Biomedical subjects

J C Hunt

Publications and source records attributed to J C Hunt.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

PubMed1980

[Not Available].

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Academies and Institutes↗

PubMed1979

The Mayo Three-Community Hypertension Control Program. I. Design and initial screening results.

The Mayo Three-Community Hypertension Control Program implemented graduated programs for the control of high blood pressure in three rural southeastern Minnesota communities, beginning in 1974. Prevalence of hypertension (when defined as diastolic blood pressure, at initial screening, of 95 mm Hg or more) was similar to that found for comparable groups by age and sex in the United States generally, but an atypically high frequency of known but untreated hypertension was found. Programs of public and professional information, systematic household screening, continuing professional education (two communities), and a new community hypertension clinic (one community) were initiated, and plans were made to evaluate the programs simultaneously by means of total rescreening of persons found to be hypertensive initially. The present report describes in detail the design of the program and the results of initial screening in relation to findings in other populations at the time. Subsequent reports assess the impact of each program on its target community and of a community hypertension clinic within the one setting where this component of a model program was established.

Adult↗

PubMed1979

The Mayo Three-Community Hypertension Control Program. II. Outcome of intervention in entire communities.

A pronounced decline in blood pressure levels of hypertensive patients occurred in each of three rural Minnesota communities 1 to 2 years after the inception of community programs to control high blood pressure in these populations. An experimental hypertension clinic was established in one community to integrate a nurse practitioner into a physician-supervised program of long-term patient management. In the community with this innovative, partially subsidized practice arrangement, we observed declines in diastolic pressures of hypertensives. However, comparable degrees of blood pressure reduction occurred in the two other communities, with traditional solo or small group practice arrangements, where intervention was limited to detection and referral alone or was supplemented with continuing education of physicians in the management of hypertension. The evaluation of these three community programs suggests, among other conclusions, that this innovative community model for hypertension control, based on the recommendations of the Inter-Society Commission for Heart Disease Resources, contributed to favorable short-term blood pressure outcomes for the community. The observation of similar overall outcomes as measured by blood pressure reduction in all three communities was unexpected; the clinic's impact appears to have been matched by the effectiveness of screening and referral, alone or with continuing education, in the two other communities.

Adult↗

PubMed1979

The Mayo Three-Community Hypertension Control Program. III. Outcome in a community-based hypertension clinic.

As part of a broader community program to evaluate approaches to hypertension control, a Community Hypertension Clinic, staffed by two nurse practitioners, was set up in a rural community. Hypertensive persons were identified either by an initial central blood pressure screening or by a subsequent home screening. Slightly more than half of the hypertensive patients at initial screening, or 256 persons, elected to go to the Community Hypertension Clinic for second-stage screening, whereas the remainder elected to see their physicians or to do neither. After secondary screening at the Clinic, 120 patients eventually came under care and were managed by the nurse practitioners. After 2 years of follow-up, 57% of the Clinic patients had office-recorded diastolic blood pressures of less than 90 mm Hg. The Community Hypertension Clinic dropout rate was only 5% after 30 months of operation, for participants whose duration of follow-up ranged from 12 to 27 months (median 16 months), when a repeat home blood pressure screening examination was performed. Comparison of outcomes was thus possible between persons who attended the Community Hypertension Clinic and those who were referred to their physicians' offices. Persons with more severe hypertension most often elected to go to the Clinic, whereas patients with milder degrees of hypertension tended to go to their private physicians for follow-up or failed to make the recommended second-stage screening contact altogether. Greater declines in blood pressure were observed in the Clinic group.

Adult↗

PubMed1978