Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Baird

Publications and source records attributed to J Baird.

38 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Long-term use of the low molecular weight heparin tinzaparin in haemodialysis.

Fifty-two patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hospital haemodialysis were given a single bolus dose of tinzaparin (Innohep, Leo Laboratories, UK) into the arterial side of the dialyser, for up to 43 consecutive dialyses. The mean tinzaparin dose at the beginning was 2,139 IU anti-Xa and at the end 2,186 IU anti-Xa. Overall, tinzaparin proved a satisfactory anticoagulant for 1,370 (96.0%) out of 1,427 dialyses. Significant clot formation was prevented in 1,326 (92.8%) out of 1,429 dialyses. The clinically effective dose was associated with a mean plasma anti-Xa activity 1 h after dosing of 0.4 IU/ml and suppressed fibrinopeptide A formation for up to 4 h. Bleeding, from the skin or mucous membranes, was recorded at 27 (1.9%) of 1,408 dialyses. Prolonged fistula bleeding on completion of dialysis was recorded on only 20 occasions. Other haemorrhagic events included haematemesis, bruising and subconjunctival haemorrhage (each in 1 patient) and epistaxis (2 patients). Three patients died during the study of causes considered unrelated to tinzaparin therapy, myocardial infarction (2 patients) and multiple myeloma. Other adverse events reported included vomiting (3 patients) and hypotension (3 patients). Three patients ceased treatment due to haematemesis, prolonged bleeding from fistula puncture and thrombosis of the arteriovenous access, respectively. A small, but statistically significant, increase within the normal reference range was recorded in the mean values for aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase.

Adult↗

Urea monitoring during dialysis: the wave of the future. A tale of two cities.

The National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS) suggested that the removal of small molecules controls the adequacy of the dialysis prescription, and it would seem appropriate that renal units regularly carry out formal urea kinetic modeling to ensure that the adequacy of dialysis is provided. Current methods of calculating Kt/V (urea) are complex and require the accurate measurement of dialyzer urea clearance and calculation of the volume of distribution of urea. This may be done by the direct measurement of total urea removed or by the use of computer programs that examine plasma urea and weight changes over time. Both methods have inherent problems, and this has stimulated the search for easier "bedside" formulas for the calculation of Kt/V. These newer formulas involve examination of the percentage reduction in blood urea concentration during hemodialysis. Two such formulas were examined and applied to 78 patients undergoing hemodialysis in two centers. One center routinely carried out formal urea kinetic modeling; the other did not. In the first center, it was found that the majority of patients were receiving more dialysis than necessary to achieve Kt/V (urea) = 1 when the latter was judged by those formulas. This suggested the possibility of time savings, with considerable implications for cost efficiency. In the second center, the majority of patients required more dialysis. It was concluded that intermittent formal urea kinetic modeling tends to overshoot the necessary prescription to allow for occasional "imperfect" dialyses and also that it is impossible to base dialysis prescriptions on routine pre-dialysis blood work and a "feel" for patients' needs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Humans↗