Time-oriented patient records and a computer databank.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J F Fries.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Comparative toxicity of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was assessed using the Stanford Toxicity Index consisting of weighted symptoms, laboratory abnormalities and hospitalizations in 2976 consecutively enrolled rheumatoid arthritis patients from eight data bank centers with 27,936 patient-years of observation. Scores ranged from 1.77 (SE 0.20) for aspirin to 5.94 (SE 0.92) for meclofenamate, with many differences between drugs being 2- to 3-fold and highly statistically significant. Results are consistent with our prior data, persist when assessed by several different scoring algorithms, are consistent across data bank centers and are consistent with data of others. There are major and reproducible differences in the overall toxicity of different non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A population's medical need represents its illness burden. Medical demand represents the service level requested for a particular need. Medical care costs are, in large part, a function of need and demand. Our review of health education programs designed to reduce health risks and reduce costs identified thirty-two programs with documented effectiveness, generally achieving claims reductions of 20 percent. Specific program features including chronic disease self-management, risk reduction, and increased self-efficacy appear important. A broadened definition of health promotion focused on increased personal responsibility for health-related actions and directed at improvement of long-term health outcomes also could reduce health care costs.
In this exploratory and descriptive study, data are drawn from a sample of 1,864 Bank of America retirees collected in 1987 to investigate correlations among healthy habits, age, gender, and education. Findings include: 1) Health habits are strongly and positively associated with each other and negatively associated with unhealthy habits. 2) Age is statistically significant and positively associated with fiber, fat consumption, and lack of exercise, but negatively associated with cigarette use. 3) Women are more likely than men to smoke, use seat belts, and eat foods high in fiber. Men are more likely than women to exercise and drink excessively. 4) Education is statistically significant and positively associated only with fiber in the diet and no other habit. 5) Fiber consumption emerges as the healthy habit most consistently associated with all other habits.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Health promotion programs are increasingly important components of health care in an era of predominantly chronic illness preceded by identified health risk behaviors. We report a large and relatively long experience with a low-cost intervention delivered through the mail and using sequential time-oriented risk appraisal and personalized recommendations, each six months, together with self-management materials. METHODS: We performed a prospective, longitudinal, observational study of 103,937 consecutive program participants observed for at least six months and up to 30 months. The primary study endpoint is overall health risk score, with secondary analysis of individual risk behaviors. A concurrent comparison group utilizes the initial scores of new participants by calendar time over the study period. RESULTS: Strong overall positive effects were observed, with improvement in computed health risk scores over 18 months of 14.7% (p less than .0001) in those 65 and over and 18.4% (p<.0001) in those under 65. At 30 months, improvement was 18.8% (p less than .0001) and 25.7% (p less than .0001), respectively. There was improvement in self-report scores for all targeted health risk behaviors, except for pounds over ideal weight, including smoking; dietary fat, salt, and fiber; alcohol; exercise; cholesterol; and reported stress. There was progressive improvement approximating 5% each six-month period. Results were consistent across age groups 16-35, 36-50, 51-65, and over 65 and over different educational level. Results could not be accounted for by sequential changes in initial health habits of participants over time. DISCUSSION: (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)