Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J E Leggat

Publications and source records attributed to J E Leggat.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1997

Long-term renal allograft survival: prognostic implication of the timing of acute rejection episodes.

BACKGROUND: The timing of an acute rejection may have a variable impact on renal allograft survival. To determine whether the time of first acute transplant rejection (ATR) is an independent predictor of long-term allograft survival, we studied 31,600 first cadaveric renal transplants that were functional on the first transplant anniversary, from 217 U.S. centers. METHODS: Transplant patients were divided into four groups according to the time to the first ATR: no rejection in year 1 (group I); predischarge ATR (group II); first ATR between discharge and month 6 (group III); and first ATR in months 7-12 (group IV). RESULTS: Four-year allograft survival after year 1, estimated by a Cox proportional hazard model adjusting for 19 cofactors, was 78%, 72%, 69%, and 54% for groups I-IV, respectively (P<0.0001 for each comparison to group I). In those patients who had ATR episodes in more than one time period, later episodes were associated with worse long-term allograft survival, an observation that was independent of previous ATR episodes. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that late occurrence of a first acute rejection portends a worse prognosis for allograft survival after the first year. Later rejections, in combination with previous rejections, also lead to worse long-term allograft survival. Unlike early ATRs occurring in the setting of supervised immunosuppression, late occurring ATR may reflect inadequate immunosuppression from noncompliant behavior or may reflect disruption or lack of immune tolerance to the allograft. Efforts to minimize late transplant loss require a combination of strategies directed at both immunologic and behavioral factors.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1997

Withdrawal from dialysis: a review with an emphasis on the black experience.

Withdrawal from dialysis has been shown to be a common occurrence in treated end-stage renal disease. Interestingly, there have been several reports documenting that blacks withdraw from dialysis one half to one third the rate of whites. There has been little research into the reasons for this marked discrepancy. This article reviews the existing literature on the different rates of withdrawal in blacks compared with whites. It then draws on a broad range of literature, including sociology, psychiatry, and anthropology, to propose possible reasons for the differences. From this review, it would seem that both medical and cultural factors play important roles in the decisions about withdrawal, but that cultural beliefs and attitudes are more important. More research is needed in both the medical and cultural aspects of rates of withdrawal to help explain the observed differences in blacks compared with whites.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1997

An analysis of risk factors for withdrawal from dialysis before death.

Withdrawal from dialysis has been a significant cause of mortality among dialysis patients, accounting for 6 to 22% of deaths. Since 1990, a new death notification form has allowed more detailed analyses of withdrawal from dialysis separate from causes of death. Using the U.S. Renal Data System data base, this study examined 116,829 deaths in adult patients from 1990 to 1995. Adjusted odds ratios were calculated for the risk of withdrawal using logistic regression. Adjustments included age at death, ethnicity, gender, cause of death, primary cause of end-stage renal disease, time on dialysis, and dialysis modality. In addition, odds ratios of withdrawal were calculated for deaths in patients who started dialysis after age 65. Death was preceded by withdrawal significantly more frequently in women than in men, more than twice as frequently in Caucasians than in African-Americans or Asians, and more frequently in older than in younger age groups. Patients who died of chronic diseases (e.g., dementia, malignancy) were much more likely to withdraw before death, whereas patients who died from more acute causes (e.g., coronary artery disease) were less likely to withdraw before death. It is concluded that patients who are Caucasian, female, older, or die of chronic or progressive diseases are more likely to withdraw from dialysis before death. The ethnic and gender differences in withdrawal do not appear to have a medical explanation from this analysis. Further research along sociologic lines is needed to better explain the differences in withdrawal from chronic dialysis.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Decrease in phenotypically defined T helper inducer cells (T4+4B4+) and increase in T suppressor effector cells (T8+2H4+) in stable renal allograft recipients.

Two monoclonal antibodies, anti-2H4 and anti-4B4, reciprocally divide the T4+ (CD4+) and T8+ (CD8+) lymphocytes into T4+2H4+, T4+4B4+, T8+2H4+ and T8+4B4+ subsets. The T4+2H4+, T4+4B4+ and T8+2H4+ subsets possess suppressor-inducer, helper-inducer, and suppressor-effector function, respectively, as previously defined in a system of B cell immunoglobulin production. Using monoclonal antibodies, including anti-2H4 and anti-4B4, and flow cytometry, we monitored lymphocyte subpopulations in 66 renal allograft recipients. We found that patients with stable allograft function have a decrease in the percentage of total T4+ lymphocytes from 41.9 +/- 9.5% pretransplant (pre-Tx) to 36.3 +/- 13.9% posttransplant (post-Tx) (P less than 0.05). This decrease was seen mainly in the T4+4B4+ or helper-inducer subset from 20.8 +/- 4.7% (pre-Tx) to 16.0 +/- 6.3% (post-Tx) (P less than 0.005). Patients with stable function were also noted to have an increase in the percentage of total T8+ lymphocytes from 21.3 +/- 10.7% (pre-Tx) to 30.9 +/- 15.4% (post-Tx) (P less than 0.02). Examination of T8 subsets revealed that a statistically significant increase was seen in the T8+2H4+ or suppressor effector subset from 15.5 +/- 9.2% (pre-Tx) to 21.5 +/- 10.2% (post-Tx) (P less than 0.01). Additionally, serial studies on 14 patients revealed an increase in the %T4+2H4+ suppressor-inducer subset from 9.31 +/- 3.64% (pre-Tx) to 15.71 +/- 6.41% (post-Tx) (P less than 0.0025). Since the role of these subsets has not been established in alloimmunity, in vitro allogeneic studies of 2H4-enriched (2H4+) and 2H4-depleted (2H4-) lymphocytes from normal peripheral blood were performed. In the mixed lymphocyte reaction, 2H4+ cells proliferated less than 2H4- cells (cpm ratio 2H4+/2H4-: 0.63-0.84), but 2H4+ cells generated twice as much suppressor activity as 2H4- cells (ratio % suppression 2H4+/2H4-: 1.9-2.3). These results suggest that 2H4+ cells play a role in the suppressor limb of the alloimmune response and that the increase in cells of this phenotype in our transplant population may be responsible for the maintenance of stable allograft function.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Antigen specificity of mixed lymphocyte response-induced suppressor cells.

The nature of the antigens recognized by mixed lymphocyte response-generated suppressor cells is currently unknown. Previous investigations have yielded conflicting results, with different studies finding that suppressor cells recognize HLA class I antigens, class II antigens, or neither. To characterize the antigens recognized by suppressor cells (modulators) further, we generated 36 different modulators and assayed them for suppressor activity against a random 48-member HLA-typed panel in a total of 473 assays. Logistic regression analysis of the data revealed that suppression was correlated with B and DQ antigenic sharing between the original stimulator (used to generate the suppressor cells) and the test culture stimulator (p = 0.0043 and 0.0277, respectively). A role for DR antigen sharing could not be excluded. Overall, 35% of all suppressed assays could not be accounted for by the sharing of either any classical private HLA antigens, or of HLA-A or B locus cross-reactive group specificities. Suppression in these instances may involve the sharing of minor antigenic determinants, unidentified private HLA epitopes, or possibly another gene related to suppression that exists in linkage disequilibrium with the HLA-B locus or the DQ subregion.

Cross Reactions↗