Biomedical subjects

J C Petrie

Publications and source records attributed to J C Petrie.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of moderate/severe hypertension.

1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine vs enalapril as monotherapy was evaluated in patients with moderate/severe hypertension (supine DBP 105-125 mm Hg, SBP 140-220 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks placebo treatment 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (15 patients) 5-10 mg, or enalapril (16 patients) 5-20 mg for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Clinic supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 177 to 152 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 169 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -22.1, 0.3, P = 0.06) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Clinic supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 110 to 93 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 109-102 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the intergroup difference -17.7, -2.7, P < 0.01) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure. Although the reduction in blood pressure was greater for the amlodipine treated group, the differences between treatments were not statistically significant. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (5), peripheral oedema (3), upper respiratory infection (3) and anxiety (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril treated patients were headache (6), dizziness (3) and upper respiratory infection (2).

Adult↗

PubMed1993

A comparison of amlodipine with enalapril in the treatment of isolated systolic hypertension.

1. The safety and efficacy of amlodipine and enalapril were compared in patients with isolated systolic hypertension (supine DBP < 95 mm Hg and supine SBP 160-200 mm Hg). 2. After 2 weeks treatment with placebo 31 patients were randomised by the technique of minimisation in an observer-blind study to receive once daily treatment with either amlodipine (16 patients) or enalapril (15 patients) for 8 weeks. The study design concluded with 2 weeks placebo treatment. In addition to clinic measurements, home blood pressure monitoring (Copal UA-251) was performed during the study. 3. Mean supine systolic blood pressure was reduced from 185 to 164 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 183 to 159 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -10.5, 15.3) after 8 weeks treatment. 4. Mean supine diastolic blood pressure was reduced from 86 to 80 mm Hg (amlodipine) and 88 to 80 mm Hg (enalapril) (95% CI for the difference between the drugs -4.9, 7.6) after 8 weeks treatment. 5. Home blood pressure recordings confirmed these reductions in blood pressure, although there was no significant difference between treatments for the reductions in blood pressure. 6. Both drugs were reasonably well tolerated. The adverse events occurring most frequently in the amlodipine group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (5) and palpitations (2). The adverse events occurring most frequently in the enalapril group were headache (2), peripheral oedema (2), palpitations (2) and dizziness (3).

Aged↗

PubMed1993

The haemodynamic effects of GR 32191, a thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist, in patients with renal artery stenosis and hypertension.

This study was designed to determine if GR 32191 a thromboxane A2 receptor antagonist, would lower blood pressure in patients with hypertension and renal artery stenosis. Eight patients with unilateral atheromatous renal artery stenosis and hypertension were studied in a double-blind, single dose, placebo controlled, crossover study. The results show that, GR 32191, given orally, in doses of 20 mg and 40 mg, does not reduce the blood pressure to any clinically important degree.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Cryopreservation of human adult hepatocytes for use in drug metabolism and toxicity studies.

1. Human hepatocytes were cryopreserved for up to 14 days at -80 degrees C and the cryoprotection offered by different media investigated in terms of post-thaw cell viability and function. 2. Optimal cryoprotection was offered by a solution containing dimethylsulphoxide, propylene glycol, acetamide and polyethylene glycol 8000 in Leibowitz L15 medium. 3. The cytochrome P450 content and activities of the microsomal P450 dependent mixed function oxidase system were well maintained at above 70% of fresh cell values throughout the cryopreservation period. However, the activities of the cytosolic enzymes studied, glutathione S-transferase and glutathione reductase, were not well maintained; they declined to < 40% of fresh cell values after storage of cells for 14 days at -80 degrees C. The membrane environment may protect microsomal enzymes from denaturation by freeze-thaw damage. 4. After cryopreservation, viability of human hepatocytes was higher than that of rat hepatocytes preserved under identical conditions. For human cells maximum post-cryopreservation viability was 67% after 24 h at -80 degrees C; this declined to 49% after 14 days storage at -80 degrees C. In addition post-cryopreservation human hepatocytes remained > 70% viable when incubated at 37 degrees C in suspension compared with only 46% of rat hepatocytes. This indicates that human hepatocytes can withstand freeze-thaw damage better than those from rat. 5. The results of this study define optimal conditions for cryopreserving human hepatocytes. Although microsomal enzyme activities are retained post-cryopreservation, the decrease in viability of thawed cells upon incubation at 37 degrees C suggests that caution should be exercized when using cryopreserved cells to study integrated drug metabolizing pathways in man in vitro.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Relation between treated blood pressure and death from ischaemic heart disease at different ages: a report from the Department of Health Hypertension Care Computing Project.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relation between mortality from ischaemic heart disease (IHD) and treated blood pressure at different ages. DESIGN: Prospectively, 6216 patients were studied for a mean of 107 months. SETTING: Of the total patients, 95% were followed in five hospital-based hypertension clinics and the remainder in four group general practices. PATIENTS: Respectively, 2250 and 2126 hypertensive men and women aged < 60 years and 822 and 1018 aged > or = 60 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mortality (any mention on the death certificate) from IHD. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-seven patients died with IHD mentioned on the death certificate. The relation between both diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) during the first 3-12 months of treatment and subsequent IHD mortality was examined. Under the age of 60 years the relative hazard rate (RHR) for death from IHD tended to increase with DBP in both men and women. Above the age of 60 years there was no important or significant relation between IHD mortality and treated DBP. For SBP there was no reduction in the positive relation between IHD mortality and blood pressure in the older age groups. The RHR for SBP ranged between 1.008 and 1.021 in men and women over and under the age of 60 years. CONCLUSIONS: The positive relation between DBP and IHD mortality decreased with increasing age and, in women aged > or = 60 years, even inverted, partly explaining the negative relation reported between DBP and total mortality in the very old.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1992

Relation between blood pressure and stroke mortality.

The relation between stroke mortality and blood pressure was investigated in 10,186 hypertensive patients followed up in the Department of Health Hypertension Care Computing Project for an average of 9 years. An untreated blood pressure measurement was available in 3,472 men and 3,405 women. The age-adjusted risk of stroke death increased by 1% for every 1 mm Hg increase in untreated systolic blood pressure. The relative hazard rate was 1.014 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.007, 1.021) in men and 1.009 (1.003, 1.016) in women. The corresponding increases for 1 mm Hg for untreated diastolic blood pressure were almost 3% in men and again 1% in women (relative hazard rate 1.026 [95% CI, 1.014, 1.038] in men and 1.010 [1.000, 1.021] in women). Treated blood pressure measurements were available in 3,073 men and 3,148 women. Stroke mortality increased by 2% for a 1 mm Hg increase in treated systolic pressure and 3% for the corresponding increase in diastolic blood pressure. The relation between stroke mortality and blood pressure was similar over and under the age of 65, although the increase in mortality with pressure was greater for treated diastolic blood pressure in women under the age of 65 than over this age. There was no evidence for a J-shaped relation between stroke mortality and either systolic or diastolic pressure in men. In women there was a suggestion of such a relation, but since this relation was also observed for untreated pressures, any increase in risk at lower pressures is unlikely to be a result of treatment.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed1991

Caffeine restriction: effect on mild hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects on blood pressure of modifying dietary caffeine intake in patients with mild and borderline hypertension by monitoring ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. DESIGN: Four way, randomised, crossover trial of four consecutive two week dietary regimens: normal diet, caffeine free diet alone, caffeine free diet with decaffeinated instant coffee, caffeine free diet with caffeinated instant coffee (instant coffee phases conducted double blind). SETTING: Hospital hypertension clinic, Scotland. PATIENTS: 52 patients (23 men; aged 26-67 years) with untreated borderline or mild hypertension (diastolic blood pressure 90-105 mm Hg) who normally drank a minimum of three cups of coffee daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean ambulatory blood pressure over 24 hours; mean morning, daytime, and night time ambulatory blood pressure; sitting clinic blood pressure at 1700; plasma caffeine concentration at 1700 on the last day of each regimen. RESULTS: Mean 24 hour ambulatory blood pressure was not different between regimens. There was no difference in blood pressure variability between regimens. During the caffeine free diet alone morning ambulatory diastolic blood pressure was higher (2.8 mm Hg) than during the caffeine free diet with caffeinated coffee. Mean sitting clinic systolic blood pressure was higher at 1700 (4.7 mm Hg) with a caffeine free diet than with the caffeine free diet with caffeinated coffee (p less than 0.05). Dietary compliance as assessed by plasma caffeine concentration was excellent. There was no significant correlation between plasma caffeine concentration and blood pressure. CONCLUSIONS: Drinking caffeinated instant coffee over a two week period does not adversely influence blood pressure in patients with borderline or mild hypertension; abstinence is of no benefit.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

The LEADIN study.

The LEADIN project involves linking six large hypertension databases, each with a long period of follow up in terms of patient years and endpoints. The results of this pooled observational-type trial involving such a large group of patients outside the framework of the explanatory type of clinical trial will be of considerable interest.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed1991

Nicardipine sustained release in hypertension.

1. A novel formulation of nicardipine (25% standard, 75% sustained release--SR) was evaluated in mild hypertension in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled comparison with standard nicardipine (STD), using clinic measurements (Hawksley) augmented by home recorded blood pressures (Copal UA 251). 2. At 2 h after dosing (peak effect) both STD nicardipine (30 mg three times daily) and SR nicardipine (60 mg twice daily) for 28 days produced a highly significant reduction in sitting and standing blood pressure. The mean sitting blood pressure was reduced by 20/16 mm Hg (STD) and by 25/18 mm Hg (SR) compared with placebo. 3. Predose (8-11 h after last dose of STD, 12-15 h after last dose of SR) the reductions in sitting blood pressure relative to placebo were 11/6 mm Hg (STD) and 14/7 mm Hg (SR). 4. Home recordings confirmed the hypotensive effect of both formulations. Both exhibited a distinct 'peak dose' effect between 1-3 h after dosing. The effect of the SR formulation was sustained throughout the 12 h dosing interval. 5. Of the 60 patients entering the study, one died of unexplained staphylococcal septicaema, two were withdrawn for non drug-related reasons and 14 (32%) were withdrawn because of adverse effects on active therapy (headaches, facial flushing, leg oedema, chest pain, dizziness). 6. In the 43 patients who completed the study adverse symptoms were reported more frequently while they were on the two active formulations of nicardipine compared with placebo. Most of these reactions were again of vasodilator origin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗

PubMed1991

A comparison of the chronic effects of oral xamoterol and enalapril on blood pressure and renal function in mild to moderate heart failure.

1. We compared the effects, after 3 weeks oral therapy, of xamoterol 200 mg twice daily and enalapril 2.5, 5 or 10 mg twice daily on home and clinic blood pressure, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and renal plasma flow, stroke and minute distances, linear resistance and on plasma renin activity in 19 patients with mild to moderate heart failure in a single-blind randomised crossover study. 2. Enalapril reduced mean home blood pressure by 17/7 mm Hg compared with xamoterol (P less than 0.0001) and by 19/7 mm Hg compared with placebo. Compared with placebo xamoterol had no effect. Enalapril reduced predose blood pressure, compared with xamoterol, on average by 15/5 mm Hg (P = 0.02 systolic, 0.09 diastolic) and by 20/7 mm Hg compared with placebo. At 4 h post-dose the mean differences were: xamoterol-enalapril 13/10 mm Hg (P = 0.01 systolic, 0.0007 diastolic) and placebo-enalapril 23/9 mm Hg. 3. Stroke and minute distances were marginally less 4 h following xamoterol than following enalapril: mean (s.e. mean) values were 9.4 (0.7) vs 10.4 (0.8) cm (P = 0.23) and 699 (51.7) vs 767 (62.1) cm (P = 0.04) respectively. Linear resistance was reduced by enalapril, from the placebo value of 13.2 (1.2) to 11.0 (0.9) mm Hg m-1 and marginally increased by xamoterol, to 14.2 (1.2) mm Hg m-1, the difference between active treatments being statistically significant (P = 0.03). 4. Renal plasma flow, GFR and filtration fraction were not influenced by enalapril or xamoterol therapy. There were no significant correlations between glomerular filtration rate and either blood pressure or stroke distance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

PubMed1991

Disposition of gamma-glutamyl levodopa (gludopa) after intravenous bolus injection in healthy volunteers.

1. The pharmacokinetics of gludopa in healthy volunteers were studied at two doses, 250 micrograms kg-1 and 100 micrograms kg-1, after rapid intravenous bolus injection. 2. Gludopa had a clearance of 4.43 +/- 1.50 ml min-1 kg-1 and 4.92 ml min-1 kg-1 at the higher and lower doses, respectively. Corresponding half-lives were 29.2 +/- 3.7 min and 32.5 +/- 5.6 min, and volumes of distribution were 0.183 +/- 0.052 l kg-1 and 0.235 +/- 0.07/ l kg-1. 3. Urinary excretion of dopamine rose sharply after injection of gludopa at both doses, peaking at 30 min. At this time, amounts were over 215 and 60 times baseline values at the higher and lower dose of gludopa, respectively. Urinary dopamine rose in parallel with urinary levodopa excretion, supporting the view that levodopa is the precursor of urinary dopamine. 4. Less than 1% of the injected dose of gludopa was excreted unchanged in the urine. 5. These findings suggest that, in man, gludopa is an efficient pro-drug for dopamine. Gludopa may find therapeutic use in conditions where the beneficial renal effects of dopamine may be indicated.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Grampian Health Board's joint drug formulary.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a model for creating a joint general practice-hospital formulary, using the example of ulcer healing drugs. DESIGN: A joint formulary development group produced draft guidelines based on an earlier hospital formulary, which were sent to interested local general practitioners for consultation. Revised guidelines were then drawn up and forwarded to the health board's medicines committee for approval and distribution. SETTING: Grampian Health Board. SUBJECTS: Nine members of joint formulary development group plus local general practitioners who were invited to comment on a list of 11 ulcer healing drugs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Degree of coincidence of drugs selected by hospital doctors and general practitioners. RESULTS: The ulcer healing drugs selected by the panel of general practitioners and by hospital doctors were highly coincident. The cost of one day's treatment with drugs varied considerably between hospital and general practice--for example, one drug cost 46p in hospital and 1 pounds in general practice and another cost 1.26 pounds in hospital and 1.01 pounds in general practice. Overall, six drugs cost more in hospital and five cost more in general practice. CONCLUSIONS: A joint formulary for use in hospitals and general practice in a health board can be devised fairly simply by consultation as virtually the same drugs are used in both types of practice. It should influence the health board's expenditure on drugs and affect the choice of drugs when a patient is discharged from hospital or is referred to any hospital in the region.

Anti-Ulcer Agents↗

PubMed1990

An evaluation of the A&D UA-751 semi-automated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer.

We compared blood pressure recordings made with the A&D UA-751 semi-automated cuff-oscillometric sphygmomanometer (A&D Co. Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) and with a conventional Hawksley random-zero mercury sphygmomanometer (Hawksley and Sons Ltd, Lancing, UK). Simultaneous single-arm recordings were obtained in duplicate with both devices in 200 subjects having blood pressure in the ranges 92-221/51-121 mmHg. The measurements obtained by three observers using the Hawksley sphygmomanometer were compared with recordings from two A&D UA-751 devices. In most cases, there was an acceptable level of agreement between the results, according to the criteria suggested by the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (range of differences systolic: mean - 0.9 to 1.4 mmHg, s.d. 4.6-9.8 mmHg; diastolic: mean - 0.6 to 1.3 mmHg, s.d. 2.9-5.1 mmHg), although there were sizeable discrepancies in individual subjects. Thus the A&D UA-751 device appears to be an acceptable alternative to a conventional sphygmomanometer; it should be suitable for routine clinical and limited research use, including intermittent home blood pressure recording.

Blood Pressure Determination↗

PubMed1990

Bench and ambulatory field evaluation of the A & D TM-2420 automated sphygmomanometer.

Adequate evaluation of automated sphygmomanometers, in terms of safety, accuracy, mechanical reliability, patient acceptability and ability to record ambulatory blood pressure is essential before these devices are used in clinical practice and in clinical trials. We have evaluated the accuracy and performance of the A & D TM-2420 automated sphygmomanometer, an auscultatory device designed for ambulatory blood pressure recording. Four devices were tested for accuracy by simultaneous comparison against two experienced observers using standard mercury column sphygmomanometers. Two of these devices developed faults that precluded complete evaluation. One of the remaining devices met and one failed to meet the somewhat liberal criteria for accuracy recommended by the American Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, the current standard for evaluation (mean difference of less than or equal to 5 mmHg and standard deviation of differences less than or equal to 8 mmHg). The mean differences (standard deviation of differences) between observers for simultaneous triplicate observations of systolic/diastolic pressure in 50 subjects, including 35 hypertensives, were 0.8 (3.0)/-0.6 (2.4) mmHg. In comparison, the differences between each device and each observer were: device 11, observer 1, -6.4 (5.4)/-6.3 (9.9); device 11, observer 2, -5.6 (4.7)/-7.0 (10.4); device 12, observer 1, -4.9 (5.2)/-4.0 (7.5); device 12, observer 2, -4.1 (4.9)/- -4.5 (7.7) mmHg. Ambulatory trials were carried out with a further 10 devices. Of these, seven developed faults requiring their return to the supplier. Numerous additional problems were encountered with microphones, cuffs, leads and connections, the processing unit, error algorithms and data-handling software. The device was not capable of making truly ambulatory recordings. We do not confirm the previously favourable, but limited, evaluation of this device. We stress the vital importance of subjecting a number of devices to benchtesting for accuracy, and the need to undertake extensive 'field' testing before any devices can be considered suitable for ambulatory recording. Exercise testing under laboratory conditions is not an adequate substitue for true ambulatory evaluation.

Algorithms↗

PubMed1990

The measurement of blood pressure: sitting or supine, once or twice?

In 166 patients attending a hypertension review clinic, we compared supine and sitting blood pressure measurements and first and second measurements (1 min apart) in each position to determine whether any differences seen might have implications for the routine measurement of blood pressure in these patients, as a group or as individuals. Measurements were made with the Copal UA-251 semi-automated sphygmomanometer. In the group there was no significant difference between the first and the second diastolic measurements. The first systolic measurement was on average 3-4 mmHg higher than the second in both positions. Mean supine systolic pressures were 2-3 mmHg higher and diastolic pressures 2-3 mmHg lower than the corresponding sitting pressures. In individual subjects there were substantial disagreements between successive measurements in both positions and between positions. However, these differences would not have influenced blood pressure management in more than a few instances. We suggest that two measurements should routinely be taken, and the average recorded, particularly when the average exceeds 155/90 mmHg.

Blood Pressure Determination↗

PubMed1990

Pharmacokinetics of epanolol after acute and chronic oral dosing in elderly patients with stable angina pectoris.

1. Epanolol is a novel anti-anginal agent which is a beta 1-adrenoceptor partial agonist exhibiting selective beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist and selective beta 1-adrenoceptor agonist activity. It is mainly metabolised to conjugates prior to excretion in urine and it was of interest to determine if any accumulation occurred in elderly patients. 2. The pharmacokinetics of epanolol have been studied over 72 h after a single oral dose of 200 mg and then over 24 h after 12 consecutive daily oral doses in 13 elderly patients with stable angina pectoris. 3. The peak plasma concentrations (mean +/- s.d.) after the single dose (25.7 +/- 17.0 ng ml-1) were not significantly different (P = 0.35) from those at steady state (32.4 +/- 20.9 ng ml-1). There was wide inter-individual variation on both occasions. The time to peak did not alter significantly during the study with mean values of 1.5 and 1.2 h on acute and chronic dosing respectively. 4. Plasma concentrations declined biphasically with a mean terminal phase half-life of 17 h and 5 fold inter-individual variation. 5. The mean area under the curve to 24 h was not significantly different (P = 0.26) after the single dose (59.0 +/- 29.8 ng ml-1 h) from that at steady state (78.4 +/- 55.0 ng ml-1 h). There was also wide inter-individual variation in these values. 6. In conclusion, the lack of significant accumulation of epanolol indicates that no alteration of dose is necessary when using epanolol in elderly patients with normal renal and hepatic function.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed1990

The pharmacokinetics of gamma-glutamyl-L-dopa in normal and anephric rats and rats with glycerol-induced acute renal failure.

1. The pharmacokinetics of gamma-glutamyl-L-dopa (gludopa) and its metabolite, L-dopa, have been studied in normal rats at three dose levels of gludopa: 2 mg kg-1, 5 mg kg-1 and 7.5 mg kg-1. The extent of metabolism in normal rats, and the pharmacokinetics in anephric rats and rats with glycerol-induced acute renal failure (ARF) were also studied at a gludopa dose of 2 mg kg-1. 2. Gludopa was extensively metabolised to L-dopa with only about 10% of an injected dose being excreted unchanged. Normal rats had a rapid gludopa clearance of 50.9 +/- 9.6 ml min-1 kg-1 and elimination rate constant of 2.99 +/- 0.27 h-1. The mean residence time and half-life were 20.9 +/- 1.4 and 14.4 +/- 1.0 min, respectively. The apparent volume of distribution at steady state was 1.05 +/- 0.18 l kg-1. 3. No statistically significant differences were found in the main pharmacokinetic parameters between ARF and controls for either gludopa or its metabolite L-dopa. 4. In anephric rats and controls the kidneys were found to contribute about 68.5% and 67.2% to the elimination of gludopa and the metabolite L-dopa, respectively. 5. These results confirm that gludopa is an efficient pro-drug for L-dopa, and that the kidneys are the major site of gludopa metabolism. It seems likely that the renal specificity of gludopa persists in ARF.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

PubMed1990

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for atheromatous renal artery stenosis--blood pressure response and discriminant analysis of outcome predictors.

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed in 39 consecutive patients with atheromatous renal artery stenosis associated with hypertension. The mean blood pressure before angioplasty was 191/107 mmHg and this had dropped to a mean of 167/90 mmHg at the patient's most recent visit, representing a significant fall in both systolic (p less than 0.01) and diastolic pressures (p less than 0.001). The mean serum creatinine was 166.7 mumol/l before percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and 155.3 mumol/l at the most recent visit (not statistically significant). The mean number of anti-hypertensive drugs fell from 2.4 to 1.9 after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (p less than 0.05). Three patients (eight per cent) were 'cured' (diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg without medication), 25 (64 per cent) had 'improved' (diastolic blood pressure less than 109 mmHg, with a fall of more than 15 per cent) and 11 (28 per cent) had not improved. Logistic discriminant analysis showed that pre-percutaneous transluminal angioplasty diastolic blood pressure, age, serum creatinine and smoking habit together correctly predicted the outcome of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in 90 per cent of patients, with four 'false positives' and no 'false negatives'. Ten patients suffered a total of 12 serious complications related to the procedure: one death in acute renal failure, one myocardial infarction, one severe hypotension just after the procedure, one deep vein thrombosis, one episode of transient ischaemia of the toes and seven groin haematomas. Thus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for atheromatous renal artery stenosis rarely 'cures' hypertension, but improved blood pressure control is often achieved, albeit at the expense of troublesome complications. A prospective, randomized trial is needed to establish whether or not the improvement is due directly to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty.

Age Factors↗