Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A McCaffrey

Publications and source records attributed to J A McCaffrey.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Low-volume nodal metastases detected at retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for testicular cancer: pattern and prognostic factors for relapse.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence, pattern, and predictive factors for relapse in patients with low-volume nodal metastases (stage pN1) at retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy (RPLND) and identify who may benefit from chemotherapy in the adjuvant or primary setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumor had low-volume retroperitoneal metastases (pathologic stage pN1, 1997 tumor-node-metastasis classification) resected at RPLND, 50 of whom were managed expectantly without adjuvant chemotherapy. The dissection was bilateral in 12 and was a modified template in 38 patients. Retroperitoneal metastases were limited to microscopic nodal involvement in 14 patients. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 106 months (median, 31.4 months). RESULTS: Eleven patients (22%) suffered a relapse at a median follow-up of 1.8 months (range, 0.6 to 28 months). The most frequent form of recurrence was marker elevation in nine (18%) patients. Persistent marker elevation after orchiectomy and before retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was a significant independent predictor of relapse (relative risk, 8.0; 95% confidence interval, 2.3 to 27.8; P =.001). Four of five (80%) patients with elevated markers (alpha-fetoprotein alone in three, alpha-fetoprotein and beta human chorionic gonadotropin in one) suffered a relapse, compared with seven of 45 (15.6%) patients with normal markers. CONCLUSION: Clinical stage I and IIA patients with normal markers who have low-volume nodal metastases have a low incidence of relapse and can be managed by observation only if compliance can be assured. In contrast, patients with elevated markers before retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy have a high rate of relapse and should be considered for primary chemotherapy.

Actuarial Analysis↗
PubMed2000

Ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin for patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract: final report of a phase II trial evaluating two dosing schedules.

BACKGROUND: A combination regimen of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ITP), recycled every 4 weeks, was reported in the treatment of previously untreated patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC). This study sought to examine ITP at 3-week intervals to assess its feasibility and toxicity, compare the results for different schedules, and assess the impact of prognostic factors and postchemotherapy surgery on outcome. METHODS: ITP (ifosfamide 1.5 g/m(2) daily for 3 days, paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) over 3 hours, and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) on Day 1) was administered to patients with metastatic or unresectable TCC and was recycled every 4 weeks (for 30 patients) or 3 weeks (for 15 patients). Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was given during each cycle. RESULTS: Thirty of 44 assessable patients (68%; 95% confidence interval, 52-81%) demonstrated a major response (10 complete responses [23%], 20 partial [45%]), with durations of response ranging from 4 to 36 months. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the median survival was 20 months. Eleven patients (25%) were disease free at last follow-up. Overall toxicity for the 15 patients whose treatment was recycled at 3 weeks was similar to that for patients treated every 4 weeks. Hematologic toxicity included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and febrile neutropenia. Febrile neutropenia was observed in 7 patients (16%) and in 3.3% of cycles of therapy. No Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity included alopecia, renal insufficiency (11%), and neuropathy (9%). CONCLUSIONS: ITP is an active, well-tolerated regimen for previously untreated patients with TCC of the urothelial tract, resulting in a median survival of 20 months. Treatment can be recycled at 3-week intervals without enhanced toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Phase II trial of pyrazoloacridine as second-line therapy for patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of pyrazoloacridine (PZA) was conducted to assess its activity and toxicity in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) refractory to or progressing after one prior cisplatin-, carboplatin- or paclitaxel- based regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PZA at a dose of 750 mg/m2 was administered to 14 patients as a three-hour intravenous infusion on day 1 every 21 days. Premedication consisted of lorazepam 0.5-1.0 mg prior to each cycle to alleviate central nervous system toxicity. Reduction of subsequent doses was made for hematologic or central nervous system toxicity. RESULTS: Among fourteen patients evaluable for response, no responses were observed (0% response rate; 95% confidence interval 0% to 23%). The median duration of survival for all patients was 9 months with a median follow-up of 8.5 months. Toxicity to PZA included grade 3 or 4 neutropenia in 8/14 (57%) and grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia in 2/14 (14%). Non-hematologic toxicity was mild. CONCLUSIONS: PZA at this dose and schedule does not have significant single-agent activity in patients with TCC who have failed one prior regimen.

Acridines↗
PubMed2000

Phase I evaluation of sequential doxorubicin gemcitabine then ifosfamide paclitaxel cisplatin for patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract.

PURPOSE: This phase I trial sought to evaluate the toxicity of and determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for the two-drug regimen doxorubicin and gemcitabine (AG) followed by the three-drug regimen of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ITP) in patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients received AG every other week for six cycles followed by ITP every 3 weeks for four cycles. Five AG dose levels were investigated, up to doxorubicin 50 mg/m(2) and gemcitabine 2, 000 mg/m(2), to determine the MTD of the regimen. The dose and schedule of ITP were constant: ifosfamide 1,500 mg/m(2) (days 1 to 3); paclitaxel 200 mg/m(2) (day 1); and cisplatin 70 mg/m(2) (day 1). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was given between all cycles of therapy. RESULTS: Fifteen patients enrolled onto this phase I trial. AG was well tolerated at all dose levels, with no grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression. Toxicity experienced with ITP included grade 3 and 4 granulocytopenia in four patients and grade 3 nausea/vomiting in three patients. No grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity was observed. Eight of 14 assessable patients experienced a major response to AG, including five of six patients treated at the two highest AG dose levels. After completion of AG-ITP, nine of 14 assessable patients had a major response (three complete responses and six partial responses). CONCLUSION: AG is a well-tolerated and active regimen. Sequential chemotherapy with AG-ITP is also well tolerated, and phase II investigation at the highest dose level is ongoing.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Evaluation of drug delivery and survival impact of dose-intense relative to conventional-dose methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy in urothelial cancer.

The efficacy of dose-intense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) chemotherapy relative to conventional-dose M-VAC in patients with advanced transitional cell carcinoma is unknown. The outcomes of 33 patients on two successive protocols using dose-intense M-VAC with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support were compared with those of 129 patients treated with conventional-dose M-VAC to assess for an impact of dose-intense therapy on long-term survival. The mean relative dose intensity of chemotherapy delivered to the dose-intense cohort was 55% higher than that delivered to the conventional-dose cohort (p = 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed with regard to response proportion (72% vs. 76%), median survival (13.3 vs. 16.7 months, p = 0.31), or 5-year survival (16% vs. 15%). Growth factor support enabled a statistically significant increase in the delivered dose intensity of M-VAC chemotherapy, but no survival advantage relative to conventional-dose M-VAC was observed.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Phase II trial of intermediate dose methotrexate in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine whether the use of intermediate dose methotrexate in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin as first-line therapy increases the proportion of major responders and overall survival in patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urothelial tract. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with histologically confirmed TCC received methotrexate at a dose of 1000 mg/m2 on Day 1 followed by leucovorin calcium rescue on Day 2 and vinblastine (3 mg/m2), doxorubicin (30 mg/m2), and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) (VAC) on Day 2. Therapy was recycled at 28-day intervals. RESULTS: Fourteen of 28 patients (50%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 31-69%) achieved a major response, including 6 pathologic or clinical complete responses (CR) and 8 partial responses (PR). Nine patients were rendered disease free after postchemotherapy surgical resection of residual disease (surgical CR), including five patients who had PR and four nonresponders to chemotherapy alone. Five of 18 patients with disease limited to lymph nodes attained CR, in contrast to only 1 of 10 patients with visceral metastatic disease. The median survival for the entire population was 13.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: The escalation of methotrexate to 1000 mg/m2 in combination with vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin did not result in a response proportion or median survival superior to that observed with standard dose M-VAC. As previously observed in a Phase II trial of M-VAC, only the attainment of CR was associated with prolongation of survival.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Long-term survival in metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma and prognostic factors predicting outcome of therapy.

PURPOSE: The variation in reported survival of patients with metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) treated with systemic chemotherapy may be a consequence of pretreatment patient characteristics. We hypothesized that a prognostic factor-based model of survival among patients treated with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin chemotherapy could account for such differences and help guide clinical trial design and interpretation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A database of 203 patients with unresectable or metastatic TCC was retrospectively subjected to a multivariate regression analysis to determine which patient characteristics had independent prognostic significance for survival. Patients were assigned to three risk categories depending on the number of unfavorable characteristics. Patient selection in phase II studies was addressed by developing a table of expected median survival for patient cohorts that had varying proportions of patients from the three risk categories. RESULTS: Two factors had independent prognosis: Karnofsky performance status (KPS) less than 80% and visceral (lung, liver, or bone) metastasis. Median survival times for patients who had zero, one, or two risk factors were 33, 13.4, and 9.3 months, respectively (P =.0001). The median survival time of patient cohorts could vary from 9 to 26 months simply by altering the proportion of patients from different risk categories. CONCLUSION: The presence of baseline KPS less than 80% or visceral metastasis has an impact on survival. Reporting the proportion of patients with zero, one, and two risk factors will facilitate understanding of the relevance of the median survival in phase II trials. Phase III trials should stratify patients according to the number of risk factors to avoid imbalance in treatment arms.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Outcome of postchemotherapy surgery after treatment with methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The role of postchemotherapy surgery for patients with metastatic transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) is controversial. We retrospectively analyzed our experience with patients who underwent postchemotherapy surgery after methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) chemotherapy to assess an impact on long-term survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This report is based on the retrospective analysis of 203 patients with unresectable primary tumors or metastatic TCC, previously reported in five trials of M-VAC chemotherapy. Fifty patients underwent postchemotherapy surgery for suspected or known residual disease. Characteristics of patients selected for surgery, results of surgery, and the impact of surgery on survival were assessed. RESULTS: In 17 patients, no viable tumor was found at postchemotherapy surgery, pathologically confirming a complete response to chemotherapy. Three patients had unresectable residual TCC. In 30 patients, residual, viable TCC was completely resected, which resulted in a complete response to chemotherapy plus surgery. Ten (33%) of these 30 patients remained alive at 5 years, similar to results observed for patients who attained a complete response to chemotherapy alone (41%). Analysis by baseline extent of disease suggested that patients with unresectable primary tumors or with metastases restricted to lymph node sites were most likely to survive for 5 years. CONCLUSION: Postchemotherapy surgical resection of residual cancer may result in 5-year disease-free survival in some patients who would otherwise succumb to disease. Optimal candidates include patients whose prechemotherapy sites of disease are restricted to the primary or lymph node sites and who have a major response to chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Risk assessment for metastatic testis cancer.

Metastatic germ cell tumors represent a model for curable malignancy, with 70% to 80% of patients cured of their disease. Patients with a good prognosis are likely to be cured, and the aim of investigation is to maintain the high cure rate while minimizing toxicity. For patients who fail to achieve a complete response (CR) to therapy, or who relapse after achieving CR, the prognosis is poor--these patients have become the focus of more intensive treatment to increase the cure rate. Distinguishing which patients will require more aggressive therapy ab initio has been the goal of successive attempts to stratify patients into either good- or poor-risk groups to tailor treatment accordingly. A number of analyses have yielded variable factors and differing schemas to classify patients, culminating in the International Germ Cell Consensus Group whose findings have been utilized to develop the new testicular cancer staging system for the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) and the Union International contre le Cancre (UICC). This article traces the developments in risk assessment that have lead to this consensus, which would prospectively allow comparison among future clinical trials.

Biomarkers, Tumor↗
PubMed1998

Treatment of patients with transitional-cell carcinoma of the urothelial tract with ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin: a phase II trial.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of ifosfamide, paclitaxel, and cisplatin (ITP) was conducted in previously untreated patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) to assess its efficacy and toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients with metastatic or unresectable TCC were treated with ifosfamide 1.5 g/m2/d for 3 days with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 over 3 hours and cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day 1 of each 28-day treatment cycle. Therapy was continued for a maximum of six cycles. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factor (recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor [rhG-CSF]) was given on days 6 to 17 of each cycle. RESULTS: Twenty-three of 29 assessable patients (79%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 60% to 92%) demonstrated a major response (six complete [CR] and 17 partial [PR]) with response durations that ranged from 5 to 24+ months. Five patients with T4 bladder primary tumors had a major response, two with pathologic CR. At a median follow-up duration of 17.9 months, nine (31%) patients remain disease-free (range, 10+ to 24+). Hematologic toxicity included anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia; febrile neutropenia was observed in 17% of patients and 4% of cycles. No grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was observed. Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity included alopecia, allergy (3%), renal insufficiency (13%), and neuropathy (10%). Dose reductions or drug omissions were necessary for adverse events in seven (23%) patients. CONCLUSION: ITP is an active, well-tolerated regimen in previously untreated patients with TCC of the urothelial tract. Further study of this regimen in patients with both TCC and non-transitional-cell urothelial tumors is ongoing.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Therapy for good risk germ cell tumors.

Patients with good-prognosis germ cell tumors are those with the highest likelihood of cure. By identifying pre-treatment risk assignment, these patients may be treated with the most efficacious and least toxic regimens, while poor-risk patients may be selected to receive potentially more toxic combinations to optimize cure rates. The lack of uniform criteria of good-risk disease has been addressed by an international consortium, the International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group. Recommendations for three risk strata, defined by serum tumor markers and specific sites of disease provide reproducible subsets of good-, intermediate-, and poor-risk populations that allow international trial collaborations and direct comparison of good-risk therapies and outcomes. Despite different criteria defining good-risk disease, trials in these patients have successfully eliminated bleomycin from combination regimens, have reduced the number of cycles of therapy, and have proven that carboplatin cannot replace cisplatin. As a consequence of controlled studies, three cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) or four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin, using a 5-day etoposide schedule have been established as American standards. In Europe, four cycles of BEP using the 3-day etoposide schedule is considered the standard schedule. Because the schedule of etoposide is not uniform, prospective evaluation is necessary to determine whether the 3-day European standard is the equivalent of the 5-day American standard.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

Phase II trial of docetaxel in patients with advanced or metastatic transitional-cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A phase II trial of docetaxel was conducted to assess its efficacy and toxicity in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma (TCC) who had failed to respond to prior cisplatin-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty assessable patients who had failed to respond to or relapsed after one prior cisplatin-containing regimen were treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 over 1 hour, every 21 days. All patients were premedicated with dexamethasone and diphenhydramine to reduce allergic reactions. Reductions of subsequent doses were made for severe hematologic toxicity. Prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors were not used. RESULTS: Four of 30 patients (13.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8% to 30.7%) demonstrated a partial response (PR), with durations of response ranging from 3 to 8 months. The estimated median survival duration for all patients is 9 months (95% CI, 6 to 12 months) with a median follow-up time of 14 months (range, 1 to 27). Hematologic toxicity included anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicity included alopecia and mucositis. Fluid retention was not observed and cutaneous toxicity was mild and infrequent. Dose reductions were necessary for adverse events in 18 patients (60%). CONCLUSION: Docetaxel is an active single agent in previously treated patients with TCC of the urothelial tract. Therapy was well tolerated in this patient population but myelosuppression was frequent. Further study in previously untreated patients, both alone and in combination, is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Phase II randomized trial of gallium nitrate plus fluorouracil versus methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin in patients with advanced transitional-cell carcinoma.

PURPOSE: A phase II randomized trial of gallium nitrate/fluorouracil (5-FU) versus dose-intense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (M-VAC) was performed in poor-risk patients with advanced urothelial tract tumors. The efficacy and toxicity of these regimens were compared. Assessment of dose-intense M-VAC as salvage treatment in patients who failed to respond to the gallium nitrate/5-FU regimen was also performed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients who had not received prior systemic chemotherapy were randomized to either arm of the study. All patients had one or more clinical features predicting a low likelihood of durable complete response to standard chemotherapy, ie, weight loss, visceral metastases, and low performance status. Gallium nitrate and 5-FU were each administered by continuous 5-day infusions every 28 days. M-VAC was recycled every 21 days, with prophylactic recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rh-G-CSF). RESULTS: Two of 17 patients (12%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4% to 36.4%) had a major response to gallium nitrate/5-FU. Sixteen of 17 patients treated with M-VAC (94%; 95% CI, 71.3% to 99.8%) demonstrated a major response. Five of 12 patients who failed to respond to the gallium nitrate/5-FU combination responded to M-VAC as second-line therapy (42%; 95% CI, 15.2% to 72.3%). Median survival for the gallium nitrate and 5-FU arm was 19 versus 17 months for the M-VAC arm, with a median follow-up duration of 35 months (range, 2 to 51) for all patients. Dose-intense M-VAC was associated with a greater incidence of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Dose-intense M-VAC is superior to gallium nitrate/5-FU in poor-risk patients (P < .0001). Despite the overall high response rate, the median survival for patients with M-VAC remained unsatisfactory. Similar survival distributions were observed for patients who received investigational therapy followed by cisplatin-based therapy and patients treated with initial cisplatin-based therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy as first-line salvage therapy in germ cell tumors: response and survival.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing chemotherapy as first-line salvage treatment for patients with germ cell tumors (GCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-six patients with advanced GCT resistant to one prior cisplatin-containing regimen were treated with a salvage chemotherapy regimen of ifosfamide, cisplatin, and either vinblastine or etoposide (VeIP/VIP). RESULTS: Twenty of 56 (36%) assessable patients achieved a complete response (CR). Thirteen (23%) are alive and continuously free of disease at a median follow-up time of 52 months; the median survival duration was 18 months. Among patients with a testis primary tumor site and a prior CR to first-line therapy, 65% are alive and 41% continuously disease-free, and the median survival time has not been reached. In contrast, for patients with an extragonadal primary tumor or with a testis primary tumor site and an incomplete response (IR) to first-line therapy, 31% are alive and 15% continuously free of disease, with a median survival time of 12 months (P < .03). CONCLUSION: Ifosfamide- and cisplatin-containing therapy achieves a durable CR in a minority of patients with resistant GCT as first-line therapy. Patients with a primary testis site who relapsed from a CR to first-line cisplatin therapy have a better prognosis than patients with an extragonadal primary tumor site or an IR to first-line therapy. Risk-directed clinical trials to improve response and survival in both subsets are warranted.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for urothelial carcinoma.

Transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder is associated with a high relapse rate, locally and systemically, particularly in patients with nodal or soft-tissue involvement, despite radical cystectomy. The responsiveness of the disease to chemotherapy in the metastatic setting has stimulated the use of systemic therapy in earlier stage disease, either before (neoadjuvant) or after (adjuvant) definitive local therapy. Interpretation of the data is hampered by low patient accrual to randomized trials, lack of standardization of local treatment modalities, and the use of a variety of chemotherapy agents and regimens pointing to the difficulty in reaching a consensus as to what constitutes standard therapy. In this article, we review the use of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the advantages and disadvantages of both approaches, and the recommendations that can be made based on available data. New approaches to improving survival, potentially with organ preservation, include the development of more effective chemotherapy, and the identification of prognostic features-clinical or biologic-that might be a better guide to patient selection.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1997

Combined-modality therapy for bladder cancer.

Radical cystectomy remains standard management for patients with locally advanced T2 through T4, N0, M0 transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. Although radical cystectomy results in excellent local control, 50% or more of patients relapse. Studies have shown that multidrug cisplatin (Platinol)-based chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival in 10% to 15% of cases and is superior to single-agent cisplatin. These studies led to the application of these regimens in conjunction with surgery and/or radiation therapy in an attempt to preserve bladder function. With this approach, the decision to leave the bladder in place, remove a portion (partial cystectomy), or perform a radical cystectomy is made after assessing the initial response to therapy. Results from neoadjuvant studies have shown that: major responses are observed in at least 50% of patients; bladder preservation can be achieved in 25% to 50%; a pathologic complete response predicts long survival; and patients with deeply invasive lesions (T3b to T4) usually are not candidates for bladder preservation. Whether overall survival is improved has been difficult to ascertain due to such issues as small sample size and case selection. Concurrently, newer surgical approaches with continent diversions have reduced, to some extent, the need for ileal conduits, a factor influencing the bladder preservation approach. Adjuvant chemotherapy, although less well studied, suggests a possible survival benefit for selected patients with a high likelihood of relapse. To optimize patients selection, new prognostic factors are necessary. Many biologic variables based on expression of tumor-related proteins are under study. Combined-modality therapy is not standard management for the majority of bladder-cancer patients. However, it is a viable alternative for those who are committed to preserving bladder function. Additional research is required to determine whether these approaches improve survival and to identify better markers of treatment outcome.

Carcinoma, Transitional Cell↗