Biomedical subjects

J Feldon

Publications and source records attributed to J Feldon.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

The effects of excitotoxic lesion of the medial prefrontal cortex on latent inhibition, prepulse inhibition, food hoarding, elevated plus maze, active avoidance and locomotor activity in the rat.

Latent inhibition is a measure of retarded conditioning to a previously presented nonreinforced stimulus that is impaired in schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. In terms of neural substrates, latent inhibition depends on the integrity of the nucleus accumbens and the inputs to this structure from the hippocampal formation and adjacent cortical areas. Since another major source of input to the nucleus accumbens is the medial prefrontal cortex, and there are numerous demonstrations that manipulations of this region can modify ventral striatal dopamine, we investigated the effects of N-methyl-D-aspartate lesion to the medial prefrontal cortex on latent inhibition, assessed in an off-baseline conditioned emotional response procedure in rats licking for water. In addition, the effects of the medial prefrontal cortex lesion were assessed on a battery of tasks potentially sensitive to medial prefrontal cortex damage, including spontaneous and amphetamine-induced activity, elevated plus maze exploration, food hoarding, prepulse inhibition, and active avoidance. The lesion decreased hoarding behaviour and increased spontaneous exploratory activity in the open field, while exerting only mild effects on amphetamine-induced activity. Prepulse inhibition, exploration of the elevated plus maze, and the acquisition of two-way active avoidance were unaffected by the lesion. Likewise, latent inhibition was left intact following the lesion, suggesting that neither the destruction of the intrinsic cells of the medial prefrontal cortex nor any potential lesion-induced changes in subcortical dopamine, affect latent inhibition.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1998

Reduced latent inhibition in people with schizophrenia: an effect of psychosis or of its treatment.

BACKGROUND: People with schizophrenia show impaired attention. This could result from reduced latent inhibition (a measure of ability to filter out irrelevant stimuli). Previous studies have found reduced auditory latent inhibition in people with acute schizophrenia: we tested whether this results from psychosis or from drug treatment. METHOD: We measured auditory latent inhibition in two studies. One compared antipsychotic-naive people with acute schizophrenia with patients within two weeks of starting antipsychotic treatment. The second compared healthy volunteers given either saline or 1.0 mg haloperidol, intravenously. RESULTS: Latent inhibition was absent in treated patients, but was clearly present in patients who were naive to antipsychotics. Latent inhibition was absent in volunteers given haloperidol, but was clearly present in those given saline. CONCLUSIONS: The reduced auditory latent inhibition seen in acute schizophrenia is more plausibly due to antipsychotic treatment than to the disorder. Unless neuropsychological models of schizophrenia incorporate evidence from drug-free patients and drug-treated healthy controls, they may be invalid.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Haloperidol-induced potentiation of latent inhibition: interaction with parameters of conditioning.

If a stimulus (e.g. tone or light) is repeatedly pre-exposed without consequences, it subsequently shows retarded conditioning when paired with a reinforcer (e.g. footshock) compared with a non-pre-exposed stimulus. This is latent inhibition (LI). Haloperidol-treated animals show potentiated LI, and it has been suggested that this is due to retarded switching to respond according to the stimulus-reinforcer contingency. Recently, it has been argued that the slowed control of behaviour by the stimulus-reinforcement contingency is due to a haloperidol-induced decrease in the impact, or salience, of the reinforcer, and thus should be antagonized by increasing the impact of reinforcement. Two experiments tested this prediction. In both, LI was assessed using an off-baseline conditioned emotional response procedure in rats licking for water. In Experiment 1, rats were given 10 light pre-exposures and conditioned with two footshocks of either a low (0.5 mA) or a high (1 mA) intensity. In Experiment 2, rats were given 30 pre-exposures and conditioned with either two or five footshocks of 1 mA. In Experiment 1, no-drug controls did not show LI at both shock intensities. Haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) was ineffective in potentiating LI at low-intensity shock, but produced LI when shock level was increased. In Experiment 2, no-drug controls showed LI with two but not five conditioning trials. Haloperidol was ineffective in potentiating LI with two conditioning trials, but produced LI with five conditioning trials. Although the effect of haloperidol on LI could thus be modified by manipulating shock intensity or the number of conditioning trials, the direction of such modification indicates that the potentiating effect of haloperidol on LI is not in general antagonized by increasing the impact of reinforcement.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Effects of electrolytic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex or its subfields on 4-arm baited, 8-arm radial maze, two-way active avoidance and conditioned fear tasks in the rat.

The present study tested the effects of electrolytic lesions in two mPFC subregions, the dorsal anterior cingulate area (dACA) and prelimbic cortex, as well as the effects of a larger medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) lesion which included both subregions, on 4-arm baited, 4-arm unbaited, 8-arm radial maze task and its reversal (Experiments 1 and 4), two-way active avoidance (Experiments 2 and 5) and conditioned emotional response (Experiments 3 and 6). Rats with large or small lesions of the mPFC learned the location of the 4 baited arms in the training and reversal stages of the radial maze task similarly to sham rats, indicating that these lesions did not affect animals' capacity to process and remember spatial information. dACA and mPFC lesions produced a transient deficit in the acquisition of the radial maze task, suggestive of an involvement of these regions in mnemonic processes. However, in view of the normal performance of these groups by the end of training and during reversal, this deficit is better interpreted as stemming from a difficulty to learn the memory-based strategy used to solve the task. Only mPFC lesion led to better avoidance performance at the beginning of training and tended to increase response during the presentation of a stimulus previously paired with shock, compared to sham rats. Both effects can be taken as an indication of reduced emotionality following mPFC lesion. The results are discussed in relation to known behavioral functions of the mPFC and the suggested functional specialization within this region.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Neonatal nonhandling and in utero prenatal stress reduce the density of NADPH-diaphorase-reactive neurons in the fascia dentata and Ammon's horn of rats.

The density of nitric oxide (NO)-producing neurons in the fascia dentata and Ammon's horn was assessed in 6-month-old male rats using NADPH-diaphorase (NADPH-d) histochemistry. Two separate experiments investigated whether (1) the complete absence of neonatal handling or (2) the administration of periodic prenatal stress could affect the expression and distribution of NADPH-d reactivity in the hippocampus, when compared with rats raised in normal standard laboratory conditions. Experiment 1 demonstrated that adult rats that received no handling during neonatal development (from birth to postnatal day 22) showed a very substantial reduction in NADPH-d-positive neurons per unit area throughout the entire hippocampus when compared with rats that received regular daily handling in this period. Quantitative analysis further revealed that this effect was significantly more pronounced in Ammon's horn than in the fascia dentata, and within Ammon's horn the dorsal region was selectively more affected. Experiment 2 showed that prenatal stress, which involved the administration of daily restraint stress to pregnant dams throughout the gestation period, also led to a reduction in NADPH-d reactivity in the hippocampus of the offspring of these dam when they reached adulthood. The present results suggest that behavioral manipulations in the early neonatal or prenatal period can significantly alter the neurodevelopment of the hippocampal NO system and these changes might be related to some of the behavioral abnormalities that emerge later in adulthood.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Cytotoxic lesions of the retrohippocampal region attenuate latent inhibition but spare the partial reinforcement extinction effect.

Experiment I assessed the effect of cytotoxic retrohippocampal (entorhinal and extra-subicular cortices) lesions on the development of latent inhibition (LI) using an off-the-baseline, between-subjects, conditioned emotional response paradigm. Sham-operated controls and unoperated rats that had been pre-exposed to a light stimulus prior to light-shock pairings showed less conditioned suppression towards the light stimulus than the nonpre-exposed animals, thus demonstrating LI. However, LI was not evident in rats with retrohippocampal lesions. In experiment 2, the same animals were trained to run in an straight runway for food. Half of the animals were trained under a 50% partial reinforcement schedule (i.e. they were rewarded randomly on half of the acquisition trials) and the other half were trained under a continuous reinforcement schedule (i.e. they were rewarded on every acquisition trial). When tested in extinction, animals trained on the partial reinforcement schedule showed greater persistence than animals trained on continuous reinforcement, thus demonstrating the partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE). Rats with retrohippocampal lesions showed a PREE that was at least as clear as that seen in the sham-operated controls and in the unoperated animals. It is concluded that cytotoxic lesions of the retrohippocampal region selectively led to an abolition of LI, but spared the PREE. The present study thus provided evidence against the hypothesis that LI and the PREE share a common neural substrate.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1997

Haloperidol enhances latent inhibition in visual tasks in healthy people.

We have previously shown that 0.5 mg haloperidol (i.v.) increased latent inhibition in one of two visual tasks. The present study analysed the effects of a higher dose of haloperidol (1.0 mg, i.v.) on latent inhibition in these two visual tasks in healthy volunteers in a randomised controlled trial. In the task where 0.5 mg haloperidol had enhanced latent inhibition, 1.0 mg had the same effect, thus replicating the previous result. In the task where 0.5 mg haloperidol had been ineffective, 1.0 mg haloperidol enhanced latent inhibition in high schizotypal subjects only. This indicates that subjects with higher schizotypy scores are more sensitive to dopamine blockade. A comparison of the results from the studies at the two different doses suggests a dose dependence of haloperidol's effects on latent inhibition that parallels results from animal work.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition is not reinforcer-mediated.

Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus that had been repeatedly preexposed without consequences, as compared with a nonpreexposed stimulus. Amphetamine disrupts LI, and this effect was suggested to result from enhanced switching to respond according to the stimulus-reinforcer contingency. Recently, it has been argued that amphetamine disrupts LI by increasing the impact of the reinforcer. This implies that amphetamine should produce stronger conditioning in the nonpreexposed group and that its influence on LI can be modified only by changing reinforcer parameters. We report two studies, using an off-baseline conditioned emotional response procedure in rats licking for water, that question both predictions. In the first study, a meta-analysis based on 23 replications of the effect of amphetamine on LI, using tone as the preexposed stimulus, showed that LI is significantly attenuated due to drug-induced increased suppression in the preexposed groups only. The second study included two experiments, each using two shock intensities but different preexposed stimuli. Amphetamine disrupted LI at both shock intensities when the stimulus was a steady light, but this effect disappeared when the stimulus was three flashing lights. Thus, the effect of amphetamine could not be modified by manipulating shock intensity, but was modifiable by manipulating the nature of the preexposed stimulus. The results are inconsistent with the hypothesis that amphetamine-induced disruption of LI is solely mediated by drug-induced changes in the effects of reinforcers.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Amphetamine-induced disruption and haloperidol-induced potentiation of latent inhibition depend on the nature of the stimulus.

If a stimulus (e.g. light) is repeatedly preexposed without consequences, it subsequently develops a weaker association with a reinforcer (e.g. foot shock) than does a non-preexposed stimulus. This retarded conditioning to the preexposed as compared to the non-preexposed stimulus, is latent inhibition (LI). It is well documented that LI is disrupted by low doses of amphetamine and potentiated by neuroleptic drugs, and there is evidence that the action of these agents on LI can be modified by changes in the parameters of preexposure or conditioning. The present experiments tested whether the effects of DA agents on LI are influenced by the nature of the stimulus. In two experiments, LI was assessed using an off-baseline conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the stimulus (a light) to be conditioned, was repeatedly presented without being followed by reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with reinforcement (a foot-shock); and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' degree of suppression of licking during stimulus presentation. In both experiments, different groups of animals were preexposed and conditioned with four different preexposed visual stimuli: three steady side-lights, three flashing side-lights, one flashing side-light, and a flashing houselight. Experiment 1 used 40 stimulus preexposures and tested the effects of 1 mg/kg D-amphetamine, whereas experiment 2 used 10 preexposures and tested the effects of 0.1 mg/kg haloperidol. The results showed that of the four stimuli used, both drugs were effective with only one and the same stimulus, namely, flashing houselight. This demonstrates that the disruptive effect of amphetamine and the potentiating effect of haloperidol on LI, are modifiable by manipulating the nature of the preexposed stimulus.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

The switching model of latent inhibition: an update of neural substrates.

Organisms exposed to a stimulus which has no significant consequences, show subsequently latent inhibition (LI), namely, retarded conditioning to this stimulus. LI is considered to index the capacity to ignore irrelevant stimuli and its disruption has recently received increasing interest as an animal model of cognitive deficits in schizophrenia. Initial studies indicated that LI is disrupted by systemic or intra-accumbens injections of amphetamine and hippocampal lesions, and potentiated by systemic administration of neuroleptics. On the basis of these findings, the switching model of LI proposed that LI depends on the subicular input to the nucleus accumbens (NAC). Subsequent studies supported and refined this proposition. Lesion studies show that LI is indeed disrupted by severing the subicular input to the NAC, and further implicate the entorhinal/ventral subicular portion of this pathway projecting to the shell subterritory of the NAC. There is a functional dissociation between the shell and core subterritories of the NAC, with lesions of the former but not of the latter disrupting LI. This suggests that the shell is necessary for the expression and the core for the disruption of LI. The involvement of the NAC has been also demonstrated by findings that LI is disrupted by intra-accumbens injection of amphetamine and potentiated by DA depletion or blockade in this structure. Disruption and potentiation of LI by systemic administration of amphetamine and neuroleptics, respectively, have been firmly established, and in addition, have been shown to be sensitive to parametric manipulations of the LI procedure. LI is unaffected by lesions and DA manipulations of medial prefrontal cortex and lesions of basolateral amygdala. The implications of these findings for LI as an animal model of schizophrenia are discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Electrolytic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex in rats disrupt performance on an analog of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, but do not disrupt latent inhibition: implications for animal models of schizophrenia.

The effects of electrolytic lesions of the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) or its subregions were investigated on two cognitive tests that may have relevance to the behavioral impairments of patients with schizophrenia. One task consisted of a delayed non-match-to-sample and reversal of the non-match-to-sample rule, in a Skinner box. The reversal component simulated the essential feature of rule shifting of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST), which is a commonly used test for assessing 'frontal-like' deficits in schizophrenia. The second was latent inhibition, in which repeated pre-exposure to a stimulus without consequence retards subsequent associations with that stimulus. Latent inhibition is impaired in acute schizophrenic patients, and its disruption in the rat has been suggested to constitute an animal model of schizophrenia. Expts. 1 and 2 tested the effects of lesions of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACA) and mPFC, respectively, on the WCST analog. Expt. 3 tested the effects of lesions of the dACA or infralimbic cortex, and Expt. 4 tested the effects of mPFC lesion, on latent inhibition. Lesions of mPFC subregions had no effect. mPFC lesion produced transient deficits in the performance of the DNMS task and impaired the reversal from the non-match-to-sample to the match-to-sample rule, but left the latent inhibition effect intact. Possible relevance of this behavioral profile of mPFC lesion to the 'frontal syndrome' is discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Haloperidol- and clozapine-induced enhancement of latent inhibition with extended conditioning: implications for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs.

Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its nonreinforced preexposure. LI is impaired in acute schizophrenic patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs enhance LI, and this effect is selective and specific for this class of drugs. The present experiments tested the proposition that neuroleptic-induced enhancement of LI stems from decreased capacity of stimulus-preexposed animals to switch responding according to the new stimulus-reinforcement contingency in the conditioning stage. LI was assessed using an off-baseline conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: preexposure to the-to-be conditioned stimulus, tone; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with a foot-shock; and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. Whereas in previous studies that demonstrated LI enhancement by neuroleptics, preexposure consisted of 10 to 40 tones, and conditioning included two tone-shock pairings, the present experiments used 40 tone preexposures, followed by an extended conditioning stage with five tone-shock pairings. It was expected that under these conditions no LI effect would be evident in untreated animals, but that animals treated with a neuroleptic drug, either during the entire LI procedure or only in conditioning, would show LI. Experiments 1 and 2 showed that LI was obtained in rats treated with haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg in experiment 1, 0.03 and 0.2 mg/kg in experiment 2) but not in the untreated controls. Experiment 3 showed that the same outcome was obtained when haloperidol (0.1 mg/kg) administration was confined to the conditioning stage. Experiment 4 showed that clozapine (5 mg/kg)-treated animals showed LI when the drug was confined to conditioning, but not to the preexposure stage. The implications of these results for the mechanism of action of neuroleptic drugs are discussed.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1997

The effects of electrolytic lesion to the shell subterritory of the nucleus accumbens on delayed non-matching-to-sample and four-arm baited eight-arm radial-maze tasks.

The effects of bilateral electrolytic lesions of the "shell" subterritory of the nucleus accumbens in the rat were examined on 2 tasks known to be sensitive to hippocampal damage. Experiment 1 tested the effects of shell lesion on delayed non-matching-to-sample (DNMS) task in a T-maze. The maze was rotated 180 degrees after the end of acquisition. Experiment 2 used a 4-arm baited, 4-arm unbaited, 8-arm radial-maze task and its reversal. Shell lesion led to impaired acquisition of DNMS in a T-maze and of 4-arm baited, 4-arm unbaited, 8-arm radial maze tasks, suggestive of mnemonic deficits. Following analysis of animals' choice pattern in both tasks, the deficit was interpreted as being largely due to an extensive use of response strategy. The results suggest that the inappropriate use of response strategy by shell animals was a result of their inability to switch from initial response strategy to a later, more appropriate, memory-dependent strategy.

Animals↗

PubMed1997

Intravenous administration of haloperidol to healthy volunteers: lack of subjective effects but clear objective effects.

Healthy volunteers who received i.v. injections of either saline or haloperidol (0.5 or 1.0 mg) made visual analogue scale ratings of subjective mood, tension, shakiness and the global feeling of having received an active drug. The subjective ratings of volunteers who received haloperidol did not differ, overall, from those who received saline. In contrast, the drug caused clear objective changes in several psychological tests. I.v. administration of low doses of haloperidol may permit double-blind testing of the psychological actions of haloperidol in healthy volunteers.

Affect↗

PubMed1997

Amphetamine-induced disruption of latent inhibition depends on the nature of the stimulus.

It is well documented that latent inhibition (LI), i.e. slower conditioning to a stimulus that had been repeatedly pre-exposed without consequences, compared to a non-pre-exposed stimulus, is prevented by amphetamine. Recently, we found that the effects of amphetamine on LI, as assessed in an off-baseline conditioned emotional response (CER) procedure, depend on the nature of the pre-exposed stimulus, irrespective of reinforcer intensity. Because these results contrast with a recent finding that a reduction in reinforcer intensity reversed amphetamine-induced attenuation of LI in an on-baseline CER procedure, the present study investigated the effects of amphetamine on LI as a function of the nature of the pre-exposed stimuli and shock intensity, using an on-baseline CER procedure. The effects of amphetamine on post-shock suppression of drinking as well as on activity, were monitored throughout the stages of the CER procedure. Experiment 1 used a 5 s steady light as the pre-exposed and conditioned stimulus, and two shock intensities in conditioning, and Experiment 2 used a 10 s flashing light and two shock intensities. Amphetamine disrupted LI with a steady light at both low and high shock intensities, but failed to disrupt LI with a flashing light at both shock intensities. In addition, the drug disrupted LI in Experiment 3, which increased the duration of the steady light to 10 s and used only low shock intensity, but failed to affect LI in Experiment 4 which used the flashing light on the background of darkness or of light, and only high shock intensity. The effects of amphetamine on LI were not related to its effects on behavioural suppression after footshock, or on activity.

Amphetamine↗

PubMed1996

Antipsychotic drug effects in a model of schizophrenic attentional disorder: a randomized controlled trial of the effects of haloperidol on latent inhibition in healthy people.

We studied the effects of haloperidol (0.5 mg, intravenously) on latent inhibition in an auditory paradigm and two visual paradigms in healthy subjects. Haloperidol increased latent inhibition in one visual paradigm and tended to increase latent inhibition in an auditory task, compared to saline-injected controls. These results indicate that haloperidol can enhance the selectivity of attention. In contrast, previous studies have reported that acute schizophrenics show reduced latent inhibition.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed1996

The latent inhibition model of schizophrenia: further validation using the atypical neuroleptic, clozapine.

Latent inhibition (LI) refers to retarded conditioning to a stimulus that has been repeatedly presented without reinforcement. LI is impaired in schizophrenia patients and in rats treated with amphetamine. Neuroleptic drugs produce two effects in this test paradigm: antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of LI, and enhancement of LI when administered on their own. The present experiments tested the effects of the atypical neuroleptic, clozapine, on LI. The experiments used a conditioned emotional response procedure in rats licking for water, consisting of three stages: preexposure, in which the to-be-conditioned stimulus (tone) was repeatedly presented without reinforcement; conditioning, in which the preexposed stimulus was paired with reinforcement (foot shock); and test, in which LI was indexed by animals' degree of suppression of licking during tone presentation. In experiments 1 and 2, the effects of 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg clozapine on LI were assessed following 20 or 10 tone preexposures, respectively. Experiments 3 and 4 used 40 preexposures and investigated antagonism of amphetamine-induced disruption of LI by 5.0 and 10.0 mg/kg clozapine, respectively. The results demonstrated that clozapine possesses a neuroleptic profile in the LI model, namely, it facilitates the development of LI and antagonizes amphetamine-induced disruption of LI.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Differential involvement of the shell and core subterritories of the nucleus accumbens in latent inhibition and amphetamine-induced activity.

Latent inhibition (LI) consists of retardation in conditioning to a stimulus as a consequence of its prior non-reinforced pre-exposure. In view of findings that LI is disrupted in acute schizophrenic patients and evidence from animal experiments pointing to the involvement of the mesolimbic dopamine (DA) system in this phenomenon, the present study investigated the effects of electrolytic lesions to the shell and core subterritories of the nucleus accumbens on LI in rats (Expt. 1). LI was indexed by the amount of suppression of drinking in the presence of a tone that was either pre-exposed or not prior to its pairing with reinforcement (a foot shock). Expt.2 tested the effects of the DA antagonist, haloperidol, on LI in shell- and core-lesioned animals. Expt. 3 tested the effects of shell and core lesions on spontaneous and amphetamine-induced locomotion. In Expt. 1, LI, i.e., lower suppression of drinking in the pre-exposed as compared to the non-pre-exposed animals, was obtained in the sham-operated condition. Core and shell lesions produced distinct effects on LI. Animals with core lesions developed LI, but exhibited an overall lower suppression of drinking in comparison to the sham-operated animals. In contrast, shell lesions led to a disappearance of LI. Expt. 2 replicated the differential effects of shell and core lesions on LI, although in this experiment, core lesion did not attenuate suppression of drinking. Haloperidol prevented shell-induced abolition of LI. In Expt. 3, shell- but not core-lesioned animals were more active than sham controls following amphetamine administration. These results provide evidence for functional differences between the shell and core subregions, as well as for the involvement of the mesolimbic DA system in LI.

Amphetamine↗