Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Fielding

Publications and source records attributed to J Fielding.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2000

Developing an evidence-based Guide to Community Preventive Services--methods. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

Systematic reviews and evidence-based recommendations are increasingly important for decision making in health and medicine. Over the past 20 years, information on the science of synthesizing research results has exploded. However, some approaches to systematic reviews of the effectiveness of clinical preventive services and medical care may be less appropriate for evaluating population-based interventions. Furthermore, methods for linking evidence to recommendations are less well developed than methods for synthesizing evidence. The Guide to Community Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations (the Guide) will evaluate and make recommendations on population-based and public health interventions. This paper provides an overview of the Guide's process to systematically review evidence and translate that evidence into recommendations. The Guide reviews evidence on effectiveness, the applicability of effectiveness data, (i.e., the extent to which available effectiveness data is thought to apply to additional populations and settings), the intervention's other effects (i.e., important side effects), economic impact, and barriers to implementation of interventions. The steps for obtaining and evaluating evidence into recommendations involve: (1) forming multidisciplinary chapter development teams, (2) developing a conceptual approach to organizing, grouping, selecting and evaluating the interventions in each chapter; (3) selecting interventions to be evaluated; (4) searching for and retrieving evidence; (5) assessing the quality of and summarizing the body of evidence of effectiveness; (6) translating the body of evidence of effectiveness into recommendations; (7) considering information on evidence other than effectiveness; and (8) identifying and summarizing research gaps. Systematic reviews of and evidence-based recommendations for population-health interventions are challenging and methods will continue to evolve. However, using an evidence-based approach to identify and recommend effective interventions directed at specific public health goals may reduce errors in how information is collected and interpreted, identify important gaps in current knowledge thus guiding further research, and enhance the Guide users' ability to assess whether recommendations are valid and prudent from their own perspectives. Over time, all of these advantages could help to increase agreement regarding appropriate community health strategies and help to increase their implementation.

Decision Making↗
PubMed2000

Methods for systematic reviews of economic evaluations for the Guide to Community Preventive Services. Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the methods used in the Guide to Community Preventive Services: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations (the Guide) for conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations across community health-promotion and disease-prevention interventions. The lack of standardized methods to improve the comparability of results from economic evaluations has hampered the use of data on costs and financial benefits in evidence-based reviews of effectiveness. The methods and instruments developed for the Guide provide an explicit and systematic approach for abstracting economic evaluation data and increase the usefulness of economic information for policy making in health care and public health. METHODS: The following steps were taken for systematic reviews of economic evaluations: (1) systematic searches were conducted; (2) studies using economic analytic methods, such as cost analysis or cost-effectiveness, cost-benefit or cost-utility analysis, were selected according to explicit inclusion criteria; (3) economic data were abstracted and adjusted using a standardized abstraction form; and (4) adjusted summary measures were listed in summary tables. RESULTS: These methods were used in a review of 10 interventions designed to improve vaccination coverage in children, adolescents and adults. Ten average costs and 14 cost-effectiveness ratios were abstracted or calculated from data reported in 24 studies and expressed in 1997 USD. The types of costs included in the analysis and intervention definitions varied extensively. Gaps in data were found for many interventions.

Abstracting and Indexing↗
PubMed2000

Developing the Guide to Community Preventive Services--overview and rationale. The Task Force on Community Preventive Services.

When the GUIDE TO COMMUNITY PREVENTIVE SERVICES: Systematic Reviews and Evidence-Based Recommendations (the Guide) is published in 2001, it will represent a significant national effort in encouraging evidence-based public health practice in defined populations (e.g., communities or members of specific managed care plans). The Guide will make recommendations regarding public health interventions to reduce illness, disability, premature death, and environmental hazards that impair community health and quality of life. The Guide is being developed under the guidance of the Task Force on Community Preventive Services (the Task Force)-a 15-member, nonfederal, independent panel of experts. Subject matter experts, methodologists, and scientific staff are supporting the Task Force in using explicit rules to conduct systematic literature reviews of evidence of effectiveness, economic efficiency, and feasibility on which to base recommendations for community action. Contributors to the Guide are building on the experience of others to confront methodologic challenges unique to the assessment of complex multicomponent intervention studies with nonexperimental or nonrandomized designs and diverse measures of outcome and effectiveness. Persons who plan, fund, and implement population-based services and policies to improve health at the state and local levels are invited to scrutinize the work in progress and to communicate with contributors. When the Guide is complete, readers are encouraged to consider critically the value and relevance of its contents, the implementation of interventions the Task Force recommends, the abandonment of interventions the Task Force does not recommend, and the need for rigorous evaluation of the benefits and harms of promising interventions of unknown effectiveness.

Decision Making↗
PubMed2000

Sample size calculation for clinical trials: the impact of clinician beliefs.

The UK Medical Research Council (MRC) randomized trial of gastric surgery, ST01, compared conventional (D1) with radical (D2) surgery. Sample size estimation was based upon the consensus opinion of the surgical members of the design team, which suggested that a change in 5-year survival from 20% (D1) to 34% (D2) could be realistic and medically important. On the basis of these survival rates, the sample size for the trial was 400 patients. However, this trial was exceptional in the way that a survey of surgeons' opinions was made at the start of the trial, in 1986, and again before results were analysed but after termination of the trial in 1994. At the initial survey, the three surgeons from the trial steering committee and 23 other surgeons experienced in treating gastric carcinoma were given detailed questionnaires. They were asked about the expected survival rate in the D1 group, anticipated difference in survival from D2 surgery, and what difference would be medically important and influence future treatment of patients. The consensus opinion of those surveyed was that there might be a survival improvement of 9.4%. In 1994, prior to closure of the trial, and before any survival information was disclosed, the survey was repeated with 21 of the original 26 surgeons. At this second survey, the opinion of the trial steering committee was that 9.5% difference was more realistic. This was in accord with the opinion of the larger group, which remained little changed since 1986. The baseline 5-year D1 survival was thought likely to be about 32%, which corresponded closely to the actual survival of recruited patients. Revised sample size calculations suggested that, on the basis of these more recent opinions, between 800 and 1200 patients would have been required. Both surveys assessed the level of treatment benefit that was deemed to be sufficient for causing surgeons to change their practice. This showed that the 13% difference in survival used as the study target was clinically relevant, but also indicated that many clinicians would remain unwilling to change their practice if the difference is only 9.5%. The experience of this carefully designed trial illustrates the problems of designing long-term, randomized trials. It raises interesting questions about the common practice of basing sample size estimates upon the beliefs of a trial design committee that may include a number of enthusiasts for the trial treatment. If their opinion of anticipated effect sizes drives the design of the trial, rather than the opinion of a larger community of experts that includes sceptics as well as enthusiasts, there is likely to be a serious miscalculation of sample size requirements.

Bayes Theorem↗
PubMed1999

Patient survival after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: long-term results of the MRC randomized surgical trial. Surgical Co-operative Group.

Controversy still exists on the optimal surgical resection for potentially curable gastric cancer. Much better long-term survival has been reported in retrospective/non-randomized studies with D2 resections that involve a radical extended regional lymphadenectomy than with the standard D1 resections. In this paper we report the long-term survival of patients entered into a randomized study, with follow-up to death or 3 years in 96% of patients and a median follow-up of 6.5 years. In this prospective trial D1 resection (removal of regional perigastric nodes) was compared with D2 resection (extended lymphadenectomy to include level 1 and 2 regional nodes). Central randomization followed a staging laparotomy. Out of 737 patients with histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma registered, 337 patients were ineligible by staging laparotomy because of advanced disease and 400 were randomized. The 5-year survival rates were 35% for D1 resection and 33% for D2 resection (difference -2%, 95% CI = -12%-8%). There was no difference in the overall 5-year survival between the two arms (HR = 1.10, 95% CI 0.87-1.39, where HR > 1 implies a survival benefit to D1 surgery). Survival based on death from gastric cancer as the event was similar in the D1 and D2 groups (HR = 1.05, 95% CI 0.79-1.39) as was recurrence-free survival (HR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.29). In a multivariate analysis, clinical stages II and III, old age, male sex and removal of spleen and pancreas were independently associated with poor survival. These findings indicate that the classical Japanese D2 resection offers no survival advantage over D1 surgery. However, the possibility that D2 resection without pancreatico-splenectomy may be better than standard D1 resection cannot be dismissed by the results of this trial.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

Interpreting kappa values for two-observer nursing diagnosis data.

Reliability of nursing observations often is estimated using Cohen's kappa, a chance-adjusted measure of agreement between observer RNs. However, use of kappa as an omnibus measure sometimes can be misleading. In a study partly designed to describe the frequency and reliability of nursing diagnoses in long-term care facilities, 360 residents each were assessed independently by two registered nurses, and kappa and observed proportion of agreement were calculated as estimates of reliability. For some diagnoses we observed high proportions of agreement, yet paradoxically low kappa values. This article presents an in-depth statistical analysis to resolve this paradox. Results from our analysis also suggest means for planning improvements in the diagnostic performance of participating RNs. Consequently, our approach can be used in similar studies of diagnosis reliability to enhance nursing research, education, and practice.

Bias↗
PubMed1997

The reliability of saliva as a sample for the detection of hepatitis A immunoglobulins under various sampling conditions.

BACKGROUND: Saliva is increasingly being investigated as an alternative to serum for diagnostic and epidemiological testing even though antibody levels are substantially lower in buccal cavity fluids. However, there has been little study on whether buccal cavity activity and/or the timing of saliva sampling affects the diagnostic outcome, particularly in seropositive subjects. The absence of influence by these factors may be critical to the use of saliva for pre-vaccination screening for example. OBJECTIVES: The effects of eating, brushing of teeth and circadian rhythm on the measureable salivary immune status of 42 healthy individuals known to be serum and saliva anti-HAV positive were examined. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 141 saliva samples obtained from the 42 healthy subjects, before and after meals, before and after brushing of teeth and at various timepoints throughout the day, were assayed for total anti-HAV using an in-house saliva based enzyme-immunoassay, previously shown to have a 100% correlation in terms of sensitivity and specificity with a serum based assay. RESULTS: The results indicated that total anti-HAV titres varied according to the time of day and that eating had no significant effect on the total anti-HAV titre, but brushing of teeth did. Titres never varied to the extent that a result was falsely negative at any timepoint. CONCLUSION: These results confirm the usefulness of saliva as a diagnostic sample for the detection of hepatitis A antibody, regardless of sampling times, eating or tooth-brushing.

Antibodies, Viral↗
PubMed1997

Generic nursing outcome objectives for use in long-term care facilities.

Twenty-two registered nurses employed in four long-term care facilities generated data for a study about nursing diagnoses in long-term care (N = 360). Generic outcome objectives were developed as an integral part of the project. The research team also specified exceptions to the outcomes: instances where meeting outcome objectives might not be possible. The outcome objectives and exceptions for the sample's 20 most frequently occurring nursing diagnoses are presented as working statements. The authors expect that these outcome objectives and exceptions will be revised by nurses who use them in practice, basic and continuing education, and research.

Humans↗
PubMed1996

Postoperative morbidity and mortality after D1 and D2 resections for gastric cancer: preliminary results of the MRC randomised controlled surgical trial. The Surgical Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: In Japan the surgical approach to treatment of potentially curable gastric cancer, including extended lymphadenectomy, seems in retrospective surveys to give better results than the less radical procedures favoured in Western countries. There has, however, been no evidence from randomised trials that extended lymphadenectomy (D2 gastric resection) confers a survival advantage. This question was addressed in a trial involving thirty-two surgeons in Europe. METHODS: In a prospective randomised controlled trial, D1 resection (level 1 lymphadenectomy) was compared with D2 resection (levels 1 and 2 lymphadenectomy). Central randomisation (200 patients in each arm) followed a staging laparotomy. FINDINGS: The D2 group had greater postoperative hospital mortality (13% vs 6.5%; p=0.04 [95% Cl 9-18% for D2, 4-11% for D1] and higher overall postoperative morbidity (46% vs 28%; p<0.001); their postoperative stay was also longer. The excess postoperative morbidity and mortality in the D2 group was accounted for by distal pancreaticosplenectomy and splenectomy. In the whole group (400 patients), survival beyond three years was 30% in patients whose gastrectomy included en-bloc pancreatico-splenic resection versus 50% in the remainder. INTERPRETATION: D2 gastric resections are followed by higher morbidity and mortality than D1 resections. These disadvantages are consequent upon additional pancreatectomies and distal splenectomies, and in long-term follow-up the higher mortality when the pancreas and spleen are resected may prove to nullify any survival benefit from D2 procedures.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1996

Primary hepatic leiomyosarcoma.

Hepatomegaly was noted in a 63-year-old man who presented with an exacerbation of chronic pulmonary disease. A diagnosis of hepatic leiomyosarcoma was made by fine needle aspiration biopsy. Intensive investigations failed to reveal a primary source. The patient was treated conservatively.

Biopsy, Needle↗
PubMed1996

Health and unemployment.

This paper reviews the relationship between health and inadequate employment, especially unemployment. Poor physical or mental health can lead, via poor work performance, to job loss; however, studies that control for such selection effects are still scarce except for a few health outcomes. For example, aggregate-level studies typically find a positive association between unemployment and suicide rates over time. At the individual level of analysis, panel surveys of laid-off workers tend to find increased psychiatric problems such as depression and substance abuse. Few studies have evaluated interventions to prevent or reduce the adverse health effects of job loss. There have been even fewer studies of the health effects of other types of inadequate employment such as the increasingly prevalent forms of underemployment.

Adaptation, Psychological↗
PubMed1994

A comparison of hospital- and community-based mental health nurses: perceptions of their work environment and psychological health.

This study compares hospital- (n = 67) and community-based (n = 55) mental health nurses in relation to their perceptions of the work environment and also their psychological health. Measures include: the General Health Questionnaire, the Maslach Burnout Inventory and the Work Environment Scale. The data, obtained from self-returned questionnaires, show that community nurses rated their work environments higher for the dimensions of Involvement, Supervisor Support, Autonomy, Innovation and Work Pressure. Hospital nurses saw their environments as being higher in (managerial) Control. There were no differences between the groups for the dimensions of Peer Cohesion, Task Orientation, Clarity or (physical) Comfort. Furthermore, there were no overall differences between the two groups in relation to psychological health, although the pattern of factors associated with emotional well-being differed. Finally, analyses of the community data revealed that those nurses with 'flexitime' arrangements evaluated their work environments less positively and showed higher levels of psychological strain than did those working 'fixed-time' schedules. The findings suggest that the hospital and community environments make different demands on nursing staff, and that this should be considered when organizing nursing services if stress is to be avoided.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Association of IBM's "A Plan for Life" health promotion program with changes in employees' health risk status.

To evaluate the association of participation in IBM's "A Plan for Life" program with changes in blood pressure, serum total, high-density lipoprotein, and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, body mass index, and cigarette smoking, we compared changes in these measures over a 1- to 5-year period among program participants and nonparticipants initially found to be at risk. After adjustment for age, sex, time to follow-up, and baseline values, the proportion of participants no longer at high risk was significantly greater than the corresponding proportion of nonparticipants in the areas of blood pressure total and non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and smoking cessation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Contact with AIDS patients as a source of work-related distress: effects of organizational and social support.

In this study, we hypothesized that a nurse's exposure to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) patients as part of the work role is positively associated with distress as indexed by negative mood at work. Given this expected relation, we sought to identify factors that might reduce the negative effects of caring for AIDS patients on nurses. We predicted that both organizational and social support would moderate the relationship between extent of exposure and negative mood, with the relationship being strongest when support is low and weakest when support is high. The results of tests among a sample of 256 nurses supported all the hypotheses. We discuss implications of this study and directions for future research.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗