Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I Laufer

Publications and source records attributed to I Laufer.

166 records · Page 10Linked to original sources

Solitary ulcers in reflux esophagitis: radiographic findings.

BACKGROUND: Some patients with reflux esophagitis have solitary ulcers in the distal esophagus. This study was undertaken to characterize further the radiographic features of these ulcers and to determine whether or not they have a predisposition to develop on the posterior esophageal wall. METHODS: Radiologic files and teaching files at our university hospital and affiliated Veterans Administration hospital revealed 29 patients with solitary reflux-induced ulcers. The radiographs were reviewed retrospectively to determine the size and location of the ulcers as well as the presence or absence of other findings. RESULTS: Twenty ulcers (69%) were located on the posterior wall, five (17%) on the left or right lateral wall, and four (14%) on the anterior wall. All but two ulcers were located 1-4 cm from the gastroesophageal junction. All of the ulcers were less than 10 mm in width and 5 mm in depth. Other associated findings included hiatal hernias in 11 patients (38%), mucosal nodularity or granularity in 12 (41%), one or more tiny satellite ulcers in three (10%), esophageal intramural pseudodiverticula in three (10%), an inflammatory esophagogastric polyp in one (3%), and scarring or stricture formation in 12 (41%). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that solitary reflux-induced ulcers tend to occur on the posterior wall of the distal esophagus near the gastroesophageal junction, producing characteristic radiographic findings. We postulate that affected individuals sleep primarily in the supine position, so that refluxed acid pools on the dependent or posterior esophageal wall, causing maximal injury in this location.

Adult↗

Total proctocolectomy and ileoanal pouch: the role of contrast studies for evaluating postoperative leaks.

BACKGROUND: To assess the role of contrast enemas for the evaluation of leaks in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients after the first stage of restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: We reviewed the findings of 59 contrast enemas in 40 patients who underwent total proctocolectomy with creation of an ileoanal pouch and a proximal diverting ileostomy. Thirty-seven patients initially underwent routine contrast studies of the ileoanal pouch, and three underwent contrast studies because of suspected fistulas or obstruction. Medical records were also reviewed to determine the clinical presentation and course of these patients. RESULTS: Of 37 patients who underwent routine postoperative contrast enemas, 33 (89%) had normal studies, three (8%) had clinically silent leaks (including two blind-ending tracks from the ileoanal anastomosis and one from the pouch), and one (3%) had pouchitis. In all three patients with unsuspected leaks, ileostomy closure was delayed. In two other patients with abdominal pain and fever, contrast enemas revealed leaks from the ileoanal pouch and distal ileum, respectively. The remaining patient had a contrast enema because of abdominal pain and distention; this patient had a distal ileal obstruction due to adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: Routine postoperative contrast studies revealed clinically silent leaks from the ileal J pouch or ileoanal anastomosis in three of 37 patients (8%) after the first stage of restorative proctocolectomy. Our findings suggest that routine contrast enema can detect clinically silent leaks after this surgery.

Adolescent↗