Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Boldt

Publications and source records attributed to J Boldt.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 compared with 0.4 does not further reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting in dolasetron-treated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most frequent complications after general anaesthesia. Single-dose antiemetic prophylaxis has limited efficacy in high-risk patients. Adding a simple potential antiemetic approach, such as increasing the inspired oxygen fraction, to the antiemetic portfolio would preserve pharmacological interventions for treatment of symptoms in the postoperative period. However, the antiemetic effect of a high inspired oxygen fraction is still discussed controversially. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 decreases PONV in patients receiving the 5-HT3-antagonist dolasetron. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded trial we studied 377 patients (ASA I-III) undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Induction of anaesthesia was standardized, including thiopental fentanyl and cis-atracurium. For all patients the individual risk for PONV was calculated using the Koivuranta score and all patients received 12.5 mg dolasetron i.v. before surgery. Patients were allocated randomly to one of three groups: Group A (n=125) received 80% oxygen in air, Group B (n=125) 40% oxygen in air and Group C (n=127) 40% oxygen in nitrous oxide. Postoperative nausea, postoperative vomiting (PV), or nausea, vomiting, or both (PONV) was assessed in the early (0-4 h) and overall postoperative period (0-24 h) by an anaesthesiologist unaware of patient allocation. RESULTS: There was a significantly lower incidence of PONV and PV in Groups A (PONV: 11.2%; PV: 3.2%) and B (PONV: 10.4%; PV: 3.2%) compared with Group C (PONV: 26.7%; PV: 13.3%), but there were no significant differences between Groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: An inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 does not further decrease PONV or vomiting in dolasetron-treated patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The lower incidence of PONV in Groups A and B compared with Group C is most likely caused by the omission of nitrous oxide.

Adolescent↗

Fluid management of patients undergoing abdominal surgery--more questions than answers.

The 'wet vs. dry' philosophy in patients undergoing abdominal surgery is a subject of substantial debate. It has been suggested that restricting fluid input would significantly reduce complications and improve outcome following abdominal surgery. Keeping the patients dry may be a two-edged sword because the resulting hypovolaemia may result in compromised organ perfusion and poor tissue oxygenation. A review of the literature from 1990 to 2004 revealed that only very few studies on this subject have been published. Unfortunately, most of the 'dry'-supporting studies used fixed amounts of volume instead of a fluid concept adapted to the patients' need ('goal-directed') and there is no generally accepted definition of 'restricted', 'dry' or 'overload'. Not only the amount but also the kind of administered fluid appears to be important. Current evidence indicates that using crystalloids exclusively may cause overloading of the interstitial compartment with considerable negative sequelae, whereas using colloids may improve microperfusion and tissue oxygenation. This review shows that the meagre literature on a restricted volume replacement strategy in abdominal surgery patients cannot clearly support the 'dry' approach. Further well-performed studies are necessary to elucidate the ideal amount and type of fluid replacement and determine how to guide fluid therapy.

Abdomen↗

[Current level of patients' knowledge of anaesthesiology].

The anaesthesiologist's competence in anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, pain therapy and emergency medicine is accepted throughout the medical society. Nevertheless, during the last decades patient surveys demonstrated a considerable lack of information of the responsibility of our work. By continuous education and information anaesthesiologists have aimed to improve the information and decision-making process for the patient. This multicentre trial was designed to investigate the current public view on our profession in seven German hospitals. In-hospital patients were asked to fill out a standardised questionnaire prior to the anaesthesia premedication visit and a total of 692 questionnaires (77%) were analysed. Results demonstrated an increased level of knowledge for anaesthesia (>95%), intensive care medicine (74%), and pain therapy (50% acute pain; 32% severe pain). In the case of emergency medicine (10%) the in-hospital and out-of-hospital responsibilities were not clear among patients. We conclude that the continuous distribution of information in recent years has contributed to improving patients' knowledge on interdisciplinary responsibilities. Future efforts should focus on the gaps in patient's knowledge to allow the patient to ask the right questions necessary for decision-making.

Adult↗

[Comparison of a propofol-based anesthesia regimen using optimated-target-controlled-infusion (OTCI) and manually-controlled infusion (MCI) technique].

BACKGROUND: Propofol anesthesia based on target-controlled-infusion (TCI) has been shown to be superior to a manually-controlled-infusion (MCI) technique. A new optimal-target-controlled-infusion (OTCI) technique enables an individual plasma-targeted adjustment by including the concentration in the effect-compartment. This study compared practicability and costs of the new system with a conventional MCI-based propofol anesthesia regimen. METHODS: In a prospective study, 50 patients scheduled for elective surgery of nose or nasal sinuses were randomly enrolled to receive BIS-controlled anaesthesia (level: 40-55) using either OTCI (n = 25) or MCI (n = 25). Hemodynamics, extubation times and time of awaking, rate and quality of propofol adjustment, total drug requirements, costs, postanaesthetic care unit (PACU) stay, Aldrete and pain scores, and adverse effects (postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), shivering) were recorded. RESULTS: Demographics, hemodynamics, and perioperative data including extubation times were comparable for both study groups. Propofol consumption was similar within the first 60 min for both groups, thereafter, significantly less propofol in the OTCI group (5.03 mg/kg/h) than the MCI group (5.79 mg/kg/h) was used. Costs for propofol was significantly reduced with OTCI (0.2 vs. 0.23 Cent/anaesthesia minute/kg), the administration of other anaesthetics (fentanyl, remifentanil, cis-atracurium) did not differ between the groups. The number of infusion adjustments to BIS values were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The new OTCI-system is a safe and easily controllable technique. The obvious advantage of this infusion system appears to be a reduction in propofol consumption and direct drug costs for anaesthesia lasting longer than 60 min.

Adolescent↗

Early recovery, cognitive function and costs of a desflurane inhalational vs. a total intravenous anaesthesia regimen in long-term surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the study was to compare time of recovery, return of cognitive function, post-anaesthetic care unit (PACU) stay and costs of a propofol/remifentanil (TIVA) with a desflurane/fentanyl-based anaesthesia (desflurane group) in surgical procedures lasting more than 150 min. METHODS: Forty-nine patients undergoing elective abdominal prostatectomy were allocated randomly to receive bispectal index (BIS)-controlled desflurane/fentanyl (n=24) or propofol/remifentanil (n=25). Awakening, clinical recovery, direct drug acquisition and post-operative pain treatment were documented. Cognitive skills were tested using the Mini-Mental Status (MMST) test. RESULTS: Extubation was significantly faster with desflurane (6.9+/-3.5 min) than with TIVA (11.2+/-4.0 min) as well as times for stating name and date of birth (desflurane: 6.1+/-3.9 and 6.6+/-4.0 min; TIVA: 12.4+/-11.5 min and 13.4+/-11.3 min). There were no significant differences in PACU discharge times or MMS scores between the groups. Significantly more patients suffered post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the desflurane (33% vs. 0%) than the TIVA group. Overall costs were significantly higher in the TIVA (58.8+/-11.6 euro) than in the desflurane group (35.0+/-5.7 euro). CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing prolonged surgical procedures showed a faster early recovery after desflurane/fentanyl than using TIVA, whereas stay in the PACU and recovery of cognitive function were similar in both groups. Costs of a TIVA regimen were significantly higher than using a desflurane-based anaesthesia technique.

Anesthesia Recovery Period↗

[Who contributes to research in intensive medicine in Germany? An update].

INTRODUCTION: In today's times of financial short-cut, it is of highest interest to improve quality. Research in intensive care medicine is an important instrument to improve therapeutic strategies. The origin of papers published in the field of intensive care medicine by German universities were evaluated and compared to a previous analysis (1992 - 1997). METHODS: Using a Medline analysis, 10 international journals (Crit Care Med; Intensive Care Med; Resuscitation; J Crit Care; Crit Care Clin; Circulation; Chest; Am Resp Crit Care Med; Stroke; J Inf Dist) that exclusively or often publish intensive care papers were analysed over the past 6 years (1998 to 2003). Only original papers from German universities were included and the publications were listed according to the origin of specialty: anesthesiological, surgical, cardiac surgical, neurosurgical, internal medicine, neurological, pediatric intensive care medicine. RESULTS: The total number of publications has markedly increased (1998 - 2003; n = 1245) compared to a previous analysis (1992 - 1997: n = 621). The number of publication from surgical institutions was still significantly lower than that of other intensive care units (cardiac surgery: n = 44; anesthesia: n = 356; internal medicine: n = 463). Institutions from the formerly eastern part of Germany participated much more to international journals than in the former analysis. DISCUSSION: Scientific research in intensive care medicine is important to develop new strategies for treating the critically ill. Although the total number of publications has increased, it is astonishing that some intensive care units from German universities did almost not publish in the selected intensive care journals.

Critical Care↗

[Expensive modern therapy options in intensive care medicine in Germany-- are they being used? Results of a questionnaire].

BACKGROUND: The use of new, high-priced therapies in intensive care medicine should be assessed by a questionnaire. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 849 intensive care units in Germany. The use of three new strategies were asked: treatment of methicilline resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) patients (using linezolid), of severe bleeding (using rFVIIa), and of severe sepsis (using activated protein C [aPC]). RESULTS: Approximately 39 % of the questionnaires were answered and analyzed. All three new strategies were only rarely or very rarely used in Germany even in universities and hospitals with more than 1000 beds. This appears to be very astonishing because all substances were subject to extensive marketing campaigns, received scientific prices (linezolid) or were strongly recommended by some scientific societies (aPC). One major concern to the use of the new approaches was based on the high pricing. Prices were assessed as excessive or very excessive. In spite of a mass of information about the substances, a lot of the intensivists reviewed the scientific basis as weak and not justifying the use of the costly substances. CONCLUSIONS: Modern, costly pharmaceutical approaches in intensive care medicine are widely not accepted in Germany. Especially a tight financial corset hinders most intensivists to use these strategies that may be life-saving in some patients. A solution to this problem is urgently required that can be reached only in intensive exchange with all who are responsible for this dilemma.

Acetamides↗

Insignificant effect of desflurane-fentanyl-thiopental on hepatocellular integrity--a comparison with total intravenous anaesthesia using propofol-remifentanil.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Inhalational anaesthetics have been associated with hepatotoxicity. Even desflurane, with its low solubility in blood and tissues, and its minimal hepatic biotransformation, is known to affect hepatic integrity. The effects of propofol on hepatic function are, however, a matter of controversy. Alpha-glutathione S-transferase (alpha-GST), a sensitive and specific biomarker for hepatic integrity, was measured to assess the influence of total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol vs. anaesthesia with desflurane. METHODS: Forty-two patients scheduled for elective prostatectomy were randomly allocated to receive either desflurane, fentanyl and thiopental (desflurane group) or propofol and remifentanil (TIVA group). Depth of anaesthesia was guided by bispectral index. Plasma concentrations of alpha-GST and aminotransferases were measured before induction of anaesthesia (TO), at the end of surgery (T1), as well as 2 h (T2) and 24 h (T3) postoperatively. Haemodynamic parameters and bispectral index values were documented. RESULTS: alpha-GST increased significantly in the desflurane group from TO (3.0 +/- 2.2 microg L(-1)) to T1 and T2 (5.5 +/- 4.3 and 5.6 +/- 3.7 microg L(-1), respectively), whereas no changes were seen in the TIVA group. alpha-GST values above the normal upper limit (> 7.5 microg L(-1)) were seen in 24% of the patients receiving desflurane. Aminotransferases remained unchanged in both groups throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: The use of propofol as part of a TIVA regimen seems to have no influence on hepatocellular function during and after surgery. In contrast, patients receiving desflurane showed a transient slight, but significant, increase of alpha-GST to above the normal upper limit after anaesthesia, although this was without further clinical relevance.

Alanine Transaminase↗

[Requirements and expectations for optimal volume replacement].

A volume replacement should compensate a reduction in the intravascular volume and counteract a hypovolemia so that hemodynamics and vital functions can be maintained. For this therapy, a physiologically-based solution comprising both osmotically and colloid osmotically active components should be administered. A consensus is proposed for this purpose which takes into consideration the following aspects: The optimum colloid, the questionable use of albumin, the physiological electrolyte pattern encompassing sodium, potassium, chloride and phosphate and their contributions to osmolality, an eventual addition of glucose, the physiological acid-base status with bicarbonate or alternately with metabolisable anions, and the importance of a clear declaration of all ingredients. The consensus distinguishes between compulsory requirements derived from evidence-based medicine and physiological data and the potential expectations of an optimal volume replacement, including well-grounded wishes and aspirations for the future.

Blood Substitutes↗

Physostigmine for the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering following general anaesthesia - a placebo-controlled comparison with nefopam.

Physostigmine was studied for its efficacy in the prevention of postanaesthetic shivering compared to nefopam and placebo. We studied 89 patients undergoing abdominal and urological surgery. The study was randomised and double-blind, the patients received physostigmine 2 mg (n = 31), nefopam 10 mg (n = 30) or saline (n = 28). Haemodynamic parameters and temperature were measured at induction of anaesthesia (T0), and 5 min (T1), 15 min (T2), 30 min (T3) and 60 min (T4) after reaching the postanaesthetic care unit (PACU). Significantly less shivering occurred following administration of physostigmine and nefopam (9.7 and 3.3%) compared to placebo (53.6%). The degree of shivering was also significantly reduced following physostigmine and nefopam (p < 0.01). Extubation time, haemodynamic parameters and tympanic temperature were found to be similar in all groups. Aldrete score, duration of PACU stay and postoperative analgesic requirements did not differ between the groups. Only nefopam significantly (p < 0.01) reduced postoperative nausea and vomiting. Physostigmine is a safe alternative to nefopam, significantly reducing the incidence and severity of postanaesthetic shivering without affecting postanaesthetic recovery.

Adult↗

Plasma substitutes.

Adequate restoration of intravascular volume remains an important therapeutic manoeuvre in managing the surgical, medical and the critically ill intensive care patient. Definition of the ideal volume replacement strategy still remains one of the burning problems. The choice between colloid and crystalloid solutions continues to generate controversy. The highly controversial crystalloid/colloid dispute has been enlarged to a colloid/colloid debate because aside of the natural colloid albumin several non-protein (synthetic) colloids are available as plasma substitutes (e.g. dextrans, gelatins, hydroxyethyl starch [HES] solutions). Due to their varying physico-chemical properties, these solutions widely differ with regard to their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties as well as to their hemodynamic efficacy and side-effects. HES is the most intensively studied plasma substitute. The different HES preparations are defined by concentration, molar substitution (MS), mean molecular weight (MW), and the C2/C6 ratio of substitution. Two new HES specification, a third-generation HES with a lower Mw and a lower MS (6% HES 130/0.4) than all other HES preparation and a first-generation HES prepared in a balanced solution, may be promising by improving the therapy of the hypovolemic patient. Albumin cannot be recommended for correction of hypovolemia because of ist extreme costs and because it can easily be replaced by other no-protein colloids. Dextrans should also not be used any more due to the negative effects on coagulation and its high anaphylactic potency. The historical crystalloid/colloid controversy has been focused primarily on outcome. There is increasing evidence that outcome (mortality) is not the correct measure when assessing the ideal volume replacement strategy. New concepts about critical care such as organ perfusion and organ function, the role of inflammation, immunological aspects, and wound healing may change this point of view. Volume replacement has been hitherto often based on art, dogma and personal beliefs. Further well-performed studies in this area will help more to shed new light on the ideal volume replacement strategy of the hypovolemic patient than more meta-analyses that are pooling old-to-very old studies to solve this problem.

Blood Volume↗

[Can we afford the costs of progress in intensive care medicine? A plea for a candid debate].

Intensive care medicine is one of the most fast growing segments in medicine. New substances that may improve therapy of the critically ill dramatically have entered the market. Improvements include therapy of methicilline-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections (linezolid), severe heart failure (calcium sensitizer levosimendan), intractable bleeding (recombinant factor VIIa) and severe sepsis (recombinant activated protein C (aPC)). The anticipations concerning this new strategies of intensive care therapy are high, but use of the new substances is associated with extreme costs. In the past, pharmaceutical therapy represented only a small aspect of all costs in the intensive care unit (ICU). Using this new substances, we are entering a new dimension of costs. One case of recombinant factor VIIa or recombinant aPC increases costs by approximately 10000,- Euro. At the moment, this costs are not covered by extra-budgets. It is still unclear whether by using this new therapeutic strategies other costs can be reduced and the extreme extra-costs can be balanced. The elderly population will increase dramatically in the next years. Looking at this development, it is not only the question whether we can afford intensive care medicine, but the question has to be enlarged whether we can afford the new developments of intensive care medicine. All responsible persons (intensivists, pharmaceutical companies, politicians) are urged to define solutions in the near future.

Aging↗

Do we necessarily need local anaesthetics for venous cannulation? A comparison of different cannula sizes.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: This randomized, prospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of a subcutaneous local anaesthetic infiltration prior to venepuncture using different cannula sizes. METHODS: Three-hundred-and-one patients were included in the study, 150 received mepivacaine 1% (0.25 mL) subcutaneously, 151 were cannulated without local analgesia. Patients were further allocated to one of five cannula size groups (standard wire gauge (G)): 20-, 18-, 17-, 16- and 14-G. They were asked to quantify the pain experienced using a four-point rating scale. RESULTS: In the group without local anaesthetics, 28.8% complained about pain compared to 12% receiving local analgesia. The incidence of pain for 14-G (10%) and 16-G (12.9%) cannulae was significantly reduced in the local analgesia group (P < 0.01) compared to no local analgesia (77.4% and 45.1%). Other cannula sizes showed no difference in pain whether using local analgesia or not. CONCLUSIONS: Patients profit from a subcutaneous infiltration with mepivacaine 1% prior to intravenous cathetherization only when cannulae of size > or = 16-G are inserted.

Anesthetics, Local↗

[ProSeal-laryngeal mask versus endotracheal intubation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopy].

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the practicality of the ProSeal laryngeal mask (PS-LMA) airway during laparoscopic surgery with capnoperitoneum compared to endotracheal intubation (ET). METHODS: Prospective, randomized study. 104 patients undergoing gynaecologic, laparoscopic surgery were allocated randomly to two groups: 1. ET-group (n = 50). 2. PS-LMA-group (n = 54). Total intravenous anaesthesia was performed by the same anaesthesiologist. MEASUREMENTS: Mean arterial pressure, heart rate, at 4 and circuit pressure at 2 measurement points, and the incidences of coughing and sore throat. Insertion of the ET and the PS-LMA was scored by using a four-point scale. Ease of placing the gastric tube was judged by measuring the number of attempts at insertion and the insertion times. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: There were no differences between PS-LMA and ET concerning circuit pressure at any measurement point. At the end of anaesthesia, mean arterial pressure (92 +/- 13 vs. 100 +/- 14 mmHg; p < 0.01) and heart rate (66 +/- 13 vs. 76 +/- 14 beats/min; p < 0.01) were lower in the PS-LMA-group compared to the ET-group. At the end of anaesthesia 25 patients of the ET-group coughed but nobody in the PS-LMA-group (p < 0.00001). There was no difference with regard to postoperative sore throat. The insertion of the PS-LMA was easier compared to ET (p < 0.05), but we found no significant difference concerning insertion times. Fewer attempts at insertion of the gastric tube were necessary in the PS-LMA-group than in the ET-group (p < 0.01), whereas insertion times did not differ. CONCLUSION: The PS-LMA is a convenient and practicable approach for anaesthesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Adult↗

[A comparison of the Arndt endobronchial blocker with a double lumen tube in robotic cardiac surgery].

OBJECTIVE: In this prospective, randomised study a double lumen tube (DLT) or an Arndt bronchial blocker (BB) was used for one lung ventilation (OLV). Intraoperative oxygenation, ventilation, haemodynamics, and ease of placement were compared. METHODS: In 32 patients undergoing robotic harvesting of the left internal thoracic artery (ITA) a left-sided DLT or a BB controlled by bronchoscopy was used for OLV of the right lung. In 2 patients randomised for DLT, a single lumen tube and BB was used for difficult visualisation of the larynx. These 2 patients were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Correct placement of DLT (8.8 +/- 5.4 min, 87.5 % of the patients) as well as BB (6.5 +/- 4.0 min; n. s.; 100 % of the patients) was achieved rapidly. The Cormack-Lehane score for visualisation of the larynx was 2, 1 - 3 (median, range) in group DLT and 3, 1 - 4 (median, range) in group BB (p < 0.05). OLV lasted for 93 +/- 29 min in group DLT and 88 +/- 34 min in group BB (n. s.). Satisfactory conditions for harvesting ITA were achieved in all patients of both groups. There was no difference in any haemodynamic parameter at any time between the two groups. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance were increased without significant differences between the two groups during thoracoscopy for robotic preparation of left ITA. During OLV, index of paO (2)/FiO (2) was significantly (p < 0.05) lower in DLT patients compared to BB patients. Time to extubation did not differ between the two groups (DLT 14.3 +/- 4.6 h; BB 11.8 +/- 3.8 h). CONCLUSION: OLV in patients undergoing robotic cardiac surgery was safely achieved either by BB or by left-sided DLT. Positioning of the BB was easier than that of a DLT when intubation was difficult and tube exchange at the end of surgery is avoided. Therefore, we prefer a BB in patients undergoing robotic harvesting of left ITA.

Aged↗