Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J D Wallace

Publications and source records attributed to J D Wallace.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

On-line statistical detection of average evoked potentials: application to evoked response audiometry (ERA).

An objective method of EP detection in averaged EEG epochs is described which is based on the statistical properties of the averaged EEG in the absence of time-locked EP activity. The statistical properties of the subject's averaged background EEG are summarized by making a set of comparisons between two consecutive EEG epochs immediately preceding each stimulus presentation. After every stimulus presentation, a second set of comparisons is made between the post-stimulus EEG epoch and the immediately preceding pre-stimulus EEG epoch. These two sets of comparisons are then examined to determine whether the latter differ significantly from the former. The technique has been programmed for on-line use on a 12-bit minicomputer, validated on cooperative adult subjects and used for ERA threshold determinations in young children. Using response detection criteria yielding an empirically determined false positive error rate of between 1 and 4%, threshold estimates averaged about 10 dB higher than psychophysical thresholds. The efficiency with which such ERA thresholds may be obtained with this method is substantially greater than that of conventional ERA procedures employing subjective evaluation of averages. Further, the technique allows variation of detection criteria to suit non-audiometric needs and empirical determination of the false-positive error rate under any set of conditions.

Adult↗

Thermography, mammography, and clinical examination in breast cancer screening. Review of 16,000 studies.

Breast cancer screening detected 139 biopsy-proved malignancies in 16,000 slef-selected women (8.7/1,000). In these, xeroradiography detected 78% (109), clinical examination 55% (76), and thermography 39% (54). In all 16,000 women, the thermogram was interpreted as positive in 17.9% (2,864). The greatest effectiveness of mammography vs. clinical examination was seen in detection of early breast cancers (small lesions with negative axillary lymph nodes). In this group, thermography was less effective than it was in patients with larger lesions and lymph node metastases.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Analysis of clinically occult and mammographically occult breast tumors.

Findings by xeromammography and clinical examination were compared in 16,000 self-selected women aged 45-64 who participated in a voluntary breast cancer screening program. A total of 138 malignancies were detected: 108 (78%) by mammography and 78 (57%) by clinical examination. Mammography was more effective for large breasts, fatty breasts, and in older women. Conversely, clinical examination was more effective for small breasts, dense breasts, and retroareolar lesions. Clinical detection decreased strikingly for lesions with negative lymph nodes, in situ and microinvasive lesions, deeply situated lesions, and lesions where microcalcifications were the sole mammographic finding.

Age Factors↗

Mass screening for breast disease. Results, problems, and expectations.

The first 18 months' experience of the Breast Diagnostic Center of Jefferson Medical College have been reviewed. Almost 14,000 patients were screened for breast disease, using a combination of clinical examination. Xeroradiography, and thermography. In this group of 14,000 women, 106 cases of cancer were discovered, in incidence of almost 8 per 1000 women screened. Of these 106 cases of cancer, 45.3% were clinically occult or not recognized by clinical examination, and within this group at the time of mastectomy only a small percent had any evidence of axillary lymph node metastases. The combination of several technics of examination is proving to be more reliable for the early detection of breast cancer than any of the technics alone, and programs such as these may make a significant difference in the death rate from breast cancer.

Biopsy↗