Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to I M Finger.
A method of articulator comparison and a technique demonstrating the effects of three occlusal determinants were demonstrated and proved successful. The techniques used could be used in dental research circumstances and in dental schools as a means to study the determinants of occlusion.
Patients who require complete and removable partial dentures may find the adaptation process quicker and easier after certain pre-prosthetic surgical procedures. Incorporating selected surgical procedures into a treatment plan for removable dentures could be the determining factor between success and failure of the prosthesis. The rationale in pre-prosthetic surgery is to provide the patient an adequate restoration to function with a minimum of surgical morbidity. This article describes various procedures and considerations for their use.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A total of 443 hydroxyapatite-coated cylindrical implants were placed into the posterior mandibles of consenting patients from July 1985 through December 1991. Implants were placed into ridges that had sufficient bone volume. Implants were also placed in ridges with thin bone, grafted bone, or immediate extraction sites, which occasionally resulted in increased morbidity. All were followed yearly with clinical and radiographic examinations. Life table analyses were performed using SAS software. Ten-year cumulative survival and nonmorbid (based on bone loss criteria) rates were determined for the four posterior tooth locations and for all posterior locations combined. Cumulative survival for implants was 0.858 +/- 0.056 in the first premolar region, 0.833 +/- 0.041 for the second premolar region, 0.785 +/- 0.041 for the first molar region, and 0.718 +/- 0.064 for the second molar region. When all posterior mandibular locations were taken together, the cumulative survival was 0.793 +/- 0.025. Cumulative nonmorbid rates were 0.816 +/- 0.056 for the first premolar, 0.729 +/- 0.049 for the second premolar, 0.600 +/- 0.046 for the first molar, and 0.507 +/- 0.066 for the second molar. The cumulative nonmorbid rate was 0.646 +/- 0.028 for all sites combined. Comparisons between sites indicated that the second molar site had statistically more morbidity than did the other three sites. Most of the problems were identified with 8-mm-long implants, especially in the second molar location. Clinical parameters, including the presence of keratinized gingiva and a hygienic restoration, were associated with survival. Both mechanical and inflammatory compromise were found to be reasons for implant failure.