The sapogenin constituent of the seeds of Camellia sasanqua Thunb.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to I Yoshioka.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Thirty-one postlingually deafened adults with 22-channel cochlear implants were evaluated preoperatively using vestibular function tests, the caloric test and stabilometry. The results of caloric response were classified into two diagnostic groups: normo- or hyporeflexia and areflexia. Stabilometric recordings were made using a computerized static posturographic platform. Between the two categories of caloric response, there was a significant difference in consonant recognition, but the recognition of vowels showed no significant difference. The results of the distance of body sway in stabilometry, but not of the area, correlated to the results of consonant recognition in speech perception tests. The degree of residual vestibular function seems to be one of the indicators influencing postoperative speech recognition by cochlear implant patients.
We report 10 postlingually deafened adults in whom the electrophysical criteria for cochlear implant were fulfilled, except that they showed the following unfavorable middle ear lesions: otitis media with effusion, chronic perforative otitis media, cholesteatoma and previous radical ear operation. Staged operations for cochlear implant were performed in 8 cases, and 2 patients who had undergone radical ear operation had a single-stage operation. As a first step, one of the following was performed in each patient as surgically indicated: myringoplasty with or without mastoidectomy, mastoidectomy with reconstruction of the posterior wall of the external canal, mastoidectomy with the insertion of a ventilation tube, radical mastoidectomy or surgical cleansing of the radical cavity. From 6 months to 2.5 years after the first operation, the actual cochlear implant was performed in the second or third stage. There was no major complication as a result of electrode insertion into the cochlea and the results of speech perception in these cases were not different from those in patients with normal middle ears. In our experience, it was considered that the staged operations would enable successful cochlear implants in selected patients with pathological middle ear lesions even if they had previously been diagnosed as contraindicated for this procedure. In a case with radical ear cavity a single-stage operation could be performed when there was no cavity problem.