Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Light

Publications and source records attributed to J A Light.

At least 55 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Screening and confirmatory testing of cadaver organ donors for hepatitis C virus infection: a U.S. National Collaborative Study.

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be transmitted by organ transplantation. Cadaver organ donors are screened for HCV infection by testing for antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV). The prevalence of HCV infection and performance of anti-HCV tests in detecting HCV infection in organ donors are unknown. Sera from 3078 cadaver organ donors were tested for anti-HCV by a first generation enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA1). Sera from all 137 ELISA1 positive donors and a random sample of 92 ELISA1 negative donors were tested for anti-HCV by a second generation ELISA (ELISA2) and for HCV RNA by the polymerase chain reaction. Organ bank records were reviewed for risk factors associated with HCV infection. Follow-up was available on 70 recipients of organs from 42 ELISA2 positive donors. The prevalence of HCV RNA, extrapolated to all 3078 donors, was 2.4%. Liver disease, anti-HCV and HCV RNA were detected more frequently among recipients of organs from ELISA2 positive donors with HCV RNA than from ELISA2 positive donors without HCV RNA. Among donors, the sensitivity and negative predictive value of the ELISA2 for HCV RNA were 100%. However, despite a specificity of 98.1%, the positive predictive value was only 55.1%. Clinical and laboratory characteristics did not distinguish ELISA2 positive donors with and without HCV RNA. The presence of serum HCV RNA in organ donors predicts the risk of transmission of HCV infection. Discarding organs from ELISA2 positive donors would eliminate transmission, but organs from 1.88 percent of donors would be wasted.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗

Experience with schistosomiasis in renal transplantation.

Schistosomiasis involving the urinary tract has only occasionally been reported in North American literature and rarely from American hospital experience. Chronic infection may result in numerous abnormalities of the urinary tract which may interfere with the function of a transplanted kidney. Our institution has performed a number of renal transplants in patients who are from countries where schistosomiasis is endemic. Six patients in our group had evidence of schistosomal disease during their pretransplant evaluation and were appropriately treated. None of these patients had postoperative complications attributable to the schistosomal disease. We recommend that all patients who are from areas where urinary schistosomiasis is endemic undergo a cystoscopic examination and bladder biopsies in addition to the routine pretransplant urologic evaluation.

Adult↗

Renal transplantation at the Washington Hospital Center: experience with OKT3 and Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin for induction of immunosuppression.

These data demonstrate excellent long-term patient and graft survival rates when cytolytic induction therapy is combined with sequential addition of CsA. OKT3 and MAG produce virtually indistinguishable outcomes with low rates of rejection and DGF. The frequency of serious posttransplant complications, infection, rejection, and malignancy was low. Although both MAG and OKT3 are effective, each has its drawbacks. Problems associated with MAG therapy are leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, cumbersome administration, and difficulty monitoring the patient's specific level of induced immunosuppression. OKT3 is simpler to administer, easy to monitor, but first dose reactions may produce additional graft injury. Furthermore, OKT3 may not protect completely against all mechanisms of cellular rejection. In our patient population, the best results occurred when kidneys functioned immediately, when CsA was introduced promptly, and when there were several days of overlap, with MAG or OKT3, especially when OKT3 was used as the induction agent.

Adult↗

Renal transplantation from a blood group A1B donor to an A2B recipient: a case report.

This case report describes the transplantation of a kidney from an A1B donor to a recipient who was blood group A2B. The donor/recipient pair were ABO mismatched but compatible. In the majority of cases, A1 antibodies fail to react at 37 degrees C and are of no clinical significance. However, hemolytic transfusion reactions due to A1 antibodies active at 37 degrees C have been reported but are extremely rare. When the opportunity for transplantation arose for this patient, who had received multiple blood transfusions because of dialysis, the question of safety concerning the subject of transplanting across ABO sub-grouping mismatches was presented. Inquiries regarding this matter proved fruitless and the transplant was performed mainly due to the lack of preformed anti-A, antibodies in the recipient at the time of transplant. It was hoped that the A2B recipient would fail to make an anti-A1 antibody due to antigen exposure or if it did, would not pose a hazard to the allograft. Therefore we present our experience with a patient who was successfully transplanted across an ABO incompatible sub-grouping, A1B allograft to an A2B recipient.

ABO Blood-Group System↗

Changes in lymphocyte subset distribution aid in the differential diagnosis of renal allograft dysfunction.

The distribution of selected lymphocyte subset populations in renal transplant patients was used to assist in the differential diagnosis of graft dysfunction. Patients experiencing dysfunction due to rejection showed consistent and significant decreases in relative numbers of CD 8 (cytotoxic/suppressor) lymphocytes. The ratio of CD 4 cells to CD 8 cells in this group of patients was generally greater than 2.00 due to decreases in CD 8 cells. Patients showing graft dysfunction due to viral infections showed consistent and significant increases in CD 8 cells which also bear the HNK-1 or the HLA-Dr determinants. Serial monitoring for these dual-marked lymphocytes on a weekly basis can be of considerable use in determining the etiology of graft dysfunction. Increases in other "activation" markers, including transferrin receptors, CD 38, and a T cell lineage specific activation antigen (TLiSA) were not specific for rejection; in fact, increases in CD38 were more often associated with viral infections. These studies indicated that lymphocyte subset determinations done on a regular basis can help distinguish graft dysfunction due to viral infections from other causes. The ability to distinguish rejection episodes from stable grafts is less obvious. Although the alterations in lymphocyte subset distribution are not entirely specific, they can distinguish viral infections from rejection.

Diagnosis, Differential↗