Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Dauplat

Publications and source records attributed to J Dauplat.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

[Intravascular leiomyomatosis of uterine origin. a case of pseudo-metastatic cavo-cardial thrombus].

BACKGROUND: Leiomyomatosis is a benign smooth muscle tumor which can provoke serious complications in case of intracaval or intracardiac extension. CASE REPORT: A 61-year-old woman had undergone hysterectomy at the age of 45 years for a hemorrhagic fibroma. She underwent surgery for infiltrative breast cancer 3 months before hospitalization and was taking tamoxifen 30 mg/day. In the cancer context, the diagnosis of cavo-cardiac metastatic thrombus was proposed but not confirmed at pathology. The diagnosis of uterine tissue intravascular leiomyomatosis was established on the basis of pathology findings and immunohistochemistry results. DISCUSSION: Five other cases of leiomyomatosis after hysterectomy have been reported in the literature.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

[Inserm ad hoc committee: Recommendations for the management of women with a genetic risk for developing cancer of the breast and/or the ovary].

BACKGROUND: Almost 10% of breast and ovarian cancer are inherited, and the majority are linked to BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. Despite the uncertainty, consensus guidelines were defined to assist practitioners', and patients' decisions about the health care decisions to be made. METHODOLOGY: The ad hoc committee consisted of 14 experts designated by the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research. They all attended eleven workshops at which a systematic analytical review of more than 3,500 articles was carried out. Five additional experts critically analyzed the first version of the report. PROCESS: Two thresholds were defined on a probability scale giving the risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer, to serve as a means of deciding as whether an intervention is worthwhile. The first threshold is that above which an intervention can be envisaged or recommended; the second is that under which an intervention can be ruled out; between the two, the decision has to be made on a each by case basis. SCREENING AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES ANALYZED: About breast cancer: 1) hormonal interventions; 2) primary prevention (diet, family planning and chemoprevention); 3) screening (breast self-examination, clinician breast examination, tumor markers, imaging); 4) prophylactic mastectomy. About ovarian cancer: 1) hormonal stimulation; 2) screening (clinical screening, ultrasound and tumor markers); 3) prophylactic oophorectomy. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: With each strategy the following points were dealt with: the information to be delivered to the consult and, the procedure and the indications. The committee's opinion about BRCA mutation screening is that population-based or even large scale implementation are not justified. The committee feels that specific management is indispensable and advocates the use of defined and evaluated procedures, and involvement in clinical trials.

Age Factors↗
PubMed1999

[INSERM-FNCLCC collective expertise. Recommendations for medical management of women with genetic risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer].

BACKGROUND: Almost 10% of breast and ovarian cancer are inherited, and the majority are linked to BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. Despite the uncertainty in the management of women gene carriers, consensus guidelines were defined to assist practitioners', and patients' decisions about the health care decisions to be made. METHODOLOGY: The Ad Hoc Committee consisted of 14 experts designated by the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research. They all attended eleven workshops at which a systematic analytical review of more than 3500 articles was carried out. Five additional experts critically analysed the first version of the report. CRITERIA AND DECISION PROCESS: Two thresholds were defined on a probability scale giving the risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer, to serve as a means of deciding as whether an intervention is worthwhile. The first threshold is that above which an intervention can be envisaged or recommended; the second is that under which an intervention can be ruled out; between the two, the decision has to be made on a each by case basis. STRATEGIES ANALYZED: About breast cancer: 1) hormonal interventions; 2) primary prevention (diet, family planning and chemoprevention); 3) screening (breast self-examination, clinician breast examination, tumor markers, imaging); 4) prophylactic mastectomy. About ovarian cancer: 1) hormonal stimulation; 2) screening (clinical screening, ultrasound and tumor markers); 3) prophylactic oophorectomy. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: With each strategy the following points were dealt with; the information to be delivered to the Consultant, the procedure and the indications. In addition, the Committee's opinion about BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening is that population-based or even large scale implementation are not justified. Although no scientific evidence is available, the Committee feels that specific management is indispensable and advocates the use of defined and evaluated procedures, and involvement in clinical trials.

BRCA1 Protein↗
PubMed1999

[Microinvasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Role of axillary lymph node dissection].

The role of axillary lymph node dissection for microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast was analyzed in a series of 60 consecutive cases. Forty-four cases were subclinical mammographically-detected carcinomas revealed by the clusters of microcalcifications. Although pathologists differ in their criteria for microinvasion, the maximal size considered in this retrospective study was 2 mm. Axillary lymph node involvement was found in 3 cases (i.e. 5%) which harbored poor histologic features: comedocarcinoma subtype, high nuclear grade, and size of the ductal carcinoma in situ greater than 3 cm, requiring total mastectomy. While there is no need for axillary dissection in women with pure ductal carcinoma in situ, the management is quite different in proven microinvasion. Owing to the weakness of prognostic information given by cellular, biochemical and molecular features, instead of lymph node status, axillary dissection is still recommended in microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Recommendations for medical management of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: the French National Ad Hoc Committee.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Almost 10% of breast and ovarian cancers are familial, and the majority are linked to BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. Despite uncertainty about the management of female gene carriers, consensus guidelines have been established to assist practitioners and consultees in making health care decisions. METHODOLOGY: The Ad Hoc Committee was composed of 14 experts appointed by the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research, all of whom attended eleven workshops at which more than 3500 articles were systematically analyzed. Five additional experts critically analysed the first version of the report. CRITERIA AND DECISION PROCESS: On a probability scale of the risk of developing breast or ovarian cancers, two thresholds were defined for use in determining whether an intervention would be worthwhile. The first is the threshold above which an intervention can be envisaged or recommended, and the second is the one below which an intervention can be ruled out; between the two, the decision has to be made on a case-by-case basis. SCREENING AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES ANALYZED: With respect to breast cancer: 1) hormonal interventions; 2) primary prevention (diet, family planning and chemoprevention); 3) screening (breast self-examination, clinician breast examination, tumor markers, imaging); 4) prophylactic mastectomy. With respect to ovarian cancer: 1) hormonal stimulation; 2) screening (clinical screening, ultrasound and tumor markers); 3) prophylactic oophorectomy. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: For each strategy the following points were addressed: the information to be given to the consultee, the procedure and the indications. In addition, the committee's opinion about BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation screening is that population-based, or even large-scale, implementation are not justified. Although no scientific evidence is available, the committee feels that specific management is indispensable and advocates the use of defined and evaluated procedures, and participation in clinical trials.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1998

Primary chemotherapy in breast cancer: correlation between tumor response and patient outcome.

This study focused on the correlation between tumor response and patient outcome in 329 breast cancers treated with primary chemotherapy. There were 141 stage IIIB tumors, including 109 inflammatory carcinomas. Other malignancies (34 IIIA, 99 IIB, 55 IIA) were operable but considered to be too large (> 3 cm) for conservative surgery and received primary chemotherapy to avoid mastectomy. All received the AVCF regimen, comprising 4-week cycles of doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) day 1, vincristine (1 mg/m2) day 1, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; 400 mg/m2) days 2 through 5, cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) days 2 through 5. In 189 cases, methotrexate (15 mg/m2) was added at day 2 and day 3. Patients received 6 cycles, then underwent locoregional treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, or both) according to tumor regression. The response rate was assessed by clinical, mammographic, and echographic examinations: a 50% rate of objective responses were noted, of which 15% were complete responses (tumor shrinkage allowed breast conservation in 68% of patients who had stages II or IIIA). For the whole population studied, median follow-up was 111 months (range, 60- 196). One hundred fifty-seven patients had disease relapse (48 local, 14 contralateral, 95 distant). Kaplan-Meier estimates showed an increased 10-year overall survival for patients in complete response, as compared with noncomplete response: 70% versus 50% (p < 0.03). Complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy seems a good prognostic factor.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[INSERM-FNCLCC collective expert's report. Recommendations for management of women having a genetic risk of developing breast and/or ovarian cancer. National Federation of Centers of the Fight Against Cancer].

BACKGROUND: Almost 10% of breast and ovarian cancer are inherited, and the majority are linked to BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. Despite the uncertainty, consensus guidelines were defined to assist practitioners', and patients' decisions about the health care decisions to be made. METHODOLOGY: The Ad Hoc Committee consisted of 14 experts designated by the French National Institute for Health and Medical Research. They all attended eleven workshops at which a systematic analytical review of more than 3500 articles was carried out. Five additional experts critically analyzed the first version of the report. PROCESS: Two thresholds were defined on a probability scale giving the risk of developing breast or ovarian cancer, to serve as a means of deciding as whether an intervention is worthwhile. The first threshold is that above which an intervention can be envisaged or recommended; the second is that under which an intervention can be ruled out; between the two, the decision has to be made on a each by case basis. SCREENING AND PREVENTIVE STRATEGIES ANALYZED: About breast cancer: 1) hormonal interventions; 2) primary prevention (diet, family planning and chemoprevention); 3) screening (breast self-examination, clinician breast examination, tumor markers, imaging); 4) prophylactic mastectomy. About ovarian cancer: 1) hormonal stimulation; 2) screening (clinical screening, ultrasound and tumor markers); 3) prophylactic oophorectomy. MAIN CONCLUSIONS: With each strategy the following points were dealt with: the information to be delivered to the consultant, the procedure and the indications. The Committee's opinion about BRCA mutation screening is that population-based or even large scale implementation are not justified. The Committee feels that specific management is indispensable and advocates the use of defined and evaluated procedures, and involvement in clinical trials.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed1998

[Surgery for subclinical breast lesions].

Subclinical mammographic abnormalities discovered through screening are subjected to excisional surgical biopsy in order to prove or rule out malignant disease of the breast by histological examination. Close attention should be paid by the surgeon to avoid cosmetically disfiguring scar and failure in excision removal exhibited on postoperative mammogram. Indications for surgical assessment are selected upon suspicious patterns of opacities, clusters of microcalcifications or architectural distortions. Good communication between the radiologist, the surgeon and the pathologist is required for proper management of non palpable lesion. The most adequate lumpectomy technique should be performed with regard to the oncologic risk and cosmetic outcome.

Biopsy, Needle↗
PubMed1998

[Natural history of ovarian adenocarcinomas: from epidemiology to experimentation].

The ovarian carcinogenesis is not well known because the diagnosis is usually delayed to an advanced stage with a lot of chromosomic abnormalities. On the other hand, there is a lack of animal models and preneoplastic patterns are discussed. Different ways of studying are in progress. Prophylactic oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 mutation provides ovaries that can be compared to a control group. Epithelial or stromal changes are observed in the familial risk group more frequently than in the controls and could be preneoplastic. An experimental approach has been developed in order to confirm the Fathalla's theory of the incessant ovulation by culturing cells of rat surface ovarian epithelium with a high proliferative pressure. These cells become malignant in 10 out of 30 cases (after 10 cultures). The transformed tumor cells are a syngeneic tumor model that can be transplanted in the animal and analysed by molecular biology technics. This allowed to show the loss of a potentially tumor suppressor gene, lot 1, in the transformed cells and on the other hand the overexpression of a gene coding for a protease enzyme the cathepsin B, which is a marker of an aggressive metastatic power.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1997

[Krükenberg tumors of breast origin. 10 cases].

OBJECTIVE: To assess the characteristic features of ovarian carcinoma mucocellular secondary to breast cancer. METHODS: A retrospective pathology evaluation of ovariectomy specimens was conducted to compare the histological types with the original pathology diagnosis of breast cancer. RESULTS: Ten cases of ovarian carcinoma mucocellular were observed. Histologically, the ovarian stroma presented voluminous mucin-containing vacuoles in epitheliomatous cells with peripheralized nuclei. In 7 out of 10 cases, the primary breast cancer was invasive lobular carcinoma. DISCUSSION: These pathology findings are in agreement with comparative studies on the metastatic behavior of different histological types of breast cancer: invasive lobular carcinoma differs from invasive ductal carcinoma by its tropism for gastrointestinal and internal genital organs.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is used to improve patients' survival in locally-advanced and inflammatory breast cancer and to increase conservative surgical procedures in bulky tumours. Pathological complete responses are unusual. The aim of this pilot study was to assess the clinical and pathological response rates and to evaluate toxicity with a new protocol of primary chemotherapy in 50 high-risk breast cancer patients. All tumours were > 3 cm and had at least one other adverse prognostic factor: lymph node involvement (32 N1, 6 N2), SBR grade III (20), aneuploidy (29), negative hormonal receptors (19). Patients were treated by 3-week cycles of THP-doxorubicin 20 mg/m2 D1 to 3, vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 D1 and 4, cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 D1 to 4 (TNCF). 38 patients received G-CSF or GM-CSF support. After 4-6 cycles, all underwent surgery (39 conservative, 11 modified radical). Tumour response was assessed clinically, by mammography and echography and on pathological specimens. An objective clinical response was observed for 43 patients: 26 complete (51%) and 18 partial (37%). After pathological review, 11 patients (22%) were devoid of any tumour cells, 4 others (8%) had only in situ carcinoma. From 253 evaluated cycles, grade III-IV toxicity occurred, 81% with neutropenia, 25% with anaemia, and 20% with thrombocytopenia. All patients recovered. This regimen induced a severe but not life-threatening haematological toxicity and resulted in a high pathological response rate (30%).

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin-containing regimen for 326 stage II breast cancers: 15-year results.

Between 1975 and 1986, 326 patients with stage II breast cancer were treated with an adjuvant combination of doxorubicin, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and 5-fluorouracil (AVCF) following regional therapy (232 modified radical mastectomy, 94 lumpectomies, 304 irradiations). The AVCF regimen consisted of 4-week cycles of doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 day 1, modified radical mastectomy), vincristine (1 mg/m2 day 2), 5-fluorouracil 400 (mg/m2), and cyclophosphamide (300 mg/m2) days 3-6. Two hundred twenty-four patients (pts) had six cycles and 102 pts 12 cycles; 90 pts also received 30 mg daily tamoxifen for 1 year after chemotherapy. As of March 1994, the median follow-up was 130 months (range 86-221). One hundred eighteen pts developed recurrences (7 local, 19 controlateral, 92 metastatic) and 104 died. Estimated disease-free survival (DFS) was 5 years, 76 +/- 5%; 10 years, 64 +/- 5%; 15 years, 54 +/- 9%. Overall survival (OS) was 5 years, 85 +/- 4%; 10 years, 70 +/- 5%; 15 years, 58 +/- 10%. Survival was affected by the number of involved lymph nodes (258 pts were N+), menopausal status (OS at 15 years: 53% for MP+ and 65% for MP-) and Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grading, but not by hormonal receptors, number of courses, or associated hormonotherapy. Minimal cardiac toxicity was induced by doxorubicin either during or subsequent to treatment completion.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic rescue in patients with stage III to IV ovarian cancer: long-term results.

PURPOSE: A series of 53 patients with poor-prognosis epithelial ovarian cancer treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) followed by hematopoietic rescue was retrospectively studied from the day of diagnosis for toxicity and long-term survival analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with surgery followed by cisplatin combination chemotherapy. After second-look operation (SLO), HDC was administered: 23 patients received melphalan (140 mg/m2 on day 1) and 30 patients received a combination of carboplatin (400 mg/m2 on days 1 to 4) and cyclophosphamide (1.6 g/m2 on days 1 to 4). After HDC, autologous stem-cell transplantation was performed for hematologic support. RESULTS: One patient died of cardiac failure after HDC, but the acute toxicity was acceptable for the other patients. With a median follow-up of 81.5 months, the 5-year overall survival rate for the 53 patients was 59.9% and the disease-free survival (DFS) rate at 5 years was 23.6%. Twenty-four patients (45.3%) were alive, 12 with no evidence of disease and 12 with recurrent disease. The best results were achieved in 19 patients with pathologic complete response at SLO (74.2% 5-year overall survival; 32.8% 5-year DFS). CONCLUSION: HDC followed by autologous stem-cell support is a well-tolerated therapeutic approach for patients with poor-prognosis ovarian carcinoma. In this report, the 59.9% survival of 53 patients at 5 years must be compared to the 20% to 30% 5-year survival observed after conventional therapy. These results should be confirmed by an ongoing prospective randomized trial.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Initial surgery in advanced epithelial cancers of the ovary].

Epithelial ovarian cancer is usually diagnosed at an advanced stage with a bulky tumor in the pelvis and upper abdomen. The most common therapeutic strategy begins by a surgical operation that allows histologic diagnosis, accurate staging and maximal debulking. Since the papers by Griffiths at the end of the seventies, the volume of the residual tumor after surgery appears to be one of the most important prognostic factors in all series. Indeed, patients whose tumor is completely or optimally debulked have greater chances of prolonged survival of about 50% at 5 years. Surgeons experienced in this field can achieve optimal debulking in about 75 to 80% of cases. But, in order to reach this objective, they must often perform an ultra-radical operation with extensive peritonectomies, lymphadenectomies and intestinal resections. Moreover, since 1983, Hacker has shown that the initial tumor bulk was still a poor prognostic factor even after debulking. Today it can be demonstrated that the greater the tumor bulk the more aggressive must be the surgical procedure in order to be optimal and the final benefit will nevertheless be proportionally lower with a higher morbidity rate. This paradigm leads the surgeons to currently try to more accurately assess the initial tumor bulk in order to determine wether the tumor would be optimally debulked by means of a well-standardised operation. If not, the alternative strategy would be 3 chemotherapy courses as front-line treatment before debulking surgery, which hopefully would be easier. Trials are needed in order to validate this strategy despite the fact that some patients will unfortunately have their prognosis jeopardized by the chemoresistance of their tumor.

Carcinoma↗
PubMed1997

[First-line chemotherapy in operable breast neoplasms: results of 3 protocols].

In order to avoid modified radical mastectomy, a neoadjuvant approach was adopted in our institute for operable bulky breast cancers. From January, 1982, to December, 1995, 288 patients received primary chemotherapy with 3 different regimens (all doses mg/m2): (1) AVCF/AVCFM, 167 patients (adriamycin 30, vincristine 1 d1, cyclophosphamide 300, fluorouracil 400 d2-d5 and methotrexate 20 d2 and d4, every 28 days); (2) NEM, 78 patients (vinorelbine 25, epirubicin 35, methotrexate 20 d1 and d8, every 28 days); and (3) TNCF, 43 patients (THP-adria 20, d1-d3, vinorelbine 25 d1 and d4, cyclophosphamide 300, fluorouracil 400 d1-d4, every 21 days). Evaluation of the response comprised 3 methods: clinical (C), echographic (E), mammographic (M). The overall objective response rate (C: 63/90/93; E: 49/61/85; M: 53/65/83%) is higher with regimens (2) and (3). The complete response rate was increased 2-fold with TNCF but the hematologic toxicity was very superior with this combination. Patients were all operated for (2) and (3), only several for (1), and the breast conservation rate (68/83/79%) was quite similar in the 3 regimens. The pathological complete response rate reached 23% with TNCF. However the impact on patient survival has to be confirmed.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗