In order to determine a scheme for the screening of inherited thrombotic disorders, abnormalities considered as predisposing to thrombosis have been reviewed. Owing to the low prevalence of biological alterations, a selection of patients is required: documented venous thromboses, possibly at unusual sites (mesenteric vein, portal, cerebral veins), occurring before the age of 40 in patients with a positive family history of thromboses are relatively frequently associated with coagulation abnormalities. In addition, patients with skin necrosis at the initiation of oral anticoagulants, or with repeated superficial vein thrombosis or unexplained arterial occlusions at a young age might be included for screening. Tests have also to be selected. Some abnormalities, such as congenital deficiencies in antithrombin III, protein C and protein S, are recognized risk factors and have to be searched. Some others cannot be at present considered as definite risk factors (e.g., dysfibrinogenemias or deficiencies in factor XII), but their detection is easy by routine tests: prothrombin time, fibrinogen assay. Other abnormalities are recognized risk factors (or not) and need specific uncommon tests (e.g., study of fibrinolysis). Each time a biological abnormality is found, it is important to verify it is isolated since combined deficiencies have been observed and we should be able to answer the question whether the abnormality is the cause or the consequence of thrombosis, or a coincidence. Finally, in our experience, even in well selected patients, a coagulation disorder is detected in less than 30% of patients, so that new tests are needed to improve our knowledge in this field.

Antithrombin III Deficiency↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Should pulmonary embolism be treated with thrombolytic agents?].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Fibrinolytic Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Biological coagulation findings in third-generation oral contraceptives.

An increased risk of venous thrombosis has been demonstrated in women receiving oral contraceptives (OCs). This risk has been primarily associated with the oestrogen content, but recent studies showed that the progestogen may also play a role. A higher risk was found with the so-called third-generation (desogestrel, gestodene) as compared with the second-generation progestogens (levonorgestrel). The risk was approximately two-fold. These unexpected results have been the subject of many debates, and bias--such as selection bias--has been suggested. The existence of bias cannot be completely excluded, but the thrombotic risk seems however to be slightly higher with the third-generation progestins. Haemostatic changes have been observed during OC intake. Both coagulation and fibrinolytic activity are increased: the beneficial profibrinolytic effect may counterbalance the deleterious procoagulant effect. This may explain that the absolute risk of venous thromboembolism is low during OC treatments. Some women who have pre-existing haemostatic abnormalities such as deficiency in antithrombin or activated protein C resistance with factor V Leiden, may be at a higher risk. The biological plausibility of the increased risk related to the third-generation progestogens has been explored. Theoretically, this could be due to an increased coagulation or to a lack of increased fibrinolysis as compared with second-generation progestogens. The only difference presently reported with third-generation OCs is a decreased sensitivity to activated protein C, possibly resulting in a hypercoagulability of greater magnitude. The selection bias suggested in epidemiological studies may also exist for the latter study, as women taking third- or second-generation OCs were not randomized. The possible increased risk related to third-generation OCs should not change the known general contra-indications. Practical guidelines are proposed for women with personal or family history of venous thromboembolism, and for those with a congenital cause of thrombophilia.

Contraceptives, Oral↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Vitamin K metabolism in a patient resistant to vitamin K antagonists.

We investigated various pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in a 63-year-old man, resistant to warfarin, fluindione, acenocoumarol and phenprocoumon. Daily doses of up to 30 mg of the long-acting phenprocoumon yielded a drug concentration of 85 mg/l (usual range 1-5 mg/l) but the international normalized ratio remained around 1. The plasma half-life of phenprocoumon was approximately 350 h (normal 120-150 h). Thus, the resistance was not due to malabsorption or to an accelerated metabolism of the drug. The level of vitamin K1 (1,202 ng/l) was insufficient to induce resistance. Decarboxyprothrombin concentrations were low, demonstrating that the gamma-carboxylation of the precursors of the vitamin K-dependent coagulation factors was not effectively reduced. The concentration of vitamin K epoxide, normally increased under oral anticoagulation, correlated to the vitamin K concentration (r2 = 0.77) but the quotient epoxide/vitamin K remained 4-fold lower than that of 22 warfarin-sensitive patients, suggesting an absence of blockade of the vitamin K reductase by phenprocoumon. This resistance to all the molecular forms of the vitamin K antagonists is most likely due to a reduced affinity of the drugs to a mutant vitamin K reductase.

Drug Resistance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

[Modifications of the hemostatic balance during estrogen treatments: menopause and its treatment].

During menopause the essential modifications in haemostatis are an increase in fibrinogen, in PAI and in factor VII, all of which are arterial risk factors. Women who have undergone physical training or polymorphism of factor VII are protected from unfavourable modifications in haemostasis. Hormone replacement therapy tends to correct modifications of arterial risk factors (decrease in fibrinogen and PAI), which is a beneficial effect of treatment. This treatment also induces other changes that are venous risk factors (decrease in antithrombin and protein S) and these constitute an unfavourable treatment effect. The most important variations are associated with conjugated equine oestrogens. The transcutaneous administration of oestrogens is associated with no variations in haemostasis, which seem to have a favourable effect on venous risk but the effect on cardiovascular risk could be ineffective if the fibrinolysis parameters will be predominant.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗