Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J C Raeder

Publications and source records attributed to J C Raeder.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Skin conductance correlates with perioperative stress.

BACKGROUND: Skin conductance (SC) as a measure of emotional state or arousal may be a tool for monitoring surgical stress in anaesthesia. When an outgoing sympathetic nervous burst occurs to the skin, the palmar and plantar sweat glands are filled up, and the SC increases before the sweat is removed and the SC decreases. This creates a SC fluctuation. The purpose of this study was to measure SC during laparoscopic cholecystectomy with propofol and remifentanil anesthaesia and to evaluate whether number and amplitude of SC fluctuations correlate with perioperative stress monitoring. METHODS: Eleven patients were studied nine times before, during and after anaesthesia. SC was compared to changes in stress measures such as blood pressure, heart rate, norepinephrine and epinephrine levels. SC was also compared to changes in Bispectral index (BIS). RESULTS: The blood pressure, epinephrine levels and norepinephrine levels were positively correlated with both the number (P < 0.001) and amplitude (P < 0.01) of the SC fluctuations. Moreover, the BIS was positively correlated with the number (P < 0.001) and amplitude (P < 0.001) of the SC fluctuations. Furthermore, during tracheal intubation, the mean levels of the number of SC fluctuations from the 11 patients had the same stress response as measured in changes of the mean levels of norepinephrine. The mean BIS did not show any stress response during tracheal intubation. CONCLUSION: Number of SC fluctuations may be a useful method for monitoring the perioperative stress.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Remifentanil sedation compared with propofol during regional anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: The short onset and offset of remifentanil may allow for accurate dosing of sedative effect with few side-effects and rapid recovery. In this study remifentanil is compared with propofol for sedation during successful regional anaesthetic blocks. METHODS: After informed consent was given, 125 patients undergoing surgery under spinal or brachial plexus anaesthesia were randomized to receive, either propofol: bolus 500 microg/kg plus initial infusion 50 microgkg/min or remifentanil: bolus 0.5 microg/kg plus initial infusion 0.1 microgkg/min. Study drug infusion rate was titrated throughout the procedure according to level of sedation and side-effects. Pain, discomfort, sedation level and side-effects were recorded at regular intervals until discharge from the post operative care unit (PACU). RESULTS: Two patients in the remifentanil group versus ten in the propofol group were treated for discomfort or pain during surgery (P<0.02). Due to a significantly higher rate of respiratory depression (46% vs. 19% with propofol, P<0.01) the mean remifentanil infusion rate was decreased to 0.078 +/- 0.028 microgkg/min, whereas it was kept stable with propofol. Propofol patients had significantly higher (P<0.05) sedation levels and experienced more frequent amnesia of the procedure. Eleven propofol patients experienced pain at injection site, versus two remifentanil patients (P<0.02). Nausea and vomiting were more frequent in the remifentanil patients during infusion (27% vs. 2% in the propofol group, P<0.001) but similar postoperatively. Time to discharge from PACU was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Propofol results in less respiratory depression and nausea when sedation is needed during a case with a successful regional block. Remifentanil may be considered as an alternative if pain during the procedure is a major concern or if amnesia is contraindicated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting are similar after metoclopramide 20 mg and ondansetron 8 mg given by the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomies.

BACKGROUND: Ondansetron has a well documented antiemetic prophylactic effect, whereas in most studies of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), metoclopramide is less efficacious. This can be attributed to the short-lasting effect of metoclopramide when a low dose is given at the beginning of surgery. We wanted to test a 20-mg dose of metoclopramide given at the end of surgery, using ondansetron 8 mg as a reference. METHODS: 122 patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anesthesia were studied in a randomized, double-blind study design. At the end of the procedure, the patients received either metoclopramide 20 mg or ondansetron 8 mg intravenously. The patients were observed for 24 h for PONV, pain, side-effects and need for rescue antiemetic medication. RESULTS: No significant differences in the incidence of PONV or need for rescue antiemetic treatment was observed in the 0-24 h postoperative study period. The overall incidence of PONV was 43% in the ondansetron group and 47% in the metoclopramide group. The ondansetron patients had a significantly higher incidence of moderate or strong pain during the postoperative observation period (61% vs. 35% in the metoclopramide group) (P < 0.05). No significant differences in side-effects between the groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Metoclopramide 20 mg i.v. given at the end of laparoscopic cholecystectomy resulted in a similar incidence of PONV compared with ondansetron 8 mg. The patients receiving metoclopramide had less pain than the patients receiving ondansetron.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2001

Neostigmine 50 microg kg(-1) with glycopyrrolate increases postoperative nausea in women after laparoscopic gynaecological surgery.

BACKGROUND: Neostigmine, used for reversal of neuromuscular block, has been implicated in the development of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The use of mivacurium, which does not require neostigmine reversal due to its metabolism by plasma cholinesterase, has made it possible to study the effect of neostigmine on PONV in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled manner. METHODS: Ninety healthy women scheduled for laparoscopic gynaecological surgery were randomly allocated to two groups in a double-blind manner. One group was given neostigmine (50 microg kg(-1)) and glycopyrrolate (10 microg kg(-1)) (group NG), the other NaCl i.v. as placebo (group P) at the end of surgery when all the patients were spontaneously reversed to at least 75% of full muscle power. The risk of PONV was reduced by using low doses of opioids and ondansetron prophylaxis. All the patients were monitored and assessed for 24 h with regard to pain, nausea, vomiting and overall satisfaction. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference (P=0.03) in the occurrence of nausea during the first 6 h postoperatively between NG group (30%) and P group (11%), resulting in the more extensive use of antiemetic drugs in the NG group (28%) than in P group (7%) (P=0.01) in this period. There was no difference between the groups in the frequency of vomiting; seven nauseated patients had vomiting, four in group NG, three in group P. Total number of patients with PONV during the observation period of 24 h, usage of antiemetic rescue medication and overall patient satisfaction did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that antagonism of neuromuscular block with a high dose of neostigmine increases postoperative nausea and the use of antiemetic drugs during the first 6 h after administration.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗
PubMed2000

[Can postoperative nausea or vomiting be predicted?].

BACKGROUND: In order to identify patients who may benefit from prophylactic anti-emetic medication during surgery, it is of interest to evaluate risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting preoperatively by a simple scoring system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study we evaluated the ability to assess the risk of PONV by a preoperative clinical score developed in our institution (U-score, 0-13 points) and two simple scoring systems from the literature (A-score, 0-4 points and K-score, 0-5 points). 120 patients were interviewed 24 hours after a surgical procedure. Possible risk factors for PONV were scored and compared to the occurrence of PONV. RESULTS: 60% of patients experienced PONV during the first 24 postoperative hours. No difference was seen between those who had received droperidol prophylaxis and those who had not. A significant correlation (p < 0.01) were seen on all scoring systems between occurrence of PONV and high score. With the U-score, 78% of the patients with a score > 7 experienced PONV, compared to only 41% of those with a score < 6. INTERPRETATION: We suggest that patients with a U-score > 7 should receive effective prophylaxis against PONV, i.e. not droperidol only. Further evaluation of different scoring systems should be carried out in larger patient populations. Simplified systems, such as the A-score or K-score or simplified U-score, may be sufficient in uniform surgical populations. The U-score may be more universal because anaesthetic method and use of postoperative opioids are also included.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Intramuscular ephedrine reduces emesis during the first three hours after abdominal hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that intramuscularly administered ephedrine prevents postoperative nausea and vomiting. Ephedrine is cheap, and for this indication poorly documented. METHODS: One hundred and nine patients undergoing elective abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia were studied in a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. Ten minutes before the end of the procedure patients received either ephedrine 0.5 mg/kg i.m. or placebo. The patients were closely observed for 24 h for postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) and received a standardized two-step antiemetic treatment of i.v. metoclopramide 10 mg, supplemented with ondansetron 4 mg i.v. if needed. RESULTS: The ephedrine treated patients had significantly less nausea, retching and vomiting, and need of antiemetic rescue during the first 3 h postoperatively compared with the placebo patients. No difference between the groups was evident in the 3-24 h postoperative observation period. All the patients with PONV during 0-3 h experienced PONV in the 3-24 h period. Treatment or prophylaxis with one drug was less efficient than two or more drugs combined. No significant differences in hypotension, tachycardia or other side-effects between the groups were noted. CONCLUSION: Ephedrine 0.5 mg/kg i.m. administered at the end of abdominal hysterectomy has a significant antiemetic effect during the first 3 h after administration with no evident side-effects.

Double-Blind Method↗
PubMed2000

Non-opioid postoperative analgesia.

Although significant improvement has been made in the treatment of pain in the postoperative period, many patients still experience unnecessary discomfort resulting in distress, higher morbidity and prolonged stay in hospital. The standard pillar of postoperative treatment of severe pain is the use of opioids. However, adverse reactions to opioids make their use unfavourable. A better understanding of the pathophysiology of pain has helped clinicians to a more balanced approach to postoperative pain treatment. The development of the multimodal approach to postoperative analgesia, with the use of different drugs acting via different routes to give good analgesia, with minimal side-effects, represents a major development in the treatment of postoperative pain. Early, aggressive mobilisation and feeding must follow in order to restore normal conditions quickly. Alternatives to opioids should be used as extensively as possible. Local anaesthesia, used as regional blocks or as wound infiltration, is most beneficial. Paracetamol has good basic analgesic properties, and should probably be used in dosages higher than recommended today. The combination with a NSAID results in better and longer-lasting analgesia. The intravenous form propacetamol will increase the possibilities of its use. The new concept of selective COX-2 inhibiting NSAIDs will result in analgesic and anti-inflammatory drugs with fewer side-effects. The well-known inexpensive group of corticosteroids have good analgesic and anti-emetic properties, and are especially interesting to use in patients who do not tolerate NSAIDs. The alpha2-receptor agonists like clonidine, when administered epidurally or intrathecally, are useful adjuncts, but their adverse effects on sedation and hypotension limit their use. NMDA-receptor antagonists are of limited value in the postoperative period. Adenosine and neostigimine are still on a research level but may lead to new, clinically useful analgesic drugs. In the future, cannabinoids, cholecystokinin-receptor antagonists and neurokinin-1 antagonists may become important analgesic drugs.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed2000

No effect of preoperative paracetamol and codeine suppositories for pain after termination of pregnancies in general anaesthesia.

Outpatient surgery demands rapid recovery and satisfied patients. The purpose of the study was to investigate whether rectal premedication with paracetamol and codeine would reduce the need of rescue analgesics, reduce the postoperative pain experience and result in faster eligibility for discharge. Ninety pregnant patients scheduled for day-case surgery with evacuation of the uterine cavity were randomly assigned into two groups. The paracetamol and codeine group was given a suppository with 60 mg of codeine and 800 mg of paracetamol together with standard premedication of intramuscular midazolam 0.08 mg/kg. The placebo group was given a placebo suppository and midazolam. All patients underwent the surgical procedure under general anaesthesia with alfentanil 15 microg/kg and propofol 1.5-2 mg/kg. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the postoperative pain experience as judged by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS-scale), verbal scale or the need for rescue analgesic medication with ketobemidone. Most of the patients experienced little postoperative pain with more than 70% scoring less than 20 mm on a VAS-scale from 0-100 mm at any time during the postoperative period. The paracetamol and codeine patients were significantly more sleepy at 30 min postoperatively. There were no differences between the groups in postoperative nausea or vomiting and no difference in discharge eligibility. The use of pre-operative suppository with paracetamol 800 mg and codeine 60 mg is unnecessary in this group of patients.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2000

Does ketamine have preemptive effects in women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy procedures?

UNLABELLED: Ketamine may produce "preemptive" analgesia when administered before surgically induced trauma. Therefore, we hypothesized that pre- versus postincisional administration of ketamine would improve pain control after abdominal hysterectomy procedures. Eighty-nine patients were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups according to a placebo-controlled, double-blinded protocol: Group 1 (placebo) received saline 0.04 mL/kg IV immediately before and after surgery; Group 2 (preincision), received ketamine 0.4 mg/kg IV before skin incision and saline at the end of the operation; and Group 3 (postincision), received saline before skin incision, and ketamine 0.4 mg/kg IV was given after skin closure. The general anesthetic technique was standardized in all three treatment groups. During the first postoperative hour, Group 3 experienced significantly less pain than Groups 1 and 2, as assessed by using both visual analog and verbal rating scales. There were no significant differences between Groups 1 and 2 with respect to pain scores, postoperative opioid analgesic requirements, and incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. We conclude that a single dose of ketamine 0.4 mg/kg IV fails to produce preemptive analgesic effects. IMPLICATIONS: Even though ketamine 0.4 mg/kg IV has short-lasting acute analgesic effects, it failed to produce a preemptive effect when given before abdominal hysterectomy procedures.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Axillary brachial plexus block with ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml. A comparative study with bupivacaine 5 mg/ml.

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine is less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine and may be used in higher doses in order to increase the quality of a block. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 40 ml ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml (300 mg) and 40 ml bupivacaine 5 mg/ml (200 mg) for axillary plexus block. METHODS: One hundred and four adult patients were included in a prospective, double-blind study. Sensory and motor block were tested for the five main terminal nerves of the arm at 10-min intervals until start of surgery and every second hour there-after until full resolution of the block. RESULTS: The overall evaluation of the block by the surgeon and the anesthesiologist showed a significantly better quality in the ropivacaine patients, regarding both anesthesia and motor block. There were no differences in the time to onset and duration of the block. Except for one patient, who had seizures after an accidental IV injection of ropivacaine, there were no major side effects. CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml, 40 ml, produces axillary plexus block of similar onset and duration but better quality than 40 ml of bupivacaine 5.0 mg/ml.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

[Obstetric analgesia in Norwegian hospitals].

We report the results of a questionnaire sent to anaesthetists and midwives on the use of obstetric analgesia and anaesthesia in Norwegian hospitals in 1996. 95% of the 49 hospitals involved responded to the questionnaire, representing a total of 56,884 births. The use of epidural analgesia in labour varied from 0 to 25% in the different hospitals with a mean value of 15%. Epidural analgesia was much more widely used in university and regional hospitals than in local hospitals (p < 0.001). Five of the local hospitals did not offer epidural analgesia during labour at all. The combination of low-dose local anaesthetic and an opioid (either sufentanil or fentanyl) had not been introduced in nine of the hospitals (20%). The optimal use of epidural analgesia to relieve labour pain was judged to be more frequent by the anaesthetists than by the midwives (19% versus 11%, p < 0.01). In response to what factors limited the frequency of epidural analgesia, the anaesthetists specified factors related to the attitude of the midwife, and the midwives specified factors related to the anaesthetist. Only five of the hospitals provided written information on the various analgesic methods that could be employed during labour. The majority of midwives considered the analgesic methods employed on their maternity ward to be good or excellent. The frequency of Caesarean section was 12%; spinal anaesthesia was used in 55%, epidural anaesthesia in 17%, and general anaesthesia in 28% of the cases.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMed1998

Betamethasone reduces postoperative pain and nausea after ambulatory surgery.

UNLABELLED: The aims of this study were to evaluate the effects of a single-dose glucocorticoid on the incidence and severity of pain and nausea and vomiting (PONV) after ambulatory surgery. Seventy-eight ASA physical status I-III patients scheduled for hemorrhoidectomy or hallux valgus correction were studied using a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled protocol. One group received 12 mg of betamethasone i.m. 30 min before the start of surgery (Group B), whereas the placebo group (Group P) received saline. General anesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl and maintained with isoflurane in both groups. Pain (measured using a visual analog scale, verbal score, and analgesic requirements), PONV, and other side effects were evaluated postoperatively. Patients in Group B experienced significantly less postoperative pain, less PONV, and better patient satisfaction during the first 24 h after surgery. In conclusion, a single dose of betamethasone (12 mg) seemed to produce analgesic and antiemetic effects after day-case surgery. IMPLICATIONS: In a placebo-controlled study, the use of corticosteroid prophylaxis (betamethasone) produced a significant reduction in both postoperative pain and nausea in outpatients who received the corticosteroid injection before ambulatory foot or hemorrhoid operations.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Desflurane versus propofol maintenance for outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: The aims of the study were to evaluate costs and clinical characteristics of desflurane-based anaesthetic maintenance versus propofol for outpatient cholecystectomy. METHODS: All 60 patients received ketamine 0.2 mg kg(-1), fentanyl 2 microg kg(-1) and propofol 2 mg kg(-1) for induction. Ketorolac 0.4 mg kg(-1) and ondansetron 0.05 mg kg(-1) +droperidol 20 microg kg(-1) was given as prophylaxis for postoperative pain and emesis, respectively. The patients were randomly assigned into Group P with propofol maintenance and opioid supplements, or Group D with desflurane in a low-flow circuit system. RESULTS: All the patients were successfully discharged within 8 h without any serious complications. Emergence from anaesthesia was more rapid after desflurane; they opened their eyes and stated date of birth at mean 6.4 and 8.4 min respectively, compared with 9.6 and 12 min in the propofol group (P<0.05). Nausea and pain were more frequent in Group D, 40% and 80% respectively; versus 17% and 50% in Group P (P<0.05). By telephone interview at 24 h and 7 d after the procedure, there was no major difference between the groups. With desflurane, drug costs per case were 10 $ lower than with propofol. CONCLUSION: We conclude that desflurane is cheaper and has a more rapid emergence than propofol for outpatient cholecystectomy. However, propofol results in less pain and nausea in the recovery unit. Despite ondansetron and droperidol prophylaxis, there was still a substantial amount of nausea and vomiting after desflurane.

Ambulatory Surgical Procedures↗
PubMed1998

1 MAC-incision sevoflurane prevents explicit awareness during surgical skin incision and tracheal intubation.

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypothesis that 1 MAC-incision anesthesia secures unconsciousness during surgical skin incision and tracheal intubation. METHODS: Twenty patients scheduled for gynecological laparotomy were anesthetized with sevoflurane as the sole agent. At 1 MAC-incision steady-state conditions, the patients were observed for autonomic/movement responses and wakefulness (response to verbal commands) in the 1-min period following surgical skin incision and tracheal intubation. RESULTS: Blood pressure and heart rate increased significantly secondary to both stimuli, and significantly more after tracheal intubation than skin incision. Ten and 19 patients moved in response to skin incision and tracheal intubation, respectively. None of the patients showed wakefulness. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that 1MAC-incision sevoflurane secures unconsciousness during surgical skin incision and tracheal intubation.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Changing preoperative fasting policies. Impact of a national consensus.

BACKGROUND: Liberalisation of preoperative fasting rules has been discussed and recommended in the anaesthesia literature in recent years. In Norway, a national consensus on this issue was reached in 1993. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether a national consensus on fasting recommendations led to a change in fasting policies in Norwegian anaesthesia departments. METHODS: A questionnaire on preoperative fasting routines was sent to all Norwegian anaesthesia departments in 1993 and repeated in 1996. RESULTS: Written local guidelines for preoperative fasting were present in 85% of the institutions in both surveys. Of the hospitals, 69% had changed their local guidelines after the national consensus. In 1996 more hospitals allowed less than 6 h fasting for clear liquids in children (93% versus 71% in 1993; P < 0.005). A similar tendency was noted in adults (79% versus 63% in 1993; P = 0.1). In contradiction to the national guidelines, 31% of the departments reported that they allowed less than 6 h fasting after a light breakfast in the morning of surgery in 1996. The corresponding number for 1993 was 21% (ns). CONCLUSION: The new, consensus-based national fasting guidelines have been associated with a change towards more liberal fasting policies in Norwegian departments of anaesthesia. However, as not all local changes were supported by the national consensus, other sources of information were used when local policies were decided.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Post-operative epidural analgesia with low dose fentanyl, adrenaline and bupivacaine in children after major orthopaedic surgery. A prospective evaluation of efficacy and side effects.

The efficacy and side effects of 100 lumbar epidural treatments with low concentrations of bupivacaine (1 mg mL-1), fentanyl (2 micrograms mL-1) and adrenaline (2 micrograms mL-1) combined with rectal paracetamol were prospectively evaluated in children aged 4-14 years after femoral osteotomy. The mean treatment time was 43 h and the mean dose was 0.18 mL kg-1 h-1. Ninety-nine per cent of the children were either without pain or experienced very low pain at rest for at least 80% of the treatment time. The same was the case in 80% of children when pain evaluation was made on active movement. No cases of seizures, signs of catheter migration, hypotension or respiratory depression were observed. Sixty-three per cent of the patients experienced nausea or vomiting, but antiemetic treatment was indicated in only 11%. One epidural treatment had to be stopped in a child who did not respond to antiemetics. The incidence of pruritus was high (49%), but the symptoms were mild and limited.

Adolescent↗