Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I N Olver

Publications and source records attributed to I N Olver.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Rothmund-Thomson syndrome and tolerance of chemoradiotherapy.

Rothmund-Thomson syndrome (RTS) is a rare disorder with a predisposition for cutaneous and non-cutaneous malignancy. It is speculated that ultraviolet (UV) sensitivity and deficient DNA repair may account for this predisposition and influence the tolerance of chemoradiotherapeutic management. A case is reported of the management of an RTS patient with squamous cell carcinoma of the tongue who demonstrated increased radiosensitivity and tissue intolerance to chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase I trial of cremophor EL with bolus doxorubicin.

Cremophor EL (cremophor), a component of the paclitaxel formulation, can potentially reverse P-glycoprotein-associated multidrug resistance. A Phase I trial of cremophor as a 6-h infusion every 3 weeks was performed with bolus doxorubicin (50 mg/m2). The cremophor dose was escalated from 1 to 60 ml/m2. A standard paclitaxel premedication was given before cremophor. Using a bioassay, potentially active cremophor levels (> or = 1 microl/ml) were measured in plasma from patients receiving cremophor doses of 30, 45, and 60 ml/m2. A cross-over design was used to assess the influence of cremophor 30 ml/m2 on the pharmacokinetics of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol. The plasma area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) of doxorubicin increased from 1448 +/- 350 to 1786 +/- 264 ng/ml x h (P = 0.02) in the presence of cremophor, whereas the AUC of doxorubicinol increased from 252 +/- 104 to 486 +/- 107 ng/ml x h (P = 0.02). This pharmacokinetic interaction was associated with significantly increased neutropenia. With reduction of the doxorubicin dose to 35 mg/m2, the cremophor dose was increased to 60 ml/m2. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in two of six patients after 45 ml/m2 and two of four patients after 60 ml/m2, which included febrile neutropenia and grade III cremophor-related toxicities of rash, pruritus, headache, and hypotension. All patients who received 45 ml/m2 cremophor reached plasma levels > or = 1.5 microl/ml, but at 60 ml/m2, only two of four reached this level, and the calculated plasma clearance of cremophor was significantly faster at this dose. One patient with hepatoma resistant to epirubicin achieved a near-complete response. Cremophor 45 ml/m2 over 6 h with 35 mg/m2 doxorubicin is recommended for further studies. The pharmacokinetic interaction between cremophor and doxorubicin is quantitatively similar to that described in trials of paclitaxel with doxorubicin and suggests that the cremophor in the paclitaxel formulation is responsible.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Australian multicentre phase II trial of paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer and prior chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel given as a three-hour infusion in patients with metastatic breast cancer which had progressed despite hormonal therapy and/or chemotherapy. DESIGN AND SETTING: Multicentre phase it trial undertaken in five major centres or hospitals in Sydney, Melbourne and Adelaide. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 50 patients with clinically or radiologically measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer recruited between March and July 1993. All had received prior chemotherapy, with subsequent disease progression. INTERVENTION: Paclitaxel (Anzatax, Faulding) was given at a dose of 175 mg/m2 intravenously over three hours every three weeks for up to nine courses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Response rate (partial or complete); duration of progression-free survival; duration of survival; and adverse reactions. RESULTS: Patients had a median age of 51 years; 62% had received at least two prior drug regimens for metastatic breast cancer and 48% had anthracycline-resistant tumours. A median of six paclitaxel courses was given per patient. Overall response rate was 18% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 9%-31%), with complete responses in four patients (8%). In patients with anthracycline-resistant tumours, response rate was 25% (95% CI, 10%-47%). Response was not influenced by extent of prior treatment. Estimated median progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI, 3.2-6.0 months) and estimated median survival was 6.3 months (95% CI, 6.2-10.3 months). Treatment was well tolerated, with neutropenia the major toxic effect. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel (three-hour infusion) has significant activity in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer, including anthracycline-resistant tumours.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Radioenhancement by cisplatin with accelerated fractionated radiotherapy in a human tumour xenograft.

The aim of the present study was to investigate whether cisplatin would enhance the radioresponse of a human tumour xenograft when given in different schedules combined with accelerated fractionated radiation therapy. A human squamous carcinoma of the hypopharynx, FaDu, was grown in the thigh of athymic nude mice. Tumours were exposed to twice-daily 2-Gy fractions, applied 6 h apart over 2 weeks, 5 days a week, alone or combined with cisplatin given at maximally tolerated doses in three different schedules: (1) i.p. as a single bolus (SB) or (2) i.p. as a daily bolus at 30 min before the first daily radiation fraction or (3) s.c. as a continuous infusion through a mini-osmotic pump over 13 days, commencing 24 h prior to the first daily radiation fraction. The end point for the study was tumour growth delay (TGD), calculated as the difference between the delay in regrowth to 200% of the initial tumour size in treated versus control mice. SB cisplatin plus radiation showed only an additive effect on TGD, whereas daily-bolus and continuous-infusion cisplatin demonstrated a greater than additive effect when combined with accelerated fractionated radiation in this human tumour model. Cisplatin appears to be especially beneficial as a radiation enhancer when given throughout the course of radiation.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Phase I study of paclitaxel and oral etoposide in previously untreated non-small-cell and extensive small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase I study of paclitaxel and oral etoposide was performed to determine the safety of the combination in patients with advanced lung cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy, and to identify a dose for phase II testing. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), who had received no prior chemotherapy were treated with intravenous paclitaxel given as a three hour infusion (starting dose 100 mg/m2) and oral etoposide, 100 mg daily for five days. Two schedules of administration were used with the paclitaxel given on day 1 (schedule A) or day 5 (schedule B) of a 21 day cycle. RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were entered on the study, four of whom had SCLC. All patients were evaluable for toxicity. The maximum tolerated dose was paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1, in combination with oral etoposide 100 mg daily on days 1 to 5 (schedule A). The dose limiting toxicities were mucositis, myalgia, diarrhoea, and paraesthesiae. Using schedule B, myelosuppression, with febrile neutropenia was dose limiting at a paclitaxel dose of 160 mg/m2. Amongst the 45 patients with NSCLC there were three complete and eight partial responses (24%; 95% CI 13% 40%), while there was one complete response in the four patients with SCLC. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 on day 1, with oral etoposide 100 mg daily on days 1 to 5 can be administered safely, and is the recommended dose for phase II studies.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1997

Phase I dose intensification study of 2-weekly epirubicin with GM-CSF in advanced cancer.

This study investigated dose intensification of epirubicin administered as a 2-weekly regimen with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) support. The aim was to define the maximally tolerated dose of epirubicin and to assess the efficacy of GM-CSF to ameliorate its toxicity. Patients with anthracycline-responsive advanced malignancies were eligible. Six dose levels, commencing at 90 mg/m2, of epirubicin administered every 2 weeks for four courses were planned with GM-CSF 10 micrograms/kg/day administered for 10 days from the second day of each course. Six patients were to be entered at each dose level, and escalation to the next level was based upon toxicity criteria. Twelve patients were entered, six at dose level 1 (90 mg/m2) and six at dose level 2 (120 mg/m2). Prospectively defined haematological dose-limiting toxicities were noted in one patient at dose level 1 and in five patients at dose level 2. Further dose escalation was not attempted. Significant nonhaematological toxicities included febrile neutropenia in two and four patients at dose levels 1 and 2, respectively. This study has demonstrated that epirubicin can be safely administered at 2 week intervals with GM-CSF at a dose of 90 mg/m2, equivalent to the previously reported maximum tolerated dose intensity of 45 mg/m2/week. Neutropenia was dose-limiting despite the use of GM-CSF.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1997

A phase II trial of cisplatin and interferon alpha 2b in patients with advanced bladder cancer.

Twenty-two patients with advanced transitional cell bladder cancer were treated in a phase II trial exploring the possible synergy of cisplatin and interferon alpha 2b. Of the 20 evaluable patients, 7 (35%) had a partial response to the treatment, and only 6 patients were able to complete the full planned six cycles of treatment. Response rates, duration of responses, and overall survival of our patients are not superior to those expected by cisplatin alone.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

Paclitaxel as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. The Taxol Investigational Trials Group, Australia and New Zealand.

When administered as a single agent in pretreated patients with advanced breast cancer, paclitaxel (Taxol) exhibits remarkable antitumor activity. This trial was undertaken to compare paclitaxel with standard chemotherapy as front-line therapy for this disease. Patients with measurable or evaluable metastatic breast cancer, no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 were randomized to receive paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 intravenously over 3 hours for eight cycles (6 months) or standard treatment with oral cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan) 100 mg/m2/d days 1 through 14, intravenous methotrexate 40 mg/ m2 days 1 and 8, intravenous 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, and oral prednisolone 40 mg/m2/d (CMFP) days 1 through 14 for six cycles (6 months). Patients whose disease progressed or relapsed were recommended to receive second-line epirubicin. Accrual has been completed with 208 patients randomized, but a preplanned interim analysis of the first 100 patients is reported here. Analysis of quality of life, assessed by a linear analogue scale and overall quality of life indices, is ongoing. Objective response occurred in 31% (confidence interval, 19% to 45%) with paclitaxel and 35% (confidence interval, 22% to 51%) with CMFP with stable disease in an additional 33% and 29%, respectively. Median time to progression was 5.5 months for paclitaxel-treated patients and 6.4 months for those given CMFP, with median survival durations of 17.3 and 11.3 months, respectively. Grades 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 64% of patients treated with paclitaxel and in 63% treated with CMFP. However, febrile neutropenia was the primary reason for hospitalization in 1% of paclitaxel courses, compared with 8% of CMFP courses. Nine percent of the patients had major infections with CMFP, but none were seen with paclitaxel. Moderate or severe mucositis occurred in 13% of paclitaxel-treated and 27% of CMFP-treated patients. Alopecia and peripheral neuropathy were more common with paclitaxel. Quality of life assessments in the first 100 patients suggest better overall results on paclitaxel treatment as compared with CMFP. Preliminary analyses suggest that single-agent paclitaxel is well tolerated and provides comparable control of metastatic cancer to CMFP combination therapy when used as front-line treatment.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1996

Preliminary results of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for non-AIDS primary central nervous system lymphoma. Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG).

OBJECTIVES: To assess the results and toxicity of a regimen of combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with non-AIDS-related primary central nervous system lymphoma. DESIGN: Prospective assessment of patients treated with intravenous methotrexate followed by cranial irradiation between 1 January 1991 and 31 July 1995. PATIENTS AND SETTING: Patients attending nine Australian and New Zealand centres who were eligible and gave informed consent. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Probability of survival at two years, and acute toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were treated. Their probability of survival at two years was 70% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45%-95%). The acute toxicity of the regimen was minimal in most cases, but one patient died of treatment-related neutropenia and subsequent sepsis. Two patients showed progression of pre-existing short term memory disturbance, without evidence of recurrent lymphoma. CONCLUSIONS: Combined-modality therapy improves survival in patients with non-AIDS-related primary central nervous system lymphoma, at least in the short term, relative to radiotherapy alone. The combined regimen resulted in only moderate treatment-related morbidity. Longer follow-up is required for a more accurate estimate of late effects and long-term survival prospects.

Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed1996

An open multicentre study of tropisetron for cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting.

OBJECTIVES: (i) To assess the efficacy and tolerability of tropisetron when used for acute and delayed cisplatin-induced emesis. (ii) To investigate whether dexamethasone added to tropisetron improves the control of emesis for patients who do not achieve a complete response to tropisetron alone. (iii) To assess sex of the patient and alcohol intake as prognostic factors for nausea and vomiting. DESIGN: A prospective open label phase II trial over one or two cycles of chemotherapy. Data collection was based on observed response and patients' self-reporting. SETTING: Twenty Australian tertiary care hospitals in 1994. PATIENTS: 102 male and female patients from 18 to 75 years with histologically confirmed malignancy receiving their first chemotherapy containing > or = 50 mg/m2 cisplatin. INTERVENTION: In Cycle 1 tropisetron 5 mg was given intravenously before chemotherapy on Day 1, then 5 mg orally before breakfast on Days 2 to 6. In Cycle 2, dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously on Day 1, then 8 mg orally on Days 2 to 6 could be added to tropisetron if a complete antiemetic response had not been achieved in Cycle 1. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of vomiting episodes and severity of nausea for 6 days after chemotherapy; severity of side effects; patient satisfaction with chemotherapy treatment; oestradiol levels in women; and past alcohol consumption in men and women. RESULTS: (i) The complete response rate (CR) for acute emesis in Cycle 1 was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 54%-72%), with 84% (95% CI, 76%-90%) having < or = 2 vomits. The CR for delayed emesis was 24% (95% CI, 17%-32%). The CR for acute nausea was 56% (95% CI, 47%-66%), with 97% (95% CI, 91%-99%) having < or = 2 nausea episodes. The CR for delayed nausea was 21% (95% CI, 14%-30%). Seventy-one patients received Cycle 2. The main side effects were headache (20 patients) and constipation (16 patients). The control of acute emesis was rated as "good" or "very good" by 68% of investigators; 85% rated the tolerability of treatment as "good" or "very good". Treatment was rated as "very satisfactory" or "satisfactory" by 52% of patients. (ii) The CR for acute emesis with dexamethasone added was 78% (95% CI, 64%-88%). (iii) Women with lower oestradiol levels had better control of emesis, although this difference was not statistically significant. Chronic alcohol intake and binge drinking were strongly associated with a complete acute antiemetic response. CONCLUSIONS: Tropisetron was effective for acute cisplatin-induced emesis; adding dexamethasone enhanced this response. Both single and combined therapy had less effect on delayed emesis. The impact of alcohol on control of emesis is a chronic rather than acute phenomenon which requires prospective testing.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Concurrent radiotherapy and continuous ambulatory infusion 5-fluorouracil in advanced head and neck cancer.

Patients with locally advanced stage 3 or 4 recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck received 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 200 or 300 mg/m2/day by prolonged ambulatory infusion concomitantly with radiotherapy (60-66 Gy) to the primary site and neck nodes in 30-33 fractions at five fractions per week, boosting to smaller volumes after 60 Gy. Of 39 patients, the complete response rate was 82% (95% CI: 67-93%). The estimated percentage without failure at 2 years was 59% (S.E. 8%) and at 4 years was 50% (S.E. 8%). Estimated head and neck cancer specific survival was 64% (S.E. 8%) at 2 years and 52% (S.E. 8%) at 4 years. Acute toxicities included moist desquamation in 49% and dry desquamation in 28%, confluent mucositis in 56% and patchy mucositis in 44%. Late effects, more than 6 months after completing treatment, assessed in 35 patients, included severe salivary dysfunction in 3 patients and moderate in 21, severe osteonecrosis in 4 patients and moderate toxicity in subcutaneous tissues in 13, skin in 3 and mucosa in 2 patients. It is feasible to give continuous 5-FU concurrently with radiotherapy in locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancer, albeit with increased toxicity. The response rate and survival obtained in this trial justify further investigation of the combined treatment in a randomised trial.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Antiemetic study methodology: recommendations for future studies.

The methodology of future antiemetic studies will reflect the need to address the problems identified in current studies. New preclinical information on the mechanisms of emesis and antiemetic action will allow more rational clinical study design. Prior to large randomized studies, phase I and II trials should define the minimum effective dose of an antiemetic which may differ according to the strength of the emetic stimulus. The most convenient route of administration and schedule should also be sought in early phase trials. New endpoints such as cost-effectiveness should be incorporated into phase III studies, which should also serve as vehicles for further studies of prognostic factors. Problem areas such as delayed emesis should be specifically targeted in future trials. Patients must evaluate the overall benefit of a new antiemetic regimen.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Phase II trial of a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the antitumor activity and toxicity of paclitaxel administered as a 3-hour infusion in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-one patients with advanced measurable or assessable NSCLC and performance status 0 to 2 who had not received prior chemotherapy were treated with paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 over 3 hours with premedication. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of nine cycles. Most patients had prior radiotherapy (57%), extrathoracic metastatic disease (65%), and measurable disease (75%). Twenty-two percent had previously untreated stage III disease. RESULTS: The objective response rate was five of 51 (10%; 95% confidence interval, 3% to 21%). No subgroup with a higher response rate could be identified. There were no complete responses (CRs) and all responses lasted less than 5 months. Treatment was well tolerated with brief World Health Organization (WHO) grade IV neutropenia in only 16% of patients. Grade III/IV myalgia/athralgia occurred in 22% of patients. No significant hypersensitivity reactions occurred. CONCLUSION: The antitumor activity of this dose and schedule appears inferior to that reported in previously published phase II trials in NSCLC that used higher doses of paclitaxel infused over 24 hours, although confidence intervals for response overlap. Determining the optimal dose and schedule for using paclitaxel in NSCLC requires further investigation, and these results should caution against using shorter infusions outside appropriate clinical trials.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Impact of an information and consent form on patients having chemotherapy.

Of 100 patients having chemotherapy who were given a written information and consent form, only 34 understood the purpose of the form and only one considered it the major source of information; 75 patients could not name any of their drugs, 26 did not know the goal of therapy and only 15 remembered all of four general side effects. Such forms may not satisfy the requirements of informed consent.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

A phase I and pharmacokinetics study of prolonged ambulatory-infusion carboplatin.

A total of 18 patients received 6-week ambulatory infusions of carboplatin in groups at dose levels of 14, 28, 35 and 42 mg/m2 per day. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression. At 42 mg/m2, three of four patients had WHO grade 4 and one of four had grade 3 neutropenia, whereas two patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. At 35 mg/m2, two of five patients had grade 3 neutropenia, whereas one had grade 4 and two had grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematological toxicities were predominantly gastrointestinal, with 3 of 18 patients experiencing grade 3 emesis. Total and ultrafiltrable platinum (UFPt) were assayed by flameless atomic absorption spectrometry in weekly and post-infusion plasma and urine samples. In plasma, levels of total platinum increased throughout the infusion, and the protein binding slowly increased from 60% platinum bound at week 1 to 90% bound by week 4. Although the UFPt level reached a steady state within 1 week, the concentration did not increase with the dose level, remaining at a mean value of 0.58 +/- 0.24 microM. Renal excretion of platinum accounted for 70 +/- 12% of the dose at steady state. There was a high inter-patient variability in both total body clearance of UFPt (range, 83-603 ml/min) and renal clearance (range, 67-390 ml/min). A terminal elimination half-life of 13-27 h was noted for post-infusion UFPt. Neutropenia was linearly related to the total daily carboplatin dose, but neither neutropenia nor thrombocytopenia could be related to steady-state UFPt or the UFPt area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). The recommended dose for phase II studies is 28 mg/m2 per day.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

The adequacy of consent forms for informing patients entering oncological clinical trials.

The impact on 100 patients of information and consent forms signed prior to medical oncology clinical trials was evaluated by a survey at a subsequent visit. Only 40 patients believed that the purpose of the form was to explain the treatment. The form was listed as the major source of information by 12 patients while 52 listed a doctor and 26 a nurse. Although 21 patients believed that the form mad them less anxious, 19 patients believed that it made them more anxious. Despite 80 patients reading all of the form, 60 claiming to understand all of it and 68 claiming that in contained adequate information, in tests of recall only 52 patients could name all of their drugs and only 4 all of the side effects. The number of drugs named correlated with how much of the consent form had been read (p = 0.003) and the highest education level achieved by the patient (p = 0.0003). Patients under 55 years had significantly better recall. Patients with a better ECOG performance status were more likely to find the form very helpful. Such forms may not ensure that the requirements for informed consent are satisfied.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

The roles of patient and observer assessments in anti-emetic trials.

The endpoints assessed by both patients and nurses were compared in three anti-emetic studies. In a parallel subjects study, there was no significant difference between the patients' and nurses' assessment of the number of vomiting episodes, but the duration of vomiting, the severity and duration of nausea, and the side-effects of the anti-emetic were given higher scores by the nurses. In two cross-over studies, the patients recorded more vomiting episodes than the nurses, while the nurses recorded more anxiety and sedation than the patients. This resulted in the patients detecting a difference between the side-effects of the anti-emetics being compared that was not apparent from the nurses' forms. Many of the differences reflect differences in the timing and frequency of data collection. Nurses collected data regularly during the assessment period whereas patients reported their experiences only at the completion of 24 h. Both assessments provide useful perspectives on the study outcomes.

Cross-Over Studies↗