Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J F Atkins

Publications and source records attributed to J F Atkins.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Control of epistaxis in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia.

Twenty-nine patients were admitted to Pennsylvania Hospital between March 1984 and July 1990 with a diagnosis of epistaxis and hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Data were obtained through a retrospective review of the charts of these patients. Patients were treated for epistaxis with the CO2 laser, neodymium:aluminum garnet laser with a wavelength of 1064 nm (Nd-Yag), Nd-Yag laser with a wavelength of 532 nm (KTP), septodermoplasty, or any combination of these procedures. Patients underwent an average of 2.5 procedures each. Overall, 25 of 29 patients reported their symptoms had greatly improved with therapy. The average length of time without the need for further surgical intervention was 16.3 months for the Nd-Yag laser and 11.7 months for the KTP laser. Septodermoplasty using buccal mucosal grafts allowed, patients to avoid additional procedures for 24.4 months, which was twice as long as for standard septodermoplasty using split-thickness skin grafts. Although no therapy completely resolves the epistaxis, laser therapy combined with septodermoplasty enables the patients to gain excellent control of the epistaxis for several years.

Adolescent↗

The role of EF-Tu and other translation components in determining translocation step size.

The two EF-Tu encoding genes, tufA and tufB, of Salmonella typhimurium have been sequenced. Nearly all the differences from their Escherichia coli counterparts are third position changes which do not alter the encoded amino acids. Unexpectedly, most of the changes in one Salmonella tuf gene are paralleled by changes in the other tuf gene perhaps due to gene repair despite the distance separating the genes. Three mutants which cause mis-framing, have their substitutions at codon 375. Explanations for mutants which cause mis-framing are considered and the mechanism of normal reading frame maintenance discussed.

Escherichia coli↗

tRNA hopping: enhancement by an expanded anticodon.

At a low level wild-type tRNA(1Val) inserts a single amino acid (valine) for the five nucleotide sequence GUGUA which has overlapping valine codons. Mutants of tRNA(1Val) with an insertion of A or U between positions 34 and 35 of their anticodons have enhanced reading of the quintuplet sequences. We propose that this decoding occurs by a hopping mechanism rather than by quintuplet pairing. Such hopping involves disengagement of the paired codon and anticodon with the mRNA slipping two (or more) bases along the ribosomal--peptidyl tRNA complex and subsequently re-pairing at a second codon--the landing site. The mutant with the anticodon sequence 3'CAAU5' 'hops' over the stop codon in the mRNA sequence GUG UAA GUU with the insertion of a single amino acid (valine). In contrast, in reading the same sequence, the mutant with the anticodon 3'CAUU5' hops onto the stop with the insertion of two valine residues. It is likely that in some instances of hopping alternate anticodon bases are used for the initial pairing and at the landing site.

Alleles↗

Glycine tRNA mutants with normal anticodon loop size cause -1 frameshifting.

Mutations in the acceptor stem, the 5-methyluridine-pseudouridine-cytidine (TFC) arm, and the anticodon of Salmonella tRNA2Gly can cause -1 frameshifting. The potential for standard base pairing between acceptor stem positions 1 and 72 is disrupted in the mutant sufS627. This disruption may interfere with the interaction of the tRNA with elongation factor-Tu.GTP or an as-yet-unspecified domain of the ribosome. The potential for standard base pairing in part of the TFC stem is disrupted in mutant sufS625. The nearly universal C-61 base of the TFC stem is altered in mutant sufS617, and the TFC loop is extended in mutant sufS605. These changes are expected to interfere with the stability of the TFC loop and its interaction with the D arm. The mutation in mutant sufS605, and possibly other mutants, alters nucleoside modification in the D arm. Three mutants, sufS601, sufS607, and sufS609, have a cytidine substituted for the modified uridine at position 34, the first anticodon position. None of the alterations grossly disrupts in-frame triplet decoding by the mutant tRNAs. The results show that -1 frameshifting in vivo can be caused by tRNAs with normal anticodon loop size and suggest that alternative conformational states of the mutant tRNAs may allow them to read a codon in frame or to shift reading frame.

Anticodon↗

Genetic characterization of frameshift suppressors with new decoding properties.

Suppressor mutants that cause ribosomes to shift reading frame at specific and new sequences are described. Suppressors for trpE91, the only known suppressible -1 frameshift mutant, have been isolated in Escherichia coli and in Salmonella typhimurium. E. coli hopR acts on trpE91 within the 9-base-pair sequence GGA GUG UGA, is dominant, and is located at min 52 on the chromosome. Its Salmonella homolog maps at an equivalent position and arises as a rarer class in that organism as compared with E. coli. The Salmonella suppressor, hopE, believed to be in a duplicate copy of the same gene, maps at min 17. The +1 suppressor, sufT, acts at the nonmonotonous sequence CCGU, is dominant, and maps at min 59 on the Salmonella chromosome.

Base Sequence↗

Suppression of a -1 frameshift mutation by a recessive tRNA suppressor which causes doublet decoding.

sufS was found to suppress the only known suppressible-1 frameshift mutation, trpE91, at a site identified as GGA and mapped within the single gene of the only tRNA that can decode GGA in Escherichia coli. It mapped to the same gene in Salmonella typhimurium. sufS alleles were recessive, and dominant alleles could not be isolated. This is in contrast to all other tRNA structural gene mutations identified thus far that cause frameshift suppression. The recessiveness implies that all sufS alleles are poor competitors against their wild-type tRNA(Gly2) counterparts. The base G immediately 5' of the GGA suppression site influenced the level but was not critical for suppression by sufS601. From this result, it is inferred that sufS601 causes frameshifting by doublet decoding.

Alleles↗

E. coli ribosomes re-phase on retroviral frameshift signals at rates ranging from 2 to 50 percent.

Many retroviruses express gag-pol or gag-pro-pol polypeptides by coupling their translation from overlapping reading frames with -1 ribosomal frameshifts. Here, we show that the well-known ribosomal frameshift signals found in retroviral mRNA will provoke Escherichia coli ribosomes to shift frame in the same manner as their eukaryotic counterparts. Ribosomes of E. coli respond in vivo to both the tandem slippery codons present at the retroviral frameshift site and the 3' flanking sequence. Slight alteration of the mouse mammary tumor virus gag-pro frameshift site from A-AAA-AAC to A-AAA-AAG boosts the level of frameshifting in E. coli to over 50%. This suggests that A-AAA-AAG, and its slippery relatives, may be utilized by E. coli genes as sites of high-level ribosomal frameshifting. This observed conservation of response to retroviral frameshift signals affords new avenues to dissect the mechanism of ribosomal frameshifting evoked by these mRNA sequences.

Base Sequence↗

Mutants of translational components that alter reading frame by two steps forward or one step back.

External suppressors, sufS, of a -1 frameshift mutant cause ribosomes to shift into the -1 frame when reading the sequence CAG GGA GUG. The resulting product is not Gln-Gly-Val but Gln-Gly-Ser with Ser being encoded by the underlined AGU. The alleles investigated are approximately 2% efficient in causing frameshifting. Two other suppressors, hopR and hopE of the same -1 frameshift mutant, cause some ribosomes reading the sequence GUG UG to decode a single amino acid, Val, from the five nucleotides. The possibility is considered that peptidyl-tRNA(Val) dissociates from the mRNA, but re-pairs in a triplet manner after the mRNA slips forward by two bases.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Reading frame switch caused by base-pair formation between the 3' end of 16S rRNA and the mRNA during elongation of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli.

Watson-Crick base pairing is shown to occur between the mRNA and nucleotides near the 3' end of 16S rRNA during the elongation phase of protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. This base-pairing is similar to the mRNA-rRNA interaction formed during initiation of protein synthesis between the Shine and Dalgarno (S-D) nucleotides of ribosome binding sites and their complements in the 1540-1535 region of 16S rRNA. mRNA-rRNA hybrid formation during elongation had been postulated to explain the dependence of an efficient ribosomal frameshift on S-D nucleotides precisely spaced 5' on the mRNA from the frameshift site. Here we show that disruption of the postulated base pairs by single nucleotide substitutions, either in the S-D sequence required for shifting or in nucleotide 1538 of 16S rRNA, decrease the amount of shifting, and that this defect is corrected by restoring complementary base pairing. This result implies that the 3' end of 16S rRNA scans the mRNA very close to the decoding sites during elongation.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Mutants of elongation factor Tu promote ribosomal frameshifting and nonsense readthrough.

This is the first report of ribosomal frameshifting promoted by mutants of the elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu). EF-Tu mutants can suppress both -1 and +1 frameshift mutations. The level of nonsense readthrough is also increased at some UGA (this paper) and UAG (Hughes, 1987) sites by these mutants. Suppression occurs when a mutant tuf allele is paired with a wild-type copy of the other tuf gene but is most efficient when both tuf genes are mutant. Frameshifting mediated by the tuf alleles studied, tufA8 and tufB103, is not general; indeed most frameshift mutations are not suppressed. Several possible mechanisms by which mutant EF-Tu may cause frameshifting are discussed.

Alleles↗

Characterization of ribosomal frameshift events by protein sequence analysis.

In cell-free protein synthesis studies with RNA from phage MS2 as template, normal Escherichia coli tRNASer3 promotes two base translocation at GCA alanine codons with a resultant shift of ribosomes to the minus one reading frame. Similarly, normal tRNAThr3 promotes two base translocation at CCG proline codons. These conclusions were reached by amino acid sequencing of tryptic peptides or cyanogen bromide fragments that contained the reading frame shift site. It is proposed that these frameshift events occur by a two-base pair interaction between the anticodons of these exceptional tRNAs and the noncognate codons.

Alanine↗

tRNA anticodon replacement experiments show that ribosomal frameshifting can be caused by doublet decoding.

The expression of certain normal genes requires a specific ribosomal frameshift event because the mRNA has the coding information for one protein in two different reading frames. One of several possible mechanisms for this involves recognition of a nontriplet codon by a noncognate tRNA. The AGUC-decoding Escherichia coli tRNASer3 reads a GCA alanine codon to cause a -1 frameshift. Replacement of the anticodon of tRNAPhe with the anticodon of tRNASer3 allows the constructed tRNA to cause this frameshifting. By altering the anticodon loop nucleotides at positions 33-36 in the constructed tRNAPhe molecules, the tRNA was found to recognize a 2-base codon. Instead of the usual anticodon, positions 34-36, the nucleotides in positions 34 and 35 form essential base pairs with the first two positions of the alanine codon. The uridine in position 36 is also required but not for base pairing.

Anticodon↗

Resolution of the discrepancy between a gene translation--termination codon and the deduced sequence for release of the encoded polypeptide.

The translation-termination codon of the synthetase gene of the RNA phage MS2 has been determined, by nucleotide sequencing and suppression studies in vitro, to be UAG. However in one of the only two studies on the signals for polypeptide chain release at the end of genes, Capecchi and Klein [(1970) Nature (Lond.) 226, 1029-1033] deduced that the synthetase of an almost identical phage, R17, is released at UAA. Here we show that under certain conditions the synthetase is released at the UAG terminator but that this UAG is especially prone to read-through with resulting release at the downstream UAA codon. The possible significance of the UAG being in a context prone to leakiness is discussed but is unresolved.

Autoradiography↗