How often should patients with diabetes be screened for retinopathy?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J C Javitt.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical success rates and quality of life impact of brimonidine 0.2% with timolol 0.5% in newly diagnosed patients naive to glaucoma therapy. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-masked, clinical effectiveness trial in which the clinical outcomes of twice daily brimonidine tartrate 0.2% were compared with those of timolol maleate 0.5% in patients with glaucoma and' ocular hypertension was conducted. Two hundred nineteen patients were enrolled--111 in the brimonidine group and 108 in the timolol group. Patients instilled their study medications twice daily for 4 months. Factors for determining clinical success were reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP), safety, and adverse events. Quality of life effects were assessed with the SF-36 Health Survey and Glaucoma Disability Index questionnaires. RESULTS: Clinical success was 71% (75/106) with brimonidine and 70% (73/105) with timolol as initial treatment. The overall mean decrease in IOP was 6.5 mm Hg with brimonidine and 6.2 mm Hg with timolol. Few patients reported a specific adverse event and, with the exception of a slightly higher rate of ocular burning and stinging in the brimonidine group, there were no significant between-group differences. No significant chronotropic effects on the heart were seen with brimonidine, while small but significant mean decreases in heart rate were seen at months 1 and 4 with timolol. Mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure remained relatively stable in both groups. Quality of life remained stable, with no significant between-group differences. CONCLUSIONS: As a first-line agent for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension, brimonidine has clinical effectiveness equivalent to timolol, but with less chronotropic effect on the heart. Brimonidine is a viable alternative to timolol for first-line therapy in glaucoma and ocular hypertension.
OBJECTIVE: The authors measured functional status after bilateral implantation of a multifocal versus a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL). METHODS: A retrospective, case-control study was done on 100 subjects implanted bilaterally with a silicone-optic foldable zonal progressive IOL under United States Food and Drug Administration Investigational Device Exemption protocol and 103 control subjects implanted bilaterally with a monofocal IOL of similar design who were matched on age and postoperative corrected distance acuity. The Cataract TyPE specification, a 17-item functional status instrument, was modified, validated, and administered via telephone interview. The measures of vision, functional status, and quality of life were compared between patients and controls. RESULTS: The instrument was valid (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and correlated moderately (Pearson's r= 0.34) with Snellen acuity. Multifocal subjects were more likely than monofocal controls to never wear spectacles (41% vs. 11.7%; P < 0.001). Multifocal subjects rated their vision without spectacles significantly better than those with monofocal IOLs (9.0 vs. 7.9; P < 0.001). The difference was most significant in rating of near vision without spectacles (7.8 vs. 5.0; P < 0.001). Multifocal subjects reported less limitation in specific visual tasks without spectacles (0.3 vs. 0.8; P < 0.001, where 1.0 represents "slightly" limited). This difference was consistently observed in subscales related to distance vision activities (0.1 vs. 0.4; P < 0.001), near vision activities (0.6 vs. 1.4; P < 0.001), and social activities (0.1 vs. 0.6; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, subjects with bilateral multifocal IOLs reported better overall vision, less limitation in visual function, and less spectacle usage than monofocal controls.
AIM: To estimate risk of infectious endophthalmitis after cataract extraction in Denmark and to compare results with the risk of this complication in the USA. METHODS: In the national Danish administrative hospital register, 19,426 patients were identified who underwent first eye cataract surgery from 1985 to 1987 and who were 50 years of age or older. Of these, 61 patients had postoperative endophthalmitis. RESULTS: A 12 month cumulative risk of rehospitalisation for endophthalmitis was estimated at 0.18% (95% CI 0.09-0.26) after extracapsular cataract extraction with lens implant. Advanced age, male sex, intracapsular cataract extraction, and anterior vitrectomy were all associated independently with an increased risk of postoperative endophthalmitis. When restricting the sample to patients aged 65 years or older, in order to allow comparisons to be made with the US National Study of Cataract Outcomes, a 12 month risk of 0.17% (95% CI 0.08-0.25) was estimated. The previously reported US risk of 0.12% is included in the confidence interval of the risk estimated in the Danish sample. CONCLUSION: Despite considerable differences in the healthcare systems, no statistically significant difference in outcome of surgery as measured by risk of endophthalmitis was shown between Denmark and the USA.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a model of NIDDM for analyzing prevention strategies for NIDDM. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A Markov type model with Monte Carlo techniques was used. Age, sex, and ethnicity of cohort was based on U.S. data. Incidence rates of complications were also based on community and population studies. RESULTS: Nonproliferative retinopathy, proliferative retinopathy, and macular edema are predicted in 79, 19, and 52%, respectively, of people with NIDDM; 19% are predicted to develop legal blindness. Microalbuminuria, gross proteinuria, and end-stage renal disease related to diabetes are predicted in 53, 40, and 17%, respectively. Symptomatic sensorimotor neuropathy and lower-extremity amputation are predicted in 31 and 17%, respectively. Cardiovascular disease is predicted in 39%. Higher rates of complications (1.1-3.0x) are predicted in minority populations. Predicted average life expectancy is 17 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: A probabilistic model of NIDDM predicts the vascular complications of NIDDM in a cohort representative of the incident cases of diabetes in the U.S. before age 75 years. Predictions of complications and mortality are consistent with the known epidemiology of NIDDM. The model is suitable for evaluating the effect of preventive interventions on the natural history of NIDDM.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the health benefits and economics of treating NIDDM with the goal of normoglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Incidence-based simulation model of NIDDM was used. Hazard rates for complications were adjusted for glycemia using risk gradients from the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Treatment costs were estimated from national survey data and clinical trials. Incremental costs and benefits were expressed in present value dollars (3% discount rate). Life-years were adjusted for quality of life, yielding quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS: Comprehensive treatment of NIDDM that maintains an HbA1c value of 7.2% is predicted to reduce the cumulative incidence of blindness, end-stage renal disease, and lower-extremity amputation by 72, 87, and 67%, respectively. Cardiovascular disease risk increased by 3% (no effect of treating glycemia is assumed). Life expectancy increased 1.39 years. The cost of treating hyperglycemia increased by almost twofold, which is partially offset by reductions in the cost of complications. The estimated incremental cost/QALY gained is $16,002. Treatment is more cost-effective for those with longer glycemic exposure (earlier onset of diabetes), minorities, and those with higher HbA1c under standard care. CONCLUSIONS: The incremental effectiveness of treating NIDDM with the goal of normoglycemia is estimated to be approximately $16,000/QALY gained, which is in the range of interventions that are generally considered cost-effective.
PURPOSE: To identify the location of barriers to treatment for glaucoma and cataract among African-American Medicare beneficiaries. METHODS: We examined the receipt of eye care in general and care for glaucoma and cataract in particular among black and white Medicare beneficiaries using 1991 Medicare physician claims data. Racial differences in treatment for glaucoma and cataract were examined both for the Medicare population as a whole and for identified eye care users. The results were compared to the expected value of black-white difference based on population prevalence data for each specific condition. RESULTS: Thirty percent of black beneficiaries and 45% of white Medicare beneficiaries used eye care services in 1991. After adjusting for the expected difference in prevalence, black beneficiaries were half as likely to be surgically treated for glaucoma compared to white beneficiaries, and 80% as likely for cataract. When the analysis was restricted to those using eye care services, blacks continued to have lower than expected rates of treatment for glaucoma (observed RR = 3.2, 95% confidence interval = 3.1-3.4 vs an expected RR of 4.3, 95% confidence interval = 3.5-5.4), but a higher rate of treatment for cataract (RR = 1.2, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-1.3). Among those with physician-diagnosed glaucoma and cataract, blacks were more likely to undergo surgical treatment for these conditions than whites (RR = 1.5 for glaucoma, 95% confidence interval = 1.4-1.5; RR = 1.2 for cataract, 95% confidence interval = 1.2-1.3). CONCLUSION: Barriers to treatment for glaucoma and cataract among black Medicare beneficiaries involve primarily limitations in access to the eye care system. The undertreatment for glaucoma among black beneficiaries was reduced, but not eliminated, after removing the effect of unequal access to the eye care system.
OBJECTIVE: To determine, from the health insurer's perspective, the cost of preventing vision loss in patients with diabetes mellitus through ophthalmologic screening and treatment and to calculate the cost-effectiveness of these interventions as compared with that of other medical interventions. DESIGN: Computer modeling, incorporating data from population-based epidemiologic studies and multicenter clinical trials. Monte Carlo simulation was used, combined with sensitivity analysis and present value analysis of cost savings. RESULTS: Screening and treatment of eye disease in patients with diabetes mellitus costs $3190 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. This average cost is a weighted average (based on prevalence disease) of the cost-effectiveness of detecting and treating diabetic eye disease in those with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus ($1996 per QALY), those with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) who use insulin for glycemic control ($2933 per QALY), and those with NIDDM who do not use insulin for glycemic control ($3530 per QALY). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis indicates that prevention programs aimed at improving eye care for diabetic persons not only result in substantial federal budgetary savings but are highly cost-effective health investments for society. Ophthalmologic screening for diabetic persons is more cost-effective than many routinely provided health interventions. Because diabetic eye disease is the leading cause of new cases of blindness among working-age Americans, these results support the widespread use of screening and treatment for diabetic eye disease.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the frequency and content of post-operative examinations by ophthalmologists and optometrists for cataract surgery patients without operative complications and to assess the referral patterns of optometrists when complications are identified. DESIGN: In 1992 we conducted a survey of randomly selected members of the American Academy of Ophthalmology and American Optometric Association. Responses were obtained from 538 (82%) of 655 eligible ophthalmologists and 130 (84%) of 154 eligible optometrists. RESULTS: Eighty-eight percent of responding ophthalmologists reported that patients had 4 or more visits within 4 months after surgery, 97% of ophthalmologists performed the first postoperative examination on their cataract surgery patients, and 60% of ophthalmologists reported that no other eye professional saw their patients postoperatively. Forty-six percent of responding optometrists participated in postoperative care of cataract surgery patients, and usually performed their first postoperative examination 7 days after surgery; 78% of these optometrists reported that they saw patients 3 or more times after surgery. Postoperatively, 83% of ophthalmologists and 75% of optometrists usually performed at least 1 dilated fundus examination, 87% of ophthalmologists and 47% of optometrists performed 4 or more slit-lamp examinations, 74% of ophthalmologists and 42% of optometrists performed 4 or more tonometry tests, and 83% of both groups performed 2 or more refractions. More than 80% of responding optometrists involved in postoperative care of cataract surgery patients immediately refer a patient to an ophthalmologist if there is evidence of acute glaucoma or an unexplained decrease in vision in the eye that was operated on. For less urgent complications, most optometrists promptly make a referral to an ophthalmologist. CONCLUSIONS: In 1992, a small percentage of ophthalmologists and optometrists were performing fewer follow-up examinations and tests for cataract patients than recommended by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Not all optometrists immediately refer to an ophthalmologist any acute complication that they identify postoperatively.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between cataract extraction and atherosclerosis and its complications. DESIGN: A nationwide case-control study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Using a 5% random sample of all Medicare beneficiaries, we analyzed Medicare claims data on 60803 persons 65 years of age and older who underwent cataract extraction in 1986 or 1987 and a control group of 63765 persons matched to the cases for age, race, sex, ZIP code, and reason for Medicare entitlement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Atherosclerosis and atherosclerosis-related disease and procedures were defined by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification, codes or by Health Care Financing Administration Common Procedure Classification System (Current Procedural Terminology) codes. The strength of evidence for atherosclerotic disease was categorized on the basis of the types of bills in the Medicare claims file. RESULTS: Odds of atherosclerosis-related morbidity and procedures were higher for cases than for controls. The association decreased with patient age and was strongest in beneficiaries aged 65 to 69 years (odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.13-1.48). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that there is a weak association between a visually significant cataract requiring surgery and atherosclerosis in the younger elderly.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to understand current pattern of eye care use among people with diabetes. METHODS: Study population included 175,015 Medicare beneficiaries who had physician-diagnosed diabetes. The authors estimated overall rate of eye care visits among these beneficiaries in 1992 and 1993 using Medicare physician claims data. In combination of Area Resource File, the authors examined association of eye care use with demographic characteristics, regional socio-economic characteristics, and regional eye care provider supply. RESULTS: Fifty-three percent of the population had at least 1 eye care visit in a 1-year period and 67% in a 2-year period. Younger age (ages < 75 years), male gender, black race, high regional poverty, and fewer ophthalmologist supply were related to lower rate of eye care use. There was no association between eye care use and regional education level and optometrist supply. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that a large portion of elderly people with diabetes is not obtaining the necessary eye care, especially blacks, men, and those residing in poor areas with fewer ophthalmologists.
PURPOSE: Previous analyses of Medicare claims data, as well as clinical series, have suggested that performance of neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) laser posterior capsulotomy after extracapsular cataract surgery increases significantly the risk of retinal detachment. However, methodologic problems with previous research limit the strength of conclusions that can be drawn from these earlier studies. This study was designed to resolve those methodological limitations while using a population-based approach for assessment of the independent association between the performance of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy and pseudophakic retinal detachment. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted. Medicare beneficiaries who had undergone extracapsular cataract extraction from 1988 to 1990 were identified from a 5% sample of Medicare claims data. Within this cohort, people who were diagnosed or treated for retinal detachment during the years 1988 through 1991 (cases) were identified from Medicare records. Four controls were matched to each case of retinal detachment using an incidence density design. Providers of the patients' cataract and retinal surgery were contacted and asked to provide clinical data for all cases and controls that they had treated. RESULTS: Seven hundred six cases of retinal detachment were originally identified from Medicare records. After exclusions due to ineligibility, a total of 291 cases and 870 matched controls were available for analysis. Conditional logistic regression models showed that a number of factors were associated independently with an excess risk of retinal detachment after cataract surgery. These included Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy (odds ratio [OR] = 3.8; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.4-5.9), a history of retinal detachment (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2-6.1), a history of lattice degeneration (OR = 6.6; 95% CI, 1.6-27.1), axial length (OR = 1.21/mm; 95% CI, 1.03-1.43), refractive error (OR = 0.92/diopter; 95% CI, 0.88-0.95), and a history of ocular trauma after cataract surgery (OR = 6.1; 95% CI, 4.3-28.2). CONCLUSION: Performance of Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy is associated with a significantly elevated risk of retinal detachment in patients who have undergone extracapsular cataract extraction. Other independent risk factors for retinal detachment include axial length, myopia, posterior capsular rupture during surgery, history of retinal detachment or lattice degeneration, and ocular trauma after cataract surgery.
AIMS: To estimate the risk of retinal detachment (RD) following cataract extraction in Denmark, and to compare the risk with that following cataract extraction in the USA, and with that in a sample of Danish patients who did not have ocular surgery. METHODS: A sample was created from the administrative Danish Hospital Register and included 19,252 patients who underwent first eye cataract surgery between 1985 and 1987, and who were 50 years of age or older. The patients were then followed for 4-6 years using the register data. The design and definition of events were identical to the US National Study of Cataract Outcomes. RESULTS: In Denmark a 4 year cumulative risk of hospitalisation for RD of 0.93% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.16) was observed following an extracapsular cataract extraction with a lens implant. A similar cumulative risk of RD was reported from the US study. Thus, no difference in outcomes concerning risk of RD was shown between Denmark and the USA. In a multivariate analysis younger age, male sex, and intracapsular cataract extraction were all associated with higher risk of postoperative RD. A reference group of 7636 people not undergoing any ocular surgery was created and the incidence of RD in this group was calculated. During the sixth year following cataract surgery, the incidence of RD in the cataract group was still 7.5 (95% CI 1.6-22.0) times higher than that observed in the reference group.
Cataract is the leading cause of blindness, accounting for 50% of blindness worldwide. Although significant progress has been made toward identifying risk factors for cataract, there is no proven primary prevention or medical treatment. Surgical removal of cataract remains the only therapy. In this paper, we reviewed (a) the prevalence and incidence data of cataract, (b) the findings on risk factors for cataract, and (c) health service utilization and outcome of cataract surgery in both developed and developing countries.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To examine the change in volume and costs of physician services for ophthalmic surgical procedures associated with physician fee cuts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors analyzed the physician claims (Part B) data for a 5% random sample of the Medicare population. Number, rate, average allowed charge, and total cost of physician services for ophthalmic surgical procedures were compared for 1988 and 1991. RESULTS: An estimated 3.1 million (98 per 1000) ophthalmic surgical procedures were performed on Medicare beneficiaries in 1991, compared with 2.3 million (76 per 1000) in 1988. There was a 35% increase in number and a 28% increase in rate. The average allowed charge for these services decreased by 26% ($1155 vs $852 per procedure), with an overall cost of $2.6 billion in both years. CONCLUSION: A reduction in fee for physician services for ophthalmic surgical procedures from 1988 to 1991 was associated with an increase in the volume of the services. The overall costs of physician services for ophthalmic surgical procedures remained consistent between the two years.
BACKGROUND: Although the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment increases with age, most surveys of ocular disease do not include nursing home residents. METHODS: We conducted a population-based prevalence survey of persons 40 years of age or older residing in nursing homes in the Baltimore area. Of 738 eligible subjects in 30 nursing homes, 499 (67.6 percent) participated in the study. They had their eyes examined and their visual acuity tested and were interviewed in detail. The nonparticipants were more likely to be older, to be white, and to have lower scores on the Mini-Mental State Examination. RESULTS: The prevalence of bilateral blindness (visual acuity < or = 20/200) was 17.0 percent. The prevalence of visual impairment (< 20/40 but > 20/200) was 18.8 percent. The frequency of blindness increased from 15.2 percent among those under 60 years of age to 28.6 percent among those 90 or older. The age-adjusted prevalence of blindness was 50 percent higher among blacks than among whites (P < 0.01). As compared with the noninstitutionalized population from the same communities, the rate of blindness among nursing home residents was 13.1 times higher for blacks and 15.6 times higher for whites. Cataract was the leading cause of blindness, followed by corneal opacity, macular degeneration, and glaucoma. We judged that 20 percent of the functional blindness and 37 percent of the visual impairment could be remedied by adequate refractive correction. CONCLUSIONS: Blindness and visual impairment are highly prevalent among nursing home residents. Much of this loss of vision could be treated or prevented with appropriate ophthalmologic care.