Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

J A Crowell

Publications and source records attributed to J A Crowell.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Oncogenicity evaluation of resveratrol in p53(+/-) (p53 knockout) mice.

A six-month study was conducted in p53(+/-) mice to evaluate the possible oncogenicity of resveratrol (3,5,4'-trihydroxy-trans-stilbene), a cancer chemopreventive agent present in grapes and other foods. p53(+/-) mice (25/sex/group) received daily gavage exposure to vehicle only (negative control), resveratrol doses of 1000, 2000, or 4000 mg/kg/day, or p-cresidine (400 mg/kg/day; positive control). No mortality was seen in mice receiving the low dose of resveratrol. However, the mid and high doses induced mortality associated with impaction of the test article in the gastrointestinal tract. Resveratrol had no effect on body weight, food consumption, or clinical signs in surviving mice in any dose group, but induced dose-related increases in liver weight and serum cholesterol in both sexes. Mild anemia was seen in male mice at the high dose only; hematologic effects were not seen in females. Histopathology identified the kidney (hydronephrosis) and urinary bladder (epithelial hyperplasia) as target tissues for resveratrol toxicity. The incidences of both benign and malignant tumors in mice exposed to resveratrol were comparable to those in vehicle controls. By contrast, the positive control article, p-cresidine, induced urinary bladder cancer in both sexes. When administered to p53(+/-) mice at its maximum tolerated dose, resveratrol demonstrates no evidence of oncogenicity.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Agents, biomarkers, and cohorts for chemopreventive agent development in prostate cancer.

Chemoprevention is the use of agents to slow progression of, reverse, or inhibit carcinogenesis thereby lowering the risk of developing invasive or clinically significant disease. With its long latency, high incidence and significant morbidity and mortality, prostate cancer is a relevant target for chemoprevention. Developing rational chemopreventive strategies for prostate cancer requires well-characterized agents, suitable cohorts, and reliable intermediate biomarkers of cancer. Chemopreventive agent requirements are experimental or epidemiologic data showing efficacy, safety on chronic administration, and a mechanistic rationale for activity. Current promising agents include antiandrogens and antiestrogens; steroid aromatase inhibitors; retinoids and their modulators; 5alpha-reductase inhibitors; vitamins D, E, and analogs; selenium compounds; carotenoids; soy isoflavones; dehydroepiandrostenedione and analogs; 2-difluoromethylornithine; lipoxygenase inhibitors; apoptosis inducers; and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Identifying biomarkers and validating them as surrogate endpoints for cancer incidence are critical for prostate chemoprevention trials. Potentially useful biomarkers for prostate chemoprevention are associated with histologic, proliferative, differentiation-related, biochemical, and genetic/regulatory features of prostatic disease. In that the prostate is not easily visualized, critical issues also include adequacy and consistency of tissue sampling. Various drugs for the chemoprevention of prostate cancer are now under evaluation in phase 1, 2, and 3 clinical trials. Cohort selection should be based on various patient characteristics (stage of the disease, previous cancers or premalignant lesions, or high risk factors) and should be conducted within the context of standard treatment.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Pursuit compensation during self-motion.

The pattern of motion in the retinal image during self-motion contains information about the person's movement. Pursuit eye movements perturb the pattern of retinal-image motion, complicating the problem of self-motion perception. A question of considerable current interest is the relative importance of retinal and extra-retinal signals in compensating for these effects of pursuit on the retinal image. We addressed this question by examining the effect of prior motion stimuli on self-motion judgments during pursuit. Observers viewed 300 ms random-dot displays simulating forward self-motion during pursuit to the right or to the left; at the end of each display a probe appeared and observers judged whether they would pass left or right of it. The display was preceded by a 300 ms dot pattern that was either stationary or moved in the same direction as, or opposite to, the eye movement. This prior motion stimulus had a large effect on self-motion judgments when the simulated scene was a frontoparallel wall (experiment 1), but not when it was a three-dimensional (3-D) scene (experiment 2). Corresponding simulated-pursuit conditions controlled for purely retinal motion aftereffects, implying that the effect in experiment 1 is mediated by an interaction between retinal and extra-retinal signals. In experiment 3, we examined self-motion judgments with respect to a 3-D scene with mixtures of real and simulated pursuit. When real and simulated pursuits were in opposite directions, performance was determined by the total amount of pursuit-related retinal motion, consistent with an extra-retinal 'trigger' signal that facilitates the action of a retinally based pursuit-compensation mechanism. However, results of experiment 1 without a prior motion stimulus imply that extra-retinal signals are more informative when retinal information is lacking. We conclude that the relative importance of retinal and extra-retinal signals for pursuit compensation varies with the informativeness of the retinal motion pattern, at least for short durations. Our results provide partial explanations for a number of findings in the literature on perception of self-motion and motion in the frontal plane.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed2001

Phase I pharmacokinetic study of tea polyphenols following single-dose administration of epigallocatechin gallate and polyphenon E.

Green tea has been shown to exhibit cancer-preventive activities in preclinical studies. Its principal active components include epigallocatechin gallate (EGCG), epigallocatechin (EGC), epicatechin (EC), and epicatechin gallate, of which EGCG is the most abundant and possesses the most potent antioxidative activity. We performed a Phase I pharmacokinetic study to determine the systemic availability of green tea catechins after single oral dose administration of EGCG and Polyphenon E (decaffeinated green tea catechin mixture). Twenty healthy subjects (five subjects/dose level) were randomly assigned to one of the dose levels (200, 400, 600, and 800 mg based on EGCG content). All subjects were randomly crossed-over to receive the two catechin formulations at the same dose level. Blood and urine samples were collected for up to 24 h after oral administration of the study medication. Tea catechin concentrations in plasma and urine samples were determined using high-performance liquid chromatography with the coulometric electrode array detection system. After EGCG versus Polyphenon E administration, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) of unchanged EGCG were 22.5 versus 21.9, 35.4 versus 52.2, 101.9 versus 79.7, and 167.1 versus 161.4 min x microg/ml at the 200-, 400-, 600-, and 800-mg dose levels, respectively. EGC and EC were not detected in plasma after EGCG administration and were present at low/undetectable levels after Polyphenon E administration. High concentrations of EGC and EC glucuronide/sulfate conjugates were found in plasma and urine samples after Polyphenon E administration. There were no significant differences in the pharmacokinetic characteristics of EGCG between the two study medications. The AUC and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of EGCG after the 800-mg dose of EGCG were found to be significantly higher than those after the 200- and 400-mg dose. The AUC and Cmax of EGCG after the 800-mg dose of Polyphenon E were significantly higher than those after the three lower doses. We conclude that the two catechin formulations resulted in similar plasma EGCG levels. EGC and EC were present in the body after the Polyphenon E administration; however, they were present predominantly in conjugated forms. The systemic availability of EGCG increased at higher doses, possibly due to saturable presystemic elimination of orally administered green tea polyphenols.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Surrogate end-point biomarkers in chemopreventive drug development.

Relevant and feasible surrogate end-points are needed for the evaluation of intervention strategies against cancer and other chronic, life-threatening diseases. Carcinogenesis can be viewed as a process of progressive disorganization. This process is characterized by the accumulation of genotypic lesions and corresponding tissue and cellular abnormalities, including loss of proliferation and apoptosis controls. Potential surrogate end-points for cancer incidence include both phenotypic and genotypic biomarkers of this progression. In the US National Cancer Institute chemoprevention programme, histological modulation of a precancer (intraepithelial neoplasia) has so far been the primary phenotypic surrogate end-point in chemoprevention trials. Additionally, high priority has been given to biomarkers measuring specific and general genotypic changes correlated with the carcinogenesis progression model for the targeted cancer (e.g., progressive genomic instability as measured by loss of heterozygosity or amplification at specific microsatellite loci). Other potential surrogate end-points include proliferation and differentiation indices, specific gene and general chromosome damage, cell growth regulatory molecules, and biochemical activities (e.g., enzyme inhibition). Serum biomarkers thought to be associated with cancer progression (e.g., prostate-specific antigen) are particularly appealing surrogate end-points because of accessibility. Potentially chemopreventive effects of the test agent may also be measured (e.g., tissue and serum estrogen levels in studies of steroid aromatase inhibitors). To establish chemopreventive efficacy, prevention of virtually all biomarker lesions, or of those lesions with particular propensity for progression, may be required. Ideally, the phenotype and genotype of any new or remaining precancers in the target tissue of chemopreventive agent-treated subjects would show less, and certainly no greater, potential for progression than those of placebo-treated subjects.

Anticarcinogenic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Progress in cancer chemoprevention: development of diet-derived chemopreventive agents.

Because of their safety and the fact that they are not perceived as "medicine," food-derived products are highly interesting for development as chemopreventive agents that may find widespread, long-term use in populations at normal risk. Numerous diet-derived agents are included among the >40 promising agents and agent combinations that are being evaluated clinically as chemopreventive agents for major cancer targets including breast, prostate, colon and lung. Examples include green and black tea polyphenols, soy isoflavones, Bowman-Birk soy protease inhibitor, curcumin, phenethyl isothiocyanate, sulforaphane, lycopene, indole-3-carbinol, perillyl alcohol, vitamin D, vitamin E, selenium and calcium. Many food-derived agents are extracts, containing multiple compounds or classes of compounds. For developing such agents, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) has advocated codevelopment of a single or a few putative active compounds that are contained in the food-derived agent. The active compounds provide mechanistic and pharmacologic data that may be used to characterize the chemopreventive potential of the extract, and these compounds may find use as chemopreventives in higher risk subjects (patients with precancers or previous cancers). Other critical aspects to developing the food-derived products are careful analysis and definition of the extract to ensure reproducibility (e.g., growth conditions, chromatographic characteristics or composition), and basic science studies to confirm epidemiologic findings associating the food product with cancer prevention.

Biomarkers↗
PubMed2000

Potential use of lipoxygenase inhibitors for cancer chemoprevention.

Increasing evidence suggests that lipoxygenase (LO)-catalysed metabolites have a profound influence on the development and progression of human cancers. Compared with normal tissues, significantly elevated levels of LO products have been found in breast tumours, colon cancers, lung, skin and prostate cancers, as well as in cells from patients with both acute and chronic leukaemias. LO-mediated products elicit diverse biological activities needed for neoplastic cell growth, influencing growth factor and transcription factor activation, oncogene induction, stimulation of tumour cell adhesion and regulation of apoptotic cell death. Agents that block LO catalytic activity may be effective in preventing cancer by interfering with signalling events needed for tumour growth. In the past ten years, pharmaceuticals agents that specifically inhibit the 5-LO metabolic pathway have been developed to treat inflammatory diseases such as asthma, arthritis and psoriasis. Some of these compounds possess anti-oxidant properties and may be effective in preventing cancer by blocking free radical-induced genetic damage or by preventing the metabolic activation of carcinogens. Other compounds may work by negatively modulating DNA synthesis. Pharmacological profiles of potential chemopreventive agents are compiled from enzyme assays, in vitro testing (e.g., cell proliferation inhibition in human cancer cells) and in vivo animal carcinogenesis models (e.g., N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced rat mammary cancer, benzo(a)pyrene-induced lung tumours in strain A/J mice and hormone-induced prostate tumours in rats). In this way, compounds are identified for chemoprevention trials in human subjects. Based on currently available data, it is expected that the prevention of lung and prostate cancer will be initially studied in human trials of LO inhibitors.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Extraretinal and retinal amplitude and phase errors during Filehne illusion and path perception.

Pursuit eye movements give rise to retinal motion. To judge stimulus motion relative to the head, the visual system must correct for the eye movement by using an extraretinal, eye-velocity signal. Such correction is important in a variety of motion estimation tasks including judgments of object motion relative to the head and judgments of self-motion direction from optic flow. The Filehne illusion (where a stationary object appears to move opposite to the pursuit) results from a mismatch between retinal and extraretinal speed estimates. A mismatch in timing could also exist. Speed and timing errors were investigated using sinusoidal pursuit eye movements. We describe a new illusion--the slalom illusion--in which the perceived direction of self-motion oscillates left and right when the eyes move sinusoidally. A linear model is presented that determines the gain ratio and phase difference of extraretinal and retinal signals accompanying the Filehne and slalom illusions. The speed mismatch and timing differences were measured in the Filehne and self-motion situations using a motion-nulling procedure. Timing errors were very small for the Filehne and slalom illusions. However, the ratios of extraretinal to retinal gain were consistently less than 1, so both illusions are the consequence of a mismatch between estimates of retinal and extraretinal speed. The relevance of the results for recovering the direction of self-motion during pursuit eye movements is discussed.

Acceleration↗
PubMed2000

Perspectives on surrogate end points in the development of drugs that reduce the risk of cancer.

This paper proposes a scientific basis and possible strategy for applying surrogate end points in chemopreventive drug development. The potential surrogate end points for cancer incidence described are both phenotypic (at the tissue, cellular, and molecular levels) and genotypic biomarkers. To establish chemopreventive efficacy in randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, it is expected that in most cases it will be critical to ensure that virtually all of the biomarker lesions are prevented or that the lesions prevented are those with the potential to progress. This would require that both the phenotype and genotype of the target tissue in agent-treated subjects, especially in any new or remaining precancers, are equivalent to or show less progression than those of placebo-treated subjects. In the National Cancer Institute chemoprevention program, histological modulation of a precancer (intraepithelial neoplasia) has thus far been the primary phenotypic surrogate end point in chemoprevention trials. Additionally, we give high priority to biomarkers measuring specific and general genotypic changes correlating to the carcinogenesis progression model for the targeted cancer (e.g., progressive genomic instability as measured by loss of heterozygosity or amplification at a specific microsatellite loci). Other potential surrogate end points that may occur earlier in carcinogenesis are being analyzed in these precancers and in nearby normal appearing tissues. These biomarkers include proliferation and differentiation indices, specific gene and general chromosome damage, cell growth regulatory molecules, and biochemical activities (e.g., enzyme inhibition). Serum biomarkers also may be monitored (e.g., prostate-specific antigen) because of their accessibility. Potentially chemopreventive drug effects of the test agent also may be measured (e.g., tissue and serum estrogen levels in studies of steroid aromatase inhibitors). These initial studies are expected to expand the list of validated surrogate end points for future use. Continued discussion and research among the National Cancer Institute, the Food and Drug Administration, industry, and academia are needed to ensure that surrogate end point-based chemoprevention indications are feasible.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2000

Effect of subacute ibuprofen dosing on rectal mucosal prostaglandin E2 levels in healthy subjects with a history of resected polyps.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs are among the most promising chemopreventive agents for colorectal cancer. Although the mechanism by which nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs exert such effects remains to be further characterized, their best known pharmacological effect is inhibition of prostaglandin synthetase, which leads to decreases in tissue prostaglandin levels. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, controlled study to examine the effect of daily ibuprofen treatment on the rectal mucosal prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels in healthy subjects with a history of resected polyps. Study participants (n = 27) completed a 2-week run-in period and were then randomized to take a single, daily dose of ibuprofen (300 or 600 mg) or of a placebo for 4 weeks. Rectal biopsy specimens were taken before and after the run-in period and at 2 and 4 weeks after the ibuprofen/placebo treatment. Notably large between- and within-subject variability in the rectal mucosal PGE2 content was seen. The changes in PGE2 levels after ibuprofen/placebo treatment correlated with the baseline PGE2 content. After adjustment of the baseline values, 2 weeks of 300 mg/day of ibuprofen treatment resulted in significantly more suppression of PGE2 levels than that observed after the placebo treatment (55% versus 22% suppression from baseline; P = 0.033). Although other ibuprofen treatment schedules and doses appeared to result in suppression in the PGE2 levels, the suppression was not statistically significant because of the large variability in this measurement. Because lower doses are associated with fewer adverse effects, a dose of 300 mg of ibuprofen/day should be considered for future Phase II chemoprevention studies. Stratifying study participants, based on their baseline PGE2 levels and inclusion of a larger number of study subjects, are recommended for future trials where the rectal mucosal PGE2 level is to be used as a surrogate end point biomarker.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The contributions of vestibular signals to the representations of space in the posterior parietal cortex.

Vestibular signals play an important role in spatial orientation, perception of object location, and control of self-motion. Prior physiological research on vestibular information processing has focused on brainstem mechanisms; relatively little is known about the processing of vestibular information at the level of the cerebral cortex. Recent electrophysiological experiments examining the use of vestibular canal signals in two different perceptual tasks are described: computation of self motion and localization of visual stimuli in a world-centered reference frame. These two perceptual functions are mediated by different parts of the posterior parietal cortex, the former in the dorsal aspect of the medial superior temporal area (MSTd) and the latter in area 7a.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Thirteen-week oral toxicity study of difluoromethylornithine in combination with tamoxifen citrate in female dogs.

PURPOSE: Cancer chemoprevention is the use of pharmacologic or natural agents to inhibit the development of cancer. Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) is an irreversible inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of polyamines. DFMO has demonstrated chemopreventive efficacy in animal models of tumorigenesis. Tamoxifen (TAM), a nonsteroidal antiestrogen, is approved for use in the treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinoma and has demonstrated efficacy in chemoprevention of breast cancer in women at high risk for the disease. The administration of TAM with DFMO is being considered for development by the National Cancer Institute as a potential drug regimen for the chemoprevention of breast carcinoma. METHODS: The toxicity of DFMO in combination with TAM was evaluated in female Beagle dogs following 13 weeks of daily oral administration by capsule. Dose levels in milligrams per kilogram body weight per day were: 0 (vehicle control), 100 DFMO, 0.1 TAM, 1.0 TAM, 0.1 TAM + 100 DFMO and 1.0 TAM + 100 DFMO. RESULTS: No mortalities occurred. Diarrhea was produced by TAM and vaginal discharge, due to reproductive tract lesions, was produced by both DFMO and TAM, either alone or in combination. DFMO decreased reticulocyte counts and TAM increased counts of mature neutrophils. DFMO alone resulted in lesions to the intestines and ovaries, and cornified epithelium of vagina and cervix. TAM produced cornified epithelium of vagina and cervix, and numerous lesions in the ovaries, fallopian tube, uterus, cervix and vagina which were likely due to an estrogen agonist effect. Coadministration of DFMO increased the incidence and/or severity of these reproductive tract lesions. Each compound alone produced ovarian atrophy, and antral follicles and corpora lutea were completely absent in the 1.0 TAM + 100 DFMO group. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of DFMO and TAM resulted in additive toxicity involving the female reproductive system.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Difluoromethylornithine in combination with tamoxifen in female rats: 13-week oral toxicity study.

PURPOSE: Cancer chemoprevention is the use of pharmacologic or natural agents to inhibit the development of cancer. Difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) is an irreversible inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of polyamines. DFMO has demonstrated chemopreventive efficacy in animal models of tumorigenesis. Tamoxifen (TAM) is currently used for treatment of estrogen receptor-positive breast carcinoma and has demonstrated efficacy in chemoprevention of breast cancer in women at high risk for the disease. The administration of tamoxifen with DFMO is being considered for development by the National Cancer Institute as a potential drug regimen for the chemoprevention of breast carcinoma. METHODS: The toxicity of DFMO in combination with TAM was evaluated in female rats following 13 weeks of daily administration by gavage. Dose groups were vehicle control, DFMO (1000 mg/kg per day), low TAM (0.25 mg/kg per day), high TAM (2.5 mg/kg per day), low combination (1000 + 0.25) and high combination (1000 + 2.5). RESULTS: No mortalities occurred in the study. Clinical signs of toxicity were limited to dermal lesions consisting of scab formation and abrasions produced by DFMO. Administration of either DFMO or TAM resulted in decreased body weight gains, with coadministration having an additive effect. Serum albumin, total protein, cholesterol and triglyceride levels were decreased in all drug-treated dose groups, although histologic evidence of liver lesions were not seen. TAM resulted in increased numbers of red blood cells, whereas DFMO produced a slightly anemic response. DFMO produced lesions in the small intestine consisting of necrosis of crypt epithelium and crypt microabscess, which were enhanced by TAM coadministration. Administration of TAM resulted in histologic changes in the ovaries, fallopian tube, vagina, cervix and uterus, indicating that inhibition of ovulation and reproductive cycle arrest in the proestrus stage had occurred. Coadministration with DFMO did not affect the changes to the reproductive system induced by TAM. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of DFMO with tamoxifen did not result in toxicity unique to the combination drug regimen, but rather toxicity resulted from administration of each drug. Under the conditions of the study, the overall toxicity produced by dual administration of DFMO with tamoxifen was additive with respect to the toxicity associated with each agent alone.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1999

Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception.

The slant of a stereoscopically defined surface cannot be determined solely from horizontal disparities or from derived quantities such as horizontal size ratio (HSR). There are four other signals that, in combination with horizontal disparity, could in principle allow an unambiguous estimate of slant: the vergence and version of the eyes, the vertical size ratio (VSR), and the horizontal gradient of VSR. Another useful signal is provided by perspective slant cues. The determination of perceived slant can be modeled as a weighted combination of three estimates based on those signals: a perspective estimate, a stereoscopic estimate based on HSR and VSR, and a stereoscopic estimate based on HSR and sensed eye position. In a series of experiments, we examined human observers' use of the two stereoscopic means of estimation. Perspective cues were rendered uninformative. We found that VSR and sensed eye position are both used to interpret the measured horizontal disparities. When the two are placed in conflict, the visual system usually gives more weight to VSR. However, when VSR is made difficult to measure by using short stimuli or stimuli composed of vertical lines, the visual system relies on sensed eye position. A model in which the observer's slant estimate is a weighted average of the slant estimate based on HSR and VSR and the one based on HSR and eye position accounted well for the data. The weights varied across viewing conditions because the informativeness of the signals they employ vary from one situation to another.

Cues↗
PubMed1999

Developmental toxicity studies of 2-(difluoromethyl)-dl-ornithine (DFMO) in rats and rabbits.

DFMO, an irreversible inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), is under development as a chemopreventive drug against cancers with pronounced proliferative phases. In support of human clinical trials, preclinical developmental toxicity studies were conducted in pregnant rats and rabbits. Rats were treated during GD 6-17, and fetuses were obtained by C-section on GD 20. Rabbits were treated during GD 7-20, and fetuses were obtained by C-section on GD 29. The dose range-finding study in rats (5/group at 0, 50, 125, 300, 800, or 1000 mg/kg/day) revealed maternal toxicity at doses > or = 800 mg/kg/day (decreased body weights and food consumption) and developmental toxicity at doses > or = 300 mg/kg/day (increased early resorptions and reduced fetal body weights). In the main study, rats (25/group) received 0, 30, 80, or 200 mg/kg/day. Developmental toxicity in the absence of maternal toxicity was observed at 200 mg/kg/day as significantly decreased fetal weights and increased incidence of litters with skeletal variations of 14th rudimentary rib, 14th full rib, and/or 27th presacral vertebrae. There were no treatment-related fetal skeletal malformations or external or visceral anomalies at any dose level. The dose range-finding study in rabbits (5/group at 0, 30, 60, 120, 240, or 500 mg/kg/day) revealed developmental toxicity at doses > or = 60 mg/kg/day (increased resorptions and reduced fetal body weights) in the absence of maternal toxicity. In the main study, rabbits (20/group) received 0, 15, 45, or 135 mg/kg/day. Developmental toxicity in the absence of maternal toxicity was observed at 135 mg/kg/day as nonsignificantly increased early resorptions, decreased implantation sites, decreased viable fetuses, and reduced fetal weights. There were no external, visceral, or skeletal anomalies at any dose level. Thus, in the main developmental toxicity studies, DFMO produced developmental but not maternal toxicity at 200 and 135 mg/kg/day in rats and rabbits, respectively. Accordingly, in rats, the maternal no-observable-effect level (NOEL) was 200 mg/kg/day and the fetal NOEL was 80 mg/kg/day; while in rabbits the maternal NOEL was 135 mg/kg/day and the fetal NOEL was 45 mg/kg/day. These fetal NOELs are several-fold higher than the dose level currently used in Phase II and III clinical trials (approximately 13 mg/kg).

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Progress in cancer chemoprevention.

More than 40 promising agents and agent combinations are being evaluated clinically as chemopreventive drugs for major cancer targets. A few have been in vanguard, large-scale intervention trials--for example, the studies of tamoxifen and fenretinide in breast, 13-cis-retinoic acid in head and neck, vitamin E and selenium in prostate, and calcium in colon. These and other agents are currently in phase II chemoprevention trials to establish the scope of their chemopreventive efficacy and to develop intermediate biomarkers as surrogate end points for cancer incidence in future studies. In this group are fenretinide, 2-difluoromethylornithine, and oltipraz. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatories (NSAID) are also in this group because of their colon cancer chemopreventive effects in clinical intervention, epidemiological, and animal studies. New agents are continually considered for development as chemopreventive drugs. Preventive strategies with antiandrogens are evolving for prostate cancer. Anti-inflammatories that selectively inhibit inducible cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 are being investigated in colon as alternatives to the NSAID, which inhibit both COX-1 and COX-2 and derive their toxicity from COX-1 inhibition. Newer retinoids with reduced toxicity, increased efficacy, or both (e.g., 9-cis-retinoic acid) are being investigated. Promising chemopreventive drugs are also being developed from dietary substances (e.g., green and black tea polyphenols, soy isoflavones, curcumin, phenethyl isothiocyanate, sulforaphane, lycopene, indole-3-carbinol, perillyl alcohol). Basic and translational research necessary to progress in chemopreventive agent development includes, for example, (1) molecular and genomic biomarkers that can be used for risk assessment and as surrogate end points in clinical studies, (2) animal carcinogenesis models that mimic human disease (including transgenic and gene knockout mice), and (3) novel agent treatment regimens (e.g., local delivery to cancer targets, agent combinations, and pharmacodynamically guided dosing).

Animals↗