Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J C Barrett

Publications and source records attributed to J C Barrett.

At least 253 records · Page 14Linked to original sources

Detection of multiple tumor suppressor genes for Syrian hamster fibrosarcomas by somatic cell hybridization.

Identification of tumor suppressor gene loci in rodent cell culture systems has relied upon the use of somatic cell hybridization studies. Although normal rodent fibroblasts are capable of suppressing the tumorigenicity of a variety of tumor cells, the lack of complementation in tumor cell x tumor cell hybrids has left the possibility that a single tumor suppressor gene may be responsible for tumor suppression in a particular rodent cell culture system. Using this same approach, we found no evidence for complementation resulting in suppression of the transformed phenotype when three viral oncogene-transformed Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cell lines and one spontaneously transformed baby hamster kidney (BHK) cell line were fused to benzo[a]pyrene-transformed SHE cells (BP6T-M3). However, v-src oncogene-transformed cell line (srcT) x BP6T-M3 hybrids did demonstrate limited suppression of the transformed phenotype, suggesting at least two complementing tumor suppressor genes in this system. We were able to confirm and extend this finding using another experimental approach with preneoplastic hamster cell lines that are immortal in culture but nontumorigenic in nude mice. We propose that fusion of these preneoplastic cells to various tumor cells may reveal tumor suppressor genes not evident in the tumor cell x tumor cell complementation studies. Subclones of two nontumorigenic, immortal hamster cell lines, 10W and DES4, displayed differing abilities to suppress BP6T-M3 cells in somatic cell hybrids, as quantitated by the ability of the hybrid cells to form colonies in soft agar. With a panel of preneoplastic hamster cell x BP6T-M3 hybrids, a distinct pattern of suppression or expression of the transformed phenotype was observed. Marked differences in this pattern were seen when the same 10W and DES4 subclones were fused to other hamster fibrosarcoma cell lines, indicating different tumor suppressing activities of multiple tumor suppressor genes. Analysis of this data suggests that as few as three or as many as six different tumor suppressor genes may be active in the Syrian hamster embryo cell culture system. Thus, this system may provide a useful model for identifying and studying the effects and regulation of a number of different tumor suppressor genes for fibrosarcomas.

Animals↗

Characterization of murine cell lines from diethylstilbestrol-induced uterine endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Neonatal treatment with estrogens is associated with development of uterine adenocarcinomas in CD-1 mice. Treatment with the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES) on Days 1 to 5 after birth results in 90% incidence of these hormone-dependent lesions in 18-mo.-old mice. Three cell lines were established from these DES-associated tumors. Each of these cell lines exhibited morphologic and ultrastructural characteristics of transformed epithelial cells, including an increased nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio, enlarged and irregular nuclei with multiple nucleoli and areas of chromatin condensation, positive staining for cytokeratin, desmosomes, and microvilli. After subcutaneous injection into nude mice, all three cell lines formed solid tumors within 4 wk. Although the primary uterine tumors and tumor transplants in nude mice had been shown to be estrogen-dependent and estrogen-receptor positive, neither the monolayer growth nor the tumorigenicity of any of the three cell lines in this study was enhanced by or dependent on estrogen. Estrogen receptor levels were low in early and intermediate passage cells. Allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization analysis of PCR-amplified cell line DNA revealed no point mutations in the 12th, 13th, or 61st codons of the K-ras or H-ras protooncogenes. Southern analysis revealed no changes in genomic organization of the putative tumor suppressor gene DCC, but demonstrated a three- to four-fold amplification of the c-myc gene in one cell line. Expression of c-myc RNA was concomitantly increased in the same cell line. These three transformed cell lines represent the end point in the process of hormone-associated tumorigenesis and as such should prove useful in investigating the molecular changes and the mechanisms involved in hormonal carcinogenesis.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Mechanisms of action of known human carcinogens.

Mutational mechanisms can be proposed for most, if not all, known human carcinogens. Many of these are electrophilic or metabolically activated to reactive molecules which can alter DNA, causing genetic damage and different types of mutations. Even some human carcinogens previously proposed to be nongenotoxic (e.g., hormones and asbestos) exhibit mutational activity in assays for chromosomal mutations. Since such chemicals are usually inactive in the Salmonella assay and other assays for gene mutation, more emphasis has been placed on their nonmutational mechanisms. Clear evidence exists that these carcinogens can alter gene expression and stimulate cell proliferation by epigenetic mechanisms. Such properties are undoubtedly important in their carcinogenic activity. Although they are less well studied, DNA reactive, genotoxic carcinogens also alter gene expression and increase cell turnover by epigenetic mechanisms. These findings are consistent with the current understanding of the molecular basis of multistep carcinogenesis. Most common human cancers evolve as the result of multiple mutational events. The molecular basis of these mutations is varied, and they include point mutations, deletion mutations, chromosomal rearrangements, gene amplification and chromosomal losses and gains. Therefore, different mutational activities of carcinogens can influence the carcinogenic process at different steps. Influences on gene expression and cell proliferation are also important in allowing clonal expansion of preneoplastic cells and in disrupting the suppressive effects of surrounding normal cells on preneoplastic cells (Dotto et al., 1988). The mechanisms of action of human carcinogens, and very probably many rodent carcinogens, include both genetic and epigenetic processes. Carcinogenesis is a multistep, multigenic, multicausal process (Barrett, 1987b), so both epigenetic and genetic factors are probably important.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Carcinogens↗

Mechanisms of human carcinogens.

Mutational mechanisms can be proposed as contributing to the activity of most human carcinogens. Many of these chemicals are electrophilic or are metabolically activated to reactive molecules that can alter DNA. Even human carcinogens that do not exhibit direct chemical interaction with DNA, e.g., hormones and asbestos, have been shown to induce genetic effects when in vitro assays for chromosomal mutations are employed. Since these chemicals are usually inactive in the Salmonella assay and other gene mutational assays, more emphasis has been placed on their nonmutational mechanisms. Evidence exists that these carcinogens alter gene expression and stimulate cell proliferation by epigenetic mechanisms; such properties almost certainly contribute to the carcinogenic activity of these chemicals. Although less well studied, DNA reactive, genotoxic carcinogens also alter gene expression and cell proliferation by epigenetic mechanisms. These findings are consistent with the current understanding of the molecular basis of multistep carcinogenesis. The neoplastic evolution of most common human cancers occurs as the result of multiple mutational events. The molecular basis for these mutations is varied and includes point mutations, deletion mutations, chromosome rearrangements, gene amplification, and chromosome losses and gains. Therefore, different mutational activities of carcinogens may influence the carcinogenic process at different steps. In addition, chemical influences on gene expression and cell proliferation are important in allowing clonal expansion of preneoplastic cells and in disrupting the suppressive effects of surrounding normal cells on preneoplastic cells (Dotto et al., 1988). Therefore, the mechanisms of action of human carcinogens, and very likely many rodent carcinogens, will include both genetic and epigenetic processes.

Animals↗

Down-regulation of cdc2 in senescent human and hamster cells.

Senescent cells fail to respond to serum-induced signals for DNA synthesis. Because a central role for the p34cdc2 protein kinase is postulated in control of the cell cycle, we examined the status of this kinase in senescent cells and other growth-arrested cells. In growing human and Syrian hamster fibroblasts, three 35S-labeled proteins of 34-36 kDa were immunoprecipitated with p34cdc2 antiserum. Only the two slower migrating forms were phosphorylated as determined by 32P labelling. In senescent cells, which failed to incorporate [3H]thymidine, no p34cdc2 protein was synthesized and very little or no cdc2 mRNA was observed. When maintained for 48 h in 0.5% serum, young cells also retained only marginal cdc2 expression. After stimulation of low serum-arrested cells by addition of 10% serum, a time-dependent increase of cdc2 mRNA was observed, whereas serum stimulation of senescent cells did not increase cdc2 mRNA. In contrast to senescent and low serum-arrested cells, cdc2 mRNA was expressed at normal levels in cells partially growth arrested by isoleucine deficiency in G1, by aphidicolin at G1-S, by etoposide in G2, or by Colcemid in the M phase of the cell cycle, indicating that cdc2 down-regulation does not always occur upon growth arrest. Following transfection of a plasmid containing the human CDC2 gene into hamster cells, expression of human cdc2 failed to overcome the block to DNA synthesis in senescent cells. Although p34cdc2 was synthesized in the transfected cells, the multiple phosphorylated forms of the proteins were not observed. Taken together, these data support the concept that a chain of events leads to senescence. While p34cdc2 kinase may be one of the critical elements, other cell cycle controls are also involved.

Animals↗

Preneoplastic alterations in nuclear morphology that accompany loss of tumor suppressor phenotype.

Alterations of nuclear shape are frequently observed in tumor cells, but the genes controlling these changes and the stage in the neoplastic process at which they occur are unknown. We have studied nuclear shape changes in chemically immortalized, nontumorigenic Syrian hamster embryo cell clones that had either retained (supB+) or lost (supB-) the ability to suppress the tumorigenic phenotype when they were hybridized with a tumor cell line (BP6T). Quantitative morphometric analysis of the nuclei of cells from each of two pairs of supB+/supB- variants indicated that the nuclei of supB- cells were significantly more out of round than those of their corresponding supB+ clones. These data indicate that modification of nuclear structure may represent an early, preneoplastic event in multistep chemical carcinogenesis and that loss of a tumor suppressor gene function may regulate alterations in nuclear morphology.

Animals↗

Senescence of nickel-transformed cells by an X chromosome: possible epigenetic control.

Transfer of a normal Chinese hamster X chromosome (carried in a mouse A9 donor cell line) to a nickel-transformed Chinese hamster cell line with an Xq chromosome deletion resulted in senescense of these previously immortal cells. At early passages of the A9/CX donor cells, the hamster X chromosome was highly active, inducing senescence in 100% of the colonies obtained after its transfer into the nickel-transformed cells. However, senescence was reduced to 50% when Chinese hamster X chromosomes were transferred from later passage A9 cells. Full senescing activity of the intact hamster X chromosome was restored by treatment of the donor mouse cells with 5-azacytidine, which induced demethylation of DNA. These results suggest that a senescence gene or genes, which may be located on the Chinese hamster X chromosome, can be regulated by DNA methylation, and that escape from senescence and possibly loss of tumor suppressor gene activity can occur by epigenetic mechanisms.

Animals↗

Loss of a tumor suppressor gene function is correlated with downregulation of chondrocyte-specific collagen expression in Syrian hamster embryo cells.

We previously described the isolation of closely related, preneoplastic Syrian hamster cell lines that have retained (supB+) or lost (supB-) the ability to suppress the anchorage-independent growth and tumorigenicity of a sarcoma cell line (BP6T) in cell hybrids. In this report, we have used differential cDNA screening to clone several genes that are expressed in supB+ cells and downregulated in supB- cells. The nontumorigenic supB+ and supB- variants are advantageous for differential cDNA cloning because multiple independent cell lines differing in their tumor suppressor activity have been isolated. Differentially expressed cDNAs were isolated and placed into one of four groups based on DNA cross-hybridization. Representative cDNAs from Groups I and II, which were expressed at relatively high levels in two independently derived supB+ cell lines (DES4 and 10W) and downregulated in the supB- and tumor cell lines, were sequenced. The DNA and predicted amino acid sequences of these genes were found to be highly homologous to the chondrocyte-specific collagens type II and type IX. In contrast to the chondrocyte-specific collagens, another collagen isoform, collagen type I, was expressed at similar levels in both supB+ and supB- cells. These results suggest that carcinogen-induced immortalization selected for chondrocyte-like cell lines from the mixed embryo cell population. As these cells progressed toward tumorigenicity, the ability to express the chondrocyte differentiation markers was lost concomitantly with the ability to suppress the tumorigenicity of the BP6T sarcoma cell line. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that the supB+ tumor suppressor gene is involved in the regulation of differentiation. The identification of genes regulated by this suppressor gene may aid in its isolation.

Animals↗

Introduction of new genetic markers on human chromosomes.

The purpose of this study was to use DNA transfection and microcell chromosome transfer techniques to engineer a human chromosome containing multiple biochemical markers for which selectable growth conditions exist. The starting chromosome was a t(X;3)(3pter----3p12::Xq26----Xpter) chromosome from a reciprocal translocation in the normal human fibroblast cell line GM0439. This chromosome was transferred to a HPRT (hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase)-deficient mouse A9 cell line by microcell fusion and selected under growth conditions (HAT medium) for the HPRT gene on the human t(X;3) chromosome. A resultant HAT-resistant cell line (A9(GM0439)-1) contained a single human t(X;3) chromosome. In order to introduce a second selectable genetic marker to the t(X;3) chromosome, A9(GM0439)-1 cells were transfected with pcDneo plasmid DNA. Colonies resistant to both G418 and HAT medium (G418r/HATr) were selected. To obtain A9 cells that contained a t(X;3) chromosome with an integrated neo gene, the microcell transfer step was repeated and doubly resistant cells were selected. G418r/HATr colonies arose at a frequently of 0.09 to 0.23 x 10(-6) per recipient cell. Of seven primary microcell hybrid clones, four yielded G418r/HATr clones at a detectable frequency (0.09 to 3.4 x 10(-6)) after a second round of microcell transfer. Doubly resistant cells were not observed after microcell chromosome transfers from three clones, presumably because the markers were on different chromosomes. The secondary G418r/HATr microcell hybrids contained at least one copy of the human t(X;3) chromosome and in situ hybridization with one of these clones confirmed the presence of a neo-tagged t(X;3) human chromosome. These results demonstrate that microcell chromosome transfer can be used to select chromosomes containing multiple markers.

Cell Line↗

Identification of genes associated with tumor suppression in Syrian hamster embryo cells.

Loss of a tumor-suppressor gene function appears to play a critical role in the multistep process of neoplastic transformation of Syrian hamster embryo (SHE) cells in vitro. Clonal variants of two independent, preneoplastic cell lines have been isolated that have either retained (termed supB+) or lost (termed supB-) the ability to suppress the tumorigenicity of a highly malignant benzo[alpha]pyrene-transformed SHE cell line (BP6T) in cell hybrids. We have pursued several approaches in an attempt to identify genes that are responsible for tumor suppression in these cells. The only consistent differences detected in two-dimensional gel analyses of supB+ and supB- cellular proteins were decreases in the levels of two high molecular weight isoforms of tropomyosin in supB- cells. Differential screening of a supB+ cDNA library for genes that are preferentially expressed in supB+ cells yielded cDNA clones for four genes, i.e., collagen type II, collagen type IX, H19, and a previously unidentified gene (clone 5). Nuclear run-on assays suggested that higher transcription rates were responsible for the increased steady-state levels of some of these transcripts in supB+ cells. DNA sequence comparisons showed that two copies of a 9 bp element, previously identified in each of the mouse H19 enhancers, were also present in the 5' flanking region of the rat type II collagen gene. A transcription factor that controls expression of the collagen and H19 genes through binding to this conserved motif would be an attractive candidate for the supB+ gene or at least a mediator of the supB+ phenotype.

Animals↗

Failure of senescent cells to phosphorylate the RB protein.

The product of the RB susceptibility gene has been shown to be differentially phosphorylated during the cell cycle, suggesting a role in the regulation of cell cycle progression. We examined the expression and phosphorylation status of the RB protein in senescent Syrian hamster embryo cells. Both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated forms of the RB protein were observed in cells at early passages; however, only unphosphorylated RB protein was found in senescent cells. When nonsenescent cells at low population doubling levels were made quiescent by reducing the serum concentration of the media, the RB protein in these cells was mostly in the unphosphorylated form. When stimulated with serum, phosphorylation of the RB protein occurred between 10-20 h after stimulation, which corresponded with the induction of DNA synthesis. Senescent cells, in contrast, did not show any phosphorylation of the RB protein in response to serum. In addition, cell lines that had escaped cellular senescence at various stages of neoplastic progression were examined; all 25 cell lines examined expressed RB protein, which was phosphorylated normally. These results suggest that the RB protein plays a role in cellular senescence with phosphorylation status determining this role. Factors controlling this phosphorylation are potential key factors in controlling cellular life span in culture.

Animals↗