Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J D Rowley

Publications and source records attributed to J D Rowley.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

MLL is fused to CBP, a histone acetyltransferase, in therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia with a t(11;16)(q23;p13.3).

The recurring translocation t(11;16)(q23;p13.3) has been documented only in cases of acute leukemia or myelodysplasia secondary to therapy with drugs targeting DNA topoisomerase II. We show that the MLL gene is fused to the gene that codes for CBP (CREB-binding protein), the protein that binds specifically to the DNA-binding protein CREB (cAMP response element-binding protein) in this translocation. MLL is fused in-frame to a different exon of CBP in two patients producing chimeric proteins containing the AT-hooks, methyltransferase homology domain, and transcriptional repression domain of MLL fused to the CREB binding domain or to the bromodomain of CBP. Both fusion products retain the histone acetyltransferase domain of CBP and may lead to leukemia by promoting histone acetylation of genomic regions targeted by the MLL AT-hooks, leading to transcriptional deregulation via aberrant chromatin organization. CBP is the first partner gene of MLL containing well defined structural and functional motifs that provide unique insights into the potential mechanisms by which these translocations contribute to leukemogenesis.

Acute Disease↗

All patients with the T(11;16)(q23;p13.3) that involves MLL and CBP have treatment-related hematologic disorders.

The involvement of 11q23-balanced translocations in acute leukemia after treatment with drugs that inhibit the function of DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) is being recognized with increasing frequency. We and others have shown that the gene at 11q23 that is involved in all of these treatment-related leukemias is MLL (also called ALL1, Htrx, and HRX). In general, the translocations in these leukemias are the same as those occurring in de novo leukemia [eg, t(9;11), t(11;19), and t(4;11)], with the treatment-related leukemias accounting for no more than 5% to 10% of any particular translocation type. We have cloned the t(11;16)(q23;p13.3) and have shown that it involves MLL and CBP (CREB binding protein). The CBP gene was recently identified as a partner gene in the t(8;16) that occurs in acute myelomonocytic leukemia (AML-M4) de novo and rarely in treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia. We have studied eight t(11;16) patients, all of whom had prior therapy with drugs targetting topo II with fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using a probe for MLL and a cosmid contig covering the CBP gene. Both probes were split in all eight patients and the two derivative (der) chromosomes were each labeled with both probes. Use of an approximately 100-kb PAC located at the breakpoint of chromosome 16 from one patient revealed some variability in the breakpoint because it was on the der(16) in three patients, on the der(11) in another, and split in four others. We assume that the critical fusion gene is 5'MLL/3'CBP. Our series of patients is unusual because three of them presented with a myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) most similar to chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMMoL) and one other had dyserythropoiesis; MDS is rarely seen in 11q23 translocations either de novo or with t-AML. Using FISH and these same probes to analyze the lineage of bone marrow cells from one patient with CMMoL, we showed that all the mature monocytes contained the fusion genes as did some of the granulocytes and erythroblasts; none of the lymphocytes contained the fusion gene. The function of MLL is not well understood, but many domains could target the MLL protein to particular chromatin complexes. CBP is an adapter protein that is involved in regulating transcription. It is also involved in histone acetylation, which is thought to contribute to an increased level of gene expression. The fusion gene could alter the CBP protein such that it is constitutively active; alternatively, it could modify the chromatin-association functions of MLL.

Adolescent↗

Functional characterization of ETV6 and ETV6/CBFA2 in the regulation of the MCSFR proximal promoter.

The ETV6/CBFA2 (TEL/AML1) fusion gene occurs as a result of the chromosome translocation t(12;21)(p13;q22) in up to 30% of children diagnosed with B cell precursor (cd10+, cd19+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leukemic cells that have acquired the t(12;21) usually demonstrate loss of the remaining normal ETV6 (TEL) allele. Using reporter gene assays we have functionally characterized both the normal ETV6 and ETV6/CBFA2 fusion proteins in the regulation of the MCSFR proximal promoter. Neither ETV6 or ETV6/CBFA2 has any significant, detectable effect on the promoter by itself. However, both ETV6 and ETV6/CBFA2 inhibit the activation of the promoter by CBFA2B(AML1B) and C/EBPa. We have shown that a 29-bp region of the MCSFR promoter containing the binding sites for CBFA2B and C/EBPa is sufficient for the inhibition by ETV6 and ETV6/CBFA2. Mutational analysis of the MCSFR promoter revealed that binding of both CBFA2B and C/EBPa to their respective sites is necessary for the inhibition by ETV6 and ETV6/CBFA2. Deletion of the helix-loop-helix (HLH) region from the cDNAs of ETV6 and ETV6/CBFA2 decreased but did not completely abrogate the ability of either construct to inhibit promoter activation. We also found that the ETS DNA binding region of ETV6 is necessary for inhibition of the promoter. Addition of ETS1 and FLI1, two ETS family members that have homology in the 5' HLH region, but not Spi1, an ETS family member without the 5' HLH region, also inhibited reporter gene expression. Our data show that the inhibition mediated by ETV6 and ETV6/CBFA2, in the context of the MCSFR promoter, depend on interactions with other proteins, not just CBFA2B. Our results also indicate that the transactivation characteristics of ETV6/CBFA2 are a combination of positive and negative regulatory properties.

3T3 Cells↗

A t(6;12)(q23;p13) results in the fusion of ETV6 to a novel gene, STL, in a B-cell ALL cell line.

ETV6 (TEL) is rearranged in various types of hematologic malignancies. The B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell line SUP-B2 has a t(6;12)(q23;p13) involving ETV6 at 12p13 and a submicroscopic deletion of the other ETV6 allele. The reciprocal translocation results in the fusion of ETV6 to a previously unknown gene at 6q23, which we named STL (six-twelve leukemia gene). Both reciprocal fusion transcripts can be detected: On the der(6) chromosome, the ETV6/STL mRNA shows an apparently out of frame fusion of ETV6 at nucleotide 187 to STL, which would result in the addition of 14 amino acids to the first 54 amino acids of ETV6. On the der(12) chromosome three different variants of the STL/ETV6 fusion mRNA could be detected; variable size segments were inserted at the breakpoint between STL and ETV6 exon 3. One of these variants could give rise to a protein in which the first 54 amino acids of ETV6 are replaced by 12 amino acids from one of the STL short open reading frames. Sequence analysis of a 1.4 kb STL cDNA clone from a skeletal muscle library revealed no long open reading frames. This cell line will be very useful in studying the different mechanisms by which alterations of ETV6 contribute to leukemogenesis and in testing the hypothesis that ETV6 might act as a tumor suppressor gene.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Molecular analysis of the t(8;14)(q24;q11) chromosomal breakpoint junctions in the T-cell leukemia line MOLT-16.

The MOLT-16 cell line was established from the leukemic cells of a patient with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and contains a t(8;14)(q24;q11) resulting in juxtaposition of sequences downstream of the MYC gene on chromosome 8 and the J region of the T-cell receptor alpha chain gene (TCRA) on chromosome 14. The reciprocal translocation involved a complex rearrangement with two chromosome breakpoints within the TCRAJ region on chromosome 14, resulting in inversion of a 1.4 kb DNA fragment between the two breakpoints. The 5' border of the inversion joints with another segment of chromosome 14, whereas the 3' border joins with a region of chromosome 8 located at least 257 kb downstream of MYC. Extensive deletions have occurred on both chromosomes 8 and 14 in conjunction with the translocation. To investigate the possible involvement of the V(D)J recombinase in this translocation, we analyzed the nucleotide sequences surrounding the translocation breakpoints. The breakpoint on chromosome 14 occurs between a segment coding for a TCRAJ sequence and its hepatamer-nonamer signal. Heptamer-nonamer consensus sequences are also identified on chromosome 8 adjacent to the breakpoint. Inserted N and P nucleotides are observed at the breakpoint junctions.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Identification of pericentric inversion 12, inv(12)(p13.1q11), by fluorescence in situ hybridization in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M6).

Using probes located between 12p12.1 and 12p13.3, we performed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis and identified an inv(12)(p13.1q11) in a patient with acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M6). Standard cytogenetic analysis had identified the rearranged chromosomes 12 as del(12) (p11p13). Although deletions and translocations involving band 12p13 are fairly common chromosomal abnormalities observed in a broad spectrum of hematologic malignancies, inv(12) is a rather rare abnormality. We compare the clinical and cytogenetic findings with those of the previous cases reported in the literature.

Chromosome Banding↗

Hidden chromosome abnormalities in haematological malignancies detected by multicolour spectral karyotyping.

Cytogenetic analysis provides critical information of diagnostic and prognostic importance for haematological malignancies. In fact, the identification of recurring chromosomal breakpoints in leukaemias and lymphomas has expedited the cloning of genes whose translocation-induced deregulation causes malignant transformation. The pillar of karyotype analysis rests on chromosome banding techniques that have the distinct advantage that the entire genome can be analysed in a single experiment. However, poorly spread or contracted metaphase chromosomes and highly rearranged karyotypes with numerous marker chromosomes, common in tumour cell preparations, are often difficult to interpret unambiguously and subtle chromosomal aberrations, in particular the exchange of telomeric chromatin or small insertions remain elusive. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) overcomes some of these limitations, but is mainly utilized to confirm the presence of previously characterized or suspected aberrations. We have developed a novel approach, termed spectral karyotyping or SKY based on the hybridization of 24 fluorescently labelled chromosome painting probes that allows the simultaneous and differential colour display of all human chromosomes. We have used SKY to complement conventional banding techniques in haematological malignancies by analysing 15 cases with unidentified chromosome aberrations. In all instances SKY provided additional cytogenetic information, including the identification of marker chromosomes, the detection of subtle chromosomal translocations and the clarification of complex chromosomal rearrangements. Thus, SKY in combination with standard chromosome banding allows the characterization of chromosomal aberrations in leukaemia with unprecedented accuracy.

Adult↗

The leukemia-associated gene MDS1/EVI1 is a new type of GATA-binding transactivator.

EVI1, located at chromosome band 3q26, encodes a 1051 amino acid zinc finger protein inappropriately expressed in the leukemic cells of 2-5% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients. The activation of EVI1 often follows a chromosomal rearrangement involving band 3q26, and the two most frequent rearrangements are the t(3;3)(q21;q26) and the inv(3)(q21q26). EVI1 exists also as a longer protein that includes 188 additional amino acids at the N-terminus, named MDS1/EVI1. Both genes are expressed at very low levels in the normal bone marrow. The genomic region between the first coding exon of MDS1/EVI1 and the first coding exon of EVI1 is 150-300 kb. The majority of the chromosomal breakpoints at the 5' end of EVI1 in the t(3;3) resulting in EVI1 activation have been mapped in this region. As a consequence of the t(3;3), the cell would be unable to express MDS1/EVI1, although it would express EVI1. We have compared the transcriptional activity of MDS1/EVI1 and EVI1, and we show that MDS1/EVI1 is a strong activator of promoters containing the AGATA motif, whereas EVI1 is a repressor. In addition, whereas EVI1 represses activation by the GATA-1 erythroid factor, MDS1/EVI1 does not, and is itself repressed by EVI1. By gene fusion to the DNA-binding domain of Gal4, we further show that the activation properties of MDS1/EVI1 are restricted to an acidic segment encoded by the second and third exons in the 5' untranslated region of EVI1. We have also examined the relative expression of the two genes in normal bone marrow and in the bone marrow of leukemia patients with 3q26 rearrangements. Our results indicate that the rearrangements at 3q26 affect expression of EVI1, but not of MDS1/EVI1. We propose that rearrangements at 3q26 involving EVI1 could result in leukemia by a two-step process involving first transcriptional disruption of MDS1/EVI1, and next by inappropriately activating expression of EVI1.

3T3 Cells↗

Rearrangements of the AML1/CBFA2 gene in myeloid leukemia with the 3;21 translocation: in vitro and in vivo studies.

AML1 is involved at the breakpoint of chromosome 21 band q22 in several recurring chromosomal translocations associated with myeloid and lymphoid leukemias. AML1 corresponds to CBFA2, and encodes one of the DNA-binding subunits of the enhancer core binding factor CBF. Other members of this family of DNA-binding proteins are CBFA1 and CBFA3, also known as AML3 and AML2. The three proteins are characterized by a highly conserved domain (runt domain, > 90% homology) at the amino end that is necessary for DNA-binding and protein dimerization, and by a unique domain at the carboxyl end that is necessary for transactivation. Two recurring chromosomal translocations involving AML1 associated with myeloid leukemias are the t(8;21)(q22;q22), seen in 20% of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) M2, and the t(3;21)(q26;q22), that occurs in myeloid leukemias primarily following treatment with topoisomerase II inhibitors. In five patients with a t(3;21) whom we studied, AML1 is interrupted by the translocation breakpoint between the runt domain and the transactivation domain, and is fused to two genes on chromosome band 3q26: EAP, which encodes the ribosomal protein L22, and MDS1, which encodes a small polypeptide of unknown function. In one of the five patients we studied, a fusion with a third gene EVI1 also occurs. The fusion of EAP to AML1 is not in frame, and leads to a protein that is terminated shortly after the fusion junction by introduction of a stop codon. The fusion of AML1 to MDS1 is in frame, and adds 127 codons to the interrupted AML1. Thus, in the five cases that we studied, the 3;21 translocation results in expression of two coexisting chimeric mRNAs which contain the identical runt domain at the 5' region, but differ in the 3' region. In addition, the chimeric junction AML1/MDS1/EVII has been detected in cells from one of our patients with the 3;21 translocation. Several genes necessary for myeloid lineage differentiation contain the target sequence for AML1 in their regulatory regions. We have compared the normal AML1 to AML1/MDS1 and AML1/EAP as transcriptional regulators of the CSF1R promoter which contains the CBF target sequence. Our results indicate that whereas the normal AML1 can activate the promoter, the chimeric proteins compete with the normal AML1 and repress expression from the CSF1R promoter. To determine the role of the chimeric proteins in cell growth, we expressed their cDNA in rat fibroblasts. When either fusion gene is expressed, the cells lose contact inhibition and form foci over the monolayer. However, only cells expressing AML1/MDS1 grow as large tumors in nude mice. Thus, although both chimeric genes have similar effects in transactivation of the CSF1R promoter, they affect cell growth as tumor promoters differently in vivo.

Acute Disease↗

BCL3 rearrangements and t(14;19) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other B-cell malignancies: a molecular and cytogenetic study.

The t(14;19)(q32.3;q13.1) is a recurring translocation found in the neoplastic cells of some patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or other B-lymphocytic neoplasms. We previously cloned the translocation breakpoint junctions present in the leukemic cells from three such patients and identified a gene, BCL3, whose transcription is increased as a result of the translocation. In the present paper, we describe three additional patients with the t(14;19), one with lymphoma and two with CLL, and report the cloning and sequencing of the breakpoint junction in one of these patients as well as in a previously reported patient. We and others have found that the breakpoints on chromosome 14, with one exception, fall within the switch region upstream of the immunoglobulin heavy chain C alpha 1 or C alpha 2 sequences. Several of the breaks within chromosome 19 fall immediately upstream of the BCL3 gene, but several others are more than 16 kb 5' of the gene. Most patients with CLL and the t(14;19) also show trisomy 12.

Adult↗

Identification of complex genomic breakpoint junctions in the t(9;11) MLL-AF9 fusion gene in acute leukemia.

The MLL gene at chromosome 11, band q23, is involved in translocations with as many as 40 different chromosomal bands. Virtually all breakpoints occur within an 8.3 kb BamHI fragment and result in 5' MLL fused to partner genes in a 5'-3' orientation. The translocation t(9;11)(p22;q23), which results in the fusion of MLL to AF9, is the most common of the 11q23 chromosomal abnormalities observed in de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), in therapy related leukemia (t-AML), and rarely in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). We have studied 24 patients with a t(9;11) and an MLL rearrangement, including 19 patients with AML, four with t-AML, and one with ALL. To understand the mechanisms of this illegitimate recombination, we cloned and sequenced the t(9;11) translocation breakpoint junctions on both derivative chromosomes from one AML patient and from the Mono Mac 6 (MM6) cell line, which was derived from a patient with AML. Two different complex junctions were noted. In the AML patient, both chromosome 11 and 9 breaks were staggered, occurred in Alu DNA sequences, and resulted in a 331 bp duplication. In the MM6 cell line, breaks in chromosomes 11 and 9 were also staggered, but, in contrast to the finding in the AML patient, the breaks did not involve Alu DNA sequences and resulted in a 664 bp deletion at the breakpoints. Using reverse transcriptase (RT-) PCR, we analyzed 11 patient samples, including the two just described, for MML-AF9 fusions. The fusion occurred in six of seven AML patients, two of two t-AML patients, one patient with ALL, and in the MM6 cell line. Interestingly, all of the breaks within the AF9 gene in AML patients occurred in the central AF9 exon, called Site A by others, whereas in the single ALL patient the breakpoint mapped to a more 3' region of the AF9 gene. Our data, when combined with those of others, suggest that the fusion point within the AF9 gene, and thus the amount of AF9 material included in the MLL-AF9 fusion gene product, may influence the phenotype of the resulting leukemia. This further supports the proposal that the MML translocation partner genes play a critical role in the leukemogenic process.

Acute Disease↗

AF10 is split by MLL and HEAB, a human homolog to a putative Caenorhabditis elegans ATP/GTP-binding protein in an invins(10;11)(p12;q23q12).

Invins(10;11)(p12;q23q12) is one of the rare but recurring chromosome rearrangements seen in acute monoblastic leukemia. We cloned the proximal 10p breakpoint from one patient and showed that the MLL gene at 11q23 was fused to the 3' portion of AF10 at 10p12. In addition, we cloned the telomeric 10p junction and we found that the 5' portion of AF10 was juxtaposed to a previously unidentified gene at 11q12, which we call HEAB (a human homolog to a hypothetical Caenorhabditis elegans ATP/GTP-binding protein). These results indicate that the AF10 gene is split into a 5' AF10 and a 3' AF10 portion by the 11q23q12 chromosome segment and that both breakpoint junctions result in fusion transcripts of 5' AF10/HEAB and MLL/3' AF10. Only the MLL/3' AF10 fusion mRNA results in an in-frame fusion. Northern blot analysis of HEAB expression shows that a 2.0-kb major transcript is expressed ubiquitously in human tissues and is especially abundant in testis and skeletal muscle, whereas a 3.2-kb minor transcript is noted with the highest level of expression in thymus and peripheral blood leukocytes. The HEAB gene encodes a 425-amino acid protein that is rich in valine and leucine. HEAB protein shows high homology in its entire amino acid sequence to a putative C elegans protein and contains an adenosine triphosphate (ATP)/guanosine triphosphate (GTP)-binding motif that has homology to the ATP-binding transporter superfamily or to GTP-binding proteins. Our results could explain the high frequency of complex insertion and other rearrangement events that involve 10p12 and 11q12 and 11q23. The finding that different portions of a single gene are involved in fusions with two independent genes in the same leukemic cell is unique in the analysis of chromosome translocations.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Synergistic up-regulation of the myeloid-specific promoter for the macrophage colony-stimulating factor receptor by AML1 and the t(8;21) fusion protein may contribute to leukemogenesis.

AML1 is involved in the (8;21) translocation, associated with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML)-type M2, which results in the production of the AML1-ETO fusion protein: the amino-terminal 177 amino acids of AML1 and the carboxyl-terminal 575 amino acids of ETO. The mechanism by which AML1-ETO accomplishes leukemic transformation is unknown; however, AML1-ETO interferes with AML1 transactivation of such AML1 targets as the T-cell receptor beta enhancer and the granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promoter. Herein, we explored the effect of AML1-ETO on regulation of a myeloid-specific AML1 target, the macrophage colony-stimulating factor (M-CSF) receptor promoter. We found that AML1-ETO and AML1 work synergistically to transactivate the M-CSF receptor promoter, thus exhibiting a different activity than previously described. Truncation mutants within the ETO portion of AML1-ETO revealed the region of ETO necessary for the cooperativity between AML1 and AML1-ETO lies between amino acids 347 and 540. Endogenous M-CSF receptor expression was examined in Kasumi-1 cells, derived from a patient with AML-M2 t(8;21) and the promonocytic cell line U937. Kasumi-1 cells exhibited a significantly higher level of M-CSF receptor expression than U937 cells. Bone marrow from patients with AML-M2 t(8;21) also exhibited a higher level of expression of M-CSF receptor compared with normal controls. The upregulation of M-CSF receptor expression by AML1-ETO may contribute to the development of a leukemic state in these patients.

Animals↗

TEL-AML1 translocations with TEL and CDKN2 inactivation in acute lymphoblastic leukemia cell lines.

The t(12;21) (p 13; q22) results in the fusion of the TEL gene located on chromosome 12 with the AML1 gene located on the derivative chromosome 21. Because this translocation is difficult to detect using standard cytogenetic techniques, 27 previously karyotyped B-lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) cell lines were evaluated for the presence of the TEL-AML1 fusion using the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and cDNA sequencing. Six cell lines expressed the TEL-AML1 chimeric transcript by RT-PCR and the t(12;21) was confirmed by FISH analysis with probes for TEL, AML1, and chromosome 12. While only one of the 6 cell lines with the t(12;21) lost the der(12)t(12;21)-encoded AML1-TEL fusion transcript, 4 cell lines lacked expression of the nontranslocated allele of TEL and 5 cell lines lacked expression of CDKN2. Moreover, in 2 patients (1 with the TEL-AML1 transcript and 1 without), TEL expression was lost with disease progression; le, TEL was expressed in the initial cell lines (established at diagnosis or first relapse) whereas TEL was not expressed in the cell lines established from these patients in late-stage disease. These data show the coexistence of multiple genetic defects in childhood B-lineage ALL Cell lines with t(12;21) will facilitate the study of TEL-AML1 and AML1-TEL fusion proteins as well as TEL and CDKN2 gene inactivation in leukemia transformation and progression.

Base Sequence↗

LAPTM5: a novel lysosomal-associated multispanning membrane protein preferentially expressed in hematopoietic cells.

While a large body of knowledge about cell membrane proteins exists, much less is known about the repertoire and function of integral membrane proteins of intracellular organelles. In looking for novel classes of genes that are functionally important to hematopoietic cells, we have cloned the cDNA for a gene preferentially expressed in adult hematopoietic tissues. During embryonic development the gene is expressed in both hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic tissues. In cell lines the gene is expressed specifically in hematopoietic lineages, whereas in normal adult tissues the mRNA is preferentially detected at high levels in lymphoid and myeloid tissues. The predicted protein is a pentaspanner with no homology to known genes and conserved across evolution. Immunocytological and cell fractionation studies with a specific antibody revealed a protein localizing in lysosomes. The gene, provisionally named LAPTM5, maps to chromosome 1p34. The expression pattern of the gene together with preliminary evidence that the protein interacts with ubiquitin indicates that the protein may have a special functional role during embryogenesis and in adult hematopoietic cells.

Adult↗

The t(10;11)(p13;q14) in the U937 cell line results in the fusion of the AF10 gene and CALM, encoding a new member of the AP-3 clathrin assembly protein family.

The translocation t(10;11)(p13;q14) is a recurring chromosomal abnormality that has been observed in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia as well as acute myeloid leukemia. We have recently reported that the monocytic cell line U937 has a t(10;11)(p13;q14) translocation. Using a combination of positional cloning and candidate gene approach, we cloned the breakpoint and were able to show that AF10 is fused to a novel gene that we named CALM (Clathrin Assembly Lymphoid Myeloid leukemia gene) located at 11q14. AF10, a putative transcription factor, had recently been cloned as one of the fusion partners of MLL. CALM has a very high homology in its N-terminal third to the murine ap-3 gene which is one of the clathrin assembly proteins. The N-terminal region of ap-3 has been shown to bind to clathrin and to have a high-affinity binding site for phosphoinositols. The identification of the CALM/AF10 fusion gene in the widely used U937 cell line will contribute to our understanding of the malignant phenotype of this line.

Adaptor Proteins, Vesicular Transport↗

Distribution of 11q23 breakpoints within the MLL breakpoint cluster region in de novo acute leukemia and in treatment-related acute myeloid leukemia: correlation with scaffold attachment regions and topoisomerase II consensus binding sites.

A major unresolved question for 11q23 translocations involving MLL is the chromosomal mechanism(s) leading to these translocations. We have mapped breakpoints within the 8.3-kb BamHI breakpoint cluster region in 31 patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) de novo and in 8 t-AML patients. In 23 of 31 leukemia de novo patients, MLL breakpoints mapped to the centromeric half (4.57 kb) of the breakpoint cluster region, whereas those in eight de novo patients mapped to the telomeric half (3.87 kb). In contrast, only two t-AML breakpoints mapped in the centromeric half, whereas six mapped in the telomeric half. The difference in distribution of the leukemia de novo breakpoints is statistically significant (P = .02). A similar difference in distribution of breakpoints between de novo patients and t-AML patients has been reported by others. We identified a low- or weak-affinity scaffold attachment region (SAR) mapping just centromeric to the breakpoint cluster region, and a high-affinity SAR mapping within the telomeric half of the breakpoint cluster region. Using high stringency criteria to define in vitro vertebrate topoisomerase II (topo II) consensus sites, one topo II site mapped adjacent to the telomeric SAR, whereas six mapped within the SAR. Therefore, 74% of leukemia de novo and 25% of t-AML breakpoints map to the centromeric half of the breakpoint cluster region map between the two SARs; in contrast, 26% of the leukemia de novo and 75% of the t-AML patient breakpoints map to the telomeric half of the breakpoint cluster region that contains both the telomeric SAR and the topo II sites. Thus, the chromatin structure of the MLL breakpoint cluster region may be important in determining the distribution of the breakpoints. The data suggest that the mechanism(s) leading to translocations may differ in leukemia de novo and in t-AML.

Acute Disease↗