Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J F Hardy

Publications and source records attributed to J F Hardy.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

The development of indications for the preoperative use of recombinant erythropoietin.

OBJECTIVE: To develop indications for the preoperative use of recombinant erythropoietin (rHuEPO) alone and in conjunction with preoperative autologous donation (PAD). DESIGN: A 2-round modified Delphi-consensus process. PARTICIPANTS: Nine physicians representing multiple clinical specialties, practice environments and geographic locations. METHOD: From evidence tables and a literature summary (MEDLINE database from January 1985 to August 1996) provided and using the RAND-UCLA appropriateness method, the physicians developed 264 indications for the preoperative use of rHuEPO by permuting 7 clinical factors (age, history of transfusion or antibody incompatibility, hemoglobin level, anemia of chronic disease, expected blood loss, presence of cardiovascular or cardiopulmonary disease and patient anxiety). These indications were rated on a 9-point appropriateness scale. Median scores and measures of agreement were determined. OUTCOME MEASURES: The significance of cost constraints or cost and blood supply constraints and the impact of each clinical factor on the ratings as judged by statistical analysis. RESULTS: Of the 264 indications, 54% were rated appropriate, 18% uncertain and 28% inappropriate. Expected blood loss had the greatest impact on the ratings (high expected blood loss had a 5.9 point more appropriate rating on the 9-point scale than low expected blood loss [p < 0.0001]). Preoperative hemoglobin level also significantly influenced the ratings (p < 0.0001). Compared with the clinical context, the ratings under the cost constraint were 1.0 less appropriate (p < 0.0001) for rHuEPO alone and 1.2 less appropriate for rHuEPO and PAD (p < 0.0001). The ratings for patients with moderate expected blood loss were significantly influenced by the cost constraint (less appropriate). CONCLUSIONS: Expected blood loss and preoperative hemoglobin level were the best indicators of rHuEPO appropriateness. Different contexts modify the appropriateness ratings of an expensive drug like rHuEPO.

Blood Loss, Surgical↗
PubMed1997

Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of changes in flow on aortic valve area (AVA) as measured by the Gorlin formula and transesophageal echocardiographic (TEE) planimetry. BACKGROUND: The meaning of flow-related changes in AVA calculations using the Gorlin formula in patients with aortic stenosis remains controversial. It has been suggested that flow dependence of the calculated area could be due to a true widening of the orifice as flow increases or to a disproportionate flow dependence of the formula itself. Alternatively, anatomic AVA can be measured by direct planimetry of the valve orifice with TEE. METHODS: Simultaneous measurement of the planimetered and Gorlin valve area was performed intraoperatively under different hemodynamic conditions in 11 patients. Left ventricular and ascending aortic pressures were measured simultaneously after transventricular and aortic punctures. Changes in flow were induced by dobutamine infusion. Using multiplane TEE, AVA was planimetered at the level of the leaflet tips in the short-axis view. RESULTS: Overall, cardiac output, stroke volume and transvalvular volume flow rate ranged from 2.5 to 7.3 liters/min, from 43 to 86 ml and from 102 to 306 ml/min, respectively. During dobutamine infusion, cardiac-output increased by 42% and mean aortic valve gradient by 54%. When minimal flow was compared with maximal flow, the Gorlin area varied from (mean +/- SD) 0.44 +/- 0.12 to 0.60 +/- 0.14 cm2 (p < 0.005). The mean change in Gorlin area under different flow rates was 36 +/- 32%. Despite these changes, there was no significant change in the planimetered area when minimal flow was compared with maximal flow. The mean difference in planimetered area under different flow rates was 0.002 +/- 0.01 cm2 (p = 0.86). CONCLUSIONS: By simultaneous determination of Gorlin formula and TEE planimetry valve areas, we showed that acute changes in transvalvular volume flow substantially altered valve area calculated by the Gorlin formula but did not result in significant alterations of the anatomic valve area in aortic stenosis. These results suggest that the flow-related variation in the Gorlin AVA is due to a disproportionate flow dependence of the formula itself and not a true change in valve area.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1996

Reduction in requirements for allogeneic blood products: nonpharmacologic methods.

BACKGROUND: Various strategies have been proposed to decrease bleeding and allogeneic transfusion requirements during and after cardiac operations. This article attempts to document the usefulness, or lack thereof, of the nonpharmacologic methods available in clinical practice. METHODS: Blood conservation methods were reviewed in chronologic order, as they become available to patients during the perisurgical period. The literature in support of or against each strategy was reexamined critically. RESULTS: Avoidance of preoperative anemia and adherence to published guidelines for the practice of transfusion are of paramount importance. Intraoperatively, tolerance of low hemoglobin concentrations and use of autologous blood (predonated or harvested before bypass) will reduce allogeneic transfusions. The usefulness of plateletpheresis and retransfusion of shed mediastinal fluid remains controversial. Intraoperatively and postoperatively, maintenance of normothermia contributes to improved hemostasis. CONCLUSIONS: Several approaches have been shown to be effective. An efficient combination of methods can reduce, and sometimes abolish, the need for allogeneic blood products after cardiac operations, inasmuch as all those involved in the care of cardiac surgical patients adhere thoughtfully to existing transfusion guidelines.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Extracorporeal circulation, hemocompatibility, and biomaterials.

BACKGROUND: Performance of a majority of cardiac surgical procedures requires the use of extracorporeal circulation. Contact of the patients' blood with the nonendothelial surface of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit is responsible for several, potentially harmful systemic reactions. METHODS: The patients' response to extracorporeal circulation is reviewed briefly. The interactions between patient and circuit are discussed not only as they relate to blood-material contact, but also from a mechanical and rheologic standpoint. The theoretic benefits of the newer, more hemocompatible materials are presented, along with a review of published clinical experience with heparinized cardiopulmonary bypass circuits. RESULTS: The response to extracorporeal circulation extends far beyond a simple derangement of hemostasis. This inflammatory response is strongly influenced by the rheologic design of the circuit and by the physical and chemical properties of the surface. Heparinized circuits decrease inflammation, but the clinical benefits of this reduction remain unclear, except for extended cardiopulmonary support. The safe use of these circuits requires full heparinization and does not reduce allogeneic transfusions. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians are still in the search of the ideal material and the ideal extracorporeal circuit design. Newer, heparinized materials offer real but limited clinical benefits.

Biocompatible Materials↗
PubMed1996

Hemorrhage and the use of blood products after adult cardiac operations: myths and realities.

BACKGROUND: Several patient-, procedure-, and prescriber-related factors are thought to influence the decision to administer allogeneic blood products. We reexamine a number of assertions applied commonly to the practice of transfusion in cardiac operations. METHODS: More than 50 original articles including a total of more than 10,000 patients from 70 centers were reviewed. Data from 5,426 patients operated on between 1990 and 1994 at the Montreal Heart Institute are presented. RESULTS: From our review of the literature, we conclude that postoperative mediastinal fluid drainage averages 917 mL and that aspirin therapy increases drainage by less than 300 mL in most studies, which should not increase use of blood products, insofar as a strict transfusional protocol is adhered to. Across centers, transfusions can vary eightfold for the same postoperative drainage. Data from our institution show that postoperative mediastinal drainage per se is not influenced by reoperation or by the type of operation. However, total blood losses and transfusion requirements remain increased in reoperative and complex procedures. Excessive mediastinal drainage resulting in increased transfusions occurs in 29% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to allogeneic transfusions remains institution dependent. Constant reevaluation of local practice is essential to implement efficient blood conservation strategies.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Measurement of heparin concentration in whole blood with the Hepcon/HMS device does not agree with laboratory determination of plasma heparin concentration using a chromogenic substrate for activated factor X.

UNLABELLED: Measurement of circulating heparin concentration has been suggested to optimize anticoagulation during cardiopulmonary bypass. The Hepcon/HMS device (Medtronic HemoTec, Inc., Parker, Colo.) uses heparin/protamine titration to quantitatively determine heparin concentration. Extensive validation of this instrument is still lacking. METHODS: Agreement between heparin concentrations measured by the Hepcon/HMS system and by laboratory determination was evaluated in 16 patients undergoing cardiac operations. For laboratory determinations, plasma heparin concentration was derived from the measure of anti-Xa activity by means of chromogenic substrate technique. The Hepcon/HMS instrument and cartridges measured whole blood heparin concentration. Samples were analyzed 5 minutes after administration of heparin, 15 and 30 minutes after the start of cardiopulmonary bypass, 5 minutes after aortic unclamping, at the end of cardiopulmonary bypass, and after administration of protamine. Data were plotted and interpreted according to the method of Bland and Altman: First, a difference less than 1.4 U/ml (i.e., +/- 0.7 U/ml) was chosen as acceptable, because it would not cause major difficulties in clinical interpretation; second, the difference between the two measurement techniques was plotted against the mean of the two measures. RESULTS: The mean difference (bias) between heparin concentrations derived by the Hepcon/HMS device and those obtained by laboratory determination was as expected for measures performed on whole blood versus plasma (1.45 U/ml). Nevertheless, heparin concentrations derived by the Hepcon/HMS device may be as much as 2.76 U/ml above or 6.17 U/ml below the concentrations measured in the laboratory, differences well outside the predetermined limits of agreement and clearly unacceptable for clinical purposes. CONCLUSION: We conclude that heparin concentrations determined with the Hepcon/HMS instrument do not agree with laboratory determination of heparin concentration. Monitoring of heparin concentrations during bypass with the Hepcon/HMS device cannot be recommended.

Blood Chemical Analysis↗
PubMed1994

Natural and synthetic antifibrinolytics in adult cardiac surgery: efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency.

Epsilon-aminocaproic acid and tranexamic acid, two synthetic antifibrinolytics, and aprotinin, an antifibrinolytic derived from bovine lung, are used to reduce excessive bleeding and transfusion of homologous blood products (HBP) after cardiac surgery. This review analyzes the studies on the utilization of antifibrinolytics in adult cardiac surgery according to the epidemiological concepts of efficacy, effectiveness and efficiency. A majority of published studies confirm the efficacy of antifibrinolytics administered prophylactically to reduce postoperative bleeding and transfusion of HBP. More studies are needed, however, to compare antifibrinolytics and determine if any one is superior to the others. Despite their demonstrated efficacy, antifibrinolytics are only one of the options available to diminish the use of HBP. Other blood-saving techniques, surgical expertise, temperature during cardiopulmonary bypass and respect of established transfusion guidelines may modify the effectiveness of antifibrinolytics to the point where antifibrinolytics may not be necessary. At this time, insufficient data have been published to perform a cost vs benefit analysis of the use of antifibrinolytics. This complex analysis takes into account not only direct costs (cost of the drug and of blood products), but also the ensuing effects of treatment such as: length of stay in the operating room, in the intensive care unit and in the hospital; need for surgical re-exploration; treatment of transfusion or drug-related complications, etc. In particular, the risk of thrombotic complications associated with antifibrinolytics is the subject of an ongoing, unresolved controversy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Hemodynamic and pharmacodynamic comparison of doxacurium and high-dose vecuronium during coronary artery bypass surgery: a cost-benefit study.

Doxacurium (DOX), a new nondepolarizing neuromuscular blocking drug (NMBD), was compared in a randomized, double-blind fashion to high-dose vecuronium (VEC) in 60 coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) patients. A third group of 15 patients older than 70 years of age (DOX-70) was added to compare the effects of DOX to VEC in the older population. Endpoints of the study were hemodynamic stability, ease of ventilation and intubation, anesthesiologist's satisfaction, drug interventions to correct hemodynamic instability, and total cost of the drug. Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl (30 micrograms/kg) along with the NMBD (DOX 80 micrograms/kg, VEC 400 micrograms/kg) over a 2-minute period. Following induction, heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were decreased (P < 0.01) in all groups. Tracheal intubation caused the HR to return to baseline in the DOX-70 group. There was no difference in central venous pressure, pulmonary artery occlusive pressure, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, and drug intervention for DOX and VEC. None of the patients had evidence of myocardial ischemia. There was a statistically significant but clinically irrelevant decrease in central venous pressure and systemic vascular resistance in the DOX-70 group. The durations of the induction and maintenance doses of DOX were similar in the younger and older patients. Although the intubating dose of VEC had a faster onset of action, this had no effect on the ease of ventilation, conditions for tracheal intubation, and overall anesthesiologist satisfaction. The total cost for each NMBD was not different.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Low-dose aprotinin infusion is not clinically useful to reduce bleeding and transfusion of homologous blood products in high-risk cardiac surgical patients.

A high-dose regimen of aprotinin 5-6 million KIU is effective in reducing bleeding and the need for homologous blood products (HBP) associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). These high doses aim at achieving plasmin and plasma kallikrein concentrations which in vitro are inhibitory but, theoretically, smaller doses could suffice in vivo. Also, aprotinin is an expensive drug, so efficiency requires using the smallest effective dose. Therefore, the efficacy of prophylactic aprotinin 1 million KIU (the maximal dose approved currently) was evaluated in a patient population at high risk of bleeding and of being transfused. Forty-one patients undergoing reoperation or a complex surgical procedure were included in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Before skin incision, a bolus of 200,000 KIU aprotinin was administered in 20 min, followed by an infusion of 100,000 KIU.hr-1 over eight hours. Control patients received an equal volume of saline. Dryness of the operative field, chest drainage, transfusion of HBP, haemoglobin concentrations, and coagulation variables (including bleeding time) were compared. There were no differences between aprotinin and placebo-treated patients for all clinical and laboratory variables. The apparent ineffectiveness of aprotinin may be explained by the use of an insufficient dose, by a different protocol of administration (e.g., no bolus in CPB prime), or by the inability of aprotinin to decrease bleeding and transfusions any further. Also, the number of patients studied does not exclude the possibility of a Type II error.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aprotinin↗
PubMed1993

Amrinone, in combination with norepinephrine, is an effective first-line drug for difficult separation from cardiopulmonary bypass.

A crucial element for weaning patients from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) rests on the selection of an appropriate therapeutic regimen. Amrinone, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, combines inotropic support with pulmonary and systemic vasodilatation, without increasing heart rate (HR) or myocardial oxygen consumption. These characteristics should be useful in the failing heart during weaning from CPB. Nineteen patients were included in this prospective, open-labelled, phase IV study when systolic blood pressure (DPAP) > 15 mmHg or central venous pressure (CVP) > 15 mmHg, during progressive separation from CPB. At that moment, CPB flow was increased to alleviate heart failure and amrinone administered as a bolus (0.75 mg.kg-1) followed by an infusion (10 micrograms.kg-1.min-1). Weaning from CPB was then resumed and haemodynamic variables (SBP, DPAP, CVP and HR) were compared with those measured at CPB flow when failure had first occurred. Failure to wean from CPB occurred at 57 +/- 28% of full pump flow. After the amrinone bolus, DPAP and CVP decreased by 20% and 21% respectively. Subsequently, 16 patients required the infusion of norepinephrine (4-8 micrograms.min-1) to maintain a SBP > 80 mmHg. Heart rate remained unchanged after the bolus of amrinone, after separation from CPB, and no arrhythmias were noted. Successful weaning from CPB was possible 12 +/- 8 min after the amrinone bolus. Weaning resulted in a cardiac index similar to that measured pre-bypass. Amrinone is rapidly effective during weaning from CPB and, in combination with norepinephrine, provides the necessary inotropic support during this unstable period.

Aged↗