Biomedical subjects

Iuliana Ionita

Publications and source records attributed to Iuliana Ionita.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Optimal two-stage strategy for detecting interacting genes in complex diseases.

BACKGROUND: The mapping of complex diseases is one of the most important problems in human genetics today. The rapid development of technology for genetic research has led to the discovery of millions of polymorphisms across the human genome, making it possible to conduct genome-wide association studies with hundreds of thousands of markers. Given the large number of markers to be tested in such studies, a two-stage strategy may be a reasonable and powerful approach: in the first stage, a small subset of promising loci is identified using single-locus testing, and, in the second stage, multi-locus methods are used while taking into account the loci selected in the first stage. In this report, we investigate and compare two possible two-stage strategies for genome-wide association studies: a conditional approach and a simultaneous approach. RESULTS: We investigate the power of both the conditional and the simultaneous approach to detect the disease loci for a range of two-locus disease models in a case-control study design. Our results suggest that, overall, the conditional approach is more robust and more powerful than the simultaneous approach; the conditional approach can greatly outperform the simultaneous approach when one of the two disease loci has weak marginal effect, but interacts strongly with the other, stronger locus (easily detectable using single-locus methods in the first stage). CONCLUSION: Genome-wide association studies hold the promise of finding new genes implicated in complex diseases. Two-stage strategies are likely to be employed in these large-scale studies. Therefore we compared two natural two-stage approaches: the conditional approach and the simultaneous approach. Our power studies suggest that, when doing genome-wide association studies, a two-stage conditional approach is likely to be more powerful than a two-stage simultaneous approach.

Alleles↗

PubMed2006

Mapping tumor-suppressor genes with multipoint statistics from copy-number-variation data.

Array-based comparative genomic hybridization (arrayCGH) is a microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization technique that has been used to compare tumor genomes with normal genomes, thus providing rapid genomic assays of tumor genomes in terms of copy-number variations of those chromosomal segments that have been gained or lost. When properly interpreted, these assays are likely to shed important light on genes and mechanisms involved in the initiation and progression of cancer. Specifically, chromosomal segments, deleted in one or both copies of the diploid genomes of a group of patients with cancer, point to locations of tumor-suppressor genes (TSGs) implicated in the cancer. In this study, we focused on automatic methods for reliable detection of such genes and their locations, and we devised an efficient statistical algorithm to map TSGs, using a novel multipoint statistical score function. The proposed algorithm estimates the location of TSGs by analyzing segmental deletions (hemi- or homozygous) in the genomes of patients with cancer and the spatial relation of the deleted segments to any specific genomic interval. The algorithm assigns, to an interval of consecutive probes, a multipoint score that parsimoniously captures the underlying biology. It also computes a P value for every putative TSG by using concepts from the theory of scan statistics. Furthermore, it can identify smaller sets of predictive probes that can be used as biomarkers for diagnosis and therapeutics. We validated our method using different simulated artificial data sets and one real data set, and we report encouraging results. We discuss how, with suitable modifications to the underlying statistical model, this algorithm can be applied generally to a wider class of problems (e.g., detection of oncogenes).

Gene Deletion↗

PubMed2006

Multilocus linkage analysis of affected sib pairs.

OBJECTIVE: The conventional affected sib pair methods evaluate the linkage information at a locus by considering only marginal information. We describe a multilocus linkage method that uses both the marginal information and information derived from the possible interactions among several disease loci, thereby increasing the significance of loci with modest effects. METHODS: Our method is based on a statistic that quantifies the linkage information contained in a set of markers. By a marker selection-reduction process, we screen a set of polymorphisms and select a few that seem linked to disease. RESULTS: We test our approach on genome scan data for inflammatory bowel disease (InfBD) and on simulated data. On real data we detect 6 of the 8 known InfBD loci; on simulated data we obtain improvements in power of up to 40% compared to a conventional single-locus method. CONCLUSION: Our extensive simulations and the results on real data show that our method is in general more powerful than single-locus methods in detecting disease loci responsible for complex traits. A further advantage of our approach is that it can be extended to make use of both the linkage and the linkage disequilibrium between disease loci and nearby markers.

Genetic Linkage↗