Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

I E Leppik

Publications and source records attributed to I E Leppik.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2002

Lamotrigine clearance during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in lamotrigine (LTG) clearance before, during, and after pregnancy. METHODS: Twelve pregnancies that had complete steady-state data before, during, and after pregnancy were evaluated. Data included weight, LTG dose, and LTG blood levels at preconception, during pregnancy, and postpartum, and concomitant use of other antiepileptic drugs and their dosages. Apparent clearance (L/[kg.day]) of LTG was calculated by dose/level/weight for time points at preconception; during the first trimester, second trimester, and third trimester; and postpartum. Apparent clearance was compared between preconception and each of the three trimesters. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance, the Student-Newman-Keuls test, and the paired Student's t-test. RESULTS: An increase in apparent clearance (>65%) was observed between preconception and the second and third trimesters (p < 0.05). Eleven pregnancies required higher doses of LTG to maintain therapeutic levels during pregnancy. There was no significant change in apparent clearance between each trimester. A decrease in apparent clearance was observed between the last two trimesters and postpartum (p < 0.05). In the postpartum period, apparent clearances returned to the preconception baseline, and LTG doses needed to be reduced. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy increases LTG clearance by >50%. This effect occurs early in pregnancy and reverts quickly after delivery. LTG levels should be monitored before, during, and after pregnancy.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Critical re-evaluation of previous preclinical strategies for the discovery and the development of new antiepileptic drugs.

During the last decade, several new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced in Europe, the United States, or other parts of the world. Although the antiepileptic efficacy of these drugs is not superior to that of older AEDs, some of the new drugs offer advantages in terms of improved tolerability, ease of use, and reduced interaction potential with other drugs. However, the new AEDs have only a modest impact on patients with refractory epilepsies, so that about one third of patients with epilepsy continue to have seizures with current pharmacotherapies. Thus, there is a continuing need for new medical therapies in epilepsy. During the Workshop on "New Horizons in the Development of Antiepileptic Drugs" (November 28-29, 2001, Philadelphia, PA), one topic dealt with the critical re-evaluation of previous preclinical strategies for the discovery and the development of new AEDs. The discussion of this session, which was chaired by the authors, is summarized in this article. Main issues of the discussion were whether epilepsy is a progressive disease and whether refractory epilepsy is preventable, the use of acute versus chronic animal models in the discovery and development of new AEDs, models for drug-resistant epilepsy, mechanisms of drug resistance, alterations in adverse effect potential of AEDs by epilepsy, and advances in pharmacogenomics and our understanding of pharmacologic responsiveness in epilepsy. Overall, it was felt that the current preclinical strategies for the discovery and development of new AEDs have to be redefined in order to identify agents that are clearly superior to current medications.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of remacemide hydrochloride in patients with refractory epilepsy following pre-surgical assessment.

This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study investigated the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of remacemide hydrochloride in adult patients ( n= 59) with refractory epilepsy, undergoing reduced or discontinued antiepileptic drug (AED) usage, as part of an evaluation for epilepsy surgery. On discontinuation or reduction of maintenance AEDs, patients received remacemide hydrochloride, up to 600 mg daily, or placebo, for up to ten days or until they experienced a fourth complex partial (CPS) or a generalised tonic-clonic (GTC) seizure. Pre- and post-study blood and urine samples were taken for analysis. Remacemide hydrochloride showed a significantly ( P= 0.045) longer median time to fourth seizure compared with placebo (6.8 vs. 3.8 days). Median nine-day seizure counts were significantly ( P= 0.0327) lower with remacemide hydrochloride than placebo (6.2 vs. 12.8). Eleven remacemide hydrochloride patients and six placebo patients completed ten days' treatment. Remacemide and desglycinyl metabolite levels were lower in patients receiving concomitant carbamazepine or phenytoin than in those receiving non-inducing AEDs or remacemide hydrochloride alone. No serious adverse events occurred; all patients receiving remacemide hydrochloride completed the study. Remacemide hydrochloride was well tolerated and showed significant therapeutic activity in this patient population.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2001

Randomized controlled trial of zonisamide for the treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures.

BACKGROUND: Zonisamide is a sulfonamide antiepilepsy drug with sodium and calcium channel-blocking actions. Experience in Japan and a previous European double-blind study have demonstrated its efficacy against partial-onset seizures. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling 203 patients was conducted at 20 United States sites to assess zonisamide efficacy and dose response as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures. Zonisamide dosages were elevated by 100 mg/d each week. The study design allowed parallel comparisons with placebo for three dosages and a final crossover to 400 mg/d of zonisamide for all patients. The primary efficacy comparison was change in seizure frequency from a 4-week placebo baseline to weeks 8 through 12 on blinded therapy. RESULTS: At 400 mg/d, zonisamide reduced the median frequency of all seizures by 40.5% from baseline, compared with a 9% reduction (p = 0.0009) with placebo treatment, and produced a > or =50% seizure reduction (responder rate) in 42% of patients. A dosage of 100 mg/d produced a 20.5% reduction in median seizure frequency (p = 0.038 compared with placebo) and a dosage of 200 mg/d produced a 24.7% reduction in median seizure frequency (p = 0.004 compared with placebo). Dropouts from adverse events (10%) did not differ from placebo (8.2%, NS). The only adverse event differing significantly from placebo was weight loss, though somnolence, anorexia, and ataxia were slightly more common with zonisamide treatment. Serum zonisamide concentrations rose with increasing dose. CONCLUSION: Zonisamide is effective and well tolerated as an adjunctive agent for refractory partial-onset seizures. The minimal effective dosage was 100 mg/d, but 400 mg/d was the most effective dosage.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Incidence and risk factors in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine incidence of and risk factors for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). METHODS: Three epilepsy centers enrolled 4,578 patients and prospectively followed these patients for 16,463 patient-years. The cohort was screened for death annually. Deaths were investigated to determine whether SUDEP occurred. Potential risk factors were compared in SUDEP cases and in controls enrolled contemporaneously at the same center. RESULTS: Incidence of SUDEP was 1.21/1,000 patient-years and was higher among women (1.45/1,000) than men (0.98/1,000). SUDEP accounted for 18% of all deaths. Occurrence of tonic-clonic seizures, treatment with more than two anticonvulsant medications, and full-scale IQ less than 70 were independent risk factors for SUDEP. The number of tonic-clonic seizures was a risk factor only in women. The presence of cerebral structural lesions and use of psychotropic drugs at the last visit were not risk factors for SUDEP in this cohort. Subtherapeutic anticonvulsant levels at the last visit were equally common in the two groups. No particular anticonvulsant appeared to be associated with SUDEP. CONCLUSIONS: These results support the idea that tonic-clonic seizures are an important proximate cause of SUDEP. This information creates a risk profile for SUDEP that may help direct preventative efforts.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Epilepsy in the elderly.

The active prevalence rate of epilepsy among persons over 65 years of age is approximately 1.5%, about twice the rate in younger adults. Treatment of epilepsy in the elderly is complicated by alterations in drug metabolism, use of concomitant medications, and multiple medical problems. Drug interactions are a major issue, and a full knowledge of the isoenzyme profile and protein-binding characteristics of each drug (antiepileptic and other) must be known.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Treatment of epilepsy in 3 specialized populations.

When discussing the treatment of epilepsy, targeted populations need to be defined. Three patient groups, children, the elderly, and women, are considered "special" because of metabolic and physical differences that require particular care during treatment of this disease. Treatment options vary significantly among these populations. Metabolic differences in very young and elderly patients require close attention by the prescribing physician. Rates of metabolism in children may be much faster than in nonelderly adults, requiring dosing adjustments to ensure enough medication is used to control seizures. Additional concerns with treating children include their increased sensitivity to toxic effects. Elderly patients may have slower metabolic rates because of decreased renal or hepatic function, and thus these patients can easily be overdosed as toxic drug levels build when clearance is reduced. Many elderly patients also may have concomitant illnesses that require other chronic medications. The potential for drug interactions is very high among this population. Women are considered a special population because of issues related to contraception, childbirth, and breast-feeding. Some antiepileptic medications are known to reduce the efficacy of oral contraceptives, and no medication has been proven safe for pregnant women. The pharmacokinetic profiles of many new generation antiepileptic medications may be advantageous to these specialized populations by creating fewer adverse effects, cleaner metabolism, and the reduced risk for drug interactions and teratogenicity.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2000

Absence of pharmacokinetic drug interaction of levetiracetam with phenytoin in patients with epilepsy determined by new technique.

Levetiracetam has recently been approved as an adjunctive medication for partial seizures and frequently will be added to phenytoin. The objective of this study was to determine the presence or absence of a pharmacokinetic drug interaction of levetiracetam with phenytoin. A stable isotope tracer technique using deuterium-labeled (D10) phenytoin and high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (rather than mass spectrometric detection) was employed. Tracer doses of D10-phenytoin were administered i.v. before and 12 weeks after adding levetiracetam to the regimen of 6 subjects on phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy. Blood was collected for 96 hours after each infusion. The following pharmacokinetic parameters were determined for phenytoin: Cmax, Cmin, Cavo, AUC, CL, t 1/2, VD, and free (nonprotein bound) fraction. The ratio and the 90% confidence interval of the ratio of log-transformed mean values for phenytoin pharmacokinetic parameters before (denominator) and after (numerator) adding levetiracetam all fell within the range of 0.85 to 1.17 (two one-sided test). The authors conclude that the addition of levetiracetam did not bring about clinically important changes in phenytoin pharmacokinetic parameters and that it is not necessary to change the phenytoin dosing rate when levetiracetam is added to phenytoin.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Monotherapy and polypharmacy.

The availability of many new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) with novel mechanisms of action has made polypharmacy, using combinations of AEDs with differing mechanisms, a viable alternative. The concept of monotherapy in epilepsy is relatively new, having attained widespread use only during the past few decades, and replacing irrational use of combinations of AEDs. In intractable epilepsy, however, monotherapy is often unsuccessful in achieving complete control, and skilled use of AEDs with differing mechanisms may provide better results. Monotherapy remains the treatment method of choice for new-onset epilepsy, but if control is not achieved, rational combinations should be considered. Most critical to successful treatment of epilepsy is the correct identification of the epileptic syndrome.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed1999

Safety of tiagabine: summary of 53 trials.

We reviewed the clinical safety of tiagabine HCl (TGB), a selective CNS GABA uptake inhibitor, in nearly 3100 patients from 53 separate clinical trials. TGB was found to have no clinically important effect upon hepatic metabolic processes, serum concentrations of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), laboratory values, or important interactions with any common non-AEDs. Adverse effects were usually mild and involved the nervous system. TGB is safe and well-tolerated as add-on therapy for the treatment of partial seizures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Zonisamide.

Zonisamide (ZNS) is a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug in both animal models of epilepsy and patients with epilepsy. It is effective for both localization-related and generalized epilepsies and appears to be particularly potent in progressive myoclonic epilepsy syndromes. Its pharmokinetic profile is favorable, with a long half-life and low protein binding. However, its insolubility may make the development of a parenteral formulation difficult. Its safety profile is good, although teratogenicity in animal models is of concern. Adult doses of 400-600 mg per day in two doses, with blood levels from 20 to 30 mg/ml, appear to be effective.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Tiagabine for complex partial seizures: a randomized, add-on, dose-response trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of tiagabine, a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that inhibits gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) uptake, at 3 dose levels vs placebo as adjunctive therapy in patients with intractable complex partial seizures (CPS). DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a parallel-group, add-on design, starting with a 12-week unblinded baseline phase followed by a 20-week double-blind treatment phase. SETTING: Twenty-one US medical centers. PATIENTS: Patients (N = 297) aged 12 to 77 years, previously diagnosed as having CPS and receiving stable regimens of 1 to 3 hepatic enzyme-inducing AEDs; divalproex sodium or valproic acid was allowed in combination with any of these drugs. INTERVENTIONS: Placebo or tiagabine 4 times a day at 16, 32, or 56 mg daily. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Median change in 4-week CPS frequency and adverse events. RESULTS: Median decreases in 4-week CPS frequency for the 32-mg (-2.2) and 56-mg (-2.8) tiagabine groups were significantly greater than for the placebo (-0.7) group (P = .03 and P < .03, respectively); 20% and 29% of patients in the 32- and 56-mg groups had a 50% or greater reduction in the frequency of CPS vs 4% in the placebo group (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively). Adverse effects were similar for placebo and tiagabine except for a significantly greater incidence of dizziness in the 32-mg tiagabine group, tremor in the 32- and 56-mg groups, abnormal thinking (usually mental lethargy or difficulty concentrating) in the 56-mg group, and depressed mood in the 16- and 56-mg groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tiagabine is efficacious and well tolerated as adjunctive therapy for CPS; there is a clear dose-response relationship.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Quality of life of people with epilepsy in the United States.

Health care provision in the United States is driven by the fact that most health insurance is commercial and private. This leads to the tendency to view patients as units that will produce a future cash yield. The quality of life (QOL) movement in the United States is in some ways a response to this view and has a role in convincing insurers that new treatments and techniques are worth increased expenditure. In the case of epilepsy, QOL research has become essential in improving the quality of care offered to people with epilepsy. In this review, some of the outcomes of using the Quality of Life in Epilepsy questionnaire are reviewed, the preliminary data from a community-based study of people with epilepsy are described, and recent studies comparing QOL in epilepsy and other neurologic and nonneurologic diseases are discussed. This review illustrates the complexity of QOL issues and the need for the widespread use of QOL measures in people with epilepsy.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Antiepileptic drug use in nursing home residents: effect of age, gender, and comedication on patterns of use.

PURPOSE: Examine antiepileptic drug (AED) use in nursing homes by age, gender, and use of comedication that can interact with AEDs. METHODS: Two point-prevalence evaluations of AED use from computerized medical records of nursing home residents throughout the United States (set 1, 43,757; set 2, 41,386) 65 years and older serviced by PHARMERICA. RESULTS: 10.5% of residents received an AED. Of the age group 65-84 years, 15 % received an AED compared with 6.1% of those 85 years or older (p < 0.001). Gender differences were present; 13.4% of the male residents and 9.4% of the female residents were treated with an AED (p < 0.001). The most frequently prescribed AEDs were phenytoin, carbamazepine, clonazepam, or phenobarbital. The average number of routine medications taken by AED recipients was 5.6, greater than the average of 4.6 for other residents. CONCLUSIONS: AEDs are extensively prescribed for elderly nursing home residents. Men and persons aged 65-85 years were more likely to receive AEDs than were women or those older than 85 years. AED recipients receive more routine medications than do other residents, including co-medications that alter hepatic metabolism and clinical response. The reasons for age and gender differences are unclear and require further study.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗