Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J Aubertin

Publications and source records attributed to J Aubertin.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Attempted suicide by insulin injection treated with artificial pancreas.

An elderly woman with longstanding insulin dependent diabetes tried to commit suicide by injecting 400 units of insulin subcutaneously (usual total daily dose 56 units). She was admitted to hospital within the hour and treated with the aid of an artificial pancreas. This avoided the usual difficulty of the physician having to cope with rapid and substantial fluctuations in blood glucose concentrations and 67 hours after the overdose insulin was reinstituted. Using an artificial pancreas in insulin overdose is an important advance in management and may avoid the need for surgical intervention such as excising the site of injection.

Aged↗

[Prevention of post-operative infections in urologic surgery. Comparative study of cotrimoxazole and cefazolin].

The main point of this study resides in comparing the efficiency and the disadvantages of using cefazoline and cotrimoxazole in the prevention of post-surgery infections of the low urinary tract. 91 patients who were about to undergo urologic surgery were divided in three groups for randomisation. 31 patients received 500 mg of intramuscular cefazoline every eight hours, the day before surgery, the day of surgery and five days following surgery. 30 others received 800 mg of intramuscular sulfametoxazole and 160 mg of trimetoprime every 12 hours during the same lapse of time. The third group of 30 patients did not receive any antibiotics. Age, sex, clinical pathology needing surgery and indwelling catheter were the same in the three groups. The group treated by cefazoline, presented 5 post surgery infections among which 3 transitory fevers and 2 isolated bacteriurias. In the group treated by cotrimoxazole, there were 7 post surgery infections among which 3 fevers and 4 isolated bacteriurias. Tolerance in both cases was similar. In the control group, there were 19 post-surgery infections with 2 cases of sepsis, 14 transitory fevers and 3 isolated bacteriurias. These results show the importance of antibiotic prophylaxy in urologic surgery of the low genital tract whether the patient has a urethral catheter or not and whatever the type of urologic surgery. But, there is no significant difference between cefazoline and cotrimoxazole.

Aged↗

[Treatment of septicemia with latamoxef. Multicentric study of 60 cases].

Sixty patients including forty two males and eighteen females, age range: 18-87 years, received antibacterial single drug treatment with latamoxef for septicemia. Forty nine patients had underlying conditions including multiple trauma, neoplasm, cardiovascular, metabolic and respiratory tract diseases. Causative pathogens were isolated in all cases. The predominant isolates were E. coli (thirty), Klebsiella pneumoniae (tent) and Enterobacter (seven). A single organism was isolated in fifty seven cases; in the other three cases two organisms were isolated from blood cultures. Mean daily dosage was 46.6 +/- 6.1 mg . kg-1 (range: 14-113 mg . kg-1). In the majority of cases (fifty two) dosage was 3 g . d-1 or less; in thirty cases it was no higher than 2 g . d-1. Duration of therapy ranged from six to thirty eight days. Serum titer was measured in many cases and latamoxef blood levels were assayed in nine patients. A satisfactory clinical response was achieved in fifty eight cases and fifty eight bacteriological cures were also obtained. There was no statistically significant difference in therapeutic response between the 2 g and 3 g daily dosage groups. Tolerance was very good; untoward effects were few and required drug discontinuation in one case only.

Adolescent↗

[The use of cefotaxime against infections (author's transl)].

Cefotaxime was administered as sole treatment (49 cases) or after failure of another previous antibiotic (17 cases) to 66 patients suffering from infectious diseases. The 78 infections thus treated included urinary tract infections (35), septicaemia or endocarditis (25), respiratory tract infections (7), osteitis (5), meningitis (4), biliary infection (1), and skin infection (1). The pathogens identified were more often enterobacteria: Serratia: 23, E. coli: 15, Klebsiella: 7, Proteus: 7, Enterobacter: 1, Providentia: 1, Pseudomonas: 5, Staphylococcus: 7, Pneumococcus: 4, Streptococcus: 2, Branhamella: 1. Cefotaxime was given either intravenously (2/3 of cases) or intramuscularly, at an average daily dose of 3.75 g (mean: 1.5-8 g). It was administered alone to 49 patients suffering from septicaemia and urinary tract infections caused by E. coli, Klebsiella and especially Serratia, and it was combined in 17 cases, particularly in meningitis and bone infections. The overall results of cefotaxime given in serious diseases were especially favourable in debilitated patients (88% therapeutic success). The local tolerance was good and side effects were not observed in any patient. Cefotaxime seems to be an active antibiotic, indicated in many severe septicemic or not septicemic infections, more particularly in diseases with multiresistant Gram negative pathogens.

Adolescent↗

[Treatment of bacterial endocarditis with oral amoxicillin and intra-muscular gentamicin].

Fourteen patients suffering from bacterial endocarditis due to a streptococcus or staphylococcus were treated using a combination of amoxicillin per os in a dose of 1 gram every 2 or 3 hours and gentamicin in a dose of 60 mg intramuscularly every 6 or 8 hours. Two patients failed to tolerate amoxicillin, which had to be replaced by penicillin G. Two others, after a period of improvement, relapsed and were cured by the substitution of penicillin G given intravenously, in place of amoxicillin. The ten remaining patients were cured after a normal period of time had elapsed. Two of them were even treated at home. Bactericidal powers of serum obtained by the combination were satisfactory at between 1/16 to 1/4096 one hour after the administration of the antibiotics. This therapeutic protocol is thus effective, and has the advantage of improving the patient's comfort. It should nevertheless be reserved for use against sensitive organisms in patients without digestive problems, the bactericidal power of the serum being verified.

Administration, Oral↗