Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Shimoyama

Publications and source records attributed to I Shimoyama.

56 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Statistical analysis of short-latency flash visual evoked cortical potentials with noncephalic reference.

Most of the reports on visual evoked cortical potentials have dealt with peak latency or amplitude. An early negative deflection at about 20 ms, however, was reported to coincide with the initial signal to the monkey cortex. We studied the initial signal to the human cortex in nine volunteers by taking into account prestimulus fluctuation. Visual evoked cortical potentials were recorded for an interval 10 ms before and 92.4 ms, after a flash stimulus, by means of a neck reference. The amplitudes of the response before the flash stimulus and at each succeeding 5-ms interval after the stimulus were tested with a t-test. The grand average of the visual evoked cortical potentials showed an initial negative peak at 22.3 ms over the frontal poles, a second negative peak at 52.4 ms over the central area, and a third negative peak at 74.7 ms over the occipital areas. The topographic maps corresponding to the peaks of the visual evoked cortical potentials were the same as those of the dynamic t-values. The visual evoked cortical potential and t-values with the bipolar and source derivations showed a marked response beginning around 40 ms over the posterior head. This statistical analysis is an easy method to standardize evoked potentials and to identify deflections.

Adult↗

Binocular interactions in visual evoked cortical potentials with two light-emitting-diodes.

Binocular interaction for a central field was studied with transient scalp visual evoked cortical potentials (VECPs) using two light-emitting-diodes. VECPs were obtained for binocular and monocular visions with dominant and non-dominant eyes, and arithmetical sums of monocular VECPs with dominant and non-dominant eyes were calculated. Amplitude and latency of remarkable initial three peaks were tested with the multivariate analysis of variance. Significant differences were noted among the four VECPs. Pairwise comparisons showed that (1) the amplitude of the first peak for the binocular VECPs was larger than that for the monocular VECPs but smaller than that for the sum-VECPs; the latency of the first peaks for the binocular VECPs were earlier than that for the monocular VECPs with the non-dominant eye; (2) the amplitude of the first negative peak for the sum-VECPs was larger than that for the binocular VECPs, and the peak latency for the sum-VECPs showed later than that for the binocular VECPs; (3) the amplitude of the second positive peak for the binocular VECPs and monocular VECPs with the dominant eye was larger than that with the non-dominant eye, but smaller for the binocular VECPS than that for the sum-VECPs; the latency for the binocular VECPs showed earlier than that for the monocular VECPs with the dominant eye and for the sum-VECPs. Binocular suppression was noted in amplitude for the three peaks and binocular facilitation was noted in latency for the latter two peaks.

Adult↗