Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Ledermann

Publications and source records attributed to J A Ledermann.

47 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

Results of the central data analysis.

This chapter presents the results of blind serological studies carried out by workshop participants on 87 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) supplied to them as a coded panel. Twenty six mAbs had been studied in the first workshop. Participants were asked to carry out immunohistochemical, immunocytological or flow cytometric analysis on a mandatory panel of target tissues or cells. Central computer analysis and other supporting data allowed the assignment of 33 mAbs to seven clusters. Two of the antigens identified have been cloned while two more have been defined as carbohydrate epitopes. The results allow comparison of new mAbs against lung cancer with existing ones and are beginning to provide a description of the antigenic structure of the SCLC cell surface.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

EMOP/CA chemotherapy for the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

From October 1983 to June 1987, 32 patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (diffuse centroblastic, lymphoblastic and Burkitt type) were treated with the weekly alternating EMOP/CA schedule, total duration 12 weeks. There were six bulky stage II, nine stage III and 17 stage IV patients, median age 54 years (range 19-75). The complete remission rate was 59% (95% confidence limits 40-76%) and the partial remission rate 28% providing an overall response rate of 87%. With a median follow up time of 33 months (range 18-56) the relapse-free survival of those patients achieving a complete remission is 52% and the overall survival for the 32 patients treated is 27%. The CR rate for patients with stage IV disease was 47% and for those with stage II and III disease was 73% of whom 81% remain in remission. EMOP/CA chemotherapy produces acceptable results in stage II and III aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas but is inadequate therapy for stage IV disease.

Adult↗

Antibody distribution and dosimetry in patients receiving radiolabelled antibody therapy for colorectal cancer.

The distribution of iodine-131 (131I) labelled antibody to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) has been studied in 16 patients with colorectal cancer. Levels of tumour and normal tissue radioactivity were measured by serial gamma-camera imaging and counting of blood and urine. Maximum concentrations were found in tumour 8 h after administration and varied up to 9-fold in different patients. Higher levels were found on average in tumour than in any other tissue. Liver, lung and blood were the other tissues in which antibody was concentrated relative to the rest of the body. Antibody cleared from all these tissues over 1 week. Second antibody directed against the antitumour (first) antibody was given 24 h after first antibody in order to accelerate clearance from the blood. This increased the tumour to blood ratio but had little effect on other tissues. Cumulative radiation dose to tumour and normal tissue was estimated. In patients with the most efficient localisation the tumour to body ratio was 20:1 and tumour to blood ratio 5:1. This may be sufficient for effective therapy of cancer in patients selected for efficient antibody localisation. The data may be used to estimate the effect of different therapeutic strategies. For instance, in the time after second antibody administration the average tumour to blood ratio of radiation dose was 11:1, suggesting that two phase systems in which the therapeutic modality is given after a good tumour to normal tissue ratio is obtained may be effective for the majority of patients.

Antibodies, Neoplasm↗

Cyclosporin A prevents the anti-murine antibody response to a monoclonal anti-tumour antibody in rabbits.

Repeated therapy of cancer with mouse monoclonal antibodies frequently produces antibodies directed against the administered antibody. We have investigated the ability of cyclosporin A (CsA) and the use of ultracentrifuged antibody to prevent the formation of anti-antibodies in rabbits. Courses of CsA, 20 mgkg-1 day-1, were given intramuscularly for 6 days to rabbits and a mouse monoclonal anti-human chorionic gonadotrophin antibody was given intravenously on day 2 with or without ultracentrifugation to remove microaggregates. The whole course was repeated after an interval of two weeks. Rabbit anti-mouse antibody production was prevented in all 8 animals that were given CsA and ultracentrifuged preparation (non UC-W14). Anti-mouse antibody was produced by all the animals that were not given CsA. A further dose of mouse antibody eight weeks after CsA demonstrated that immunological recovery had occurred in all four animals re-challenged with non UC-W14 but only 3/7 animals given an UC-W14 preparation. This suggests that CsA and ultracentrifugation facilitate the induction of immunological tolerance. The complete suppression of antibody production which could be achieved justifies a clinical trial of CsA and ultracentrifugation of antibody.

Animals↗

Repeated antitumour antibody therapy in man with suppression of the host response by cyclosporin A.

Antibody targeted therapy of cancer results in anti-antibody production which prevents repeated treatment. Cyclosporin A (CsA) has been used to suppress this response in patients treated with a radiolabelled antibody to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Patients with CEA producing tumours received a minimum of two courses consisting of an injection of radiolabelled antibody and CsA, 24 mg kg-1 day-1, for 6 days; each course was given at 2 week intervals. Two weeks after the completion of the second course the mean human antimouse antibody (HAMA) levels were 3.5 micrograms ml-1 (s.d. 2.7) in 3 patients receiving CsA and 1,998 micrograms ml-1 (s.d. 387) in 3 patients not receiving the drug. Clearance of antitumour antibody was accelerated and tumour localisation absent when HAMA levels exceeded 30 micrograms ml-1. With lower levels of HAMA in the CsA-treated patients, further antitumour antibody accumulated in the tumour after each dose. Further therapy with antitumour antibody and CsA lead to the development of HAMA, but this was less than 25% of the amount in patients not given CsA. In this preliminary study up to 4 times as many doses of antitumour antibody could be usefully given when CsA was used. This increases the potential for effective antibody targeted therapy of cancer.

Adult↗

Use of second antibody in radioimmunotherapy.

In this study, a second antibody was directed against the first antitumor antibody to accelerate clearance of the 131I-labeled first antibody and improve tumor to normal tissue ratios of radioactivity. The value of this method in improving the therapeutic index of radioimmunotherapy with 131I-antibody to CEA has been investigated in nude mice bearing xenografts of human colon carcinoma and in 5 patients with colorectal cancer. The xenografts did not become saturated with anti-CEA as the administered dose was increased to therapeutic levels. At these high dose levels, the second antibody increased tumor to blood ratios to a maximum of 155:1, 48 times the level in controls that did not receive the second antibody. In 5 patients given 50 mCi of anti-CEA, there was no significant toxicity with the second antibody; clearance of radioactivity was accelerated; and tumor imaging was enhanced. The second antibody appears to have the potential to improve the therapeutic index of radioimmunotherapy.

Animals↗

Is ectopic production of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) or alpha fetoprotein (AFP) by tumours a marker of chemosensitivity?

We have treated eight patients with various tumours producing hCG or AFP with the high risk gestational choriocarcinoma regimen EMA/CO. Marker response was seen in two of three tumours producing AFP and in all of five tumours producing hCG. Three further patients were treated with EpPt/OMB, a regimen used in relapsed germ cell tumors. All responded biochemically. All complete biochemical responses were accompanied by anatomical response. These responses may reflect particular sensitivity in the marker producing tumours and marker measurements would identify this subgroup. These findings do not preclude the possibility that these cytotoxic regimens may have activity against a wide range of solid tumours.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗