Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Cassidy

Publications and source records attributed to J Cassidy.

At least 73 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Influence of the antacid Maalox on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: In the present study the possible influence of the antacid Maalox on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine (Xeloda) and its metabolites was investigated in cancer patients. METHODS: A total of 12 patients with solid, predominantly metastatic tumors of various origin received a single oral dose of 1250 mg/m2 of capecitabine (treatment A), a single oral dose of 1250 mg/m2 of capecitabine followed immediately by 20 ml of Maalox (treatment B), and a single oral dose of 1250 mg/m2 of capecitabine followed 2 h later by 20 ml of Maalox (treatment C) in an open, randomized, three-way cross over fashion. Serial blood and urine samples were collected for up to 24 h after each administration. Unchanged capecitabine and its metabolites were analyzed in plasma using liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry and in urine using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. RESULTS: Administration of Maalox either concomitantly with capecitabine or delayed by 2 h did not influence the time to peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) or the elimination half-lives of capecitabine and its metabolites. Unexpectedly, moderate increases in the Cmax and AUC0-infinity values obtained for capecitabine and 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine were observed when Maalox was given together with capecitabine. However, these increases, which ranged between 10% and 31%, were not statistically significant (P > 0.05) and are not of clinical significance. There was no indication of consistent changes in the plasma concentrations of the other metabolites 5'-deoxy-5'-fluorouridine (5'-DFUR), 5-fluorouracil, and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine. The Cmax and AUC0-infinity values recorded for these three metabolites increased and decreased in a stochastic manner. The magnitude of these changes was low (<13%) and not statistically significant. The primary statistical analysis of the AUC0-infinity obtained for 5'-DFUR provided a P value of 0.4524 and clearly indicated no significant difference between the treatments. The addition of Maalox had no influence on the overall urinary recovery or the proportion of the dose recovered as capecitabine or its metabolites from urine. CONCLUSION: At the dose used in this study, the effect of concomitantly delivered Maalox on the extent and rate of gastrointestinal absorption of capecitabine is not clinically significant. Therefore, there is no need to adjust the dose or timing of capecitabine administration in patients treated with Maalox.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of capecitabine and exploration of age, gender, body surface area, and creatinine clearance as factors influencing systemic exposure in cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to assess the bioequivalence of two tablet formulations of capecitabine and to explore the effect of age, gender, body surface area and creatinine clearance on the systemic exposure to capecitabine and its metabolites. METHODS: The study was designed as an open, randomized two-way crossover trial. A single oral dose of 2000 mg capecitabine was administered on two separate days to 25 patients with solid tumors. On one day, the patients received four 500-mg tablets of formulation B (test formulation) and on the other day, four 500-mg tablets of formulation A (reference formulation). The washout period between the two administrations was between 2 and 8 days. After each administration, serial blood and urine samples were collected for up to 12 and 24 h, respectively. Unchanged capecitabine and its metabolites were determined in plasma using LC/MS-MS and in urine by NMRS. RESULTS: Based on the primary pharmacokinetic parameter, AUC(0-infinity) of 5'-DFUR, equivalence was concluded for the two formulations, since the 90% confidence interval of the estimate of formulation B relative to formulation A of 97% to 107% was within the acceptance region 80% to 125%. There was no clinically significant difference between the t(max) for the two formulations (median 2.1 versus 2.0 h). The estimate for C(max) was 111% for formulation B compared to formulation A and the 90% confidence interval of 95% to 136% was within the reference region 70% to 143%. Overall, these results suggest no relevant difference between the two formulations regarding the extent to which 5'-DFUR reached the systemic circulation and the rate at which 5'-DFUR appeared in the systemic circulation. The overall urinary excretions were 86.0% and 86.5% of the dose, respectively, and the proportion recovered as each metabolite was similar for the two formulations. The majority of the dose was excreted as FBAL (61.5% and 60.3%), all other chemical species making a minor contribution. Univariate and multivariate regression analysis to explore the influence of age, gender, body surface area and creatinine clearance on the log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of capecitabine and its metabolites revealed no clinically significant effects. The only statistically significant results were obtained for AUC(0-infinity) and C(max) of intact drug and for C(max) of FBAL, which were higher in females than in males. CONCLUSION: The bioavailability of 5'-DFUR in the systemic circulation was practically identical after administration of the two tablet formulations. Therefore, the two formulations can be regarded as bioequivalent. The variables investigated (age, gender, body surface area, and creatinine clearance) had no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine or its metabolites.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1999

Intergroup collaboration in ovarian cancer: a giant step forward.

The rather slow evolution of so-called "optimal chemotherapy" for ovarian cancer is the result of suboptimal randomised clinical trials, not having the statistical power to identify truly superior regimens, and of the lack of systematic comparisons of new agents with relevant control arms. There is little doubt that we need international collaboration to move the field forward in a timely and coherent manner. European and transatlantic collaboration represents the beginning of the process and point to the success that can await us if the drive to work together remains strong. A similar organisation as for breast cancer (Breast International Group, BIG) needs to be established for ovarian cancer.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1999

Systematic review of cancer treatment programmes in remote and rural areas.

In an attempt to ensure high quality cancer treatment for all patients in the UK, care is being centralized in specialist centres and units. For patients in outlying areas, however, access problems may adversely affect treatment. In an attempt to assess alternative methods of delivering cancer care, this paper reviews published evidence about programmes that have set out to provide oncology services in remote and rural areas in order to identify evidence of effectiveness and problems. Keyword and textword searches of on-line databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, HEALTHSTAR and CINAHL) from 1978 to 1997 and manual searches of references were conducted. Fifteen papers reported evaluations of oncology outreach programmes, tele-oncology programmes and rural hospital initiatives. All studies were small and only two were controlled, so evidence was suggestive rather than conclusive. There were some indications that shared outreach care was safe and could make specialist care more accessible to outlying patients. Tele-oncology, by which some consultations are conducted using televideo, may be an acceptable adjunct. Larger and more methodologically robust studies are justified and should be conducted.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Population pharmacokinetics in phase I drug development: a phase I study of PK1 in patients with solid tumours.

Doxorubicin pharmacokinetics were determined in 33 patients with solid tumours who received intravenous doses of 20-320 mg m(-2) HPMA copolymer bound doxorubicin (PK1) in a phase I study. Since assay constraints limited the data at lower doses, conventional analysis was not feasible and a 'population approach' was used. Bound concentrations were best described by a biexponential model and further analyses revealed a small influence of dose or weight on V1 but no identifiable effects of age, body surface area, renal or hepatic function. The final model was: clearance (Q) 0.194 I h(-1); central compartment volume (V1) 4.48 x (1+0.00074 x dose (mg)) I; peripheral compartment volume (V2) 7.94 I; intercompartmental clearance 0.685 I h(-1). Distribution and elimination half-lives had median estimates of 2.7 h and 49 h respectively. Free doxorubicin was present at most sampling times with concentrations around 1000 times lower than bound doxorubicin values. Data were best described using a biexponential model and the following parameters were estimated: apparent clearance 180 I h-(-1); apparent V1 (I) 1450 x (1+0.0013 x dose (mg)), apparent V2 (I) 21 300 x (1-0.0013 x dose (mg)) x (1+2.95 x height (m)) and apparent Q 6950 I h(-1). Distribution and elimination half-lives were 0.13 h and 85 h respectively.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Potential of Xeloda in colorectal cancer and other solid tumors.

For over four decades, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) has been the mainstay of therapy for colorectal cancer and a major cytotoxic agent for treating gastrointestinal tumors and a variety of others, including breast and head and neck cancers. Xeloda (capecitabine) is a new drug that is administered orally and has been rationally designed to generate 5-FU selectively within solid tumors. Theoretically, it has two major advantages, which should translate into an improved therapeutic index: firstly, enhanced drug concentration at the cancer site and therefore greater anti-tumor activity and secondly, reduced drug levels in non-tumor tissues, with a consequent reduction in systemic toxicity. After promising preclinical studies, phase I clinical trials of Xeloda have been performed with a variety of schedules, both with and without the oral biomodulator leucovorin. Anti-tumor activity has been observed with all regimens tested. In the setting of colorectal cancer, a randomized phase II study substantiated the phase I reports of activity and established the most promising regimen for phase III clinical trials. Patients in the phase II trial were randomly selected to receive either continuous Xeloda, intermittent Xeloda or intermittent Xeloda plus leucovorin. There were complete or partial responses in 21% of patients in the continuous arm, 24% in the intermittent arm, and 23% in the arm with intermittent Xeloda plus leucovorin. In addition, 51-63% of patients in each arm achieved stable disease. Therapy was well tolerated in all three arms. The intermittent regimen of Xeloda alone was associated with a longer time to disease progression and offered a one-week rest period to the patient. It was therefore selected for subsequent studies. Two randomized phase III trials of Xeloda versus the 'Mayo' regimen in patients with advanced colorectal cancer have completed recruitment. They are designed to demonstrate at least equivalent efficacy, with important secondary endpoints of comparisons of toxicity, medical care utilization, and quality of life. No formal results are yet available from these studies. The same regimen of Xeloda is now being evaluated in a large scale adjuvant study, which is expected to recruit approximately 1,700 Dukes' C colonic cancer patients (X-ACT study). The modest toxicity of Xeloda (particularly its low incidence of neutropenia) makes it a suitable candidate for novel combination therapies involving other agents that are active in colorectal cancer, including camptothecin and its analogues, oxaliplatin and radiotherapy. Further studies of Xeloda can be expected with other diseases known to be responsive to fluoropyrimidines, together with diseases traditionally thought to be resistant.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1999

Eniluracil treatment completely inactivates dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in colorectal tumors.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of eniluracil on colorectal tumor dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were to undergo primary colorectal tumor resection received oral eniluracil 10 mg/m(2) twice daily for 3 days before surgery. Mononuclear cells were obtained before the start of eniluracil and on the morning of surgery, to measure DPD activity, protein, and mRNA. Plasma uracil was also measured at these two time points to assess the effect of eniluracil on pyrimidine accumulation. DPD activity, protein, and mRNA were also assessed in colorectal tumors and adjacent normal mucosa of patients who received eniluracil and untreated control patients. RESULTS: DPD activity in tumors from 10 untreated patients ranged from 30 to 92 pmol/min/mg of protein. In contrast, there was no detectable tumor DPD activity in 10 patients who received eniluracil. A similar pattern was observed in mononuclear cells, where median pretherapy activity was 366.5 pmol/min/mg of protein (range, 265 to 494 pmol/min/mg of protein) and was undetectable immediately before surgery. Plasma uracil changed from a median less than 0.2 micromol/L before therapy to 27.76 micromol/L before surgery. No difference in DPD protein or mRNA was observed between pretherapy and presurgery mononuclear cell samples or between treated and untreated tumor samples. CONCLUSION: This study provides definitive evidence that eniluracil completely inactivates DPD activity in human solid tumors. The increased plasma uracil and decreased DPD activity are consistent with systemic inactivation of the enzyme. The mechanism of inactivation is at the catalytic level, because no changes in DPD protein or mRNA were observed. Treatment with eniluracil will eliminate DPD activity as a source of pharmacokinetic fluorouracil variability or resistance in human colorectal cancer.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1999

The treatment of advanced colorectal cancer with interferon-alpha: a review.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common malignancies in the western world. The majority of patients who develop this tumour will ultimately die from metastatic disease. The fluorinated pyrimidine 5 fluorouracil (5-FU) is at present the most active drug available for first-line therapy of this disease. Randomised studies have consistently demonstrated a survival advantage from early treatment with 5-FU in advanced CRC, which can be achieved without deterioration in quality of life. Despite over 30 years of use, the optimal 5-FU schedule remains controversial with a wide range of response rates reported in the literature. Single agent activity is in the order of 10-11%. In an attempt to improve response rates, modulation of 5-FU with a variety of agents has been intensively investigated. This article examines the role of interferon-alpha in the treatment of advanced CRC.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1999

Effect of hepatic dysfunction due to liver metastases on the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites.

Capecitabine (Xeloda) is a rationally designed oral, tumor-selective fluoropyrimidine carbamate aimed at preferential conversion to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) within the tumor. Because capecitabine is extensively metabolized by the liver, it is important to establish whether liver dysfunction altered the pharmacokinetics of capecitabine and its metabolites. This was investigated in 14 cancer patients with normal liver function and in 13 with mild to moderate disturbance of liver biochemistry due to liver metastases. They received a single oral dose of capecitabine (1255 mg capecitabine/m2) with serial blood and urine samples collected up to 72 h after administration. Concentrations of capecitabine and its metabolites were determined in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography or liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry and in urine by 19F-nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Although plasma concentrations of capecitabine, 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine, 5-FU, dihydro-5-FU, and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanine were, in general, higher in patients with liver dysfunction, the opposite was found for 5'-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine. These effects were not clinically significant. Total urinary recovery of capecitabine and its metabolites was 71% of the administered dose in patients with normal hepatic function and 77% in patients with hepatic impairment. The absolute bioavailability of 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine was estimated as 42% in patients with normal hepatic function and 62% in patients with impaired hepatic function. In summary, mild to moderate hepatic dysfunction had no clinically significant influence on the pharmacokinetic parameters of capecitabine and its metabolites. Although caution should be exercised when capecitabine is administered to patients with mildly to moderately impaired hepatic function, there is no need for, a priori, adjustment of the dose.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

How many drug rehabilitation places are needed in prisons to reduce the risk of bloodborne virus infection?

Transmission of HIV and hepatitis B virus infection has been recognised in prisons, and injecting drug use is a major route of infection. Combined results of two pilot health care surveys showed that 47% of prisoners with a history of injecting drug use wanted help to give up class A drugs but only 11% of non-injecting drug users expressed a similar wish. It would therefore seem appropriate for prisons to estimate the number of inmates with a history of injecting drug use and provide drug rehabilitation places for half that number (47% rounded up). Data from three prisons in England and Scotland for which the numbers of drug rehabilitation places were known showed that they provided less than quarter of the minimum requirement based on this formula. The proportion of inmates with a history of injecting or of non-injecting drug use who want help to give up class A drugs requires further investigation in order to refine the needs formula.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Prisoners' views about the drugs problem in prisons, and the new Prison Service drug strategy.

Three hundred and seventy-five out of 575 prisoners (222/299 drug users and 153/267 non-users) who responded to a self-completion health care questionnaire at two prisons in 1997 commented on drugs in prisons. One hundred and forty-eight out of 176 responses expressed negative opinions about mandatory drugs testing (MDT), and 107 said that MDT promoted switching to or increased use of heroin/hard drugs'. Sixty-two prisoners suggested that more help/counselling was needed for drug users, 52 segregation of drug users/drug-free wings, and 50 more security on visits/in corridors after medication. The new Prison Service drug strategy has revised random MDT. It targets those who supply drugs, and supports those who want to stop using drugs, and accords with prisoners' views about the heroin problem in prisons.

Attitude to Health↗
PubMed1999

Regulation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase in colorectal cancer.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is responsible for degradation of the pyrimidines uracil and thymine and the inactivation of the chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil. DPD activity is highly variable in cancer populations, and this variation may influence the antitumor efficacy of 5-fluorouracil. However, little is known about the regulation of DPD mRNA expression in any tissues. Using a reverse transcription competitive PCR assay, we quantified DPD mRNA levels in 10 matched colorectal tumors and adjacent normal mucosae and 7 colorectal liver metastases and adjacent normal livers. Lower levels of DPD mRNA expression were observed in colorectal tumor compared with adjacent normal colon mucosa (median, 0.01 versus 0.37 amole/microg total RNA, P = 0.02). DPD mRNA expression was also lower in metastases than adjacent normal liver tissue (median, 0.11 versus 1.17 amole/microg total RNA, P = 0.001). DPD mRNA expression was higher in normal liver than normal colonic mucosa (median, 1.17 versus 0.37 amole/microg total RNA, P = 0.02). A significant relationship was observed between DPD mRNA and catalytic activity (r(s) = 0.66, P<0.001). The tumor:normal ratio for DPD mRNA, protein, and activity was relatively stable in liver (0.25, 0.55, and 0.51, respectively) but varied considerably in colon (0.085, 0.9, and 1.25, respectively), consistent with enhanced translation of DPD transcript in primary colorectal tumor. This suggests that DPD can be regulated at the levels of both transcription and translation.

Colon↗
PubMed1999

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of PK1 [N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymer doxorubicin]: first member of a new class of chemotherapeutic agents-drug-polymer conjugates. Cancer Research Campaign Phase I/II Committee.

PK1 comprises doxorubicin covalently bound to N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide copolymer by a peptidyl linker. Following cellular uptake via pinocytosis, the linker is cleaved by lysosomal enzymes, allowing intratumoral drug release. Radically altered plasma and tumor pharmacokinetics, compared to free doxorubicin, and significant activity in animal tumors have been demonstrated preclinically. We aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of PK1 as an i.v. infusion every 3 weeks to patients with refractory or resistant cancers. Altogether, 100 cycles were administered (range, 20-320 mg/m2 doxorubicin-equivalent) to 36 patients (20 males and 16 females) with a mean age of 58.3 years (age range, 34-72 years). The maximum tolerated dose was 320 mg/m2, and the dose-limiting toxicities were febrile neutropenia and mucositis. No congestive cardiac failure was seen despite individual cumulative doses up to 1680 mg/m2. Other anthracycline-like toxicities were attenuated. Pharmacokinetically, PK1 has a distribution t(1/2) of 1.8 h and an elimination t(1/2) averaging 93 h. 131I-labeled PK1 imaging suggests PK1 is taken up by some tumors. Responses (two partial and two minor responses) were seen in four patients with NSCLC, colorectal cancer, and anthracycline-resistant breast cancer. PK1 demonstrated antitumor activity in refractory cancers, no polymer-related toxicity, and proof of principle that polymer-drug conjugation decreases doxorubicin dose-limiting toxicities. The recommended Phase II dose is 280 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Studies are planned in colorectal, NSCLC, and breast cancer patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Comparative genomic hybridization analysis of chromosomal alterations induced by the development of resistance to thymidylate synthase inhibitors.

Acquired resistance to chemotherapy is a major obstacle to the successful treatment of cancer. In the past, technical limitations prevented the detection of genetic alterations associated with such resistance on a genome-wide scale. This study evaluated comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) as a tool to detect candidate regions of the genome associated with chemoresistance. Using a variation of conventional CGH, DNA from cell lines that were resistant to thymidylate synthase inhibitors (raltitrexed and 5-fluorouracil) and their sensitive parent cells were evaluated. In MCF-7 and H630 cells that were resistant to raltitrexed, only a single region of change (18p gain) was apparent. The third cell line, H630R10, which was resistant to 5-fluorouracil, had changes in several genomic regions following the acquisition of resistance, including 18p gain. Gain in the chromosomal region containing the thymidylate synthase gene (18p11.32) was detected by CGH in all three resistant cell lines. However, additional novel regions of interest were identified in the cells that were resistant to 5-fluorouracil. These results suggest that CGH is of potential use in the detection of regions of the genome involved in chemoresistance.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1998

Clinical trials of nimodipine as a potential neuroprotector in ovarian cancer patients treated with cisplatin.

Our previous randomised trial in patients with advanced ovarian cancer indicated a significant response and survival advantage for those receiving high-dose (100 mg/m2) as compared with low-dose (50 mg/m2) cisplatin in combination with cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2). However, this was accompanied by more toxicity; peripheral neuropathy was troublesome, with 32% of patients experiencing > or = WHO grade 2 at the cisplatin dose of 100 mg/m2. Nimodipine is a calcium-channel antagonist that has provided protection from cisplatin-induced neurotoxicity in a rat model system. We performed a pilot study in 50 patients that demonstrated the feasibility of co-administration of nimodipine in a chronic oral dosing schedule with cisplatin-based chemotherapy in an open-label non-randomised trial. This led us to initiate a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial in patients with ovarian cancer, which was prematurely discontinued because of problems with nausea and vomiting, leading to poor patient compliance, that were not predicted by the pilot study. These studies did not demonstrate a neuroprotective effect for nimodipine. The primary efficacy variable, i.e, the neurotoxicity score at the end of treatment, gave a significantly lower mean for placebo patients than for nimodipine patients. This report details our experience and discusses the reasons for premature termination of the randomised trial.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The effect of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin in patients with advanced breast cancer: preliminary evidence of a potentially common drug interaction.

Epirubicin is known to be metabolized in the liver. Therefore, drugs such as cimetidine, which inhibit the cytochrome P-450 enzyme system or reduce liver blood flow, may reduce the plasma clearance of epirubicin. In a small study, epirubicin 100 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was administered intravenously to eight patients, who also received oral cimetidine (400 mg b.d. for 7 days starting 5 days before chemotherapy) with either the first or second cycles. Epirubicin pharmacokinetics and liver blood flow (idocyanine green clearance) were assessed at each course. The areas under the plasma concentration time curves (AUCs) were used to compare the systemic exposure to epirubicin and its metabolites with each course. The estimated median percentage increase (95% confidence interval CI) in the AUC with cimetidine were: epirubicin 50% (95% CI -18 to 193, epirubicinol 41% (95% CI 1 to 92). Despite the small numbers studied, the increase in the active metabolite epirubicinol was significant (P < 0.05). These changes in exposure were not explained by reduced cytochrome P-450 activity as the 7-deoxy-doxorubicinol aglycone AUC was not reduced (357% increase: 95% CI 17 to 719) or by a decrease in liver blood flow (17% increase: 95% CI -39 to 104). Cimetidine is likely to be coprescribed or self-administered with epirubicin and therefore clinicians should be aware of this potential interaction.

Administration, Oral↗