Search PubMedSearch

Biomedical subjects

I Tomizawa

Publications and source records attributed to I Tomizawa.

9 recordsLinked to original sources

[A clinical experience of rokitamycin on Campylobacter enteritis. Research Group of Rokitamycin on Infectious Enteritis].

Rokitamycin, a newly developed macrolide, was administered to a total of 107 cases, 16 years old or more, in order to evaluate its clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness on Campylobacter enteritis. Daily dosage of 600 mg of rokitamycin was administered orally in three divided doses for 5 days. Bacteriological and clinical efficacies were judged by the attending doctors from the evaluation criteria made by the committee and from the days required for improvement of diarrhea, defervescence and so on, respectively. Antibacterial activities against the isolates were tested of rokitamycin (RKM), erythromycin (EM), josamycin (JM) and ofloxacin (OFLX). The results were as follows; 41 symptomatic patients and 5 carriers were evaluated. Clinical efficacy (n = 41) was 100% (excellent; 34.1%, good; 65.9%). Bacteriological efficacy (n = 41) was 97.6%. Eight of the 9 cases with consecutive stool cultures were free of the bacteria on and after one day of the drug administration. Clinical usefulness (n = 46) was 97.8%. Slight epigastric pain was seen in only one as a side effect. The items of abnormal laboratory findings were 4 elevated GPT and/or GOT and one increased number of WBC in 4 cases. MIC90 of RKM, EM, JM and OFLX against 41 clinical isolates of C. jejuni were 1.56, 3.13, 3.13 and 0.78 micrograms/ml, respectively. Rokitamycin was considered clinically useful to treat Campylobacter enteritis.

Adolescent

[Comparison of clinical efficacy of rokitamycin (RKM) and ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double-blind method. The Research Committee for the Effect of Rokitamycin, Research Group for Infectious Enteritis].

The clinical efficacy, safety and usefulness of Rokitamycin (RKM), a new macrolide antibiotic, were compared with those of Ofloxacin (OFLX) for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis by a double blind method. The daily dose level of RKM or OFLX was 600 mg. They were orally administered in three divided doses for 5 days. Of 223 cases studied, 106 cases were diagnosed as Campylobacter enteritis. Ninety cases (RKM group: 50, OFLX group: 40) except for 16 excluded or drop-out cases were analysed. There was no significant difference between the two groups in any background factors. The effectiveness and usefulness was evaluated in 88 cases (RKM group: 48, OFLX group: 40). The results obtained were as follows: 1. In a total of 82 strains of Campylobacter jejuni/coli (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 40), the bacteriological efficacy rate of RKM (95.2%) was superior to that of OFLX (70.0%) with a significant difference (p = 0.006). 2. In 76 symptomatic patients (RKM group: 42, OFLX group: 34) on the day of the beginning of drug administration, the clinical efficacy rate was 97.6% in the RKM group and 85.3% in the OFLX group with no significant difference between the two groups. 3. In 88 evaluable patients, the global clinical efficacy rate of RKM (95.8%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p = 0.001). 4. Side effect was observed in 1 (1.9%) of the 54 patients in the RKM group and none of the 44 patients in the OFLX group. Slightly abnormal laboratory findings were seen in 4 (10.8%) of the 37 patients treated with RKM and 3 (9.7%) of the 31 patients treated with OFLX, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. 5. In 88 evaluable patients, the clinical usefulness of RKM (91.7%) was superior to that of OFLX (67.5%) with a significant difference (p = 0.01). From these results, RKM is considered to be a very useful agent for the treatment of Campylobacter enteritis.

Adolescent

Roles of head, gaze, and spatial orientation in the production of oscillopsia.

To clarify the factors causing oscillopsia, we investigated head movement, gaze stability, and perception under various situations. High-frequency head movements, whether they were horizontal rotations or passively induced vertical oscillations, produced blurred vision and gaze fluctuations in patients with labyrinthine loss. However, this sensation differed from the oscillopsia perceived during walking, as it did not involve a sensation of oscillation of the surrounding space or a loss of body balance. Although patients with labyrinthine loss showed large irregular head perturbations during stepping, the resultant retinal velocity slips seemed too small to explain oscillopsia. Walking while wearing horizontal reversing prisms produced loss of spatial orientation, dysequilibrium, and instability of vision in normal subjects, which resembled the symptoms found in patients with oscillopsia. The present study suggests that oscillopsia represents a perceptual inability to detect spatial orientation during head or body movements rather than a mere blurring of vision caused by deficient compensation.

Adult