Adverse effect of perioperative blood transfusions on survival after hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Experimental and clinical studies have found a relationship between blood transfusion and altered immune function. We estimated the risk of transfusions for shorter survival on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent hepatic resection. METHODOLOGY: The impact of perioperative blood transfusions on 235 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who had resections from January 1981 to December 1988 was retrospectively examined. All patients underwent hepatic resection and received no additional chemotherapy. RESULTS: Using the Cox proportional hazard model, the number of perioperative blood transfusions was found to be a significant prognostic factor for patient outcome (p = 0.03). Overall, patients who received less than 12 transfused units had a significantly better 5-year survival rate than those who received more than 13 transfused units (46.3% vs. 24.5%, p < 0.001). This result was also seen when the patients were subdivided by stage: 5-year survival in the early stage group (57.2% vs. 35.5%, p < 0.01) and in the advanced stage group (30.0% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.05). The number of perioperative blood transfusions also influenced the survival of patients who underwent a curative resection (66.2% vs. 38.5%, p < 0.01), but did not affect the survival of those who received a non-curative resection (7.9% vs. 7.4%). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the number of perioperative blood transfusions is a significant prognostic factor in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who undergo hepatic resection.