriminating between wakefulness and LOR due to the large inter-individual variations in BIS-index. No volunteer could explicitly recall any of the stimuli presented during the period of wakefulness. CONCLUSION: The BIS-index decreases with increasing sedation but because of the large individual variations, the real-time BIS-index for the individual subject cannot reliably discriminate wakefulness from unconsciousness during propofol infusion. Propofol causes such profound amnesia that lack of postoperative recall does not assure that episodes of awareness have not occurred during propofol-induced hypnosis.
The bispectral index (BIS) and the auditory evoked potential (AEP) index as calculated by the new A-line monitor were measured during hypnosis with propofol, which included an episode of wakefulness. Both indices followed a similar pattern during sedation, with values decreasing with sedation and increasing when awake. Baseline AEP values varied between 60 and 98, and BIS values were between 96 and 98. The AEP-index value was at all times 10-20 points lower than the BIS-index. The transition to loss of response occurred at a mean AEP value of 46 and BIS value of 58. The transition to just responding following a period of unconsciousness occurred at a mean AEP value of 46 and BIS 65. Both monitoring techniques, however, displayed large interindividual variations making it impossible to discriminate in real time between subtle changes of clinical state. The new neurophysiological monitors A-line AEP and BIS are interesting tools for creating a better understanding of the anaesthetic effects of drugs; however, further refinements are required before their relative roles can be fully established in the clinical setting.
BACKGROUND: The search for a drug-independent monitor to determine depth of anaesthesia and hypnosis continues. The bispectral analysis (BIS) of the EEG correlates well with the clinical dose-response of hypnotic drugs during induction, but the effect on BIS of an opiate induction, as for coronary bypass surgery, is not known. METHODS: Fourteen patients scheduled for elective coronary bypass surgery were studied. BIS was recorded during induction in 7 patients receiving 10 microg/kg fentanyl without any hypnotic agent and in 7 patients receiving 0.5 mg/kg propofol before the fentanyl dose. RESULTS: The effect of fentanyl was very variable both regarding BIS and clinical response. Five of the 7 patients that received only fentanyl lost their response to verbal command within 8 min. BIS values at loss of response varied between 45 and 94. One patient remained awake with BIS 43. All 7 patients receiving propofol before the fentanyl dose lost their response to verbal command within 5 min. BIS values at the time for loss of response varied between 78 and 98. CONCLUSION: Loss of response to verbal command when a medium-high dose of fentanyl is used for induction cannot be distinguished from wakefulness with adequate sensitivity by BIS. The current BIS algorithm seems not to accurately reflect the hypnotic effects of fentanyl.
Bispectral index (BIS) was assessed as a monitor of depth of anaesthesia during fentanyl and midazolam anaesthesia for coronary bypass surgery. In 10 patients given morphine premedication, anaesthesia was induced with a combination of midazolam and fentanyl and thereafter maintained with a continuous infusion of a mixture of midazolam and fentanyl 5 and 50 micrograms kg-1 h-1, respectively. BIS was recorded continuously but not shown to the attending anaesthetist. Plasma concentrations of midazolam and fentanyl were measured five times during the procedure. An auditory stimulus was given during bypass. All patients were interviewed twice after operation for explicit and implicit recall. No patient had any anaesthetic complications. BIS decreased during anaesthesia, but varied considerably during surgery (range 36-91) with eight patients having values > 60. Midazolam and fentanyl drug concentrations did not correlate with BIS. No patient reported explicit or implicit recall. During clinically adequate anaesthesia with midazolam and fentanyl BIS varies considerably. The most likely reason is that BIS is not an accurate measure of the depth of anaesthesia when using this combination of agents.
We have studied the effect of nitrous oxide on bispectral index (BIS), calculated from a bipolar encephalogram. Inhalation of 70% nitrous oxide resulted in loss of consciousness in all healthy volunteers (n = 10) but no change in BIS. Brief inhalation up to 1.2% sevoflurane also resulted in loss of consciousness in volunteers (n = 5), but with sevoflurane, BIS decreased. BIS and the haemodynamic effects of adding nitrous oxide were also measured during coronary artery bypass surgery in patients (n = 10) receiving midazolam and fentanyl infusions. Measurements were made after 0%, 33%, 66% and 0% nitrous oxide, just before skin incision and after sternotomy. Nitrous oxide caused no change in BIS. BIS may indicate a sufficient hypnotic depth to prevent awareness during surgery, but our study demonstrated that pharmacological unconsciousness-hypnosis can also be reached by mechanisms to which BIS is not sensitive. Thus BIS is a sufficient but not a necessary criterion for adequate depth of anaesthesia or prevention of awareness.
One emergency ambulance serving an urban part of the greater Stockholm area was equipped with a semi-automatic defibrillator Life Pack 200 Physio Control during an 8-month study period. The equipment advises the user whether defibrillation is required or not, and in cases of detected ventricular fibrillation, defibrillation is advised. The user then has to press a button to defibrillate through the same electrodes that record the electrocardiogram. A built-in tape recorder was used for documentation of the underlying rhythm disturbance. In all, advice was requested 332 times. Accuracy in interpretation of ventricular fibrillation was found to be high. The sensitivity and specificity in interpretation of ventricular fibrillation were 93% and 100%, respectively. No defibrillations were performed in patients without ventricular fibrillation. All instances of ventricular fibrillation were converted to another rhythm or asystole. Seven percent of the patients with cardiac arrest caused by ventricular fibrillation survived.