Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I S Fentiman

Publications and source records attributed to I S Fentiman.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Risk factors for recurrence and metastasis after breast-conserving therapy for ductal carcinoma-in-situ: analysis of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 10853.

PURPOSE: In view of the increasing number of patients treated with breast-conserving treatment (BCT) for ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS), risk factors for recurrence and metastasis should be identified. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinical and pathologic characteristics from patients with DCIS in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer trial 10853 (excision with or without radiotherapy) were related to the risk of recurrence. Pathologic features were derived from a central review of 863 of the 1,010 randomized cases (85%). The median follow-up was 5.4 years. RESULTS: Factors associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in the multivariate analysis were young age (< or = 40 years) (hazard ratio, 2.14; P =.02), symptomatic detection of DCIS (hazard ratio, 1.80; P =.008), growth pattern (solid and cribriform) (hazard ratios, 2.67 and 2.69, respectively; P =.012), involved margins (hazard ratio, 2.07; P =.0008), and treatment by local excision alone (hazard ratio, 1.74; P =.009). The risk of invasive recurrence was not related to the histologic type of DCIS (P =.63), but the risk of distant metastasis was significantly higher in poorly differentiated DCIS compared with well-differentiated DCIS (hazard ratio, 6.57; P =.01). CONCLUSION: Patients with poorly differentiated DCIS have a high risk of distant metastasis after invasive local recurrence. Margin status is the most important factor in the success of BCT for DCIS; additionally, young age and symptomatic detection of DCIS have negative prognostic value.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Variations in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in a multicentre, randomized clinical trial (EORTC 10853) investigating breast-conserving treatment for DCIS.

AIMS: To evaluate the diagnostic and therapeutic procedures which were followed in a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized clinical trial investigating the role of radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment (BCT) for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. METHODS: The medical files of 824 of the 1010 randomized patients (82%) were reviewed during site visits to 30 participating institutes. RESULTS: Large variations occurred, particularly in the surgical procedures and histopathological work-up which were performed. Important risk factors like tumour size and margin status were poorly quantified in the medical files. CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the need for establishing uniform guidelines for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures for DCIS, and for clearly defined risk factors for recurrence after BCT for DCIS. Because of its randomized nature, the main question of the trial, i.e. the effect of radiotherapy on the risk of local recurrence, will not be influenced by variation. The risk of local recurrence in itself, and hence the success of BCT for DCIS, may however be influenced by the quality of the initial procedures that were conducted.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2001

Assessment of breast problems.

Patients with discrete breast lumps, irrespective of age, should be referred for assessment. Premenopausal women with equivocal lumps can be re-checked two weeks later and, if still present or dubious, sent to a breast clinic. Almost all women with breast pain do not need referral unless the symptoms are severe or prolonged. Careful examination will detect those individuals with underlying rib cage pain who can be reassured and given analgesics, if necessary, but not referred. Blood-containing nipple discharge is an indication for referral but such cases can be reassured that, in the absence of a lump, it is unlikely they have breast cancer. Most women who suspect their family history of breast cancer places them at increased risk can be safely reassured and do not need to be kept under surveillance. All those women who are eligible for the NHS screening programme should be encouraged to attend when invited.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2001

Benign breast disease.

Benign breast disorders (BBD), classified by the ANDI system (aberrations of normal development and involution), constitute the major workload in breast clinics. Breast pain (mastalgia) is classified as cyclical, and non-cyclical extramammary causes such as ribircage pain have to be identified. Most patients need reassurance alone but those with moderate/severe pain present for > 6 months may need treatment: randomised trials have shown danazol, bromocriptine and tamoxifen to be effective. Fibroadenoma is the commonest benign solid lump in women aged 15-30 years. The diagnosis must be confirmed by triple assessment. Cysts occur usually in women of middle to late reproductive life. After ultrasound has confirmed the lump as cystic, it can be aspirated. Nipple discharge should be tested for the presence of haemoglobin (Hb). Those with HB+ discharge may require microdochectomy for treatment and diagnosis, common causes being duct papilloma and duct ectasia. Breast abscesses may occur during lactation or in women with duct ectasia and are treated by incision or aspiration together with antibiotics.

Breast Diseases↗
PubMed2001

Fixed and modifiable risk factors for breast cancer.

Likely pathogenesis of breast cancer is in two phases, initiation and promotion. Initiating factors include ionising irradiation, dietary factors and possibly alcohol consumption causing DNA mutations uncorrected by repair mechanisms. Subsequent promotional factors include exposure to oestrogens, reduced by late menarche, early pregnancy and lactation and increased by nulliparity, oral contraceptive use and hormone replacement therapy. Only 5% of breast cancers result from inherited genetic mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2, but individuals with such mutations have a high risk (66-80%) of developing the disease. Most patients with benign breast problems are not at increased risk of breast cancer, but those with atypical epithelial hyperplasia have an increased risk and should be kept under surveillance or asked to participate in trials of prevention.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing breast-conserving therapy with mastectomy: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 10801 trial.

BACKGROUND: Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) has been shown to be as effective as mastectomy in the treatment of tumors 2 cm or smaller. However, evidence of its efficacy, over the long term, in patients with tumors larger than 2 cm is limited. From May 1980 to May 1986, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer carried out a randomized, multicenter trial comparing BCT with modified radical mastectomy for patients with tumors up to 5 cm. In this analysis, we investigated whether the treatments resulted in different overall survival, time to distant metastasis, or time to locoregional recurrence. METHODS: Of 868 eligible breast cancer patients randomly assigned to the BCT arm or to the modified radical mastectomy arm, 80% had a tumor of 2.1-5 cm. BCT comprised lumpectomy with an attempted margin of 1 cm of healthy tissue and complete axillary clearance, followed by radiotherapy to the breast and a supplementary dose to the tumor bed. The median follow-up was 13.4 years. All P values are two-sided. RESULTS: At 10 years, there was no difference between the two groups in overall survival (66% for the mastectomy patients and 65% for the BCT patients; P =.11) or in their distant metastasis-free rates (66% for the mastectomy patients and 61% for the BCT patients; P =.24). The rate of locoregional recurrence (occurring before or at the same time as distant metastasis) at 10 years did show a statistically significant difference (12% of the mastectomy and 20% of the BCT patients; P =. 01). CONCLUSIONS: BCT and mastectomy demonstrate similar survival rates in a trial in which the great majority of the patients had stage II breast cancer.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed2000

Radiotherapy in breast-conserving treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: first results of the EORTC randomised phase III trial 10853. EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and EORTC Radiotherapy Group.

BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast is a disorder that has become more common since it may manifest as microcalcifications that can be detected by screening mammography. Since selected women with invasive cancer can be treated safely with breast conservation therapy it is paradoxical that total mastectomy has remained the standard treatment for DCIS. We did a randomised phase III clinical trial to investigate the role of radiotherapy after complete local excision of DCIS. METHODS: Between 1986 and 1996, women with clinically or mammographically detected DCIS measuring less than or equal to 5 cm were treated by complete local excision of the lesion and then randomly assigned to either no further treatment (n=503) or to radiotherapy (n=507; 50 Gy in 5 weeks to the whole breast). The median duration of follow-up was 4.25 years (maximum 12.0 years). All analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 500 patients were followed up in the no further treatment group and 502 in the radiotherapy group. In the no further treatment group 83 women had local recurrence (44 recurrences of DCIS, and 40 invasive breast cancer). In the radiotherapy group 53 women had local recurrences (29 recurrences of DCIS, and 24 invasive breast cancer). The 4-year local relapse-free was 84% in the group treated with local excision alone compared with 91% in the women treated by local excision plus radiotherapy (log rank p=0.005; hazard ratio 0.62). Similar reductions in the risk of invasive (40%, p=0.04) and non-invasive (35%, p=0.06) local recurrence were seen. CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy after local excision for DCIS, as compared with local excision alone, reduced the overall number of both invasive and non-invasive recurrences in the ipsilateral breast at a median follow-up of 4.25 years.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Urinary androgens and breast cancer risk: results from a long-term prospective study based in Guernsey.

Between 1961 and 1967 a cohort of over 5000 women volunteered for a prospective study to determine the relationship between the urinary androgen metabolites, androsterone (A) and aetiocholanolone (E), and risk of breast cancer. During the first 10 years of the study the concentration of urinary A and E was determined in 1887 of the urine specimens. In 1971 we reported that subnormal amounts of urinary A and E were associated with a significantly increased risk of breast cancer. The cohort has been followed regularly during the 37 years since inception of the study and, by May 1998, 248 women had been diagnosed with breast cancer. Urinary androgen metabolites had been measured in 116 of these cases. Analysis of these data confirmed that women diagnosed in the first decade of the study were more likely to have low levels of urinary androgen metabolites. In the following decades, however, those who developed breast cancer were more likely to have manifested an increased A and E excretion. The reversal in the relationship between androgen metabolite excretion and risk suggests that age, or probably more importantly, menopausal status at diagnosis is an important modifying factor. Dichotomizing at age 50 it was found that in the younger age group (predominantly premenopausal) the rate ratios in the lowest tertile of A or E excretion were two- to threefold greater than for those in the highest tertile (chi2(1) = 3.57; P = 0.06: chi2(1) = 4.70; P = 0.03 for A and E respectively). In contrast, in the older age group comprising predominantly post-menopausal women, the rate ratios associated with the lowest tertile of A or E were half that of those in the highest tertile (chi2(1) = 4.10; P = 0.04; chi2(1) = 8.72; P = 0.003 for A and E respectively). This suggests that there may be different endocrine promotional factors for pre-and post-menopausal breast cancer. Hormonal risk factors may vary during the lifetime of an individual woman and this may have profound consequences for prevention strategies.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Management of breast pain.

Mastalgia is a common problem among premenopausal women, and those with severe and protracted symptoms merit treatment. A range of non-hormonal and hormonal agents is available for symptom control among mastalgia sufferers but many are ineffective. Tamoxifen is the most effective and least toxic agent available for the treatment of severe chronic breast pain. Dosage with tamoxifen must be tailored to individual patient requirement and symptom control balanced against troublesome side-effects.

Breast Diseases↗
PubMed1999

Survival of premenopausal breast carcinoma patients in relation to menstrual cycle timing of surgery and estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor status of the primary tumor.

BACKGROUND: Premenopausal breast carcinoma patients who undergo tumor excision during the follicular phase of their menstrual cycle may have a significantly worse prognosis than those whose tumors are excised in other phases of the menstrual cycle. METHODS: Outcome was determined in a series of 112 premenopausal women with operable breast carcinoma in relation to the timing of surgery within the menstrual cycle and the estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status of their primary tumors as determined by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: Those patients with ER positive tumors who underwent surgery in the early and luteal phase of the cycle had a significantly better survival than women with ER negative tumors (chi-square test = 15.56; P < 0.001). This also was true for PR status (chi-square test = 18.21; P < 0.001). After follicular phase surgery, tumor receptor status had no effect on overall survival. Patients with the best prognosis had ER/PR positive tumors excised on Days 0-2 and 13-32 but even those women with ER or PR negative tumors removed during the luteal phase of their menstrual cycle fared better than patients whose tumors were removed during the follicular phase. CONCLUSIONS: There was a better survival rate for patients with both ER/PR positive and negative tumors treated during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle. This could be the result of progesterone acting on the surrounding peritumoral normal tissue, thereby exerting a straitjacket effect and improving cohesion of the primary carcinoma. Unopposed estrogen in the follicular phase of the cycle may enable more tumor emboli to escape and successfully establish micrometastases.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrence after mastectomy or breast conserving therapy in two randomised trials (EORTC 10801 and DBCG-82TM). EORTC Breast Cancer Cooperative Group and the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group.

The aim of this study was to investigate and compare the prognosis after treatment for loco-regional recurrences (LR) after (modified) radical mastectomy (MRM) or breast conserving therapy (BCT), in terms of overall survival and time to subsequent LR, in patients originally treated in two European randomised trials. In EORTC trial 10801 and DBCG trial 82-TM, 1,807 patients with stage I and II breast cancer were randomised to receive MRM or BCT from 1980 to 1989. All patients with a LR in these trials were analysed for survival and time to subsequent LR after salvage treatment. Of these, 133 patients had their LR as a first event, the majority within 5 years after initial treatment. The prognostic significance for survival and time to subsequent LR after salvage treatment was analysed in uni-, and multivariate analyses for a number of original tumour- and recurrence-related variables. After salvage treatment of LR after MRM or BCT, actuarial survival curves and the actuarial locoregional control curves were similar. The 5-year survival rates were 58% and 59% and the 5-year subsequent loco-regional control rates 62% and 63%, respectively. In a multivariate analysis, pN category (P = 0.03), pT category (P = 0.01) and vascular invasion (P = 0.02) of the primary tumour were the only independent prognostic factors for survival, whereas extensive LR (P < 0.001), interval < or = 2 years (P < 0.002) and pN+ at primary treatment (P = 0.004) were significant predictive factors for time to subsequent LR. The type of original treatment (MRM or BCT) did not have any prognostic impact. It is concluded that the survival and time to subsequent LR after treatment for an early loco-regional recurrence after MRM or BCT was similar in these two European randomised trials. This suggests that both after MRM and BCT an early LR is an indicator of a biologically aggressive tumour; early loco-regional relapse carries a poor prognosis and salvage treatment only cures a limited number of patients, whether treated by MRM or BCT originally.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The influence on survival of delay in the presentation and treatment of symptomatic breast cancer.

The aim of this study was to examine the possible influence on survival of delays prior to presentation and/or treatment among women with breast cancer. Duration of symptoms prior to hospital referral was recorded for 2964 women who presented with any stage of breast cancer to Guy's Hospital between 1975 and 1990. Median follow-up is 12.5 years. The impact of delay (defined as having symptoms for 12 or more weeks) on survival was measured from the date of diagnosis and from the date when the patient first noticed symptoms to control for lead-time bias. Thirty-two per cent (942/2964) of patients had symptoms for 12 or more weeks before their first hospital visit and 32% (302/942) of patients with delays of 12 or more weeks had locally advanced or metastatic disease, compared with only 10% (210/2022) of those with delays of less than 12 weeks (P < 0.0001). Survival measured both from the date of diagnosis (P < 0.001) and from the onset of the patient's symptoms (P = 0.003) was worse among women with longer delays. Ten years after the onset of symptoms, survival was 52% for women with delays less than 12 weeks and 47% for those with longer delays. At 20 years the survival rates were 34% and 24% respectively. Furthermore, patients with delays of 12-26 weeks had significantly worse survival rates than those with delays of less than 12 weeks. Multivariate analyses indicated that the adverse impact of delay in presentation on survival was attributable to an association between longer delays and more advanced stage. However, within individual stages, longer delay had no adverse impact on survival. Analyses based on 'total delay (i.e. the interval between a patient first noticing symptoms and starting treatment) yielded very similar results in terms of survival to those based on delay to first hospital visit (delay in presentation).

Adult↗