Idealized versus realized overall treatment times.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J F Fowler.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
When clinical results are analysed to find the treatment variables which affect the outcome, two types of multivariate analysis are done. Firstly, a determination of which variables are important is made: from age, gender, stage, histology, total dose, overall time, etc. Secondly, a quasi-biological model may be set up which includes those variables, e.g. Function (p) = Variable 1 + Variable 2 + ... + alpha x dose + beta x dose x (dose per fraction) - gamma x (overall time) where p is the probability of local control and "Function" is a logit or double-log function. The coefficients thus determined are often presented simply in raw form, or as ratios such as alpha/beta or gamma/alpha where any conversion factors from "Function (p)" to percentages are assumed conveniently to cancel out. However, it is mathematically possible to convert each coefficient directly into "percent change in local control per unit dose" (for alpha), or "percent per unit time" (for gamma), without recourse to the obvious convenience of the ratios. These converted values are more understandable than the coefficients themselves. They mean the rate of change of local control with (for example) total dose if overall time and dose per fraction were held constant; or rate of loss of local control with prolongation if total dose and dose per fraction were held constant. Even though heterogeneity may alter these slopes considerably from the theoretically maximum Poisson slopes, they still tell us what is happening averaged over the group of patients being studied, with often interesting insights.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: The feasibility of reducing overall treatment time by 2 weeks in the curative radiotherapeutic management of head and neck cancer patients is reported in a pilot trial of Hyperfractionated, Accelerated Radiotherapy with Dose Escalation (HARDE). This regimen prescribes 76 Gy in 5 weeks to definitive head and neck cancer patients, and 65 Gy in 5 weeks to high-risk postoperative patients. The linear quadratic model is used to compare predicted tumor cell kill with HARDE versus that expected with conventional fractionation (CF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1991 and March 1992, 40 head and neck cancer patients were treated with HARDE at the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center. Case-matched controls treated with CF were identified from patients treated at the same institution between 1980-1990, based on tumor site, stage, and extent of prior surgery. Individual patient treatment data (total dose, fraction size, overall time) rather than idealized schedule data from each group were analyzed using the linear quadratic model. RESULTS: Seventy-nine case-matched controls were identified for comparison with HARDE patients. The predicted increase in log cell kill for HARDE patients over case-matched controls was 1.5 and 1.3 logs, respectively, in the definitive and postoperative settings. This difference in log cell kill projects an improvement in locoregional tumor control for HARDE patients of between 10-25%. HARDE patients experience very brisk acute mucosal reactions and moderately prolonged mucosal healing, however, 91% have completed therapy without a treatment break. CONCLUSION: A 2-week reduction in overall treatment time for curative head and neck cancer patients is feasible while maintaining doses > 70 Gy. Based on radiobiologic predictions, such treatment intensification may significantly improve rates of locoregional tumor control. However, intensified acute mucosal reactions accompany such accelerated therapy.
The anti-estrogen tamoxifen (TAM) is widely used in the therapy of human breast cancer. Shown to induce a G1 transition delay in vitro, the kinetic effects of TAM on breast carcinoma cells growing as tumor xenografts in nude mice have been less well characterized. In this study, we demonstrate a significant increase in the tumor potential doubling time (Tpot) and decrease in the labeling index (%LI) of estradiol (E2)-stimulated MCF-7 xenografts following TAM treatment or E2 deprivation. MCF-7 tumor pieces were transplanted s.c. into nude mice supplemented with Silastic capsules containing E2. After 2-4 weeks, animals were randomized to continued E2 treatment, E2 and TAM treatment, or E2 deprivation. At times ranging from 0 to 23 days after treatment, animals were given injections of bromodeoxyuridine and tumors excised for kinetic analysis. Using flow-cytometric techniques, the Tpot and %LI were estimated for all tumors. Seven independent experiments were performed and data pooled for statistical analysis. At the time of hormonal manipulation, E2-stimulated tumors had a volume doubling time of 5 days, a Tpot of 2.3 days, and a %LI of 23%. Continued E2 treatment resulted in only minimal changes in Tpot and %LI over the remainder of the observation period. Treatment with TAM resulted in a slowing of tumor growth (tumor doubling time, 12 days), a significant (P < 0.001) increase in Tpot to 6.6 days, and a decrease in %LI to 8% by 23 days posttreatment. E2 deprivation resulted in a cessation of tumor growth and similar changes in Tpot and %LI to 5.3 days and 10%, respectively (P < 0.001). In contrast to previous reports, these data demonstrate that TAM treatment and E2 deprivation both significantly decrease tumor cell proliferation in MCF-7 xenografts.
PURPOSE: Pulsed Brachytherapy consists of replacing continuous irradiation at low dose-rate with a series of medium dose-rate fractions in the same overall time and to the same total dose. For example, pulses of 1 Gy given every 2 hr or 2 Gy given every 4 hr would deliver the same 70 Gy in 140 hr as continuous irradiation at 0.5 Gy/hr. If higher dose-rates are used, even with gaps between the pulses, the biological effects are always greater. Provided that dose rates in the pulse do not exceed 3 Gy/hr, and provided that pulses are given as often as every 2 hr, the inevitable increases of biological effect are no larger than a few percent (of biologically effective dose or extrapolated response dose). However, these increases are more likely to exceed 10% (and thus become clinically significant) if the half-time of repair of sublethal damage is short (less than 1 hr) rather than long. This somewhat unexpected finding is explained in detail here. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The rise and fall of Biologically Effective Dose (and hence of Relative Effectiveness, for a constant dose in each pulse) is calculated during and after single pulses, assuming a range of values of T1/2, the half-time of sublethal damage repair. The area under each curve is proportional to Biologically Effective Dose and therefore to log cell kill. RESULTS: Pulses at 3 Gy/hr do yield greater biological effect (dose x integrated Relative Effectiveness) than lower dose-rate pulses or continuous irradiation at 0.5 Gy/hr. The contrast is greater for the short T1/2 of 0.5 hr than for the longer T1/2 of 1.5 hr. CONCLUSION: More biological damage will be done (compared with traditional low dose rate brachytherapy) in tissues with short T1/2 (0.1-1 hr) than in tissues with longer T1/2 values.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: to assess mouse rectum tolerance to fractionated X-ray and neutron irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: doses per fraction ranged between 0.25 and 35 Gy for X-rays, 0.05 and 12 Gy for neutrons. Neutron top-up doses were added when the fractionated irradiation was given in fractions less than 2 Gy of X-rays or 0.35 Gy of neutrons in order to bring the damage into the detectable range. The early endpoints were the nadir of weight loss occurring within the first 2-3 weeks following irradiation and lethality by 2 months. The late endpoints were the peak of weight reached at maturity of the mice, the proportion of short feces in the daily fecal output at 10 months and lethality by 12 months. The linear-quadratic (LQ) model was fitted to the data (direct "one-step" analysis) and the estimated parameters were used to calculate relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values. RESULTS: alpha/beta ratio estimates were for X-rays: 19.9 Gy [95% confidence limits: 15.2, 27.0] for weight nadir. 13.4 Gy [9.3, 19.5] for early lethality, 6.4 Gy [3.6, 11.0] for peak weight, and 6.9 Gy [4.2, 10.8] for late lethality, for neutrons 19.9 Gy [9.5, 61.0] for peak weight. The fecal-deformity data were poorly fitted by the LQ model. The RBE was slightly higher for acute endpoints than for the late ones when X-ray fraction sizes were equal to or larger than 10 Gy. However, the change in RBE with decreasing X-ray dose per fraction was much steeper for the late endpoints, so that it became equal to or even higher than for acute reactions at doses per fraction of 5 Gy or less. CONCLUSION: Our results were consistent with those obtained from previously published studies using the same experimental system but larger doses per fraction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Herpes zoster infection particularly involving the sacral dermatomes has been associated with bladder and bowel dysfunction, most commonly urinary retention. CASE REPORTS: We report two patients who developed acute urinary retention, one of whom also had constipation, within days of herpes zoster skin lesions of the S2-S4 dermatomes. CONCLUSIONS: Herpes zoster is a reversible cause of neurogenic bladder and bowel dysfunction and should be considered in a patient that presents with acute urinary retention and/or constipation. Sensory abnormalities and flaccid detrusor paralysis are most likely involved in the pathogenesis.
Data obtained for the response of tumours from two multicentre clinical trials of the British Institute of Radiology have been combined and studied. Both trials involved patients with laryngopharyngeal carcinoma. There were 734 patients in the first trial, recruited between 1965 and 1975, and 611 patients in the second trial, recruited between 1975 and 1985. Observed survival and tumour-free rates for all patients are calculated. T-class and the nodal status of the patient at the start of the treatment were important factors in the determination of both observed survival and tumour-free rates. Overall treatment time was an important factor in determining the recurrence of tumour. The longer the overall treatment time the greater was the chance of tumour recurrence. The linear-quadratic (LQ) model was used in the analysis of the tumour recurrence data for a large group of patients with laryngeal tumours without nodal involvement. A small alpha/beta ratio of 0.94 Gy was obtained for T3 tumours while that of T2 tumours was negative, -10.5 Gy. The value for T1 tumours was higher at 23 Gy. However, use of the LQ model with a time component increased the alpha/beta ratios to 26.0 +/- 27.20 Gy, 18.0 +/- 12.33 Gy and 13.38 +/- 5.40 Gy for T1, T2 and T3 tumours, respectively. The time component, the gamma/alpha ratios, for these tumours were 0.15 +/- 0.27 Gy/day, 0.81 +/- 0.18 Gy/day and 0.76 +/- 0.15 Gy/day, respectively.
Cocamidopropyl betaine is a surfactant coming into wide use in shampoos and other cleansing products. Recent reports have implicated it as a potential allergen, although it is less irritating than other surfactants such as sodium lauryl sulfate. Twelve positive patch test results were seen over a period of fifteen months of testing in selected patients. Of these, seven results were thought to be relevant. All seven patients with relevant reactions and four of the five with uncertain relevance had dermatitis of the head and neck area. It is concluded that although cocamidopropyl betaine is not a common allergen, it may be at least partially responsible for some cases of allergic dermatitis of the head and neck.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: Formaldehyde resins have been used to impart wrinkle resistance to clothing fabrics since 1926. After several patients with positive patch tests to formaldehyde resins had been examined, a study was undertaken of the records of all patch tests performed at the University of Louisville Patch Test Clinic and the Allergy Section of the Skin and Cancer Clinic of New York University Medical Center from January 1988 through April 1990 to determine the prevalence of positive patch-test reactions to formaldehyde-based textile resins and the clinical and demographic patterns associated with textile resin allergy. RESULTS: Seventeen patients were identified at the two centers. Twelve were allergic to formaldehyde as well as to formaldehyde textile resins. Several clinical patterns were found, including accentuation of dermatitis in areas of tight clothing, primary occurrence in clothing-covered areas, and a chronic recalcitrant course. Ethylene urea melamine formaldehyde resin was the best screening agent with 14 definite positive reactions and one equivocal reaction. CONCLUSION: Formaldehyde textile resin allergy is more common than has been previously recognized. Patch testing with one or more formaldehyde textile resins is indicated in patients with a particular pattern of dermatitis.
There is emerging and established clinical and laboratory evidence that proliferation of tumor clonogens during radiation therapy can impair local tumor control. The pre-treatment, tumor potential doubling time, T(pot), estimated with in situ bromodeoxyuridine (BrdUrd) labeling, followed by a single biopsy and flow cytometry, may be a predictor of a given tumor's ability to undergo such intra-treatment proliferation. Recent studies have found a strong similarity between T(pot)'s determined in this fashion and the effective doubling times of surviving tumor cells during radiotherapy, as estimated from tumor control versus treatment duration data. Furthermore, several preliminary clinical studies have indicated that T(pot) may be a predictor of outcome, with faster tumors doing worse. Accelerated fractionation might overcome such proliferation, but is more acutely toxic and is unlikely to benefit patients with slowly proliferating tumors. Thus, the BrdUrd/single biopsy method may offer the possibility of selecting between accelerated and conventional or hyperfractionated treatment. Several approaches to the analysis of data generated by this method have been described, but there has been little documentation of the validity of methods in experimental systems, particularly in human experimental tumors. This study explores various analytic methods employed with the BrdUrd, delayed, single-biopsy technique used in determining the potential doubling time, T(pot), of tumors. It compares methods of analysis in three experimental systems and in 40 in situ-labeled human tumors, and proposes a method for shortening the required labeling-biopsy interval to a clinically more convenient range of 3 to 4 hours.
The decision to use five high dose rate intracavitary (HDR-ICR) insertions at weekly intervals for invasive carcinoma of the cervix treated at the University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center (UWCCC) was made clinically. It was based on practical considerations and on previous clinical experience worldwide which showed that between 2 and 16 insertions have been used with apparently acceptable results. Although radiobiological considerations favor a large number of small doses, such a large number of HDR-ICR insertions is not clinically practical. Our strategy was to keep the biological effects of external beam and intracavitary insertions in the same ratio as used on a large series of patients treated here with low dose rate (LDR) therapy. This means keeping the same external beam treatment scheme and finding high dose rate (HDR) doses that are biologically equivalent to the previous LDR therapy, as far as possible. External beam and HDR intracavitary dose schedules for the Madison System of treating cervical carcinoma are described in detail. Because there is more repairable damage in late-reacting normal tissues, there is a bigger loss of sparing in these tissues than in tumors when changing from LDR to HDR, so total doses should be reduced more for equal late complications than for equal tumor control. The clinical decision was made to aim at equal tumor control. The possible increase in late complications has to be avoided by reducing the doses to critical normal tissues using extremely careful anatomic positioning of the HDR sources. Critical normal tissues must be kept further away from the radiation sources so that their doses are about 20% lower than with LDR geometry. This requires an extra separation of some millimeters depending on the anatomy and geometry of the individual insertion. The strategy is that the unfavourable radiobiological effects of a few large fractions must be counteracted by better physical dose distributions with HDR-ICR than with the previous LDR insertions. These good distributions are obtainable with the short exposures at HDR.
The loss in therapeutic ratio accompanying a conversion from low dose-rate (LDR) to high dose-rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy (ICR) requires increased attention to the precision and accuracy of dose distribution calculations and treatment delivery. While the HDR-ICR treatment unit allows better custom-tailored dose distributions compared to LDR, it also requires more attention to detail to achieve the distribution desired. Because the relative biological effectiveness of different isodose levels in a dose distribution varies with the absolute dose (as described in Part 1 of this article), the relative dose distribution used with LDR must be modified for HDR to produce the same expected biological effect. Because of the difference in the radiobiology and physical positioning, simply duplicating applications as performed with LDR misses opportunities for dose distribution improvement as well as opens possibilities for significant complications. Due to differences in positioning the applicator (e.g., retraction of the cervix low in the pelvis instead of packing the applicator high), traditional definitions of points of interest (such as point A) apply poorly with HDR-ICR, compelling new systems of dose specification. With HDR-ICR, irreparable mistakes can happen very quickly, and quality assurance for the treatment plan and calculated dwell times prove much more important than with LDR. Key features of the dose distribution and constant relationships involving doses and dwell times help screen planned treatments for mistakes. This paper details the procedural and physical consideration of the Madison system for HDR-ICR brachytherapy for carcinoma of the cervix.