Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to J Bostwick.
The options for breast reconstruction include implant and expander, latissimus dorsi flap, TRAM flap, and free flaps. The moratorium on silicone gel implants has increased the use of TRAM and free flap breast reconstruction. Immediate reconstruction after preoperative planning with the surgical oncologist has improved the aesthetic results. Morbidity has been reduced through refinement in surgical technique and careful patient selection.
The author review breast reconstruction after mastectomy for cancer, taking account the technical progress and problems raised by breast implants over the last twenty years. Immediate breast reconstruction has become a routine clinical practice. The principle, indications and complications of reconstruction techniques are presented: temporary expansion prosthesis, permanent expansion prosthesis, latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap associated with an implant, rectus abdominis myocutaneous pedicle flap, free flaps.
BACKGROUND: The management of state III breast cancer is challenging; it often includes multimodal treatment with systemic therapy and/or radiation therapy and surgery. Immediate breast reconstruction has not traditionally been performed in these patients. We review the results of immediate transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap in 21 patients treated for stage III breast cancer. METHODS: Data have been collected retrospectively on 21 patients diagnosed with stage III breast cancer between 1987 and 1994. All patients had mastectomy and immediate TRAM reconstruction. Thirteen patients received primary systemic therapy, 10 patients received postoperative consolidation radiotherapy to the operative site, and 3 patients received preoperative radiation. RESULTS: Mean follow-up for the group was 26 months. Two patients died with disseminated disease: neither of them developed local disease recurrence in the operative site; 82% of the patients followed for at least two years are free of disease. Sixty-two percent of the patients received preoperative chemotherapy, the remaining patients received postoperative multiagent chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. Two of the patients received autologous bone marrow transplants after their adjuvant therapy. Ten patients had postoperative radiotherapy for consolidation; three patients received preoperative radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate TRAM reconstruction for stage III breast cancer is not associated with a delay in adjuvant therapy or an increased risk of local relapse. It facilitates wide resection of involved skin without skin grafting. Radiation therapy can be delivered to the reconstructed breast when indicated without difficulty. Breast reconstruction facilitates surgical resection of stage III breast cancer with primary closure and should be considered if the patient desires immediate breast reconstruction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to define and evaluate mammographic changes in patients treated with breast-conserving therapy and a new reconstructive technique that uses autologous tissue from a latissimus dorsi musculosubcutaneous flap. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 20 patients who underwent either immediate or delayed endoscopic latissimus dorsi muscle flap reconstruction after lumpectomy, 13 also had postsurgery mammograms available for review. Radiographic findings assessed included skin thickening, density or radiolucency at the reconstruction site, density around the flap, fat necrosis, calcifications, and the presence of surgical clips. RESULTS: Mammograms for three patients (23%) revealed thickening that we believed was attributable to radiation therapy. No patient had increased density in the flap itself; all flaps were relatively radiolucent centrally (13/13; 100%). Mammograms revealed density around the rim of the flap in four patients (31%). This density was most likely secondary to latissimus dorsi muscle fibers and did not limit radiographic evaluation. One patient had calcifications, probably secondary to fat necrosis. No oil cysts were seen. In the majority of patients (11/13; 85%), surgical clips were visible. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic latissimus dorsi muscle flap reconstruction, previously used only for mastectomy patients, is now being used for improved esthetic outcome in selected patients who desire breast conservation. Our results indicate that the mammographic findings are predictable. The most common findings are relative radiolucency centrally, with or without density from muscle fibers around the edges of the area of tissue transfer. The transplanted musculosubcutaneous flap does not interfere with mammographic evaluation.
Recent developments in abdominal contouring procedures have included the extensive use of liposuction and the use of modified or limited scars, producing in effect a "downsizing" of the operative procedures for many patients. The use of minimally invasive techniques based on endoscopic technology and instrumentation represents a logical extension of this trend. Endoscopic visualization and dissection facilitate musculofascial repair through a very small incision and, combined with liposuction, allows significant improvement in abdominal recontouring in selected patients. Patient selection parameters, instrumentation, operative techniques, and complications of this developing procedure are described.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: Patients with and without radiation treatment before their breast reconstruction were compared to study the relationship of radiation to flap-related complications. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap for breast reconstruction involves a a vascular pedicle and recipient bed, both included in the radiated field of patients undergoing adjunctive therapy. Detailed reviews of flap-related complications in this subgroup of patients have been limited. METHODS: One hundred eight patients with radiation treatment who subsequently underwent a TRAM flap breast reconstruction were compared with 572 patients with no radiation treatment before similar reconstruction. Flap-related complications, radiation dosage, time, fields, relationships between risk factors, and complications were studied. RESULTS: Overall complication rates were comparable between the two groups. Only fat necrosis (> 10% of total reconstruction) was found to be statistically significant (17.6% vs. 10.1%, p = 0.03228). No difference was found for fat necrosis in unipedicled vs. bipedicled flaps controlled for radiation (17.7% vs. 17.4%). Obesity and radiation therapy were associated with fat necrosis and major infection in a logistic regression. Significant abdominal scarring was also associated with major infection (p = 0.0044). CONCLUSIONS: In this, the largest reported series, radiation therapy was associated with increased fat necrosis and major infection. The use of the TRAM flap was not found to be prohibitive in radiated patients and should still be the first choice in this subgroup of patients.
This study examines the vascular anatomy of the TRAM flap and evaluates risk factors associated with complications among 556 women who had TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Fifty-nine patients (10.6 percent) developed fat necrosis involving 10 percent or more of their breast. Risk factors associated with fat necrosis were a history of chest-wall irradiation (p = 0.001), significant abdominal scar (p < 0.01), and obesity (p < 0.02). Among unipedicle reconstructions, patients with multiple risk factors had three times the incidence of fat necrosis (24.7 versus 8.3 percent) compared with patients with one or no risk factors (p < 0.002). Patients with multiple risk factors who had bipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction had no associated increased incidence of fat necrosis (p > 0.18). Forty-nine patients (8.8 percent) developed abdominal hernias. Risk factors associated with hernia formation included smoking at the time of surgery (p = 0.00001) and abdominal-wall repair with interposed mesh (p < 0.00001). The overall complication rate for this series was 23.7 percent (132 of 556). Risk factors associated with any complication included smoking (p < 0.002), history of chest-wall irradiation (p < 0.002), significant abdominal scar (p < 0.005), and obesity (p < 0.02). Patient selection is a fundamental determinant of successful TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Among patients with multiple risk factors, the risk of tissue loss in the reconstructed breast may be diminished by use of a bipedicled TRAM flap.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraoperative changes in physiologic blood pressure following vascular delay of the TRAM flap. Ligation of the superficial and deep inferior epigastric vessels 2 weeks prior to the TRAM flap was performed. The incidence of fat necrosis was 4.3 percent in 23 high-risk patients who underwent 30 immediate breast reconstructions. Direct measurement of blood pressure in the deep inferior epigastric artery and vein was performed in a control group without delay consisting of 13 low-risk patients and in the study group of 7 high-risk patients who underwent vascular delay. Changes in TRAM flap perfusion pressure were examined following the change in location of the flap from the abdomen to the chest. Blood pressure measurements demonstrated that arterial pressure in the proximal stump of the deep inferior epigastric artery was 64 percent in the study group prior to delay and 72 percent in the control group. The physiologic response to vascular delay included an overall increase in arterial pressure with a decrease in venous congestion. TRAM flap perfusion pressure was significantly increased from 13.3 mmHg (control) to 40.3 mmHg (delayed) in the region of the midrectus perforators (p < 0.05). These data suggest that the technique of TRAM flap delay may increase the reliable tissue volume and improve the safety of the TRAM flap.
The use of endoscopic techniques mandates the need for basic understanding of endoscopic instrumentation and operating room setup in order to avoid procedural delays and surgeon frustration. The electronic systems for endoscopic surgery-cameras, light sources, monitors, and so on-have been well developed for other specialties and are fully adaptable to endoscopic plastic surgical procedures. Hand instruments, however, are in the early phases of refinement for subcutaneous plastic surgical procedures and will undoubtedly improve over the next several years. Adaptation of existing instrumentation and development of new operating tools continue and promise to make endoscopic plastic surgical procedures of the future more ergonomic and efficient. Similarly, while operating room setup for endoscopic plastic surgical procedures varies depending on individual circumstances, application of a few basic principles will help in making this step quick and simple. The knowledge and experience of scrub technicians and nurses experienced in endoscopic techniques can be invaluable to the surgeon just beginning to use endoscopic techniques in plastic and reconstructive surgery.
Endoscopy is a new tool in the armamentarium for surgery of the breast. Endoscopic techniques may offer decreased scarring and morbidity rates for a variety of aesthetic and reconstructive procedures. Whereas initial clinical experiences are encouraging, most endoscopic procedures of the breast remain developmental, both in technique and instrumentation. Additional development, refinement, and experience will be required to define fully the utility of endoscopic techniques.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The transaxillary approach to breast augmentation is an established technique that offers the advantage of a remote incision in an aesthetically acceptable area. The main disadvantage to this approach is the lack of visualization of the implant pocket, necessitating blind, blunt dissection of the pectoral muscle origins. Occasionally, this limitation may result in improper implant placement and poor aesthetic results. In order to address this shortcoming, we have explored the use of minimally invasive endoscopic techniques in transaxillary augmentation to allow division of the pectoral muscle origin under direct visualization, effectively lowering the inframammary crease. Initial dissections and instrument development were performed in five unpreserved female cadavers. Subsequently, 103 implants have been placed in 53 patients utilizing the endoscopic transaxillary approach. Follow-up ranges from 2 weeks to 20 months. There have been no hematomas, infections, capsular contractures, or other complications. Aesthetic results have been good, and patient acceptance is high. By providing predictable and reproducible control of the inframammary crease, endoscopic dissection has allowed us to expand our indications for the transaxillary approach to breast augmentation. Surgical technique and brief clinical experience are described.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the value of MR imaging with a silicone-selective pulse sequence for detecting leakage from silicone breast implants. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Women with silicone breast implants were referred for this study on the basis of clinical or imaging findings suggestive of implant rupture. Twenty-eight patients with 38 implants were examined with silicone-selective MR imaging and also underwent surgical removal of the studied implant. All but four also had mammography before MR imaging. Results of silicone-selective MR imaging for the detection of silicone leakage were compared with mammographic and surgical findings. Surgical proof was considered the gold standard. RESULTS: Silicone-selective MR imaging showed an apparently intact implant in 21 cases; 20 of these were found to be intact at surgery. Silicone-selective MR imaging showed evidence of leakage in 17 implants, all of which showed leakage at surgery. The sensitivity for detection of leakage was 94%; the specificity was 100%. The findings of silicone-selective MR imaging and mammography were in agreement in 30 of 34 cases in which both studies were performed. In the four cases of disagreement, surgical findings agreed with MR findings in three and with mammographic findings in one. When the findings of mammography and silicone-selective MR imaging were combined, the correct status (leakage or no leakage) of all implants examined was determinable. CONCLUSION: Silicone-selective MR imaging is highly effective for detecting leakage from silicone breast implants. Accuracy is improved when mammographic and MR findings are considered together.
The history of autogenous breast reconstruction is outlined followed by a review of the problems associated with prosthetic reconstructive techniques. The advantages of and indications for autogenous tissue reconstruction are highlighted and illustrated with clinical examples.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Microsurgical tissue transplantation initiated a new dimension in breast reconstruction and is the preferred method for carefully selected patients. The inferior gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flap provides abundant tissue for a permanently soft and well-contoured breast with a donor site that is often enhanced by tissue sculpting. As a knowledgeable and skilled member of a multi-disciplinary team, the professional nurse is in a position strategic to the success of breast reconstruction utilizing microsurgical tissue transfer.