Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Italian Society of Nephrology

Publications and source records attributed to Italian Society of Nephrology.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

[Instructions and implementations for percutaneous renal biopsy. Guidelines for the therapy of glomerular nephropaties].

This series of articles on the management of glomerulonephritis (GN) has been prepared by a team of experts in the evidence-based format consistent with peer review of published data. Each author was asked to review the literature for his assigned histological type, with emphasis on therapy and limited to adult studies. The age limit was not considered for minimal change disease and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, because of the high prevalence of these glomerulopathies in children. The particular treatment recommendations for each type of glomerular disease were graded by each author according to the amount of evidence provided in these reviewed studies. The first two articles concentrate on indications and techniques for kidney biopsy. Each subsequent article focuses on and describes the highest level of evidence supporting the recommendation for therapy in IgA nephropathy (Ig-GN), minimal change nephropathy (MCN) and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN), lupus nephritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, HCV-associated cryoglobulinaemia and renal involvement in paraproteinemic disorders. The article on IgA nephropathy emphasises the importance of carefully evaluating both clinical and histologic findings before settling on the treatment. The recent, renewed interest in steroids and many immunosuppressive agents is discussed in detail. Recommendations related to the patient's age are also provided. MCN and FSGS are treated together because these forms share similar evidence-based recommendations. For both of these diseases, in fact, the initial treatment approach in children should be prednisone or prednisolone for four to six weeks. The therapeutic response in adults is slower than in children, but adults experience fewer relapses and a more prolonged remission. There is also a discussion on treatment of relapse, frequent relapsing disease and true steroid-resistant disease as well as the role of new immunosuppressive agents. Membranous nephropathy is a frequent cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults and, in one third of these patients, leads to end-stage renal disease. However, the treatment of this form is as yet a matter of discussion. Based on extensive critical review of the literature, the following recommendations are put forward: (a) no treatment in the absence of nephrotic syndrome; (b) patients with heavy proteinuria should receive a 6-month treatment with i.v. methylprednisolone (MP) pulse therapy for three consecutive days followed by oral MP (0.4 mg/kg/day) (months 1, 3, 5) and chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide (months 2, 4, 6); (c) the dosage of chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide should be lowered in older patients; (d) cyclosporine is a second-choice treatment. The treatment of lupus nephritis depends on the histologic class. No specific treatment is usually necessary for class I and IIA. Oral steroids are indicated in patients with class IIb, proteinuria and active systemic disease. Steroids and azathioprine are the treatment of choice for patients with class III and IV, but cyclosporine can be an effective alternative therapy. Cyclophosphamide is more effective than azathioprine when severe acute renal involvement is present. The treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis depends mainly on clinical presentation, oral prednisone + oral or i.v. cyclophosphamide are generally effective. In the most severe cases, the association of MP pulse therapy with cyclophosphamide is probably more effective. Plasma exchange is probably justified in unresponsive patients. Azathioprine should replace cyclophosphamide during the maintenance therapy. In HCV-associated mixed cryoglobulinemia the treatment also depends on the severity of renal involvement. The treatment for chronic HCV infection involves alpha interferon alone or preferably in combination with ribavirin. Aggressive therapy, including i.v. MP, plasmapheresis and cyclophosphamide is primarily reserved for patients with acute severe disease, as manifested by progressive renal failure, distal necroses requiring amputation, or advanced neuropathy. Uncontrolled studies suggest that this regimen can improve renal function. Renal involvement is a common problem in paraproteinemic disorders that include multiple myeloma, Waldentrom's macroglobulinaemia and monoclonal gammopathy. The most common renal diseases in this setting are cast nephropathy, primary amyloidosis cast nephropathy, primary amyloidosis, and light chain deposition disease that are related to the overproduction of monoclonal immunoglobulin light chains. The approach to therapy varies with the cause of the renal dysfunction. Patients with amyloidosis or light-chain deposition disease are generally treated with chemotherapy, but the most effective therapy for myeloma kidney is prevention by minimising the risk factors that promote light chain filtration and subsequent obstruction by cast formation within the tubules. Chemotherapy or stem cell or bone marrow transplantation to decrease filtered light chain load, prevent volume depletion and maintain high fluid intake to reduce light chain concentration within the tubular lumen are indicated in almost all the patients.

Biopsy↗

[Conservative therapy Guidelines for chronic renal failure].

In recent years, many national and international organizations have developed clinical practice guidelines for the most important areas of nephrology. In 1999, the Italian Society of Nephrology (SIN) was one of the first scientific societies to publish (in Giornale Italiano di Nefrologia) the Guidelines for the Treatment of Chronic Renal Failure. Since then, new evidence has accumulated on several aspects of the conservative treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD). These new data have been included in the present version of the guidelines. The first section of the new guidelines underline the importance of the early detection of CKD and early referral to a nephrologist. The second and third sections are dedicated to the dietetic treatment of chronic renal failure, even when associated with nephrotic syndrome. The fourth section analyzes the anti-hypertensive treatment of renal failure, focusing on the choice of anti-hypertensive drugs to retard the progression of renal failure and reduce cardiovascular mortality. This section highlights the reno-protective role of ACE inhibitors and of AII receptor antagonists in diabetic and nondiabetic nephropathies. The Appendix describes methods for the evaluation of the patient's nutritional status and for protein intake in chronic renal failure.

Humans↗

[Guidelines for the treatment of anemia in chronic renal failure].

Evaluation of anemia: Before beginning epoetin treatment, it is essential to evaluate the level of anemia (Hb < 11-12g/dL) by the following measurements: -Hb concentration -Red blood cell indices (MCV, MCH, MCHC) -Reticulocyte count -Iron stores and availability -C-reactive protein (CRP) Target for anemia treatment: The minimum target Hb concentration to be attained is 11 g/dL. The upper limit is established individually on a clinical basis. Pending further data, it is advisable to maintain and not exceed 12 g/dL for patients with cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and graft access. Use of iron: At the start of epoetin treatment, 150 mg of iron are needed for every expected increase of 1 g/dL of Hb. It is important to achieve and maintain levels of TSAT > 20%, serum ferritin 100 mcg/L and hypochromic red cells > 6% both before initiating epoetin treatment and during its administration. TSAT levels should not persistently exceed > 50% and serum ferritin > 500 mcg/L. When administering oral iron the dose should be at least 200 mg/die elemental iron; on the other hand, when the intravenous route is used, the dose should be 30-60 mg/IV dose in the form of low molecular weight salts (iron sodium gluconate) while the higher doses should be reserved for patients with transferring levels > 170 mg/dL. Administration of epoetin: The dosage of epoetin is individual with more than tenfold variability among individuals and all aiming at the same target Hb concentration. There are no clinical parameters entirely capable of predicting the necessary dosage. Therapeutic range is very wide, without any toxic effects for clinical use up to 100.000 IU/week. The target Hb concentration is reached in most patients with mild anaemia after 2 months' treatment with 4.000-10.000 epoetin (20-50 mcg darbepoetin alpha) per week. The HB concentration, along with the reticulocyte count, must be checked weekly following initiation and monthly during maintenance. Patients with a stable dose-response during conservative therapy may require less frequent monitoring (every 2-3 months). Inadequate response to epoetin treatment If any resistance is encountered, after excluding all the acute and chronic conditions of inadequate response, the reticulocyte count (severe reduction in the presence of anti erythropoietin antibodies) and the erythropoietin dosage should be measured. The target Hb concentration 11-12 g/dL is maintained in 90-95% of the patients by administering 1.000-30.000 IU of epoetin (5-150 mcg darbepoetin alpha) per week in the presence of adequate reserves of iron. Higher dosages define a state of resistance. Diagnosis of pure red cell (PRCA) from anti-erythropoietin antibodies is confirmed by bone marrow examination (almost total loss of erythroblasts). If antierythropoietin antibodies are present or there is a well founded suspicion of PRCA, the administration of epoetin and other similar treatment should be avoided. Side effects of epoetin treatment: The treatment of anaemia with epoetin does not hasten the progression of CRF. Blood pressure is to be checked regularly during initiation of epoetin and the treatment should be discontinued in cases of refractory hypertension or hypertensive encephalopathy. There should be increased surveillance of graft access, especially in those patients who risk vascular depletion. In general, heparin requirements do not increase but it may be advisable to evaluate a dose increase. PRCA from anti-erythropoietin antibodies has been detected with an incidence ranging from 0.12 to 1.1 cases/every 10 thousand patients treated.

Anemia↗

[Renal osteodystrophy Guidelines].

Renal ostedystrophy (ROD) is a major long-term complication in uremic patients. Bone histomorphometry still remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of ROD. However, the low acceptance grade by patients makes bone biopsy a rarely performed and not easily repeatable investigation. No other instrumental assessment has been proved as yet to have sufficient sensitivity for ROD diagnosis. Many biochemical markers have been proposed for a diagnostic role, but few have a real predictive diagnostic value. Serum intact PTH (i-PTH) levels are thought to represent a good predictor of bone lesions. However, although a i-PTH level greater than 450 pg/mL and lower than 120 pg/mL may well predict high and low bone turnover disease respectively, in the wide range of values defined by the above border levels i-PTH does not have a predictive role for ROD. There is as yet no definite proof that the recently developed PTH assays might increase their diagnostic sensitivity. Bone alkaline phosphatase is a more reliable index of bone turnover than i-PTH levels. With regards to Al overload, given that an iron overburden is excluded, serum Al levels lower than 30 ug/L are seldom associated with increased Al deposition; conversely, levels above 60 mg/L are highly diagnostic for Al overload. In the latter condition, a DFO test is recommended. The main goals of ROD treatment are a) to maintain serum i-PTH levels between 120 and 150 pg/mL; b) to bring the phosphate (Pi) concentration under 5.5 mg/dL, Ca concentration between 9.2 and 10.4 mg/dL, and the Ca x Pi product under 55 mg/dL; c) to bring Al concentration under 20 ug/L; and d) to target serum bicarbonate levels between 20 and 24 mmol/L. The main therapeutic approaches include: Dietary Pi intake control (< 1200 mg/day). Intestinal phosphate binding using calcium salts and sevelamer. Calcium salts must be used at a dosage that avoids Ca overload (< 23 g/day). If Pi control is not reached, Mg and Al salts may be added at a dose lower than 2 g/day and for less than 3 months. Appropriate dialysis dose (KT/V > 1.2) and dialysis time (consider increased dialysis duration or session number for a week). Ca concentration in dialysate and infusion fluids can range between 1.25 and 2.00 mmol/L, according to the dialysis technique and to maintain an appropriate Ca balance. Vitamin D should not be used when i-PTH levels are < 120 pg/mL and/or serum Ca > 11 mg/dL and/or Pi > 6.5 mg/dL. The vitamin D dose should be proportional to PTH levels, with a larger dose given as a bolus (23 ug twice or three times per week). The intravenous route should be preferred in the case of very high i-PTH (> 700 pg/mL) or after 3 months of unsuccessful oral treatment. PTX should be prescribed on the basis of the clinical, biochemical, and instrumental data. A 7/8 PTX, when possible, is the most advisable procedure. Bone transplant disease (BTD) is caused by a combination of previous uremic ROD and bone lesions occurring after renal transplantation, mainly secondary to steroid effect. The main clinical result of BTD is the osteopenicosteoporotic syndrome, which frequently results in bone fractures. The most effective treatment of BTD is a reduction of the cumulative steroid dose. No strong evidence has been produced as yet for a preventive role of either bisphosphonates or vitamin D supplementation on BTD.

Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder↗

[Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of diabetic nephropathy].

The incidence of diabetes as cause of end-stage renal failure (ESRF) has significantly increased, and will continue to grow during the next few years. Moreover, diabetic nephropathy is associated with elevated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. These guidelines focus on the possible intervention strategies to prevent and treat ESRF in diabetic patients. In normoalbuminuric patients, glycated haemoglobin levels less than and equal to 7.5% is mandatory for reducing the risk of incipient nephropathy. Furthermore, blood pressure levels < 130/80 mmHg are strongly recommended. In microalbuminuric patients, glycated hemoglobin levels below 7.5% and blood pressure levels below 130/80 mmHg (120/70-75 mmHg in patients < 50 years) are recommended. Moreover, there is evidence that inhibition of the rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, either by angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) or angiotensin II receptor antagonists (AIIRA) is able to reduce the incidence of overt nephropathy, regardless of blood pressure levels. Current guidelines recommed ACE-I as the first-choice drug in type 1 diabetes, while both ACE-I and AAIRA are considered first-choice therapy in type 2 diabetes. In proteinuric patients it is uncertain whether glycemic control affects the progression of nephropathy, which in turn is dramatically influenced by blood pressure. Optimal blood pressure levels are below 130/80 mmHg (120/70-75 mmHg in patients < 50 years). In type 1 diabetes there is consensus on the renoprotective role of ACE-1. In type 2 diabetes, two recent trials demonstrated that AIIRA are more effective than conventional therapy or calcium channel blockers in slowing down the progression of nephropathy. ACE-I are indeed recommended as first-choice drugs in type 1 diabetes while AIIRA are the first-choice agents for ESRF prevention in type 2 diabetes. Dialysis treatment should be started as soon as the creatinine clearance is reduced to about 10-15 mL/min. The choice of dialysis schedule should be individualized according to clinical and adequacy criteria (CAPD weekly Kt/V > or = 2 and single HD session Kt/V > or = 1.5). Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation should be the first-choice therapeutic option in type 1 diabetes, while renal transplantation has been demonstrated to significantly improve the prognosis of type 2 diabetes patients with ESRF.

Diabetic Nephropathies↗

[Guidelines of the Italian Society of Nephrology. Peritoneal dialysis Guidelines].

The adequate dosage of peritoneal dialysis (PD) has been defined (using unrandomized and uncontrolled studies) asKt/V = 2, with a total (peritoneal + renal) creatinine clearance = 60 mL/min. The recent prospective, randomized ADEMEX study, suggests targets of 1.8 and 54 mL/min respectively. Dialysis must also be adequate to control fluid removal, phosphate levels, nutritional status, and hypertension. The targets for automated PD (APD) should be either 10% more than CAPD or similar, depending on the time of blood sample collection either immediately at the end of the automated exchanges or 6 to 8 hours after. A peritoneal equilibration test should be done 1 to 2 months after the start of PD, yearly, and when peritoneal permeability or ultrafiltration changes occurr. Residual renal function must be protected as long as possible by avoiding nephrotoxic drugs and excessive dehydration. Every effort must be taken in the attempt to maintain a good nutritional status and to diagnose as soon as possible any changes toward malnutrition. Hypertension has a high prevalence in PD patients and has negative effects on both cardiovascular status and patient survival. However, anti-hypertensive therapy should avoid hypotension, mainly in older patients, who are more at risk for cerebrovascular accident. Hyperparathiroidism must be controlled by diet, phosphate binders, and calcitriol supplement, but attention must be paid to avoid cardiac and vascular calcifications. Peritonitis and exit-site infection should be prevented by all means available. In the case of infection, empiric antibiotic therapy should be started as soon as possible and then adapted according to the antibiogram.

Catheterization↗

[Guidelines for dialysis. Replacement therapy for acute renal failure in critically ill patients].

Acute renal failure (ARF) in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) is mostly caused by ischemic or toxic injury, with a higher incidence in the latest years due to the growing number of interventions in cardiac and vascular surgery and to the general enhancement of reanimation techniques, which allow a better outcome among ICU patients. In critically ill patients, the ARF incidence reported in the literature ranges between 1 and 25%. Among ICU patients with ARF the mortality is between 40 and 65%, much more than in patients without this complication. Higher mortality rates, longer hospitalisation times and higher therapy costs demand from us an early diagnosis and treatment of ARF. Due to the lack of controlled and randomized proofs, recommended criteria for starting renal replacement therapy (RRT) in critical ARF patients might overlap with those for ESRD therapy. Moreover, randomised and controlled trials, confirming the actual efficacy of early onset of RRT on the mortality rate, are not yet available. As for stable ESRD patients, a direct relationship between dialytic doses and mortality and morbidity has been established for ARF patients. For ARF patients, as well as for ESRD patients, a minimum Kt/V of 1.2 three times a week should be ensured, although higher doses for critical ARF patients may achieve better results. The choice between intermittent (IRRT) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in these patients is still a controversial issue. In spite of the fact that most studies report a better outcome in patients treated with CRRT, a recent meta-analysis failed to demonstrate any difference on the relative risk (RR) of mortality and on the rate of renal recovery between patients treated with either IRRT or CRRT. Furthermore, the use of peritoneal dialysis for the treatment of ARF patients in ICU has not been dismissed yet; so far this is indeed considered to be the technique of choice in some specific clinical situations. The intrinsic urgency of dialysis in ARF patients entails the use of temporary central venous catheters. The internal right jugular vein is usually preferred for these catheters because of the easier insertion and the lower risk of stenosis and thrombosis. The anticoagulant procedure should be chosen on the basis of patient characteristics, treatment typology and the likelihood of effectively monitoring its action. The choice of buffers in the dialysate, mostly lactate or bicarbonate, should depend on patient characteristics; so far, however, controlled but not randomized studies do not show any significant difference in the correction of metabolic acidosis between lactate and bicarbonate.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

[Guidelines on water and solutions for dialysis. Italian Society of Nephrology].

The National Society of Nephrology has promoted the development of specific Italian Guidelines for dialysis fluids. Two previous national inquiries showed a wide variety in the type and frequency of both microbiological and chemical controls concerning dialysis water, reinforcing the need for specific standards and recommendations. An optimal water treatment system should include tap water pre-treatment and a double reverse osmosis process. Every component of the system, including the delivery of the treated water to the dialysis machines, should prevent microbiological contamination of the fluid. Regular chemical and microbiological tests and regular disinfection of the system are necessary. 1. Chemical quality (Table: see text). Treated tap water used to prepare dialysis fluid should be within European Pharmacopoeia limits at the water treatment system inlet and at the reverse osmosis outlet. In addition dialysate, concentrate and infusion fluids must comply with specific Pharmacopoeia limits. The physician in charge of the dialysis unit is advised to institute a multidisciplinary team to evaluate the requirement for added chemical controls in the presence of local hazards. 2. Microbiological quality (Table: see text). High microbiological purity of dialysis fluid--regularly verified--is a fundamental prerequisite for dialysis quality and every dialysis unit should aim as a matter of course to obtain "ultra-pure" dialysate (microbial count <0.1 UFC/mL, endotoxins <0.03 U/mL). On-line dialysate ultrafiltration and regular disinfection of dialysis machines greatly enhance microbiological purity. On-line dialysate reinfusion requires specific devices used according to corresponding instructions and to more frequent microbiological tests. Dialysis fluids for home dialysis should comply with the same chemical and bacteriological quality. The appendix reports the water treatment system's technical characteristics, sampling and analytical methods, monitoring time-tables, as well as the origin and effects of the main toxic substances. Suggestions and questions concerning these guidelines are welcome to nefrologia@sin-italy.org.

Colony Count, Microbial↗