Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Stiell

Publications and source records attributed to I Stiell.

15 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Combined use of clinical assessment and d-dimer to improve the management of patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis (the EDITED Study).

Suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a common problem facing emergency physicians. Timely diagnostic testing must be performed to accurately identify patients with DVT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a management strategy that combined consideration of clinical pretest probability and a d-dimer test to evaluate patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT). A prospective cohort study was performed in the emergency departments of four tertiary care institutions involving 1075 patients with suspected DVT. An emergency physician determined the pretest probability for DVT to be low, moderate, or high using an explicit clinical model. A blood sample was taken for d-dimer testing. Subsequent investigations (compression ultrasound, venography) were performed based upon the pretest probability and the d-dimer result. Patients considered at low pretest probability with negative d-dimer had no further diagnostic testing performed. All patients in whom the diagnosis of DVT was excluded by the algorithm did not receive anticoagulant therapy and were followed up for 90 days for the development of proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism. Overall, 195 (18.1%; 95% CI 15.9% to 20.6%) of 1075 patients were confirmed to have proximal DVT. Of the 882 patients who had proximal DVT excluded during the initial evaluation period using the algorithms, four (0.5%; 95% CI 0.1% to 1.2%) were subsequently diagnosed with proximal DVT in the follow-up period, including three patients in the low pretest probability group (1.0%; 95% CI 0.2% to 2.1%) who had normal d-dimer and no additional diagnostic testing performed. None of the 882 patients (0%: 95% CI 0% to 0.5%) developed pulmonary embolism in the follow-up period. A diagnostic strategy for the evaluation of patients with suspected DVT based on pretest probability and d-dimer is safe and feasible in the emergency department setting.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Excluding pulmonary embolism at the bedside without diagnostic imaging: management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism presenting to the emergency department by using a simple clinical model and d-dimer.

BACKGROUND: The limitations of the current diagnostic standard, ventilation-perfusion lung scanning, complicate the management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. We previously demonstrated that determining the pretest probability can assist with management and that the high negative predictive value of certain D -dimer assays may simplify the diagnostic process. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety of using a simple clinical model combined with D -dimer assay to manage patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected pulmonary embolism. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Emergency departments at four tertiary care hospitals in Canada. PATIENTS: 930 consecutive patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. INTERVENTIONS: Physicians first used a clinical model to determine patients' pretest probability of pulmonary embolism and then performed a D -dimer test. Patients with low pretest probability and a negative D -dimer result had no further tests and were considered to have a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism excluded. All other patients underwent ventilation-perfusion lung scanning. If the scan was nondiagnostic, bilateral deep venous ultrasonography was done. Whether further testing (by serial ultrasonography or angiography) was done depended on the patients' pretest probability and the lung scanning results. MEASUREMENTS: Patients received a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism if they had a high-probability ventilation-perfusion scan, an abnormal result on ultrasonography or pulmonary angiography, or a venous thromboembolic event during follow-up. Patients for whom the diagnosis was considered excluded were followed up for 3 months for the development of thromboembolic events. RESULTS: The pretest probability of pulmonary embolism was low, moderate, and high in 527, 339, and 64 patients (1.3%, 16.2%, and 37.5% had pulmonary embolism), respectively. Of 849 patients in whom a diagnosis of pulmonary-embolism had initially been excluded, 5 (0.6% [95% CI, 0.2% to 1.4%]) developed pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis during follow-up. However, 4 of these patients had not undergone the proper diagnostic testing protocol. In 7 of the patients who received a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, the physician had performed more diagnostic tests than were called for by the algorithm. In 759 of the 849 patients in whom pulmonary embolism was not found on initial evaluation, the diagnostic protocol was followed correctly. Only 1 (0.1% [CI, 0.0% to 0.7%]) of these 759 patients developed thromboembolic events during follow-up. Of the 437 patients with a negative D -dimer result and low clinical probability, only 1 developed pulmonary embolism during follow-up; thus, the negative predictive value for the combined strategy of using the clinical model with D -dimer testing in these patients was 99.5% (CI, 99.1% to 100%). CONCLUSION: Managing patients for suspected pulmonary embolism on the basis of pretest probability and D -dimer result is safe and decreases the need for diagnostic imaging.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Validation of a clinical decision aid to discontinue in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitations.

CONTEXT: Most patients undergoing in-hospital cardiac resuscitation do not survive to hospital discharge. In a previous study, we developed a clinical decision aid for identifying all patients undergoing resuscitation who survived to hospital discharge. OBJECTIVE: To validate our previously derived clinical decision aid. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Data from a large registry of in-hospital resuscitations at a community teaching hospital in Georgia were analyzed to determine whether patients would be predicted to survive to hospital discharge (ie, whether their arrest was witnessed or their initial cardiac rhythm was either ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation or they regained a pulse during the first 10 minutes of chest compressions). Data from 2181 in-hospital cardiac resuscitation attempts in 1987-1996 involving 1884 pulseless patients were analyzed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Comparison of predictions based on the decision aid with whether patients were actually discharged alive from the hospital. RESULTS: For 327 resuscitations (15.0%), the patient survived to hospital discharge. For 324 of these resuscitations, the patients were predicted to survive to hospital discharge (sensitivity = 99.1%, 95% confidence interval, 97.1%-99.8%). In 269 resuscitations, patients did not satisfy the decision aid and were predicted to have no chance of being discharged from the hospital. Only 3 of these patients (1.1%) were discharged from the hospital (negative predictive value = 98.9%), none of whom were able to live independently following discharge from the hospital. CONCLUSION: This decision aid can be used to help physicians identify patients who are extremely unlikely to benefit from continued resuscitative efforts.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Out-of-hospital defibrillation with automated external defibrillators: postshock analysis should be delayed.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The American Heart Association protocols for use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) recommend that a rhythm analysis be done immediately after each defibrillation attempt. However, shock is often followed by electrical silence or marginally organized electrical activity before ventricular fibrillation (VF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) recurs. The optimal timing of postshock analysis for identification of recurrent VF/VT is unknown. This study examines the time to recurrence of VF/VT after a defibrillation attempt with AED. METHODS: Over an 18-month period, all tapes from patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who received shocks at least once with an AED were screened for recurrent VF/VT. All cases come from a single emergency medical services system providing basic life support, defibrillation with AED, and intubation with an esophageal-tracheal twin-lumen airway device (Combitube) for a population of 633,511 individuals. Pediatric and traumatic cases were excluded. When VF/VT recurred within 3 minutes of the defibrillation attempt, rhythm strips were printed and included in the study. Two cardiology fellows, blinded to the study objectives, measured the time from defibrillation to recurrent VF/VT for each strip. RESULTS: Over the study period, 222 tapes from 96 patients met the inclusion criteria. Only 44 (20%) occurrences of VF/VT had recurred within 6 seconds of defibrillation, 162 (73%) at 60 seconds, and 200 (90%) at 90 seconds. CONCLUSION: Eighty percent of VF/VT recurred more than 6 seconds after defibrillation and were missed when using current American Heart Association AED protocols. Subsequent analysis should be postponed until at least 30 seconds after defibrillation. Performing 30 seconds of chest compressions after defibrillation before subsequent AED rhythm analysis would increase AED identification of VF/VT to 52%.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Management of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis in the emergency department: combining use of a clinical diagnosis model with D-dimer testing.

The management of patients presenting to hospital Emergency Departments with suspected deep vein thrombosis is problematic since urgent diagnostic imaging is at times unavailable. We evaluated the accuracy of a rapidly available D-dimer test and the potential of combining D-dimer testing with an explicit clinical model to improve the management of patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis. Two hundred and fourteen patients with suspected deep vein thrombosis presenting to the Emergency Departments of two tertiary care institutions were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. Patients were evaluated by an Emergency Physician who determined the pre-test probability for deep vein thrombosis to be either low, moderate, or high using an explicit clinical model. Patients were managed according to their pre-test probability category by specific algorithms that in all cases included venous ultrasound imaging within 24 h and a 90-day follow-up for the development of thromboembolic complications. Patients also underwent fingerstick SimpliRED(R) whole blood agglutination D-dimer testing; however, D-dimer results did not influence subsequent patient management. D-dimer had a sensitivity of 82.5% and a specificity of 84.9% for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. The observed negative predictive value of D-dimer was 96.9% (95% CI, 93.0% to 99.1%) overall, and 100% (95% CI, 96.3% to 100%) in low probability patients, 94.1% (95% CI, 83.8% to 98.8%) in moderate probability patients, and 86.7% (95% CI, 59.4% to 98.3%) in high probability patients. SimpliRED(R) D-dimer has a high negative predictive value and may be useful in excluding the diagnosis in patients at low pre-test probability for deep vein thrombosis.

Agglutination Tests↗
PubMed1999

Thrombosis in the emergency department: use of a clinical diagnosis model to safely avoid the need for urgent radiological investigation.

CONTEXT: The management of patients presenting to hospital emergency departments with suspected deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is problematic because urgent diagnostic imaging capability is sometimes unavailable. Experienced physicians using clinical skills alone can classify patients with suspected DVT into low-, moderate-, and high-probability categories. OBJECTIVES: To determine the accuracy of an explicit clinical model for the diagnosis of DVT when applied by emergency department physicians and to assess the safety and feasibility of a management strategy based on the clinical pretest probability for patients presenting to the emergency department with suspected DVT outside of regular hospital staff work hours. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was performed in the emergency departments of 2 tertiary care institutions involving 344 patients with suspected DVT. Patient conditions were evaluated by an emergency department physician who determined the pretest probability for DVT to be low, moderate, or high using an explicit clinical model. Patients for whom DVT was considered a low pretest probability were discharged from the emergency department and returned the following day for venous compression ultrasound imaging of the affected leg. Patients for whom DVT was considered a moderate pre-test probability received a single, weight-adjusted dose of subcutaneous unfractionated heparin sodium (between 12 500 and 20 000 U), were discharged from the emergency department, and returned the next morning to undergo ultrasonography. Patients for whom DVT was considered a high pretest probability were admitted to the hospital, administered intravenous unfractionated heparin, and ultrasonography was arranged within 24 hours. Patients with positive ultrasonographic findings were diagnosed with DVT, except for those with low pretest probability for whom confirmatory venography was performed. Patients with DVT excluded in the initial evaluation period did not receive anticoagulant therapy. All patients were followed up for 90 days to monitor development of thromboembolic or bleeding complications. RESULTS: Twenty-four (49.0% [95% confidence interval (CI), 34.5%-63.6%]) of 49 patients in the high-probability category, 15 (14.3% [95% CI, 8.3%-22.4%]) of 105 in the moderate-, and 6 (3.2% [95% CI, 1.2%-6.7%]) of 190 in the low-probability category were confirmed to have DVT. Overall, 45 (13.1%) of 344 patients were confirmed to have DVT. No patient developed pulmonary embolism or major bleeding complications within 48 hours of initial evaluation in the emergency department. Of the 301 patients who had DVT excluded during the initial evaluation period, only 2 (0.7% [95% CI, 0.1%-2.3%]) developed venous thromboembolic complications (calf vein thromboses in both) in the 3-month follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Using an explicit clinical model, emergency department physicians can accurately classify patients with suspected DVT into high-, moderate-, and low-probability groups. A management plan based on probability for DVT that avoids the need for urgent diagnostic imaging is safe and feasible in the emergency department setting.

Decision Trees↗
PubMed1999

Validation of the Ottawa Ankle Rules in children with ankle injuries.

OBJECTIVES: The Ottawa Ankle Rules (OAR) have been found to be 100% sensitive in adult patients with ankle injuries, and application of the OAR has resulted in a 28% reduction in the number of x-rays ordered. The objectives of this study were to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the OAR in children and to determine the potential change in x-ray utilization. METHODS: Children, aged 2-16 years, presenting to the EDs of two children's hospitals, with an ankle injury in the previous 48 hours, were enrolled. All patients were assessed by either staff physicians or fellows. X-rays were ordered according to standard clinical practice. Prior to reviewing x-rays, the physical examination was recorded on a standardized form. Positive outcomes (clinically significant) were defined as fractures with fragments > or =3 mm. Patients not x-rayed and asymptomatic at five to seven days postinjury were considered to have no significant fracture. RESULTS: Six hundred seventy patients were enrolled. The OAR were 100% sensitive (95% CI = 95% to 100%) for significant ankle fractures, with a specificity of 24% (95% CI = 20% to 28%). The OAR were 100% sensitive (95% CI = 82% to 100%) for the midfoot, with a specificity of 36% (95% CI = 29% to 43%). If the OAR had been followed, there would have been a reduction of ankle x-rays by 16% and foot x-rays by 29% without missing any clinically significant fracture. However, analysis of the two hospitals showed that if the rules had been applied, one would have a reduction in x-rays, while the other center would have an increase. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the OAR to be sensitive for detecting clinically significant (> or =3 mm) ankle and midfoot fractures in children. The application of these rules may reduce the number of x-rays ordered. A further study is required to determine the effect of using the OAR in clinical practice.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Tissue adhesive versus suture wound repair at 1 year: randomized clinical trial correlating early, 3-month, and 1-year cosmetic outcome.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the 1-year cosmetic outcome of wounds treated with octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and monofilament sutures and to correlate the early, 3-month, and 1-year cosmetic outcomes. METHODS: We prospectively randomized 136 cases of traumatic laceration to repair with octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive or 5-0 or smaller monofilament suture. A wound score was assigned by a research nurse, and validated by a second nurse blinded to the treatment, at 5 to 10 days after injury (early), 3 months, and 1 year. Standardized photographs were taken at 3 months and 1 year and shown to a cosmetic surgeon blinded to the method of closure, who rated the wounds on a validated cosmesis scale. RESULTS: We were able to examine 77 lacerations at 1 year for follow-up. No differences were found in the demographic or clinical characteristics between groups. Likewise, at 1 year no difference was found in the optimal wound scores (73% versus 68%, P =.60) or in visual analog scale cosmesis scores (69 versus 69 mm, P =.95) for octylcyanoacrylate and sutures, respectively. Agreement was poor between early and 3-month wound scores (kappa=.34; 95% confidence interval [CI],.10 to.58) but a strong association existed between 3-month and 1-year wound scores (kappa=.71; 95% CI,.52 to.90). We noted a moderate correlation between 3-month and 1-year results on the visual analog cosmesis scale (intraclass correlation,.48; 95% CI, .30 to.63). CONCLUSION: One year after wound repair, no difference is noted in the cosmetic outcomes of traumatic lacerations treated with octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and sutures. The assessment of wounds 3 months after injury and wound repair provides a good measure of long-term cosmetic outcome.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

A randomized trial comparing octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and sutures in the management of lacerations.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of a new tissue adhesive for laceration closure. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: An adult teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty patients with 136 lacerations who consented to enrollment during a 5-month period. The lacerations included all eligible nonmucosal facial lacerations, as well as selected extremity and torso lacerations (not on hands, feet, or joints). One hundred six lacerations were available for early follow-up, and 98 were available for 3-month evaluation. INTERVENTIONS: Lacerations were randomly allocated to have skin closure with octylcyanoacrylate adhesive or monofilament suture. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: A 3-month photograph of the wound was assigned a cosmesis score on a previously validated 100-mm visual analog cosmesis scale by a plastic surgeon who was unaware of the method of wound closure. RESULTS: There were no differences in the mean visual analog cosmesis scores (67 mm for octylcyanoacrylate vs 68 mm for sutures; P=.65). Similarly, there was no difference in the percentage of early (80% vs 82%; P=.80) or late (72% vs 75%; P=.74) optimal wound evaluation scores. The tissue adhesive was a faster method of wound repair (3.6 vs 12.4 minutes; P<.001) as well as being less painful (visual analog pain scores, 7.2 vs 18.0 mm; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Octylcyanoacrylate tissue adhesive effectively closes selected lacerations. This relatively painless and fast method of wound repair can replace the need for suturing several million lacerations each year.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Ottawa ankle rules.

The Ottawa ankle rule project demonstrated that more than 95% of patients with ankle injuries had radiographic examinations but that 85% of the films showed no fractures. A group of Ottawa emergency physicians developed two rules to identify clinically important fractures of the malleoli and the midfoot. Use of these rules reduced radiographic examinations by 28% for the ankle and 14% for the foot.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1995

Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and impact of introducing the Ottawa ankle rules to a large number of physicians in a wide variety of hospital and community settings over a prolonged period of time. DESIGN: Multicentre before and after controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Emergency departments of eight teaching and community hospitals in Canadian communities (population 10,000 to 3,000,000). SUBJECTS: All 12,777 adults (6288 control, 6489 intervention) seen with acute ankle injuries during two 12 month periods before and after the intervention. INTERVENTION: More than 200 physicians of varying experience were taught to order radiography according to the Ottawa ankle rules. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral for ankle and foot radiography. RESULTS: There were significant reductions in use of ankle radiography at all eight hospitals and within a priori subgroups: for all hospitals combined 82.8% control v 60.9% intervention(P < 0.001); for community hospitals 86.7% v 61.7%; (P < 0.001); for teaching hospitals 77.9% v 59.9%; (P < 0.001); for emergency physicians 82.1% v 61.6%; (P < 0.001); for family physicians 84.3% v 60.1%; (P < 0.001); and for housestaff 82.3% v 60.1%; (P < 0.001). Compared with patients without fracture who had radiography during the intervention period those who had no radiography spent less time in the emergency department (54.0 v 86.9 minutes; P < 0.001) and had lower medical charges ($70.20 v $161.60; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of fractures diagnosed after discharge from the emergency department (0.5 v 0.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of the Ottawa ankle rules proved to be feasible in a large variety of hospital and community settings. Use of the rules over a prolonged period of time by many physicians of varying experience led to a decrease in ankle radiography, waiting times, and costs without an increased rate of missed fractures. The multiphase methodological approach used to develop and implement these rules may be applied to other clinical problems.

Ankle Injuries↗
PubMed1995

Visualization of C7-T1 on portable lateral cervical spine radiographs using a lead-lined acrylic filter.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether lead-lined acrylic cervical filters can improve the quality of portable lateral cervical spine (c-spine) radiographs for trauma patients. METHODS: Twenty trauma patients who required portable c-spine x-rays had these taken with a lead filter attached to the collimator of the portable x-ray machine to improve penetration and visualization of lower cervical structures without overpenetrating upper cervical structures. The radiographs of these patients were compared with the first portable c-spine radiographs without filters for 20 controls matched for gender and injury severity. The comparison of radiographs was done by an experienced emergency physician and a neuroradiologist blinded to whether the filter was used. RESULTS: The two groups were similar for demographic and clinical characteristics. There was a significant improvement in the ability to visualize the C7-T1 level for the filter group compared with the control group (65% vs 30%, p < 0.05). Agreement between the physicians was excellent (kappa = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.60-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Lead-lined acrylic filters improve the ability to visualize the lower c-spine in trauma patients.

Adult↗