Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Isabel T Rubio

Publications and source records attributed to Isabel T Rubio.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Availability and public reimbursement of early breast cancer care across European expert centres: a PORTRAIT from an EUSOMA initiative.

BACKGROUND: Cross-country disparities in access to guideline-recommended early breast cancer care persist across Europe. PORTRAIT is a clinician-reported, cross-sectional access study mapping availability and state reimbursement of key services across the early breast cancer pathway. METHODS: A 49-item survey covering diagnostics, pathology and genomics, systemic therapy, surgery, radiotherapy, and supportive care was emailed from June to September 2024 to multidisciplinary teams at one expert breast centre in 42 European countries. Respondents provided a consensus perspective on service availability and reimbursement. Descriptive proportions with full, partial, or no access were calculated. RESULTS: Thirty-nine countries responded (93%). Core diagnostics were widely available, but gaps persisted: MRI-guided biopsy was absent in 29% of countries and vacuum-assisted biopsy was fully reimbursed in 66%. Genomic assays were unavailable in 14% and not fully reimbursed in 35%. Public funding gaps were reported for PARP inhibitors (33%) and CDK4/6 inhibitors (26%). Immediate implant-based reconstruction and biological meshes lacked reimbursement in 21% and 33%, respectively. Despite broad availability of hypofractionated radiotherapy, 38% of countries still used per-fraction reimbursement. Psycho-oncology was limited in 35%, fertility preservation in 46%, and patient-reported outcome measures absent in 43%. CONCLUSION: Basic services are nearly universal, but gaps persist in advanced imaging, molecular testing, targeted therapies, radiotherapy reimbursement, reconstructive/oncoplastic surgery, and survivorship care. PORTRAIT identifies practical targets for policy audit, reimbursement alignment, and resource stewardship. Findings reflect clinician perspectives from expert centres, potentially representing best specialist care rather than average national care, and are not population-representative estimates or direct measures of patient outcomes.

Humans↗

[The importance of surgical margins in conservative surgery for breast cancer].

In the last few decades, conservative surgery has become an option in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The success of conservative surgery depends not only on appropriate patient selection but also on the combination of adequate surgical margins and an acceptable cosmetic result. Obtaining negative surgical margins in conservative breast surgery influences the incidence of local disease recurrence and probably overall survival. Therefore, it is essential to optimize intraoperative examination of margins as well as to explore new techniques that would achieve the greatest possible percentage of negative margins.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Surgical use of breast ultrasound.

As surgeons become increasingly more comfortable in interpreting and using US to determine benignancy and malignancy of breast lesions, use of US-guided needle biopsy. US-guided lumpectomy, percutaneous excision of benign masses, and ablation of cancers will become routine.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Intraoperative touch preparation for sentinel lymph node biopsy: a 4-year experience.

BACKGROUND: The optimal technique for intraoperative pathologic examination of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) is still controversial. Recent small series report sensitivity between 60% and 100% for various techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate our long-term experience with touch preparation cytology (TPC) and frozen section (FS) in the intraoperative examination of SLNs for breast cancer. METHODS: A total of 247 patients with operable breast cancer underwent an SLN biopsy for staging of the axilla. The SLN was identified by (99m)Tc-labeled sulfur colloid unfiltered dye, blue dye, or both and dissected, and then intraoperative TPC or FS and permanent section, or both, were performed. RESULTS: A total of 479 SLNs were submitted for TPC and permanent hematoxylin and eosin. A total of 68 SLNs were positive by hematoxylin and eosin; 65 SLNs were positive by TPC, with a false-negative rate of 5.8%. The sensitivity for TPC was 94.2%, with a false-positive rate of 0.2%. A total of 165 SLNs were submitted for FS, with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 98.6%. The false-positive rate was 1.4%, with a false-negative rate of 15.8%. CONCLUSIONS: In a large series, TPC is as accurate as FS but is simpler and faster in the detection of intraoperative metastasis in SLNs for breast cancer.

Adult↗