Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J E Altwein

Publications and source records attributed to J E Altwein.

174 records · Page 10Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Serum prolactin and tumors of the prostate: unchanged basal levels and lack of correlation to serum testosterone.

To investigate the possible role of circulatory levels of prolactin on the development of prostatic tumors, and to gain insight into the prolactin-androgen relationship, serum prolactin and testosterone were determined in 73 patients with newly diagnosed prostatic adenocarcinoma. Controls consisted of 32 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia before treatment, 19 age-matched controls, and 21 young individuals. Hormones were measured under standardized conditions by highly specific and sensitive radioimmunoassays. There was no difference in prolactin in the elderly men regardless of prostate pathology, but a significant increment was found in young controls. Individual prolactin values did not correlate with serum testosterone, and there was no statistical regression in prolactin values of patients in the age range between 50 and 80 years. In a second study, serum testosterone and prolactin were measured in 7 patients with prostate cancer and in 6 individuals with benign prostatic hyperplasia before and 30 and 60 minutes after stimulation with an iv bolus of 200 microgram TRH. Both hormones were within the normal range at time T0, and a significant stimulation of prolactin was achieved (p less than 0.001). Prolactin values did not differ between patients with benign and malignant prostatic disease. Thus, when investigating the role of prolactin in neoplastic prostatic growth in the human, it seems necessary to investigate receptor-mediated prostatic tumor responsiveness, and interferences with androgen converting enzymes on a cellular level, rather than circulating prolactin concentrations.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Differential diagnosis and evaluation of the clinical course of transurethrally resected T1G3 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder by DNA image cytometry.

The value of DNA image cytometry in the differential diagnosis of 106 T1G3 urothelial carcinomas of the bladder and the long-term prognosis (recurrence-free interval, survival) of the patients was tested in comparison with Ta/T1G1 (n=30) and Ta/T1G2 carcinoma (n=54). Monolayer smears were prepared from three 50-microm-thick sections by a cell separation technique and were stained according to Feulgen. The DNA content of 250 epithelial cells, chosen at random, was determined using a TV-image analysis system CM-1 (Hund, Wetzlar, Germany). The DNA content of 30 lymphocytes served as an internal standard for the normal diploid value in every individual case. Different DNA cytometric parameters and the mean nuclear area were calculated. In comparison with G1- and G2-cases, the mean values of all DNA cytometric variables were markedly increased in the group of T1G3 cases, most obviously for the 5cEE, the mean ploidy and the ploidy imbalance (0.0006 > or = p > or = 0.0001). However, a remarkable overlay of the data distribution had to be considered. An aneuploid DNA stemline ploidy was highly characteristic for T1G3 urothelial carcinoma (sensitivity: 92%), but not sufficiently specific (57%). However, if increased values for the mean ploidy, the 2cDI, the 5cEE or the 9cEE (specificity: 86%-89%) were present additionally, the diagnosis of a T1G3 urothelial carcinoma could be made cytometrically. Follow-up data for survival (recurrence) analysis was available for 90 (82) patients of the T1G3 group. Using the median value as threshold, significant differences in survival were found for the mean ploidy only (p=0.0353). The length of the recurrence-free interval was significantly different for the entropy (p=0.0205), the 2cDI (p=0.0309) and the mean ploidy (p=0.0442). In conclusion, DNA single cell cytometry represents a highly relevant tool in the objective identification of T1G3 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, with a sufficient sensitivity and specificity. Further, this method enables prediction of tumor recurrence if suitable variables are chosen. The long-term survival of patients with T1G3 urothelial carcinoma can be estimated by DNA cytometry only in a limited manner, possibly due to the fact that the causes of death in the mostly elderly patients will be independent from the limited tumor disease.

Aged↗