Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J D Cox

Publications and source records attributed to J D Cox.

At least 127 records · Page 7Linked to original sources
PubMed1992

Interruptions adversely affect local control and survival with hyperfractionated radiation therapy of carcinomas of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts. New evidence for accelerated proliferation from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 8313.

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX) attempts to overcome tumor proliferation during treatment by permitting higher total doses in the same overall time as standard fractionation. Whereas interruptions, including splits, reduce local control with standard fractionation in carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts, HFX might compensate for interruptions. Patients were randomized to receive total doses of 6720, 7200, 7680, and 8160 cGy, using 120 cGy twice daily, 5 days per week. Those analyzed received +/- 4% of assigned total dose and lived 90 days or more. Treatment was completed within 5 days of the time specified for each treatment arm in 233 patients; 48, 80, and 131 patients had delays 14, 10, and 5 days or more, respectively. Locoregional control and survival were significantly (P less than or equal to 0.03) reduced with delays of 5 days or more when corrected for prognostic factors. Late effects of radiation therapy were not affected by interruptions. These data support the hypothesis that proliferation (possibly accelerated) of tumor clonogens during treatment influences the outcome.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Is long-term survival possible with external beam irradiation for stage D1 adenocarcinoma of the prostate?

From 1972 to 1986, 354 patients with local and locoregional adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated with curative intent at the Medical College of Wisconsin. Fifty-six of these patients were found to have Stage D1 disease (evidence of pelvic lymph node involvement). Using external beam irradiation alone, these patients were treated aggressively to the pelvis followed by a boost to the prostate. The median dose to the prostate was 6800 cGy, and to the pelvis, it was 5040 cGy. The median period of observation after treatment was 9 years. Actuarial survival was 76% at 5 years, and disease-free survival was 61% at 5 years. Twenty-three patients had biopsy-proved pelvic lymph node involvement; the other 33 were considered to have Stage D1 disease based on abnormal computed tomographic scans, lymphangiograms, or both. Actuarial survival and disease-free survival were calculated for both groups separately, and there was no statistical difference in the results. Major complications occurred in 3.6% (two patients) of this group with Stage D1 disease. These results support the continued use of aggressive external beam irradiation in patients with locoregional adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed1992

Thymoma. The prognostic significance of flow cytometric DNA analysis.

The clinical course of patients with thymoma varies widely despite its histologically benign appearance. Treatment decisions are based on local invasion and the extent of resection. Because some patients have more aggressive tumors, the prognostic significance of flow cytometric (FCM) analysis of nuclear DNA content was examined. Adequate tissue from paraffin-embedded blocks was available for 25 patients. Using FCM, the percentage of cells in S-phase (%S) and the ploidy, based on the DNA index (DI), were determined. The mean patient age was 52 years, with a female-to-male ratio of 1.3:1 and a median follow-up of 64 months. Seventeen patients underwent total tumor resections, and 12 also received radiation therapy. Eight patients underwent subtotal resections, with five receiving radiation therapy (with or without chemotherapy) and three receiving chemotherapy alone. Based on invasion and intrathoracic dissemination, the tumors were classified into four stages. The mean %S was 5.6. There was no relationship observed between %S and patient outcome. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 85% for the 16 patients with diploid (DI = 1) tumors and 33% for the 9 patients with aneuploid (DI more than 1) tumors (P less than 0.002). Similar significant differences were observed by stage and extent of surgery. For those who had total resection (n = 17), the disease-free survival rate was 89% when DI equaled 1 and 50% when DI was more than 1 (P = 0.01). Although the numbers studied were small, when stage, histologic findings, and type of surgery were subdivided by DI, a higher incidence of relapse was associated consistently with aneuploidy. The DI appears to be a useful prognostic parameter for identifying patients at high risk of relapse.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Thymoma: treatment and prognosis.

Thirty-six patients with pathologically confirmed thymoma were treated at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center from 1962 to 1987. The tumors were staged based on invasion and intrathoracic dissemination. Twenty-one patients had total resection, five had subtotal resection, and 10 had biopsy alone. Twenty-two patients had definitive megavoltage radiation therapy with a median dose of 50 Gy. The 5-year, disease-free survival by stage was 74% for Stage I (n = 11), 71% for Stage II (n = 8), 50% for Stage III (n = 10), and 29% for Stage IVA (n = 7) (p less than 0.03). The 5-year, disease-free survival by extent of surgery was 74% for total resection, 60% for subtotal resection and 20% for biopsy only (p = 0.001). There were 15 patients with recurrences: two in Stage I, two in Stage II, five in Stage III, and six in Stage IVA. The median months to relapse, for those who failed treatment, were 46, 36, 2, and 13 for Stages I, II, III, and IVA respectively. Of the patients with recurrences four had a total resection, two subtotal resection, and nine biopsy only. Only one patient had distant metastases as the first site of relapse without intrathoracic relapse. For the eight patients who relapsed following radiation therapy, four were in the radiotherapy field. All four of the in-field failures were in patients who had a partial response. There were insufficient numbers of patients to determine a dose response to radiotherapy. For patients with invasive, incompletely resected disease, a multimodality approach may be necessary for long term, disease-free survival.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

Randomized dose-searching phase ILE/II trials of fractionation in radiation therapy for cancer.

This article describes a new design, phase ILE/II dose searching, used in four prospective, randomized, multicenter clinical trials of escalating total doses of hyperfractionated radiation. This design combines an experimental protocol with a statistical application of ranking and selection theory. Its purpose was to identify (within a certain margin of error) a dose that achieved the highest rate of clinical response from a set of doses that were tolerable in terms of both acute (within 90 days) and late (more than 90 days) toxic effects (LE). We calculated the number of patients required to reliably test toxicity under various assumptions. To determine the maximum tolerated total dose for hyperfractionated radiation, we randomly assigned patients with tumors that responded to radiation therapy in a dose-dependent manner from four body sites (lung, upper respiratory and digestive tract, bladder, and brain) to one of three regimens receiving total doses (D1, D2, or D3) differing by increments of 4.8 Gy. All patients received two fractions of 1.2 Gy each (separated by 4-6 hours) daily 5 days a week. The lowest total dose was set at the level considered tolerable with standard once-a-day radiation therapy. We tested tumor responses and late toxic effects of higher doses by assigning patients to these three regimens until acute effects and early estimates of late effects were found to be acceptable for the highest dose D3; thereafter, regimen D1 was closed, and additional patients were assigned to D2, D3, and D4 (an escalated total dose greater than D3 by an increment of 4.8 Gy). The assignment of patients was performed in a weighted manner (1:1:2), so that greater numbers were assigned to the highest dose regimen (whether D3 or D4) to allow rapid evaluation of the feasibility of the highest dose.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1991

Comparison of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and American Joint Committee on Cancer staging systems among patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving hyperfractionated radiation therapy. A report of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 83-11.

Since 1973, the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) has staged and stratified patients in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) protocols according to the RTOG staging system. In 1985, the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) revised its lung cancer staging system, with the principle differences from the RTOG system being the staging of involvement of the chest wall and of contralateral mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. To determine if the AJCC system discriminated outcome differently than the RTOG system in a nonoperative series, all 850 evaluable patients treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (RT) on the RTOG protocol 83-11 were restaged by the AJCC system. There was 67% agreement in patient distribution between the following comparable stages in each system: RTOG Stage II/AJCC Stage II; RTOG Stage III/AJCC Stage IIIA; and RTOG Stage IV/AJCC Stage IIIB. Both systems successfully predicted for survival (P less than 0.001), although the RTOG staging was more discriminating (relative risk ratios, 1.59 versus 1.38). Among the 507 favorable patients (those with less than or equal to 5% weight loss and Karnofsky performance status [KPS] of 70 to 100), the RTOG staging was also more predictive (P = 0.004 versus P = 0.01). When RTOG Stage III (462 patients) was divided into those without contralateral mediastinal or hilar adenopathy (AJCC Stage II/IIIA) and those with (AJCC Stage IIIB), a significant survival (P = 0.0001) was noted with 2-year survival rates of 26% versus 4%, respectively. When AJCC Stage IIIA (348 patients) was divided into the patients without chest wall invasion (RTOG Stage II/III) and those with (RTOG Stage IV), a difference in 2-year survival of 22% versus 10% was observed (P = 0.002). Although both staging systems independently predict for survival, a fusion of both staging systems is the most discriminating of outcome. Future nonoperative studies in locally advanced NSCLC should stratify for contralateral nodal involvement (per AJCC staging) and chest wall invasion (per RTOG staging).

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1991

Radiation oncology.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Combined Modality Therapy↗
PubMed1991

N2 (clinical) non-small cell carcinoma of the lung: prospective trials of radiation therapy with total doses 60 Gy by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Clinical Stage III (N2) non-small cell carcinoma of the lung encompasses a large group of patients, frequently treated with radiation therapy alone, who are now considered to have borderline-resectable tumors. Pilot studies are proceeding which use combinations of resection, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy. To place trials of combination therapy in perspective with contemporary results of radiation therapy alone, recently completed trials of the RTOG were analyzed specifically for clinical Stages T1-3N2. A prospective randomized trial of hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX), conducted from 1983 through 1987, compared total doses of 60.0, 64.8, and 69.6 Gy using 1.2 Gy bid with greater than or equal to 4 hr interval. After acute and late effects were considered tolerable, 74.4 Gy and 79.2 Gy arms supplanted the two lowest dose arms. Survival was compared among the five total dose arms, and with 60 Gy in 30 fractions in 6 weeks (standard fractionation-STD) from earlier RTOG studies. Of 516 HFX patients analyzed, 296 (57.3%) with Performance Status (PS) 70-100 and less than 5% weight loss (favorable) had a significantly (p = .001) better survival than those with PS 50-69 or weight loss greater than 5%. Patients with RTOG Stage III (361, 70.0%) experienced better survival (p = .027) than RTOG Stage IV M0. The 69.6 Gy total dose arm was significantly (p = .031) better in favorable RTOG Stage III patients than all other total dose arms: the 1-year survival rate was 58% and the 3-year rate was 20%. The 69.6 Gy HFX results were significantly (p = .002) better than results with STD fractionation in comparable patients from earlier RTOG trials (1-year survival = 30%, 3-year survival = 7%). A prospective, randomized Phase III comparison of STD with 60 Gy versus HFX with 69.6 Gy is underway. These results provide benchmarks for studies of surgical resection combined with chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy until results of prospective comparisons with concurrent controls are available.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

ASTRO plenary: interfraction interval is a major determinant of late effects, with hyperfractionated radiation therapy of carcinomas of upper respiratory and digestive tracts: results from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group protocol 8313.

A prospective, randomized, multi-institutional, Phase I(LE)/II trial of HFX was conducted by the RTOG between 1983 and 1987. Patients with histologically proven, inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts stratified by site, nodal status, and performance status, were assigned to one of three arms, were assigned to one of three arms, 67.2 Gy, 72.0 Gy, or 76.8 Gy. Fractions of 1.2 Gy were given twice daily, 5 days per week: intervals of 4 to 8 hours were permitted between fractions. After acceptable rates of acute normal tissue effects were found, the randomization was changed to evaluate a new higher total dose, 81.6 Gy. Of 479 patients entered, 447 were analyzed, 63 on 67.2 Gy, 129 on 72.0 Gy, 117 on 76.8 Gy, and 138 on 81.6 Gy. The treatment arms were well balanced with respect to pretreatment characteristics. Acute reactions consisted almost entirely of pseudomembranous inflammation. "Severe" (Grade 3) acute reactions were reported in 33% to 41% and grade 4 reactions were found in 0 to 3% of patients, with no differences in frequencies among the four arms. Toxicities that developed or persisted beyond 90 days after the first treatment (408 patients evaluable greater than 90 days) did not differ among arms: grade 3+ reactions occurred in 10% to 14%, and grade 4+ effects (necroses) were reported in 5% at 67.2 Gy, 3% at 72.0 Gy, 7% at 76.8 Gy, and 2% at 81.6 Gy. Grade 3+ acute reactions occurred in 40% of patients when the interfraction interval was less than or equal to 4.5 hours versus 31% with greater than 4.5 hours (p = .03). Interfraction intervals less than or equal to 4.5 hours were associated with higher frequencies of grade 4+ late effects in all four arms, 8% of 197 patients with less than or equal to 4.5 hours versus 1% of 211 patients with greater than 4.5 hours. Estimates of late toxicity at 1, 2, and 3 years were 5.5%, 9.8%, and 15.4% with intervals less than or equal to 4.5 hours, versus 1.7% at all three periods for greater than 4.5 hours (p = .006). Local-regional control at 2 years was 25% for the assigned dose of 67.2 Gy compared to 43% to 45% for the three higher doses (p = .01), but a similar comparison for survival showed no significant difference (p = .35). There was no evidence for an effect of interfraction interval on either local-regional control (p = .38) or survival (p = .28).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1991

The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group: an update of clinical research activities.

This paper provides an introduction into the clinical activities of the RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group), its goals, its organization, its format for protocol development, and presents major areas of achievement. It provides an organizational chart of the group, a disease site modality cross-reference for protocols, and appendices which provide the key published results of the Group's clinical activities. This paper presents an important overview of the RTOG clinical research activities, which are designed to improve the role of radiation therapy.

Clinical Protocols↗
PubMed1991

The effect of overall treatment time on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 75-06 and 77-06 experience.

From 1976 to 1983, 1091 patients were entered into RTOG protocols 75-06 and 77-06. Of these, 780 patients complied with protocol requirements, received a minimum tumor dose of greater than or equal to 6500 cGy, and received no endocrine therapy. There were 78, 342, and 360 patients with localized prostate carcinoma, Stages T1b(A2), T2(B), and T3,4(C), respectively. The potential follow-up period ranges from 6 years 5 months to 13 years 3 months, with a median follow-up of 9 years. This study examines the influence of overall treatment time on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma in this patient population. Within each stage, patients were divided into three groups according to the total number of elapsed days while on treatment: within 49 days (less than or equal to 7 weeks); 50 to 63 days (8 to 9 weeks); and greater than or equal to 64 days (greater than 9 weeks). Based on actuarial analysis, within each stage, the overall treatment time did not have any impact on the following: overall survival, NED survival, or local/regional control. When grouped under different histologic grades, that is, Gleason scores 2-5, 6-7, and 8-10, the actuarial local/regional control showed no statistical difference among the three groups. The actual local/regional failures were analyzed and stratified by stage and Gleason scores, and no statistical difference was noted among the three groups for each stratification. The range of local/regional failure rates among the three groups for T1b(A2), T2(B), and T3,4(C) disease were 0%-8%, 16%-23%, and 24%-27%, respectively. The corresponding range of local/regional failure rates for patients with Gleason scores of 2-5, 6-7, and 8-10 were 13%-14%, 18%-22%, and 22%-33%, respectively. The incidence of late complications was not related to the number of elapsed treatment days. Therefore, the overall treatment time does not have an impact on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma. It is hypothesized that prostate carcinoma behaves as late-reacting tissue in which there is little, if any, accelerated repopulation of clonogenic tumor cells during the later half of a protracted course of radiotherapy. This observation is in direct contrast to that suggested for head and neck carcinoma and bears important implications in daily radiotherapeutic management of patients with prostate carcinoma.

Follow-Up Studies↗
PubMed1991

Long-term treatment sequelae following external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate: analysis of RTOG studies 7506 and 7706.

Significant late intestinal and urinary morbidity from external beam irradiation for adenocarcinoma of the prostate has been a constant concern of both the urologist and the radiation oncologist. We analyzed two large Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trials (7506 and 7706) using primary irradiation in the treatment of local or locoregional adenocarcinoma of the prostate to assess morbidity via the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scoring scheme (grade 1-5). One thousand twenty patients were treated in total with a minimum follow-up of 7 years in the surviving patients. There was a 3.3% incidence of intestinal complications defined as grade 3 toxicity or more with .6% of patients experiencing bowel obstruction or perforation. Urinary complications defined as grade 3 toxicity or more were found in 7.7% of patients with only 0.5% experiencing morbidity that would require a major surgical intervention such as laparotomy, cystectomy, or prolonged hospitalization. Intestinal and urinary complications were evaluated in reference to several parameters that might have an impact on their incidence (i.e., previous laparotomy, stage of disease, hypertension, positive lymph nodes, previous transurethral resection, total dose, and energy of accelerator used). Only total dose (greater than 70 Gray) was found to have a significant impact on the incidence of the urinary complications. None of these factors had a significant impact on the incidence of intestinal complications. These data from two large multi-institutional trials represent a fair estimate of the actual incidence of major intestinal and urinary complications from external beam irradiation in the management of local and locoregional adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Since the incidence of these major complications remains very low, we believe that external beam irradiation remains an excellent alternative to radical prostatectomy in the management of these patients.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

Five-year survival after hyperfractionated radiation therapy for non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung (NSCCL): results of RTOG protocol 81-08.

RTOG Protocol 81-08, a feasibility study of hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX) with 1.2 Gy twice daily separated by 4-6 hours for non-small-cell cancer of the lung (NSCCL), was completed in 1983. Encouraging short-term results in a recently closed trial of HFX for NSCCL (RTOG 83-11) led to assessment of long-term outcome in the earlier trial. Of 120 evaluable patients who were assigned to total doses from 50.4 Gy to 74.4 Gy, all 5 of the 5-year survivors came from the 79 patients assigned to receive 69.6 Gy. The 5-year survival rates for the 79 patients were 14.3 +/- 9.4% for clinical RTOG Stage II, 5.9 +/- 4.0% for Stage III, and 3.2 +/- 3.2% for Stage IV. Combined Stage II and III 5-year survival rates were 8.3 +/- 4.0% for HFX 69.6 Gy compared to 5.6 +/- 1.5% for standard once-a-day irradiation in concurrent RTOG trials.

Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung↗
PubMed1991

Biopsies of non-small cell lung cancer: central review in cooperative studies of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group.

Cooperative trials involving many institutions have long been recognized as a major means of gaining enough experience in a reasonably short period of time to determine the effectiveness of new approaches in cancer therapy. In order to make such multiinstitutional trials meaningful, it is necessary to have uniform and objective diagnostic standards in histopathology. Large cooperative therapeutic trials, such as the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) constructs, must rely on the histopathologic diagnoses of many pathologists from varied institutions or subject them to central review, which is a longer and costlier process. This study is an assay of the need for central review in cooperative studies on non-small cell lung cancer, which includes squamous cell, large cell, adenocarcinomas, and combined squamous cell and adenocarcinomas.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1990

Dose-response for local control with hyperfractionated radiation therapy in advanced carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tracts: preliminary report of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 83-13.

A prospective, randomized Phase Ilate/II trial of hyperfractionated radiation therapy was conducted: 1.2 Gy minimum tumor dose was administered twice daily with a minimum interval of 4 hr, 5 days per week. Patients with Stage III and IV carcinomas of the oral cavity, oropharynx, nasopharynx, hypopharynx, and supraglottic larynx were stratified by site, presence or absence of nodal metastases, and performance status. They were assigned to four total doses between 67.2 Gy and 81.6 Gy to all known tumors. The highest dose arm was opened after preliminary assessment indicated acceptable late morbidity rates with the three lower doses. Of 479 patients entered, 260 patients were randomized to the three lower total doses and 237 were analyzed for this preliminary report: 63 were assigned to receive 67.2 Gy, 58 to 72.0 Gy, and 116 to 76.8 Gy. Estimates of grade 4 necrosis at 2 years were 10.0%, 5.1%, and 13.9%, respectively, for patients who received total doses of 67.2 Gy, 72.0 Gy, and 76.8 Gy. There was a suggestion of a trend toward increased local control at 24 months (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 25% for 67.2 Gy, 37% for 72.0 Gy, and 42% for 76.8 Gy) (p = .08). No difference was observed in survival. Assessment of the results using Cox regression models to correct for slight inequalities of pretreatment prognostic variables supported a total dose-tumor control relationship (p = .054). Results for the lowest dose arm were comparable to previous RTOG studies of common fractionation with similar total doses. The higher local control rates with 72.0 and 76.8 Gy using hyperfractionated radiation therapy suggest an improvement in outcome with radiation therapy for advanced carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tracts. These preliminary findings have led to a Phase III comparison of hyperfractionated radiation therapy with 1.2 Gy b.i.d. with standard fractionation.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Superior sulcus tumors: treatment selection and results for 85 patients without metastasis (Mo) at presentation.

Superior sulcus (Pancoast) tumors (SST) are uncommon carcinomas of the lung with distinctive failure patterns and a somewhat more favorable prognosis than other sites of lung cancer. The most effective use of surgery (S), radiation (R), and chemotherapy (C) is not resolved. Most reported series include patients treated before the era of computed tomography (CT). A retrospective study was undertaken of all previously untreated patients with SST who received definitive management at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center between January 1977 and December 1987. Eighty-five patients were treated: the male:female ratio was 2.7:1, and the ages ranged from 35 to 80 (median 59) years. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 80 or more in 70 patients (82%). Thirty patients (35%) had lost 5% or more body weight. All had histologic or cytologic confirmation of carcinoma: 25% were squamous cell, 2% small cell, 54% adenocarcinoma, and 6% were large cell carcinoma (12% were not classified). After complete evaluation, 43 were classified as clinical Stage IIIA and 42 were Stage IIIB. One Stage IIIA patient received surgery, 13 surgery + radiation therapy, 2 surgery + radiation therapy and chemotherapy, 19 radiation therapy and 8 radiation therapy + chemotherapy. Seven Stage IIIB patients received surgery + radiation therapy, 12 radiation therapy, 2 surgery + radiation therapy + chemotherapy, 17 radiation therapy + chemotherapy and 4 chemotherapy. Surgery was a component of therapy more frequently in Stage IIIA than IIIB (p less than .05) and systemic treatment chemotherapy was used significantly more often (p less than .01) in Stage IIIB. Twenty-six patients (31%) lived 2 years or more (25+ to 131+ months) after treatment. Stage IIIA patients had a 46.5% 2-year survival rate compared to 20.6% for Stage IIIB (p = .0042). The one patient treated with surgery alone lived 2 years; 23% (7/31) of patients who had radiation therapy alone and none of the 4 who had chemotherapy lived 2 years. When surgery was a component of treatment, 52% (13/25) lived 2+ years, compared with 22% (13/60) when surgery was not part of treatment. When radiation therapy was part of treatment 31% lived 2 years and when chemotherapy was used, 18% lived 2 years. Fifty-two patients (61%) had control of the local tumor: their survival was significantly greater (p less than .01) than those who had local failure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Stage I and II breast carcinoma: treatment with limited surgery and radiation therapy versus mastectomy.

Between 1980 and 1986, 2,140 patients with surgical stage I or II breast carcinoma were treated including 1,179 patients with T1-2N0 disease and 961 patients with T1-2N1 disease. Among the 1,179 patients without node involvement, 215 underwent limited surgery (complete excision and axillary node dissection) and radiation therapy; 964 patients underwent modified radical mastectomy only. Of the 961 patients with node involvement, 106 were treated by means of limited surgery and radiation therapy; of these, 48 also received chemotherapy. The remaining 855 patients underwent mastectomy; of these, 381 also received chemotherapy and/or hormone therapy. The 5-year survival rates for patients with no node involvement were 96% for the group treated by means of limited surgery and radiation therapy and 88% for the group treated by means of mastectomy (P greater than .05). The 5-year survival rates for patients with node involvement were 96% for the group treated by means of limited surgery and radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy and 77% for the group treated by means of mastectomy with or without chemotherapy (P less than .01). This study demonstrates no disadvantage from treatment by means of limited surgery and radiation therapy and suggests that adjuvant radiation therapy may be important in increasing survival among patients with T1-2 breast carcinoma and positive axillary nodes.

Adenocarcinoma↗